CClinicalTrials.gg
CompletedNCT04043052MOTIV-POSDEPUpdated Jun 1, 2026

Mobile Technologies and Post-stroke Depression

An interventional study of Psychological evaluation and Functional evaluation in Stroke and Depression, sponsored by University Hospital, Bordeaux. Completed at 5 sites in France. Open to participants aged 18 Years and older. Per ClinicalTrials.gov, last updated 2026-06-01.

Sponsored by University Hospital, Bordeaux · Not applicable, Interventional, and Prevention

Phase
Not applicable
Study type
Interventional
Enrollment
401
Allocation
Randomized
Ages
18 Years and older
Sex
All
01

Study summary

The recent development of acute phase treatments has dramatically improved stroke functional outcome but post-stroke neuropsychiatric disorders, notably post-stroke depression, continue to contribute to the heavy burden of stroke. While these conditions affect about 25% of stroke patients at 3 months, they are under-reported spontaneously by patients and are under-evaluated and treated by clinicians. Other than stroke severity and psychiatric history, risk factors for post-stroke depression remain a matter of debate, thus preventing identification of high-risk patients. Moreover, to date, neither pharmacological nor nonpharmacological treatments have demonstrated a significant benefit in the prevention of this disorder, thereby also impeding the development of early treatment strategies. Yet,the early management of post-stroke depression is critical given its negative influence on long-term functional outcomes, medication adherence, efficient use of rehabilitation services and the risk of stroke recurrence or vascular events. There is a pressing need to develop new tools allowing for the early detection of post-stroke neuropsychiatric complications for each individual patient. The rapid expansion of ambulatory monitoring techniques, such as Ecological Momentary Assessment (EMA), allows daily evaluations of mood symptoms in real time and in the natural contexts of daily life. The investigators have previously validated the feasibility and validity of EMA to assess daily life emotional symptoms after stroke, demonstrating its utility to investigate their evolution during the 3 months following stroke and to identify early predictors of post-stroke depression such as stress reactivity and social support, suggesting that EMA could be used in the early personalized care management of these neuropsychiatric complications. Recently, preliminary data have also emphasized the potential of EMA interventions to improve the outcome of psychiatric disorders.

02

Conditions studied

  • Stroke
  • Depression

Keywords

  • Stroke
  • e-health
  • Depression
  • Anxiety
  • Prevention
03

In context

Stroke

7,286 studies on the registry are indexed under Stroke; 2,007 are open to participants now.

This study's enrollment of 401 is above the median of 50 across 5,369 interventional studies indexed under Stroke.

Browse Stroke studies →

Lead sponsor

University Hospital, Bordeaux is the lead sponsor of 783 studies on the registry; 188 are open to participants now.

Counted across the registry records on this site, refreshed daily.

04

Who can participate

Ages eligible
18 Years and older
Sexes eligible
All
Accepts healthy volunteers
No

Inclusion criteria

  • Age ≥ 18 years.
  • Male or Female.
  • Recent (≤ 15 days) clinically-symptomatic ischemic or hemorrhagic stroke documented through brain imaging (CT or MRI) or a Transient Ischemic Attack with an ABCD2 score ≥ 4.
  • Patient discharged to home after hospitalization in the stroke unit.
  • No severe neurological handicap: modified Rankin scale ≤ 3 at inclusion.
  • No severe cognitive impairment or dementia: MoCA ≥ 16 at inclusion.
  • Written informed consent by the patient.
  • Covered by French Social Insurance

Exclusion criteria

Exclusion Criteria:

  • Transient Non Cerebrovascular Event.
  • Subarachnoid hemorrhage.
  • Dementia syndrome or other neurologic disorder and/or severe aphasia (NIHSS item 9 ≥ 2) interfering with the completion of evaluations and the utilization of EMA.
  • Severe visual impairment interfering with the utilization of EMA.
  • Severely impaired physical and/or mental health that, according to the investigator, may affect the participant's compliance with the study
  • Patients with a severe substance use disorder (DSM-5 criteria)
  • Patients under antidepressant and/or anxiolytic and/or neuroleptic and/or mood stabilizer treatment during the month preceding inclusion
  • Participation in another protocol modifying the patient's follow-up status.
  • Pregnancy or breastfeeding
  • Inability to read French or to use a smartphone
  • Individuals under legal protection or unable to express personnally their consent
  • Individuals living in an area without 3G/4G internet coverage
05

