ClinicalTrials.gg
RecruitingNCT04050644GISTUpdated Jul 1, 2024

Comparison of Treatment With Preservative-free Dexamethasone 0.1% (Monofree Dexamethason) and Diclofenac 0.1% (Dicloabak) Eye Drops Versus Preserved Dexamethasone 0.1% (Maxidex) and Diclofenac 0.1% (Voltaren Ophtha) Eye Drops After Cataract Surgery

A Phase 4 interventional study of Preservative Free drop treatment and Preserved drop treatment in Age-related Cataract, sponsored by Universitaire Ziekenhuizen KU Leuven. Recruiting at 2 sites in Belgium. Open to participants aged 60 Years and older. Per ClinicalTrials.gov, last updated 2024-07-01.

Sponsored by Universitaire Ziekenhuizen KU Leuven · Phase 4, Interventional, and Treatment

From the registry’s dates

  • Primary completion was expected by Jun 2024, 2 years 5 months ago, but the record still lists the study as recruiting.
  • Registered 9 months after the study started (first participant enrolled Oct 2018, registered Aug 2019).
  • Started Oct 2018; still recruiting 8 years later.
Phase
Phase 4
Study type
Interventional
Enrollment
100
Allocation
Randomized
Ages
60 Years and older
Sex
All
01

Where this study stands

Counted across the records on this site · 2026-11-12

Among 13 studies in Cataract with a site in Belgium — 3 open to participants now, 3 under way, none of them phase 3. Cataract · Belgium.

Started
2018
with 1 other
Phase 4
Only one
of the 13
Registered
4th of 13
by date
Lead sponsor
3 of 13
Universitaire Ziekenhuizen KU Leuven

Among the 13 studies in Cataract with a site in Belgium, this one is one of 2 that started in 2018, is the only one in phase 4, and was the 4th registered.

Cataract

1,629 studies on the registry are indexed under Cataract; 235 are open to participants now.

Browse Cataract studies →

Open to participants now

3 of the 13 studies in Cataract with a site in Belgium are open now. Recruiting first, the newest first:

All 3 open studies →

A study can be open while its sites in Belgium have not opened yet or have stopped. Only those recruiting at a site in Belgium →

Who these studies take

Of the 141 Cataract studies recruiting now, 88 (62%) set no upper age limit and 8 (6%) stop at 75 or younger; 10 take children under 18; 16 take healthy volunteers.

This study: 60 Years and older · all sexes · no healthy volunteers.

The full table on the hub →

This tab as a report to print or save as PDF → With an account.

Was this useful?
Watch this landscapeDownload CSVNarrow it in search →With an account: a weekly mail of what changed among 13 studies in Cataract with a site in Belgium, or all of them as a file.
02

Study summary

To compare treatment with preservative-free dexamethasone 0.1% (Monofree Dexamethason) and diclofenac 0.1% (Dicloabak) eye drops versus preserved dexamethasone 0.1% (Maxidex) and diclofenac 0.1% (Voltaren Ophtha) eye drops after cataract surgery in terms of postoperative inflammation, iatrogenic dry eye disease and cystoid macular edema.

Read the detailed description

Cataract surgery is a standardized procedure yielding excellent visual outcomes in most patients. According to Daien et al., the incidence of cataract surgery in 2012 in France was 11/1000 person-years. Although there are few complications related to the surgery, patients often experience ocular discomfort in the postoperative period.

Postoperative treatment usually includes topical non-steroidal anti-inflammatory drugs and topical steroids for four weeks to control anterior chamber inflammation, to relieve ocular pain after surgery and to reduce the incidence of cystoid macular edema.

Benzalkonium chloride (BAK) is the most common eye drop preservative and is associated with several ocular adverse effects, including dry eye and ocular surface inflammation. Moreover, in two clinical trials comparing the effects of BAK-containing and preservative-free eye drops, anterior chamber inflammation was reported in response to BAK after 1 month of exposure. Finally, besides the fact that intra-ocular inflammation increases the risk of macular edema, there is some evidence in the literature suggesting that BAK may also contribute to the development of macular edema.

Because of these well-established detrimental effects of preservatives, pharmaceutical industry has invested in the development of preservative-free eye drops in the past decade, which has led to preservative-free alternatives for almost all the eye medications.

The aim of this project is to investigate whether omitting preservatives from the postoperative topical treatment after cataract surgery can reduce symptoms and signs of ocular surface disease, intra-ocular inflammation and the incidence of cystoid macular edema.

Additionally ocular microbiome research is added to our study because of its known correlation with the ocular immunity. Although the ocular surface is continuously colonized by a commensal microbial community, the healthy ocular surface is not in an inflammatory state. This phenomenon suggests that there is an interplay between the ocular surface microbiome and innate immune mechanisms, which prevents inflammatory responses against commensal microbiota.

