CClinicalTrials.gg
CompletedNCT04053699Updated Dec 7, 2023Results posted

Bleeding Incidence in VWD Patients Undergoing On-Demand Treatment

An observational study in Von Willebrand Diseases, sponsored by Octapharma. Completed at 15 sites in 8 countries. Open to participants aged 66 Months and older. Per ClinicalTrials.gov, last updated 2023-12-07.

Sponsored by Octapharma · Observational

Study type
Observational
Model
Cohort
Time perspective
Prospective
Enrollment
56
Ages
66 Months and older
Sex
All
01

Study summary

The purpose of this study is to prospectively obtain reliable data on the bleeding and treatment pattern of patients with VWD undergoing on-demand treatment with a VWF-containing product over a period of 6 months. The data obtained will be used as a basis for historical comparisons with the bleeding and treatment pattern obtained from a clinical study on the efficacy of prophylactic treatment with a VWF/FVIII concentrate.

02

Conditions studied

  • Von Willebrand Diseases
03

In context

Von Willebrand Diseases

63 studies on the registry are indexed under Von Willebrand Diseases; 4 are open to participants now.

This study's enrollment of 56 is below the median of 102 across 31 observational studies indexed under Von Willebrand Diseases.

Browse Von Willebrand Diseases studies →

Lead sponsor

Octapharma is the lead sponsor of 69 studies on the registry; 8 are open to participants now.

Of its 16 completed or terminated interventional studies of FDA-regulated products, 14 (88%) have results posted.

Counted across the registry records on this site, refreshed daily.

04

Who can participate

Ages eligible
66 Months and older
Sexes eligible
All
Accepts healthy volunteers
No
Sampling method
Non-probability sample

Study population

Overall, 55 previously treated patients aged ≥5.5 years at the time of enrolment, with type 3, type 2 (except 2N), or severe type 1 VWD will be included into this study. Of these 55 patients, at least 6 should have type 3 VWD and at least 6 should be ≥5.5 to \<16 years of age.

Inclusion criteria

Patients who meet all of the following criteria are eligible for the study:

  • Male or female patients aged ≥5.5 years at the time of enrolment
  • VWD type 1 (baseline von Willebrand factor activity [VWF:RCo], \<30 IU/dL), 2A, 2B, 2M, or 3 according to medical history requiring substitution therapy with a VWF-containing product to control bleeding
  • Currently receiving frequent on-demand treatment with a VWF-containing product
  • In female patients of child-bearing potential using hormonal contraception, the medication class should remain unchanged for the duration of their study participation
  • Voluntarily given, fully informed written and signed consent obtained before collection of any patient data

Exclusion criteria

Exclusion Criteria:

Patients who meet any of the following criteria are not eligible for the study:

  • Patients currently on prophylaxis for VWD (except for perioperative prophylaxis) as well as patients having received treatment once a month for menstrual bleeding, but not for any other bleeds
  • Patients whose VWD treatment is planned to be switched from on-demand to prophylactic treatment in the next 6 months
  • History, or current suspicion, of VWF or FVIII inhibitors
  • Medical history of a thromboembolic event within 6 months before enrolment
  • Severe liver or kidney diseases as described in the medical records
  • Female patients with an existing or suspected pregnancy or who are breast-feeding at the time of enrolment
  • Change in hormonal contraception within 6 months before enrolment
  • Cervical or uterine conditions causing abnormal uterine bleeding (including infection or dysplasia)
  • Other coagulation disorders or bleeding disorders due to anatomical reasons
  • Participation in an interventional clinical study during the 6-month of study period
  • Inability to complete the patient diary to reliably evaluate the type, frequency, and treatment of BEs during the 6-month study period
05

Study design

Observational model
Cohort
Time perspective
Prospective
Enrollment
56 participants (actual)
Patient registry
No

Groups and cohorts

  • Patients undergoing treatment with a VWF-containing product

    Patients with type 3, type 2 (except 2N), or severe type 1 VWD undergoing routine on-demand treatment with a VWF-containing product over a period of 6 months

    Drug: Von Willebrand Factor-Containing Product

Interventions

  • DrugVon Willebrand Factor-Containing Product

    Active substances: VWF concentrates, VWF/FVIII concentrates, Cryoprecipitate VWF-containing products licensed in each participating country

06

What researchers measure

Primary outcomes

  1. Total Annualized Bleeding Rate (TABR)

    The total annualized bleeding rate (TABR) will be calculated as the total number of spontaneous bleeds, traumatic BEs, and other BEs occurring in the time period between the start of data collection for each patient and the Study Completion Visit, divided by the duration (in years) between the start of data collection and the Study Completion Visit. Surgery periods, and BEs occurring within these surgery periods, will be excluded from the calculation of TABR.