Study design

Phase
Not applicable
Primary purpose
Prevention
Allocation
Randomized
Intervention model
Parallel assignment
Masking
None (open label)
Enrollment
401 participants (actual)

Study arms

  • Active comparator
    Treatment As Usual (TAU)

    Evaluation of depression and anxiety disorders at 3 and 6 months post-stroke using psychological and functional examination

    Other: Psychological evaluation · Other: Functional evaluation · Biological: Biological assessment

  • Experimental
    EMA intervention assocuated to Treatment As Usual (EMA-TAU)

    Evaluation of depression and anxiety disorders at 3 and 6 months post-stroke using psychological and functional examination in addition with Ecological Momentary Assessment (EMA) evaluation.

    Other: Psychological evaluation · Other: Functional evaluation · Biological: Biological assessment · Other: Ecological Momentary Assessment

Interventions

  • OtherPsychological evaluation

    Psychological evaluation including: MINI (current diagnosis) ; HDRS ; MDQ ; GAD-7 ; PC-PTSD-5 ; Quality of Sleep (item 6 of the Pittsburgh Sleep Quality Index) ; CES-D ; BAI ; RRS-short form ; IES-R ; mYFAS2.0;

  • OtherFunctional evaluation

    Functional evaluation including : EQ5-D ; MFI ; LUNS ; SSQ ; Physical activity (IPAQ)

  • BiologicalBiological assessment

    Biological assessment : White and red blood cells count ; platelets count ; Haemoglobin ; CRPus ; Glycaemia ; Plasmatic HbA1c ; Plasmatic LDLc ; HDLc and triglyceride ; Creatinin clearance, Transaminases.

  • OtherEcological Momentary Assessment

    During 3 months after inclusion, a 3 to 5 minutes daily interview will administer questions concerning mood symptoms, activities, stress experience, substance use, social relationships and medication intake, activities, social interaction, environmental conditions, experience of depressed mood, anhedonia, changes in weight, appetite, sleep, fatigue, feelings of worthlessness or inappropriate guilt, concentration or decision-making difficulty

06

What researchers measure

Primary outcomes

  1. Hamilton Depression Rating Scale score (HDRS)

    Semi-structured interview questionnaire designed to be used by a health care professional to investigate depressive symptomatology. 17 items are used to provide a score.

    Time frame: Day 0

  2. Hamilton Depression Rating Scale score (HDRS)

    Semi-structured interview questionnaire designed to be used by a health care professional to investigate depressive symptomatology. 17 items are used to provide a score.

    Time frame: 3 months

  3. Hamilton Depression Rating Scale score (HDRS)

    Semi-structured interview questionnaire designed to be used by a health care professional to investigate depressive symptomatology. 17 items are used to provide a score.

    Time frame: 6 months

Secondary outcomes

  1. Mini International Neuropsychiatric Interview (MINI)

    Time frame: Day 0

  2. Mini International Neuropsychiatric Interview (MINI)

    Time frame: 3 months

  3. Mini International Neuropsychiatric Interview (MINI)

    Time frame: 6 months

  4. Mood Disorder Questionnaire (MDQ)

    13 questions on mood symptoms and 2 additional questions on the co-occurrence and psychosocial impact of these symptoms. This questionnaire assesses the probability of an existing bipolar disorder. A positive screen include : a) answering 'Yes' to at least 7 of 13 questions, and b) reporting that several of these symptoms have been experienced during the same period of time, and c) reporting that psychosocial impairment has been caused by these symptoms.

