CClinicalTrials.gg
CompletedNCT04039113COURSEUpdated Feb 18, 2025Results posted

Tezepelumab COPD Exacerbation Study

A Phase 2 interventional study of Tezepelumab and Placebo in Chronic Obstructive Pulmonary Disease (COPD), sponsored by AstraZeneca. Completed at 91 sites in 10 countries. Open to participants aged 40 Years to 80 Years. Per ClinicalTrials.gov, last updated 2025-02-18.

Sponsored by AstraZeneca · Phase 2, Interventional, and Treatment

Phase
Phase 2
Study type
Interventional
Enrollment
337
Allocation
Randomized
Ages
40 Years to 80 Years
Sex
All
01

Study summary

A Multicenter, Randomized, Double-blind, Placebo-controlled, Parallel Group, Phase 2a Study to Explore the Efficacy and Safety of Tezepelumab in Adults with Moderate to Very Severe Chronic Obstructive Pulmonary Disease (COPD)

Read the detailed description

This is a Phase 2a, multicenter, randomized, double-blind, placebo-controlled, parallel group study to evaluate the safety and efficacy of tezepelumab in adults with moderate to very severe chronic obstructive pulmonary disease (COPD) receiving triple inhaled maintenance therapy, and having had 2 or more documented COPD exacerbations in the 12 months prior to Visit 1. Approximately, 338 subjects will be randomized globally. Subjects will be stratified by region and prior number of exacerbations (2 vs. 3 or more). Subjects will receive tezepelumab, or placebo, administered via subcutaneous injection at the study site, over a 52 week treatment period. The study also includes a post-treatment follow-up period of 12 weeks.

02

Conditions studied

  • Chronic Obstructive Pulmonary Disease (COPD)

Keywords

  • COPD
  • Moderate COPD
  • Severe COPD
  • chronic obstructive pulmonary disease
03

In context

Pulmonary Disease, Chronic Obstructive

4,131 studies on the registry are indexed under Pulmonary Disease, Chronic Obstructive; 697 are open to participants now.

This study's enrollment of 337 is above the median of 70 across 2,926 interventional studies indexed under Pulmonary Disease, Chronic Obstructive.

Browse Pulmonary Disease, Chronic Obstructive studies →

Lead sponsor

AstraZeneca is the lead sponsor of 3,429 studies on the registry; 270 are open to participants now.

Of its 357 completed or terminated interventional studies of FDA-regulated products, 173 (48%) have results posted.

Counted across the registry records on this site, refreshed daily.

04

Who can participate

Ages eligible
40 Years to 80 Years
Sexes eligible
All
Accepts healthy volunteers
No

Inclusion criteria

  1. History of moderate to very severe physician-diagnosed COPD for at least 12 months prior to enrolment with a post-bronchodilator FEV1/FVC\<0.70 and a post-bronchodilator FEV1 ≥20% and ≤80% of predicted normal value.
  2. History of at least 2 documented moderate to severe COPD exacerbations within 2 to 52 weeks prior to enrollment.
  3. CAT score of ≥15 at enrollment and on day of randomization.
  4. Documented treatment with triple therapy for COPD (medium or high dose ICS/LABA/LAMA) throughout the year prior to enrollment. The dose of ICS should be stable for 3 months prior to enrollment.

Exclusion criteria

Exclusion Criteria:

  1. Clinically important pulmonary disease other than COPD, as judged by the Investigator (including current or historic asthma diagnosis).
  2. Any disorder, including, but not limited to, cardiovascular, gastrointestinal, hepatic, renal, neurological, musculoskeletal, infectious (including risk factors for pneumonia), endocrine, metabolic, hematological, psychiatric, or major physical impairment that is not stable.
  3. Major surgery within 8 weeks before enrollment.
  4. History of clinically significant infection requiring antibiotics or antiviral medication within 14 days before enrollment.
  5. Pregnant or breastfeeding.
  6. The chest/lungs with pathology that precludes the patient's ability to complete the study
  7. The patient has active COVID 19 infection during screening period.
05

Study design

Phase
Phase 2
Primary purpose
Treatment
Allocation
Randomized
Intervention model
Parallel assignment
Masking
Quadruple (Participant, Care provider, Investigator, Outcomes assessor)
Enrollment
337 participants (actual)