    Time frame: Screening through study completion (6 months)

Secondary outcomes

  1. Spontaneous Annualized Bleeding Rate (SABR)

    Spontaneous annualized bleeding rate (SABR), calculated in analogy with TABR. This includes all bleeding episodes that occurred spontaneously.

    Time frame: Screening through study completion (6 months)

  2. Consumption of the VWF-containing Product

    Data on the consumption of the VWF-containing product (VWF/FVIII IU/kg per month per patient) used for routine on-demand treatment

    Time frame: Screening through study completion (6 months)

  3. Number of Bleeding Episodes (BEs) Based on a 4-point Efficacy Scale

    The efficacy assessment of bleeding episodes at the end of a BE was evaluated on a 4 point scale by the patient/legal guardian (together with the Investigator in case of on-site treatment) including the four items 'excellent,' 'good,' moderate,' and 'none.' The assessment was excellent when bleeding was completely stopped within 3 days in case of minor bleed, within 7 days in case of major bleed, and within 10 days in case of gastrointestinal bleed; Good when bleeding was completely stopped, but time and/or dose slightly exceeded expectations ; Moderate when bleeding could be stopped only by significantly exceeding time and/or dose expectations; and None when bleeding could be stopped only by using other VWF-containing products.

    Time frame: Screening through study completion (6 months)

  4. Number of Surgery With Successful/Unsuccessful Efficacy Assessment

    Effectiveness of VWF-containing product in surgical prophylaxis based on the proportion of surgeries successfully treated. Overall treatment efficacy will be assessed at the end of the postoperative period by the treating physician using predefined criteria of 'Excellent', 'Good', 'Moderate/Poor' or 'None'.

    Time frame: From start of surgery until end of post-operative period (within 8 days after surgery)

  5. Quality of Life (QoL) Assessed Using the Patient-Reported Outcomes Measurement Information System (PROMIS-29)

    QoL assessment based on the results from the PROMIS-29 survey to monitor and evaluate the physical, mental, and social health in all patients, using a scale of a minimum score of 0 and a maximum score of 10, with higher scores representing a better outcome. The survey covers seven domains from the most relevant areas of self-reported health (depression, anxiety, physical function, pain interference, fatigue, sleep disturbance and ability to participate in social roles and activities) for the majority of people with chronic illness. PROMIS scores have a mean of 50 and standard deviation (SD) of 10 in a referent population. Full details of cut off points for each domain can be found here: https://www.healthmeasures.net/score-and-interpret/interpret-scores/promis/promis-score-cut-points

    Time frame: At screening visit

  6. Quality of Life (QoL) Assessed Using a 36-Item Short Form Health Survey, Version 2 (SF-36v2)

    QoL assessment based on the results from the SF-36v2 questionnaire to measure functional health and well-being in patients ≥16 years. SF-36v2 ranks 8 different domains using a scale standardized with a scoring algorithm to obtain a score ranging from 0 to 100.The eight health domains include physical functioning (PF), role physical (RP), bodily pain (BP), general health problems (GH), vitality (VT), social functioning (SF), role emotional (RE) and general mental health (MH). Higher scores indicate better health status, and a mean score of 50 has been articulated as a normative value for all scales.

    Time frame: At screening visit

  7. Quality of Life (QoL) Assessed Using a 10-item Short Form Health Survey (SF-10)

    QoL assessment based on the results from a SF-10 parent-completed questionnaire for patients ≥5.5 and \<16 years of age, in order to score physical and psychosocial health. SF-10 uses norm-based scoring where scales have a standardized mean value of 50 and standard deviation of 10.

    Time frame: At screening

  8. Joint Health Status Assessed Using Hemophilia Joint Health Score (HJHS)

    Joint health status will be assessed using the Hemophilia Joint Health Score (HJHS), which has been specifically validated for the assessment of the clinical outcome in VWD. HJHS evaluates six index joints to produce a score between 0-124. Higher scores indicate worse joint health.