    Time frame: 3 months

  5. Mood Disorder Questionnaire (MDQ)

    13 questions on mood symptoms and 2 additional questions on the co-occurrence and psychosocial impact of these symptoms. This questionnaire assesses the probability of an existing bipolar disorder. A positive screen include : a) answering 'Yes' to at least 7 of 13 questions, and b) reporting that several of these symptoms have been experienced during the same period of time, and c) reporting that psychosocial impairment has been caused by these symptoms.

    Time frame: 6 months

  6. Generalized Anxiety Disorder-7 scale (GAD-7)

    7 items that assess GAD symptoms experienced over the past two weeks. Patients are asked the frequency of these symptoms using a 4-point scale, ranging from 0 (Not at all) to 3 (Nearly every day). A cutoff score of greater than 10 is commonly used to identify cases of GAD.

    Time frame: 3 months

  7. Generalized Anxiety Disorder-7 scale (GAD-7)

    7 items that assess GAD symptoms experienced over the past two weeks. Patients are asked the frequency of these symptoms using a 4-point scale, ranging from 0 (Not at all) to 3 (Nearly every day). A cutoff score of greater than 10 is commonly used to identify cases of GAD.

    Time frame: 6 months

  8. Primary Care PTSD Screen for DSM-5 (PC-PTSD-5)

    5-item screen designed to identify individuals with probable PTSD. It begins with an item designed to assess whether the respondent has had any exposure to traumatic events. If a respondent denies exposure, the scale is completed with a score of 0. If the respondent indicates a trauma history, he/she has additional Yes/No questions about how the traumatic event has affected him/her over the past month. If the total score is 3 or more, the screen indicates probable PTSD.

    Time frame: 3 months

  9. Primary Care PTSD Screen for DSM-5 (PC-PTSD-5)

    5-item screen designed to identify individuals with probable PTSD. It begins with an item designed to assess whether the respondent has had any exposure to traumatic events. If a respondent denies exposure, the scale is completed with a score of 0. If the respondent indicates a trauma history, he/she has additional Yes/No questions about how the traumatic event has affected him/her over the past month. If the total score is 3 or more, the screen indicates probable PTSD.

    Time frame: 6 months

  10. Center of Epidemiological Studies-Depression Scale (CES-D)

    20-item. It measures symptoms of depression in nine different groups as defined by the DSM-5: Sadness (Dysphoria, 3 items), Loss of Interest (Anhedonia, 2 items), Appetite (2 items), Sleep (3 items), Thinking (Concentration, 2 items), Guilt or Worthlessness (2 items), Fatigue (2 items), Agitation (2 items), Suicidal ideation (2 items).

    Time frame: 3 months

  11. Center of Epidemiological Studies-Depression Scale (CES-D)

    20-item. It measures symptoms of depression in nine different groups as defined by the DSM-5: Sadness (Dysphoria, 3 items), Loss of Interest (Anhedonia, 2 items), Appetite (2 items), Sleep (3 items), Thinking (Concentration, 2 items), Guilt or Worthlessness (2 items), Fatigue (2 items), Agitation (2 items), Suicidal ideation (2 items).

    Time frame: 6 months

  12. Beck Anxiety Inventory (BAI)

    The Beck Anxiety Inventory (BAI) assesses the severity of patient anxiety during the past week. Though anxiety can be thought of as having several components, including cognitive, somatic, affective, and behavioral components included only two components in the BAI's original version: cognitive and somatic symptoms, with the cognitive subscale providing a measure of fearful thoughts and impaired cognitive functioning whereas the somatic subscale measures the symptoms of physiological arousal. Care was taken during scale construction to eliminate items that would be confounded with depression items. Patients respond to the frequence of 21 symptoms using a scale from 0 (Never) to 3 (Frequently, Almost every day).