Study arms

  • Active comparator
    Tezepelumab

    Tezepelumab, SC, Q4W

    Biological: Tezepelumab

  • Placebo comparator
    Matching Placebo

    Matching placebo, SC, Q4W

    Other: Placebo

Interventions

  • BiologicalTezepelumab

    Tezepelumab subcutaneous injection

  • OtherPlacebo

    Placebo subcutaneous injection

06

What researchers measure

Primary outcomes

  1. Rate of Moderate or Severe COPD Exacerbations in Participants With Moderate to Very Severe COPD.

    A COPD exacerbation was defined as a change in the participant's usual COPD symptoms that is beyond normal day-to-day variation, is acute in onset, lasts 2 or more days, and may warrant a change in regular medication and leads to any of the following: Use of systemic corticosteroids for at least 3 days, use of antibiotics for at least 3 days, an inpatient hospitalisation due to COPD, or results in death. Analysis was done using a negative binomial model with the response variable as the number of COPD exacerbations experienced during the follow-up for exacerbations. The model included covariates of treatment group, region, and number of exacerbations reported at randomisation as recorded in IWRS (2, \>=3). The logarithm of the time at risk (in years) for exacerbation in the study is used as an offset variable.

    Time frame: From randomisation up to Week 52

Secondary outcomes

  1. Time to First Moderate/Severe COPD Exacerbation

    Time to first moderate/severe COPD exacerbation post-randomisation, presented as number of subjects with at least one moderate/severe COPD exacerbation.

    Time frame: From randomisation up to Week 52

  2. Proportion of Participants COPD Exacerbation Free at Week 52

    An exacerbation event was defined as described in primary analysis. A participant was exacerbation free if they did not experience any moderate or severe exacerbations from randomisation to Week 52 (EOT).

    Time frame: From randomisation up to Week 52

  3. Comparison of Annual Severe COPD Exacerbation Rates Over 52 Weeks

    An exacerbation was considered severe if it results in at least 1 of the following: Hospitalisation due to the COPD exacerbation (defined as a participant being admitted for ≥ 24 hours to an observation area, the emergency department, or other equivalent healthcare facility), or death related to COPD or COPD exacerbation.

    Time frame: From randomisation up to Week 52

  4. Proportion of Participants With >=1 Severe COPD Exacerbations Over 52 Weeks

    An exacerbation was considered severe if it results in at least 1 of the following: Hospitalisation due to the COPD exacerbation (defined as a participant being admitted for ≥ 24 hours to an observation area, the emergency department, or other equivalent healthcare facility), or death related to COPD or COPD exacerbation.

    Time frame: From randomisation up to Week 52

  5. Time to First Severe COPD Exacerbation

    Time to first severe COPD exacerbation post-randomisation, presented as number of subjects with at least one severe COPD exacerbation.

    Time frame: From randomisation up to Week 52

  6. Least Square (LS) Mean Difference in Change From Baseline in Pre-bronchodilator Forced Expiratory Volume in 1 (FEV1) at Week 52

    Pre-Bronchodilator FEV1 (L) was determined by spirometry at the clinic visit. FEV1 is defined as the volume of air exhaled from the lungs in the first second of a forced expiration. Change from baseline was obtained as an absolute difference between Week 52 measure and the baseline value. Baseline was defined as the last assessment recorded prior to the first dose of study treatment.

    Time frame: Baseline and Week 52

  7. Lease Square (LS) Mean Difference in Change From Baseline in St. George's Respiratory Questionnaire (SGRQ) Total Score at Week 52

    The SGRQ is a 50-item PRO instrument to measure the health status of participants with airway obstruction diseases. The total score indicates the impact of disease on overall health status. This total score is expressed as a percentage of overall impairment, in which 100 represents the worst possible health status and 0 indicates the best possible health status. Baseline is the measurement recorded at Week 0 (Visit 3).

    Time frame: Baseline and Week 52

  8. Proportion of Participants Achieving a Minimum Clinically Important Difference of 4 Units or More in St. George's Respiratory Questionnaire (SGRQ) Total Score at Week 52

    The SGRQ is a 50-item PRO instrument to measure the health status of participants with airway obstruction diseases. The total score indicates the impact of disease on overall health status. This total score is expressed as a percentage of overall impairment, in which 100 represents the worst possible health status and 0 indicates the best possible health status. A responder was defined as an individual who had "improvement" at Week 52 (\>=4 point decrease in SGRQ total score).