    Time frame: At screening

  9. Menstrual Bleeding Assessed Using Pictorial Blood Loss Assessment Chart (PBAC) Score

    Bleeding information from each menstrual period while in this study will be collected using the Pictorial Blood Loss Assessment Chart (PBAC). The PBAC will be provided to all female patients of child-bearing potential. The data documented in the PBAC and the investigator-calculated final score will be recorded in the eCRF. The PBAC records pad and tampon use (as either light \[1 point\], medium \[5 points\], or heavy \[10 points\] flow), clots (small \[1 point\] or large \[5 points\]), and flooding episodes (1 point each) which can be recorded as many times as necessary any day of the month. The PBAC is scored from 0 (no bleeding) onwards, with a score of \>100 defining abnormal coagulation and heavy menstrual bleeding (corresponds to \>80ml of blood loss per menstrual cycle).

    Time frame: Screening through study completion (6 months)

  10. Number of Participants With Adverse Drug Reactions (ADRs) Associated With Use of Wilate

    Noxious and unintended reactions arising from the use of Wilate will be monitored throughout the study.

    Time frame: Screening through study completion (6 months)

07

Results

Posted Dec 7, 2023

Participant flow

Full Analysis Set
Participant flow — Full Analysis Set
MilestonePatients Undergoing On-demand Treatment With a VWF-containing Product
Started56
Completed51
Not completed5
Per Protocol Set
Participant flow — Per Protocol Set
MilestonePatients Undergoing On-demand Treatment With a VWF-containing Product
Started42
Completed42
Not completed0

Outcome measures

PrimaryTotal Annualized Bleeding Rate (TABR)

The total annualized bleeding rate (TABR) will be calculated as the total number of spontaneous bleeds, traumatic BEs, and other BEs occurring in the time period between the start of data collection for each patient and the Study Completion Visit, divided by the duration (in years) between the start of data collection and the Study Completion Visit. Surgery periods, and BEs occurring within these surgery periods, will be excluded from the calculation of TABR.

Time frame:
Screening through study completion (6 months)
Reported as:
Mean · Bleeding events per year
Total Annualized Bleeding Rate (TABR)
Bleeding events per yearPatients Undergoing On-demand Treatment With a VWF-containing Product
Total Annualized Bleeding Rate (TABR)29.13 ± 22.925
SecondarySpontaneous Annualized Bleeding Rate (SABR)

Spontaneous annualized bleeding rate (SABR), calculated in analogy with TABR. This includes all bleeding episodes that occurred spontaneously.

Time frame:
Screening through study completion (6 months)
Reported as:
Mean · Bleeding events per year
Spontaneous Annualized Bleeding Rate (SABR)
Bleeding events per yearPatients Undergoing On-demand Treatment With a VWF-containing Product
Spontaneous Annualized Bleeding Rate (SABR)21.19 ± 19.337
SecondaryConsumption of the VWF-containing Product

Data on the consumption of the VWF-containing product (VWF/FVIII IU/kg per month per patient) used for routine on-demand treatment

Time frame:
Screening through study completion (6 months)
Reported as:
Mean · IUs per kg per month per patient
Consumption of the VWF-containing Product
IUs per kg per month per patientPatients Undergoing On-demand Treatment With a VWF-containing Product
Consumption of the VWF-containing Product77.94 ± 67.898
SecondaryNumber of Bleeding Episodes (BEs) Based on a 4-point Efficacy Scale

The efficacy assessment of bleeding episodes at the end of a BE was evaluated on a 4 point scale by the patient/legal guardian (together with the Investigator in case of on-site treatment) including the four items 'excellent,' 'good,' moderate,' and 'none.' The assessment was excellent when bleeding was completely stopped within 3 days in case of minor bleed, within 7 days in case of major bleed, and within 10 days in case of gastrointestinal bleed; Good when bleeding was completely stopped, but time and/or dose slightly exceeded expectations ; Moderate when bleeding could be stopped only by significantly exceeding time and/or dose expectations; and None when bleeding could be stopped only by using other VWF-containing products.

Time frame:
Screening through study completion (6 months)
Reported as:
Number · Number of Bleeding Episodes
Number of Bleeding Episodes (BEs) Based on a 4-point Efficacy Scale
Number of Bleeding EpisodesPatients Undergoing On-demand Treatment With a VWF-containing Product
Excellent450
Good6
Moderate1
None0
SecondaryNumber of Surgery With Successful/Unsuccessful Efficacy Assessment

Effectiveness of VWF-containing product in surgical prophylaxis based on the proportion of surgeries successfully treated. Overall treatment efficacy will be assessed at the end of the postoperative period by the treating physician using predefined criteria of 'Excellent', 'Good', 'Moderate/Poor' or 'None'.