    Time frame: 3 months

  13. Beck Anxiety Inventory (BAI)

    The Beck Anxiety Inventory (BAI) assesses the severity of patient anxiety during the past week. Though anxiety can be thought of as having several components, including cognitive, somatic, affective, and behavioral components included only two components in the BAI's original version: cognitive and somatic symptoms, with the cognitive subscale providing a measure of fearful thoughts and impaired cognitive functioning whereas the somatic subscale measures the symptoms of physiological arousal. Care was taken during scale construction to eliminate items that would be confounded with depression items. Patients respond to the frequence of 21 symptoms using a scale from 0 (Never) to 3 (Frequently, Almost every day).

    Time frame: 6 months

  14. Ruminative Response Scale-short form (RRS-short form)

    Ruminative Response Scale-short form (RRS-short form) is one of the most widely used self-reported measures of rumination, comprising 9 items and describing the factors of brooding (5 items) and reflection (5 items). For each item, patients indicate the frequency of each event on a 4-point scale ranging from 1 ("almost never") to 4 ("almost always").

    Time frame: 3 months

  15. Ruminative Response Scale-short form (RRS-short form)

    Ruminative Response Scale-short form (RRS-short form) is one of the most widely used self-reported measures of rumination, comprising 9 items and describing the factors of brooding (5 items) and reflection (5 items). For each item, patients indicate the frequency of each event on a 4-point scale ranging from 1 ("almost never") to 4 ("almost always").

    Time frame: 6 months

  16. Multidimensional Fatigue Inventory (MFI)

    The MFI contains 20 items classified into four dimensions: general fatigue, mental fatigue, reduced activities and motivation. The statements are rated on a 5-point Likert scale (from "Yes, that is true" to "No, that is not true") representing the patient's current feeling. Low MFI scores reflect a higher degree of fatigue.

    Time frame: 3 months

  17. Multidimensional Fatigue Inventory (MFI)

    The MFI contains 20 items classified into four dimensions: general fatigue, mental fatigue, reduced activities and motivation. The statements are rated on a 5-point Likert scale (from "Yes, that is true" to "No, that is not true") representing the patient's current feeling. Low MFI scores reflect a higher degree of fatigue.

    Time frame: 6 months

  18. EuroQoL 5-Dimensions Questionnaire (EQ-5D)

    The EuroQoL 5-Dimensions Questionnaire (EQ-5D) is a standardized instrument for use as a measure of health outcome in stroke and was designed for self-completion by respondents. The 5 items of the questionnaire provide a simple descriptive profile and a single index value for health status. The EQ-Index has shown reasonable validity and acceptable responsiveness for detecting the health-related quality of life in stroke patients.

    Time frame: 3 months

  19. EuroQoL 5-Dimensions Questionnaire (EQ-5D)

    The EuroQoL 5-Dimensions Questionnaire (EQ-5D) is a standardized instrument for use as a measure of health outcome in stroke and was designed for self-completion by respondents. The 5 items of the questionnaire provide a simple descriptive profile and a single index value for health status. The EQ-Index has shown reasonable validity and acceptable responsiveness for detecting the health-related quality of life in stroke patients.

    Time frame: 6 months

  20. Long-term Unmet Needs after Stroke (LUNS)

    The Long-term Unmet Needs after Stroke (LUNS) includes 22 items that have each been worded to ask whether the respondent has a need and whether the need is met, and the potential complexity of "double-barrelled" questions was managed by providing Yes or No response modalities, with instructions to tick 'No' if there is no need or if the need has been met. Participants are also asked to indicate what level of help (from care givers/friends) they have received in completing the questionnaires, if any.

    Time frame: 3 months

  21. Long-term Unmet Needs after Stroke (LUNS)

    The Long-term Unmet Needs after Stroke (LUNS) includes 22 items that have each been worded to ask whether the respondent has a need and whether the need is met, and the potential complexity of "double-barrelled" questions was managed by providing Yes or No response modalities, with instructions to tick 'No' if there is no need or if the need has been met. Participants are also asked to indicate what level of help (from care givers/friends) they have received in completing the questionnaires, if any.