    Time frame: Baseline and Week 52

  9. Least Square (LS) Mean Difference in Change From Baseline in COPD Assessment Tool (CAT) Total Score at Week 52

    The CAT is an 8-item PRO developed to measure the impact of COPD on health status. A CAT total score is the sum of item responses. Scores range from 0-40 with higher scores indicative of greater COPD impact on health status. Baseline was defined as the value at the randomisation visit (Visit 3). If the Visit 3 measurement was missing, the screening value was used as baseline instead.

    Time frame: Baseline and Week 52

  10. Serum Concentration of Tezepelumab

    Blood samples were collected to determine the serum concentration of Tezepelumab. With the exception of Week 0 and Week 64, only pre-dose data from samples collected between 21 and 35 days after previous dose of investigational product were included.

    Time frame: Pre-dose at weeks 0, 4, 12, 24, 36 and also at weeks 52 and 64 where no dosing was scheduled

  11. Number of Participants With Anti-Drug Antibody (ADA) Response to Tezepelumab

    Blood samples were measured for the presence of ADAs for tezepelumab using validated assays. Treatment-induced ADA positive was defined as ADA negative at baseline and post-baseline ADA positive. Treatment-boosted ADA positive was defined as baseline positive ADA titre that was boosted to a 4 fold or higher level following IP administration. TE-ADA positive was defined as the sum of treatment-induced ADA positive and treatment-boosted ADA positive. ADA incidence is the proportion of TE-ADA positive subjects in a population. ADA persistently positive was defined as ADA positive at \>= 2 post-baseline assessments or ADA positive at last post-baseline assessment. ADA transiently positive was defined as having at least one post-baseline ADA positive assessment and not fulfilling the conditions of ADA persistently positive. Treatment-induced nAb positive was defined as nAb negative or ADA negative at baseline and nAb positive at any post-baseline visit.

    Time frame: Pre-dose at weeks 0, 4, 12, 24, 36 and also at weeks 52 and 64 where no dosing was scheduled

07

Results

Posted Feb 18, 2025

Participant flow

The study was conducted at 80 centres in 10 countries. A total of 579 participants were screened of which 337 were randomised. Of the 337 randomised, 333 participants received treatment. 4 participants randomised in error and did not receive treatment. 187 participants not randomised were due to screen failures.

Participant flow — Overall Study
MilestoneTezepelumabPlacebo
Started169168
Received treatment165168
Completed treatment138138
Completed146150
Not completed2318
Withdrew: Withdrawal by subject811
Withdrew: Lost to follow-up11
Withdrew: Adverse event22
Withdrew: Death24
Withdrew: Site closure60
Withdrew: Failure to meet randomisation criteria40

Outcome measures

PrimaryRate of Moderate or Severe COPD Exacerbations in Participants With Moderate to Very Severe COPD.

A COPD exacerbation was defined as a change in the participant's usual COPD symptoms that is beyond normal day-to-day variation, is acute in onset, lasts 2 or more days, and may warrant a change in regular medication and leads to any of the following: Use of systemic corticosteroids for at least 3 days, use of antibiotics for at least 3 days, an inpatient hospitalisation due to COPD, or results in death. Analysis was done using a negative binomial model with the response variable as the number of COPD exacerbations experienced during the follow-up for exacerbations. The model included covariates of treatment group, region, and number of exacerbations reported at randomisation as recorded in IWRS (2, \>=3). The logarithm of the time at risk (in years) for exacerbation in the study is used as an offset variable.

Time frame:
From randomisation up to Week 52
Reported as:
Least squares mean · exacerbations per year
Rate of Moderate or Severe COPD Exacerbations in Participants With Moderate to Very Severe COPD.
exacerbations per yearTezepelumabPlacebo
Rate of Moderate or Severe COPD Exacerbations in Participants With Moderate to Very Severe COPD.1.75 (1.45 to 2.11)2.11 (1.77 to 2.53)
Statistical analysis
  • Tezepelumab vs Placebo · Negative Binomial · p = 0.1042 (1-sided p-value) · Rate ratio: 0.83 · 90% CI 0.64 to 1.06
  • Tezepelumab vs Placebo · Negative Binomial · p = 0.2085 (2-sided p-value) · Rate ratio: 0.83 · 95% CI 0.61 to 1.11
SecondaryTime to First Moderate/Severe COPD Exacerbation

Time to first moderate/severe COPD exacerbation post-randomisation, presented as number of subjects with at least one moderate/severe COPD exacerbation.