Time frame:
From start of surgery until end of post-operative period (within 8 days after surgery)
Reported as:
Number · Surgeries
Number of Surgery With Successful/Unsuccessful Efficacy Assessment
SurgeriesPatients Undergoing Treatment With a VWF-containing Product for a Surgical Procedure
Excellent7
Good0
Moderate0
Poor0
SecondaryQuality of Life (QoL) Assessed Using the Patient-Reported Outcomes Measurement Information System (PROMIS-29)

QoL assessment based on the results from the PROMIS-29 survey to monitor and evaluate the physical, mental, and social health in all patients, using a scale of a minimum score of 0 and a maximum score of 10, with higher scores representing a better outcome. The survey covers seven domains from the most relevant areas of self-reported health (depression, anxiety, physical function, pain interference, fatigue, sleep disturbance and ability to participate in social roles and activities) for the majority of people with chronic illness. PROMIS scores have a mean of 50 and standard deviation (SD) of 10 in a referent population. Full details of cut off points for each domain can be found here: https://www.healthmeasures.net/score-and-interpret/interpret-scores/promis/promis-score-cut-points

Time frame:
At screening visit
Reported as:
Mean · T-Scores
Quality of Life (QoL) Assessed Using the Patient-Reported Outcomes Measurement Information System (PROMIS-29)
T-ScoresPatients Undergoing On-demand Treatment With a VWF-containing Product
Physical Function47.24 ± 7.947
Anxiety/Fear53.57 ± 9.941
Depression/Sadness49.96 ± 9.265
Fatigue49.77 ± 11.202
Sleep Disturbance49.81 ± 10.373
Ability to Participate in Social Roles/Activities52.78 ± 9.817
Pain Interference53.87 ± 11.134
SecondaryQuality of Life (QoL) Assessed Using a 36-Item Short Form Health Survey, Version 2 (SF-36v2)

QoL assessment based on the results from the SF-36v2 questionnaire to measure functional health and well-being in patients ≥16 years. SF-36v2 ranks 8 different domains using a scale standardized with a scoring algorithm to obtain a score ranging from 0 to 100.The eight health domains include physical functioning (PF), role physical (RP), bodily pain (BP), general health problems (GH), vitality (VT), social functioning (SF), role emotional (RE) and general mental health (MH). Higher scores indicate better health status, and a mean score of 50 has been articulated as a normative value for all scales.

Time frame:
At screening visit
Reported as:
Mean · Units on a scale
Quality of Life (QoL) Assessed Using a 36-Item Short Form Health Survey, Version 2 (SF-36v2)
Units on a scalePatients Undergoing Treatment With a VWF-containing Product
Bodily Pain49.87 ± 27.304
General Health49.45 ± 21.857
Mental Health62.74 ± 16.923
Physical Functioning64.03 ± 24.509
Role Emotional62.63 ± 27.035
Role Physical51.21 ± 25.435
Social Functioning64.52 ± 24.173
Vitality58.06 ± 18.128
SecondaryQuality of Life (QoL) Assessed Using a 10-item Short Form Health Survey (SF-10)

QoL assessment based on the results from a SF-10 parent-completed questionnaire for patients ≥5.5 and \<16 years of age, in order to score physical and psychosocial health. SF-10 uses norm-based scoring where scales have a standardized mean value of 50 and standard deviation of 10.

Time frame:
At screening
Reported as:
Mean · Units on a scale
Quality of Life (QoL) Assessed Using a 10-item Short Form Health Survey (SF-10)
Units on a scalePatients Undergoing On-demand Treatment With a VWF-containing Product
Physical Summary Score28.60 ± 14.961
Psychosocial Summary Score46.56 ± 9.428
SecondaryJoint Health Status Assessed Using Hemophilia Joint Health Score (HJHS)

Joint health status will be assessed using the Hemophilia Joint Health Score (HJHS), which has been specifically validated for the assessment of the clinical outcome in VWD. HJHS evaluates six index joints to produce a score between 0-124. Higher scores indicate worse joint health.