St Leger et al. used a murine model to reveal the presence of a commensal, Corynebacterium mastitidis, on the ocular surface. Corynebacterium mastitidis elicited an IL-17 response from ƔΔT-cells, facilitating recruitment of neutrophils to the ocular surface and secretion of antimicrobial peptides in the tears. These findings suggest the presence of a functional resident microbiome on the ocular surface which contribute to immune homeostasis and protects the ocular surface from pathogens.

Our expert in the area of ocular microbiome research is affiliated with the department of biochemistry and microbiology of the University of Ghent.

03

Conditions studied

  • Age-related Cataract

Browse trials for

Keywords

  • Preservative-free ocular drops
  • Preserved ocular drops
04

Who can participate

Ages eligible
60 Years and older
Sexes eligible
All
Accepts healthy volunteers
No

Go through the criteria one by one — yes, no or not sure — and take the list to your doctor or the study team. Kept in this browser only.

Inclusion criteria

  • Patients diagnosed with age-related cataract
  • Age 60 years or above

Exclusion criteria

Exclusion Criteria:

  • Unwilling to sign
  • Pseudoexfoliation syndrome
  • Functionally monocular patient
  • Any use of eye drops during at least 3 months before surgery with the exception of artificial tears
  • Pre-existing dry eye disease according to the criteria's of the TFOS DEXS II report
  • Previous ocular surgery, laser treatment or uveitis, with the exception of retinal laser treatment (more than 6 months ago) and iridotomy (more than 6 months ago)
  • Active conjunctivitis
  • Wearing of contact lens
  • Presence of any macular diseases possibly impacting visual acuity
  • Presence of any ocular diseases leading to difficulty to have a correct eye examination
  • Known or suspected allergy to any of the ingredients on the study medications
  • Presence of uncontrolled systemic disease
Terms in these criteria, in plain language(1)

Underlined terms in the criteria open these too. Explained by clinicaltrials.gg, not part of the registry record. The study team decides who can take part.

Informed consent

Before you join, the study team explains what taking part involves — its purpose, what happens, the risks and possible benefits — and answers your questions, so you can decide freely. Consent is usually recorded on a form (the informed consent form, ICF) signed by you or, where the law allows, by someone legally authorised to decide for you.

You can keep asking questions during the study, you are told of new information that matters, and you can choose to leave at any time.

05

Study design

Phase
Phase 4
Primary purpose
Treatment
Allocation
Randomized
Intervention model
Parallel assignment
Masking
Single (Investigator)
Enrollment
100 participants (estimated)

Study arms

  • Experimental
    Preservative-free dexamethasone 0.1%/diclofenac 0.1%

    One week before surgery, patients will be randomized to either receive the preservative-free dexamethasone 0.1% and diclofenac 0.1% eye drops.

    Drug: Preservative Free drop treatment

  • Active comparator
    Preserved dexamethasone 0.1%/diclofenac 0.1%

    One week before surgery, patients will be randomized to either receive the preserved dexamethasone 0.1% and diclofenac 0.1% eye drops.

    Drug: Preserved drop treatment

Interventions

  • DrugPreservative Free drop treatment

    Patients will use the preservative-free dexamethasone 0.1% 4 times a day in the first week after cataract surgery, 3 times a day in the second week, twice daily in the third week and once daily in the fourth week and diclofenac 0.1% eye drops 3 times daily for 1 day preoperatively and every 15 minutes in the hour before surgery and then 3 times a day for four weeks.

  • DrugPreserved drop treatment

    Patients will use the preserved dexamethasone 0.1% 4 times a day in the first week after cataract surgery, 3 times a day in the second week, twice daily in the third week and once daily in the fourth week and diclofenac 0.1% eye drops 3 times daily for 1 day preoperatively and every 15 minutes in the hour before surgery and then 3 times a day for four weeks.

06

What researchers measure

Primary outcomes

  1. The superiority of treatment arm without conservative (WC) on treatment arm with conservative (C) on the aqueous flare value in the operated eye, measured with a laser flare meter, at week 4 after cataract surgery.

    The Laser Flaremeter can measure the protein density in the anterior chamber by counting the photons. Flare Value is expressed in photoncount/ms. 1-9 photoncounts/ms is a normal value. Photoncount/ms from 10-500 is abnormal and indicates an inflamed eye.

    Time frame: 4 weeks

Secondary outcomes

  1. Tear Osmolarity

    The difference in Tear Osmolarity between the two treatment arms. Tear Osmolarity value will be measured with TearLab.

    Time frame: 4 weeks

  2. Conjunctival Hyperemia

    The difference in Conjunctival Hyperemia between the two treatment arms. The scale that will be used is the Cornea and Contact Lens Research Unit (CCLRU) scale. Minimum score is 1, maximum score is 4.