Time frame:
From randomisation up to Week 52
Reported as:
Count of participants · Participants
Time to First Moderate/Severe COPD Exacerbation
ParticipantsTezepelumabPlacebo
Time to First Moderate/Severe COPD Exacerbation94105
SecondaryProportion of Participants COPD Exacerbation Free at Week 52

An exacerbation event was defined as described in primary analysis. A participant was exacerbation free if they did not experience any moderate or severe exacerbations from randomisation to Week 52 (EOT).

Time frame:
From randomisation up to Week 52
Reported as:
Count of participants · Participants
Proportion of Participants COPD Exacerbation Free at Week 52
ParticipantsTezepelumabPlacebo
Proportion of Participants COPD Exacerbation Free at Week 527163
SecondaryComparison of Annual Severe COPD Exacerbation Rates Over 52 Weeks

An exacerbation was considered severe if it results in at least 1 of the following: Hospitalisation due to the COPD exacerbation (defined as a participant being admitted for ≥ 24 hours to an observation area, the emergency department, or other equivalent healthcare facility), or death related to COPD or COPD exacerbation.

Time frame:
From randomisation up to Week 52
Reported as:
Least squares mean · exacerbations per year
Comparison of Annual Severe COPD Exacerbation Rates Over 52 Weeks
exacerbations per yearTezepelumabPlacebo
Comparison of Annual Severe COPD Exacerbation Rates Over 52 Weeks0.13 (0.07 to 0.24)0.25 (0.15 to 0.42)
SecondaryProportion of Participants With >=1 Severe COPD Exacerbations Over 52 Weeks

An exacerbation was considered severe if it results in at least 1 of the following: Hospitalisation due to the COPD exacerbation (defined as a participant being admitted for ≥ 24 hours to an observation area, the emergency department, or other equivalent healthcare facility), or death related to COPD or COPD exacerbation.

Time frame:
From randomisation up to Week 52
Reported as:
Count of participants · Participants
Proportion of Participants With >=1 Severe COPD Exacerbations Over 52 Weeks
ParticipantsTezepelumabPlacebo
Proportion of Participants With >=1 Severe COPD Exacerbations Over 52 Weeks1622
SecondaryTime to First Severe COPD Exacerbation

Time to first severe COPD exacerbation post-randomisation, presented as number of subjects with at least one severe COPD exacerbation.

Time frame:
From randomisation up to Week 52
Reported as:
Count of participants · Participants
Time to First Severe COPD Exacerbation
ParticipantsTezepelumabPlacebo
Time to First Severe COPD Exacerbation1622
SecondaryLeast Square (LS) Mean Difference in Change From Baseline in Pre-bronchodilator Forced Expiratory Volume in 1 (FEV1) at Week 52

Pre-Bronchodilator FEV1 (L) was determined by spirometry at the clinic visit. FEV1 is defined as the volume of air exhaled from the lungs in the first second of a forced expiration. Change from baseline was obtained as an absolute difference between Week 52 measure and the baseline value. Baseline was defined as the last assessment recorded prior to the first dose of study treatment.

Time frame:
Baseline and Week 52
Reported as:
Least squares mean · Liters
Least Square (LS) Mean Difference in Change From Baseline in Pre-bronchodilator Forced Expiratory Volume in 1 (FEV1) at Week 52
LitersTezepelumabPlacebo
Least Square (LS) Mean Difference in Change From Baseline in Pre-bronchodilator Forced Expiratory Volume in 1 (FEV1) at Week 520.026 ± 0.015-0.029 ± 0.015
SecondaryLease Square (LS) Mean Difference in Change From Baseline in St. George's Respiratory Questionnaire (SGRQ) Total Score at Week 52

The SGRQ is a 50-item PRO instrument to measure the health status of participants with airway obstruction diseases. The total score indicates the impact of disease on overall health status. This total score is expressed as a percentage of overall impairment, in which 100 represents the worst possible health status and 0 indicates the best possible health status. Baseline is the measurement recorded at Week 0 (Visit 3).