Time frame:
At screening
Reported as:
Mean · Units on a scale
Joint Health Status Assessed Using Hemophilia Joint Health Score (HJHS)
Units on a scalePatients Undergoing On-demand Treatment With a VWF-containing Product
Joint Health Status Assessed Using Hemophilia Joint Health Score (HJHS)6.76 ± 14.611
SecondaryMenstrual Bleeding Assessed Using Pictorial Blood Loss Assessment Chart (PBAC) Score

Bleeding information from each menstrual period while in this study will be collected using the Pictorial Blood Loss Assessment Chart (PBAC). The PBAC will be provided to all female patients of child-bearing potential. The data documented in the PBAC and the investigator-calculated final score will be recorded in the eCRF. The PBAC records pad and tampon use (as either light \[1 point\], medium \[5 points\], or heavy \[10 points\] flow), clots (small \[1 point\] or large \[5 points\]), and flooding episodes (1 point each) which can be recorded as many times as necessary any day of the month. The PBAC is scored from 0 (no bleeding) onwards, with a score of \>100 defining abnormal coagulation and heavy menstrual bleeding (corresponds to \>80ml of blood loss per menstrual cycle).

Time frame:
Screening through study completion (6 months)
Reported as:
Mean · Units on a scale
Menstrual Bleeding Assessed Using Pictorial Blood Loss Assessment Chart (PBAC) Score
Units on a scalePatients Undergoing Treatment With a VWF-containing Product
MC01521.7 ± 790.96
MC02279.2 ± 219.69
MC03311.0 ± 261.98
MC04408.8 ± 471.92
MC05289.9 ± 267.53
MC06330.4 ± 327.02
MC07411.6 ± 314.99
MC08348.5 ± 102.53
MC09361.5 ± 400.93
SecondaryNumber of Participants With Adverse Drug Reactions (ADRs) Associated With Use of Wilate

Noxious and unintended reactions arising from the use of Wilate will be monitored throughout the study.

Time frame:
Screening through study completion (6 months)
Reported as:
Count of participants · Participants
Number of Participants With Adverse Drug Reactions (ADRs) Associated With Use of Wilate
ParticipantsPatients Undergoing Treatment With a VWF-containing Product
Number of Participants With Adverse Drug Reactions (ADRs) Associated With Use of Wilate0

Adverse events

Collected over 6 Months. Non-serious events are listed at a 0% frequency threshold.

Adverse event summary by group
GroupDeathsSeriousOther
Patients Undergoing Treatment With a VWF-containing Product0/51 (0%)0/51 (0%)0/51 (0%)

Baseline characteristics

Age, Customized
Age, Customized(Participants)Patients Undergoing On-demand Treatment With a VWF-containing Product
6-11 years15
12-16 years16
>16 years25
Sex: Female, Male
Sex: Female, Male(Participants)Patients Undergoing On-demand Treatment With a VWF-containing Product
Female25
Male31
Race (NIH/OMB)
Race (NIH/OMB)(Participants)Patients Undergoing On-demand Treatment With a VWF-containing Product
American Indian or Alaska Native0
Asian0
Native Hawaiian or Other Pacific Islander0
Black or African American1
White55
More than one race0
Unknown or Not Reported0
08

Study locations

15 sites
  • Children's Healthcare of Atlanta
    Atlanta, Georgia 30329, United States
  • Republican Research Center for Radiation Medicine and Human Ecology
    Gomel, Belarus
  • Specialized Hospital for Active Treatment of Haematological Diseases" EAD, Sofia
    Sofia, Bulgaria
  • "UMHAT Sveta Marina" EAD.
    Varna, 9010, Bulgaria
  • University Hospital Centre Zagreb
    Zagreb, 10000, Croatia
  • Medical Centre Hungarian Defence Forces
    Budapest, 1134, Hungary
  • Debreceni Egyetem Klinikai Központ, Regionális Haemophilia és Thrombophilia Központ
    Debrecen, 4032, Hungary
  • University Clinical Center, Department of Internal Medicine, Hematology
    Pécs, 7624, Hungary
  • Hotel Dieu de France Hospital
    Beirut, BP166830, Lebanon
  • American University of Beirut Medical Center
    Beirut, Lebanon
  • Nini Hospital
    Tripoli, Lebanon
  • Federal State Budgetary Scientific Institution Kirov Scientific-Research Institute of Hematology and Blood Transfusion of Federal
    Kirov, 610027, Russian Federation
  • Morosovskaya Children Clinical Hospital, Moscow Health Department, Department of General Hematology with the Pathology of Hemostasis
    Moscow, 119049, Russian Federation
  • State Institution "National Children's Specialized Hospital "OKHMATDYT" of the Ministry of Health of Ukraine," Center of Hemostasis Pathology
    Kyiv, 01135, Ukraine
  • Community Institution of Lviv Oblast Council "West-Ukrainian Specialized Children's Medical Center
    Lviv, 79035, Ukraine
09