    Time frame: 4 weeks

  3. Corneal Fluorescein Staining

    The difference in Corneal Fluorescein Staining between the two treatment arms. The grading scale that will be used is the Oxford grading scale. Minimum score is grade 0, maximum score is grade 5.

    Time frame: 4 weeks

  4. Tear-film break up time

    The difference in Tear-film break up time between the two treatment arms. The Tear-film break up time will be expressed in seconds.

    Time frame: 4 weeks

  5. Corneal Sensitivity

    The difference in Corneal Sensitivity between the two treatment arms. Corneal Sensitivity value will be measured with the Cochet-Bonnet Aesthesiometer, expressed in mm.

    Time frame: 4 weeks

  6. Central macular thickness

    The difference in Central Macular Thickness between the two treatment arms. Central Macular Thickness will be measured with OCT Cirrus, expressed in µm.

    Time frame: 4 weeks

  7. DEQ-5 score

    The difference in Five-item Dry Eye Questionnaire (DEQ-5) score between the two treatment arms. Minimum total score is 0, maximum total score is 22.

    Time frame: 4 weeks

  8. Inflammatory cytokine activities in tears

    The difference in Inflammatory cytokine activities in tears between the two treatment arms. The cytokines that will be measured are IL-1Bèta, TNF-Alpha, IL-6, IL-8, IL-17, INF γ, macrophage migration inhibitory factor,...

    Time frame: 4 weeks

  9. Amount of tears

    The difference in Amount of Tears between the two treatment arms. The Amount of Tears will be measured with Schirmer tear test strips. The strips will be placed in the lower eyelid pouch for 5 minutes, value is expressed in mm.

    Time frame: 4 weeks

07

Study locations

2 of 2 sites recruiting
08

Timeline

Tracking since Sep 25, 2026
ElapsedEstimatedEstimated, not yet reachedSimilar studies: half by the dot; the band is the middle halfHalf of similar studies reached it by the dot; the band is the middle half, from a quarter to three quarters

Started Oct 2018 (actual). Primary completion is estimated for Jun 2024, 68 months after the start.

Of 39 non-industry phase 4 interventional studies under Cataract, half reached primary completion within 22 months of starting (the median), counting those still running; a quarter within 11 and three quarters within 39. This study's planned 68 months is above that.

Counting every sponsor, half of 46 studies reached it within 20 months; a quarter within 11 and three quarters within 34.

How these figures are worked out, and which studies are left out of them.

Registered
Aug 2, 2019
First posted
Aug 8, 2019
StartActual
Oct 30, 2018
Primary completionEst.
Jun 2024
CompletionEst.
Dec 2024
Last update
Jul 1, 2024
What these dates mean
Start.
When the first participant enrolled; while estimated, when the study expects to open to recruitment.
Primary completion.
When the last participant was examined or treated to collect data for the study's main question, its primary outcome. A study that stopped early gives the date its data collection stopped.
Completion.
When the last participant's last visit took place, for every outcome, secondary ones and side effects included: the end of the study. Often later than primary completion, sometimes the same day.
Actual and Est.
Actual means the registry says the date has happened. Est. (estimated) is a date the sponsor plans or expects. It can still move, and the sponsor is expected to change it to actual once it has passed.
No changes since tracking began. The registry record was last updated on Jul 1, 2024, before this site started recording changes on Sep 25, 2026. Its history is on ClinicalTrials.gov ↗
09

Registry details

Key details

Study ID
NCT04050644
Collaborators
Laboratoires Thea
Responsible party
Sponsor
First posted
Aug 8, 2019
Start date
Oct 30, 2018
Primary completion
Jun 2024 (estimated)
Completion
Dec 2024 (estimated)
Last update
Jul 1, 2024

Study contacts

Heleen Delbeke, MD
Contact
heleen.delbeke@uzleuven.be
+32 16 332687
Ingeborg Stalmans, MD, PhD
Contact
ingeborg.stalmans@uzleuven.be
+32 16 332687
Heleen Delbeke, MD
principal investigator · Universitaire Ziekenhuizen KU Leuven

Oversight

Data monitoring committee
No
FDA-regulated drug
No
FDA-regulated device
No
View the source record on ClinicalTrials.gov ↗

Interested in this study?

Eligibility is decided by the study team. Share this record with your doctor or contact the team directly.

Contact study team

Follow this study

Get an email when the registry record changes — status, dates, results — or when someone posts here.

Sign in to follow

Discussion

Questions and observations about this study, from anyone following it. Not medical advice, and not a channel to the study team — their contact details are on the registry record.

Sign in to join the discussion. Reading takes no account; posting does. You choose a display name, and a pseudonym is the default.

Nothing here yet. If you are running this trial, taking part in it, or weighing whether to, this is the place to say so.

Start the discussion