Time frame:
Baseline and Week 52
Reported as:
Least squares mean · units on a scale
Lease Square (LS) Mean Difference in Change From Baseline in St. George's Respiratory Questionnaire (SGRQ) Total Score at Week 52
units on a scaleTezepelumabPlacebo
Lease Square (LS) Mean Difference in Change From Baseline in St. George's Respiratory Questionnaire (SGRQ) Total Score at Week 52-4.796 ± 1.176-1.863 ± 1.189
SecondaryProportion of Participants Achieving a Minimum Clinically Important Difference of 4 Units or More in St. George's Respiratory Questionnaire (SGRQ) Total Score at Week 52

The SGRQ is a 50-item PRO instrument to measure the health status of participants with airway obstruction diseases. The total score indicates the impact of disease on overall health status. This total score is expressed as a percentage of overall impairment, in which 100 represents the worst possible health status and 0 indicates the best possible health status. A responder was defined as an individual who had "improvement" at Week 52 (\>=4 point decrease in SGRQ total score).

Time frame:
Baseline and Week 52
Reported as:
Count of participants · Participants
Proportion of Participants Achieving a Minimum Clinically Important Difference of 4 Units or More in St. George's Respiratory Questionnaire (SGRQ) Total Score at Week 52
ParticipantsTezepelumabPlacebo
Proportion of Participants Achieving a Minimum Clinically Important Difference of 4 Units or More in St. George's Respiratory Questionnaire (SGRQ) Total Score at Week 526559
SecondaryLeast Square (LS) Mean Difference in Change From Baseline in COPD Assessment Tool (CAT) Total Score at Week 52

The CAT is an 8-item PRO developed to measure the impact of COPD on health status. A CAT total score is the sum of item responses. Scores range from 0-40 with higher scores indicative of greater COPD impact on health status. Baseline was defined as the value at the randomisation visit (Visit 3). If the Visit 3 measurement was missing, the screening value was used as baseline instead.

Time frame:
Baseline and Week 52
Reported as:
Least squares mean · units on a scale
Least Square (LS) Mean Difference in Change From Baseline in COPD Assessment Tool (CAT) Total Score at Week 52
units on a scaleTezepelumabPlacebo
Least Square (LS) Mean Difference in Change From Baseline in COPD Assessment Tool (CAT) Total Score at Week 52-3.037 ± 0.524-1.182 ± 0.524
SecondarySerum Concentration of Tezepelumab

Blood samples were collected to determine the serum concentration of Tezepelumab. With the exception of Week 0 and Week 64, only pre-dose data from samples collected between 21 and 35 days after previous dose of investigational product were included.

Time frame:
Pre-dose at weeks 0, 4, 12, 24, 36 and also at weeks 52 and 64 where no dosing was scheduled
Reported as:
Mean · microgram per milliliter (mg/mL)
Serum Concentration of Tezepelumab
microgram per milliliter (mg/mL)TezepelumabPlacebo
Week 0NA ± NA—
Week 425.881 ± 11.8828—
Week 1244.316 ± 19.0716—
Week 2449.093 ± 21.2414—
Week 3648.667 ± 22.2241—
Week 5252.659 ± 26.1703—
Follow-up Week 646.602 ± 6.1832—
SecondaryNumber of Participants With Anti-Drug Antibody (ADA) Response to Tezepelumab

Blood samples were measured for the presence of ADAs for tezepelumab using validated assays. Treatment-induced ADA positive was defined as ADA negative at baseline and post-baseline ADA positive. Treatment-boosted ADA positive was defined as baseline positive ADA titre that was boosted to a 4 fold or higher level following IP administration. TE-ADA positive was defined as the sum of treatment-induced ADA positive and treatment-boosted ADA positive. ADA incidence is the proportion of TE-ADA positive subjects in a population. ADA persistently positive was defined as ADA positive at \>= 2 post-baseline assessments or ADA positive at last post-baseline assessment. ADA transiently positive was defined as having at least one post-baseline ADA positive assessment and not fulfilling the conditions of ADA persistently positive. Treatment-induced nAb positive was defined as nAb negative or ADA negative at baseline and nAb positive at any post-baseline visit.