References and documents

Publications

  • Sadler JE. A revised classification of von Willebrand disease. For the Subcommittee on von Willebrand Factor of the Scientific and Standardization Committee of the International Society on Thrombosis and Haemostasis. Thromb Haemost. 1994 Apr;71(4):520-5. PubMed 8052974 ↗
  • Rodeghiero F, Castaman G, Tosetto A. How I treat von Willebrand disease. Blood. 2009 Aug 6;114(6):1158-65. doi: 10.1182/blood-2009-01-153296. Epub 2009 May 27. PubMed 19474451 ↗
  • Castaman G, Goodeve A, Eikenboom J; European Group on von Willebrand Disease. Principles of care for the diagnosis and treatment of von Willebrand disease. Haematologica. 2013 May;98(5):667-74. doi: 10.3324/haematol.2012.077263. PubMed 23633542 ↗
  • Mondorf W, Siegmund B, Mahnel R, Richter H, Westfeld M, Galler A, Pollmann H. Haemoassist--a hand-held electronic patient diary for haemophilia home care. Haemophilia. 2009 Mar;15(2):464-72. doi: 10.1111/j.1365-2516.2008.01941.x. Epub 2009 Feb 16. PubMed 19226411 ↗
  • Broderick CR, Herbert RD, Latimer J, Mathieu E, van Doorn N, Curtin JA. Feasibility of short message service to document bleeding episodes in children with haemophilia. Haemophilia. 2012 Nov;18(6):906-10. doi: 10.1111/j.1365-2516.2012.02869.x. Epub 2012 Jun 11. PubMed 22681182 ↗
  • Sholapur NS, Barty R, Wang G, Almonte T, Heddle NM. A survey of patients with haemophilia to understand how they track product used at home. Haemophilia. 2013 Sep;19(5):e289-95. doi: 10.1111/hae.12170. Epub 2013 May 15. PubMed 23672744 ↗
  • Maruish M. User's manual for the SF-36v2 Health Survey (3rd edition). Optum Incorporated; 2011.
  • Saris-Baglama, R,DeRosa, M, Raczek, A, Bjorner, J,Turner-Bowker, D, Ware, J. The SF-10™ Health Survey for Children: A User's Guide. QualityMetric Incorporated; 2007.
  • Hays RD, Spritzer KL, Schalet BD, Cella D. PROMIS(R)-29 v2.0 profile physical and mental health summary scores. Qual Life Res. 2018 Jul;27(7):1885-1891. doi: 10.1007/s11136-018-1842-3. Epub 2018 Mar 22. PubMed 29569016 ↗

Study documents

  • Study protocol · Aug 5, 2020
  • Statistical analysis plan · Jun 25, 2021

Documents are hosted by the registry — open the source record to download them.

Individual participant data

Plan to share: Undecided

10

Updates

Tracking since Sep 25, 2026
No changes since tracking began. The registry record was last updated on Dec 7, 2023, before this site started recording changes on Sep 25, 2026. Its history is on ClinicalTrials.gov ↗
11

Registry details

Key details

Study ID
NCT04053699
Lead sponsor
Octapharma
Responsible party
Sponsor
First posted
Aug 12, 2019
Start date
Jun 25, 2019
Primary completion
Jan 31, 2021
Completion
Jan 31, 2021
Results posted
Dec 7, 2023
Last update
Dec 7, 2023

Study contacts

Cristina Solomon, MD
study director · Octapharma

Oversight

Data monitoring committee
No
FDA-regulated drug
Yes
FDA-regulated device
No
View the source record on ClinicalTrials.gov ↗

Not currently enrolling

This study is completed, as verified in Mar 2023. You cannot join it, but the record below documents what was studied.

Follow this study

Get an email when the registry record changes — status, dates, results — or when someone posts here.

Sign in to follow

Discussion

Questions and observations about this study, from anyone following it. Not medical advice, and not a channel to the study team — their contact details are on the registry record.

Sign in to join the discussion. Reading takes no account; posting does. You choose a display name, and a pseudonym is the default.

Nothing here yet. If you are running this trial, taking part in it, or weighing whether to, this is the place to say so.

Start the discussion