    Time frame: 6 months

  22. Short version of Sarason's Social Support Questionnaire (6 items SSQ)

    Used to measure two dimensions of social support : satisfaction and availability perceptions of social support and satisfaction with that social support. Each item is a question that solicits a two-part answer: Part 1 asks participants to list all the people that fit the description of the question, and Part 2 asks participants to indicate how satisfied they are in general with these people using a 6-point Licket scale (from 1. Very unsatisfied to 6. Extremely satisfied).

    Time frame: 3 months

  23. Short version of Sarason's Social Support Questionnaire (6 items SSQ)

    Used to measure two dimensions of social support : satisfaction and availability perceptions of social support and satisfaction with that social support. Each item is a question that solicits a two-part answer: Part 1 asks participants to list all the people that fit the description of the question, and Part 2 asks participants to indicate how satisfied they are in general with these people using a 6-point Licket scale (from 1. Very unsatisfied to 6. Extremely satisfied).

    Time frame: 6 months

  24. International Physical Activity Questionnaire (7 items IPAQ)

    The International Physical Activity Questionnaire (7 items IPAQ) assesses physical activity undertaken across a comprehensive set of domains including: a. leisure time physical activity, b. domestic and gardening activities, c. work related physical activity, d. transport-related physical activity. The IPAQ short form asks about three specific types of activity undertaken in these four domains : walking, moderate-intensity activities and vigorous-intensity activities. Computation of the total score for the short form requires summation of the duration (in minutes) and frequency (days) of walking, moderate-intensity and vigorous-intensity activities.

    Time frame: Day 0

  25. International Physical Activity Questionnaire (7 items IPAQ)

    The International Physical Activity Questionnaire (7 items IPAQ) assesses physical activity undertaken across a comprehensive set of domains including: a. leisure time physical activity, b. domestic and gardening activities, c. work related physical activity, d. transport-related physical activity. The IPAQ short form asks about three specific types of activity undertaken in these four domains : walking, moderate-intensity activities and vigorous-intensity activities. Computation of the total score for the short form requires summation of the duration (in minutes) and frequency (days) of walking, moderate-intensity and vigorous-intensity activities.

    Time frame: 3 months

  26. International Physical Activity Questionnaire (7 items IPAQ)

    The International Physical Activity Questionnaire (7 items IPAQ) assesses physical activity undertaken across a comprehensive set of domains including: a. leisure time physical activity, b. domestic and gardening activities, c. work related physical activity, d. transport-related physical activity. The IPAQ short form asks about three specific types of activity undertaken in these four domains : walking, moderate-intensity activities and vigorous-intensity activities. Computation of the total score for the short form requires summation of the duration (in minutes) and frequency (days) of walking, moderate-intensity and vigorous-intensity activities.

    Time frame: 6 months

  27. Percentage of stroke risk

    The Riskometer application will be used to measure the stroke risk based on recorded parameters. The Stroke Riskometer app assesses the possibility of suffering a stroke using a number of health and lifestyle factors including age, sex, ethnic origin, blood pressure, atrial fibrillation, left ventricular hypertrophy, anti-hypertension, tobacco, cardiovascular history, weight / height ratio, cholesterol level, diabetes, alcohol, stress, cognitive decline, family and personal history of stroke and TIA, history of head trauma and myocardial infarction

    Time frame: Day 0

  28. Percentage of stroke risk

    The Riskometer application will be used to measure the stroke risk based on recorded parameters. The Stroke Riskometer app assesses the possibility of suffering a stroke using a number of health and lifestyle factors including age, sex, ethnic origin, blood pressure, atrial fibrillation, left ventricular hypertrophy, anti-hypertension, tobacco, cardiovascular history, weight / height ratio, cholesterol level, diabetes, alcohol, stress, cognitive decline, family and personal history of stroke and TIA, history of head trauma and myocardial infarction

    Time frame: 3 months

  29. Percentage of stroke risk

    The Riskometer application will be used to measure the stroke risk based on recorded parameters. The Stroke Riskometer app assesses the possibility of suffering a stroke using a number of health and lifestyle factors including age, sex, ethnic origin, blood pressure, atrial fibrillation, left ventricular hypertrophy, anti-hypertension, tobacco, cardiovascular history, weight / height ratio, cholesterol level, diabetes, alcohol, stress, cognitive decline, family and personal history of stroke and TIA, history of head trauma and myocardial infarction

    Time frame: 6 months

  30. Recurrent stroke

    Recurrent stroke or TIA post-stroke defined by standard clinico-radiological criteria

    Time frame: 3 months

  31. Recurrent stroke

    Recurrent stroke or TIA post-stroke defined by standard clinico-radiological criteria

    Time frame: 6 months

  32. Cardiovascular events post-stroke

    Cardiovascular events post-stroke defined by standard clinical criteria

    Time frame: 3 months

  33. Cardiovascular events post-stroke

    Cardiovascular events post-stroke defined by standard clinical criteria

    Time frame: 6 months

  34. Intensity of post-stroke pain

    Intensity of post-stroke pain using a visual analog scale

    Time frame: Day 0

  35. Intensity of post-stroke pain

    Intensity of post-stroke pain using a visual analog scale

    Time frame: 3 months

  36. Intensity of post-stroke pain

    Intensity of post-stroke pain using a visual analog scale

    Time frame: 6 months

  37. Pittsburgh Sleep Quality Index

    Quality of sleep using the item 6 of the Pittsburgh Sleep Quality Index

    Time frame: Visit 1 ; 3 months ; 6 months

  38. Blood pressure

    Blood pressure

    Time frame: Visit 1 ; 3 months ; 6 months

  39. HbA1c measure

    Glycaemic control using the HbA1c measure

    Time frame: 3 months ; 6 months

  40. LDLc plasmatic measure

    Lipidic control using the LDLc plasmatic measure

    Time frame: 3 months ; 6 months

  41. CRPus plasmatic measure

    Systemic inflammation will be evaluated using CRPus plasmatic measure

    Time frame: 3 months ; 6 months

  42. Smoking Index (HSI)

    Tobacco use will be evaluated using the Heaviness of Smoking Index (HSI)

    Time frame: 3 months ; 6 months

07

Study locations

5 sites
  • CHU de Bordeaux
    Bordeaux, 33 076, France
  • CHRU de Brest
    Brest, 29 609, France
  • CHU Dijon Bourgogne
    Dijon, 21 079, France
  • CHU de Montpellier
    Montpellier, 34295, France
  • Assistance Publique Hopitaux de Paris - Groupe Hospitalier Paris Saint Joseph
    Paris, 75 014, France
08

References and documents

Individual participant data

Plan to share: No

No publications or documents are linked to this record.

09

Updates

Tracking since Sep 25, 2026
No changes since tracking began. The registry record was last updated on Jun 1, 2026, before this site started recording changes on Sep 25, 2026. Its history is on ClinicalTrials.gov ↗
10

Registry details

Key details

Study ID
NCT04043052
Lead sponsor
University Hospital, Bordeaux
Responsible party
Sponsor
First posted
Aug 2, 2019
Start date
Sep 9, 2020
Primary completion
Sep 26, 2024
Completion
Mar 23, 2025
Last update
Jun 1, 2026

Study contacts

Igor SIBON
principal investigator · University Hospital, Bordeaux

Oversight

Data monitoring committee
No
FDA-regulated drug
No
FDA-regulated device
No
View the source record on ClinicalTrials.gov ↗

Not currently enrolling

This study is completed, as verified in Jul 2025. You cannot join it, but the record below documents what was studied.

Follow this study

Get an email when the registry record changes — status, dates, results — or when someone posts here.

Sign in to follow

Discussion

Questions and observations about this study, from anyone following it. Not medical advice, and not a channel to the study team — their contact details are on the registry record.

Sign in to join the discussion. Reading takes no account; posting does. You choose a display name, and a pseudonym is the default.

Nothing here yet. If you are running this trial, taking part in it, or weighing whether to, this is the place to say so.

Start the discussion