Time frame:
Pre-dose at weeks 0, 4, 12, 24, 36 and also at weeks 52 and 64 where no dosing was scheduled
Reported as:
Count of participants · Participants
Number of Participants With Anti-Drug Antibody (ADA) Response to Tezepelumab
ParticipantsTezepelumabPlacebo
ADA positive at baseline and/or post-baseline (ADA prevalence)1019
Any baseline ADA positive58
Only baseline ADA positive21
Any post-baseline ADA positive818
Both baseline and at least one post-baseline ADA positive37
Treatment-induced ADA positive511
Treatment-boosted ADA positive00
TE-ADA positive (ADA incidence)511
ADA persistently positive515
ADA transiently positive33
nAb positive at baseline and/or post-baseline (nAb prevalence)00
Treatment-induced nAb positive (nAb incidence)00

Adverse events

Collected over From first dose of study drug until end of study at Week 64.. Non-serious events are listed at a 5% frequency threshold.

Adverse event summary by group
GroupDeathsSeriousOther
Teze 420 mg Q4W3/165 (1.8%)56/165 (33.9%)78/165 (47.3%)
Placebo6/168 (3.6%)58/168 (34.5%)56/168 (33.3%)
Most frequent serious events
Showing 10 of 102
Most frequent serious events
EventTeze 420 mg Q4WPlacebo
Chronic obstructive pulmonary diseaseRespiratory, thoracic and mediastinal disorders20/16526/168
PneumoniaInfections and infestations7/1655/168
Pneumonia bacterialInfections and infestations3/1653/168
COVID-19Infections and infestations2/1653/168
DiverticulitisInfections and infestations2/1651/168
Myocardial infarctionCardiac disorders2/1650/168
Transient ischaemic attackNervous system disorders2/1650/168
Benign prostatic hyperplasiaReproductive system and breast disorders2/1650/168
Acute respiratory failureRespiratory, thoracic and mediastinal disorders2/1651/168
Inguinal herniaGastrointestinal disorders2/1650/168
Most frequent other events
Most frequent other events
EventTeze 420 mg Q4WPlacebo
COVID-19Infections and infestations25/16516/168
NasopharyngitisInfections and infestations17/1659/168
HypertensionVascular disorders12/1655/168
Oedema peripheralGeneral disorders11/1658/168
FallInjury, poisoning and procedural complications11/16510/168
ContusionInjury, poisoning and procedural complications10/1650/168
Urinary tract infectionInfections and infestations5/16510/168
HeadacheNervous system disorders3/16510/168
DizzinessNervous system disorders9/1651/168
DiarrhoeaGastrointestinal disorders9/1654/168

Baseline characteristics

The Full Analysis Set included all participants randomised to study treatment who received at least one dose of investigational product, irrespective of their protocol adherence, and continued participation in the study.

Age, Continuous
Age, Continuous(Years)TezepelumabPlaceboTotal
Age (Years)67.4 ± 6.7567.1 ± 7.2467.2 ± 7.00
Age, Customized
Age, Customized(Participants)TezepelumabPlaceboTotal
Age Group : >=40 - <655261113
Age Group : >=65 - <=80113107220
Sex: Female, Male
Sex: Female, Male(Participants)TezepelumabPlaceboTotal
Sex — Female7768145
Sex — Male88100188
Ethnicity (NIH/OMB)
Ethnicity (NIH/OMB)(Participants)TezepelumabPlaceboTotal
Ethnic Group — Hispanic or Latino7310
Ethnic Group — Not Hispanic or Latino158165323
Ethnic Group — Unknown or Not Reported000
Race/Ethnicity, Customized
Race/Ethnicity, Customized(Participants)TezepelumabPlaceboTotal
Race — White147146293
Race — Black or African American224
Race — Asian161834
Race — Other022
08

Study locations

91 sites
  • Research Site
    Dothan, Alabama 36305, United States
  • Research Site
    Huntington Beach, California 92647, United States
  • Research Site
    Newport Beach, California 92663, United States
  • Research Site
    Upland, California 91786, United States
  • Research Site
    Westminster, California 92683, United States
  • Research Site
    New Haven, Connecticut 06510, United States
  • Research Site
    Brandon, Florida 33511, United States
  • Research Site
    Orlando, Florida 32819, United States
  • Research Site
    Panama City, Florida 32405, United States
  • Research Site
    Tampa, Florida 33607, United States
  • Research Site
    Winter Park, Florida 32789-4681, United States
  • Research Site
    Buckley, Michigan 49620, United States
  • Research Site
    Albuquerque, New Mexico 87108, United States
  • Research Site
    Charlotte, North Carolina 28277, United States
  • Research Site
    Mooresville, North Carolina 28117, United States
  • Research Site
    New Bern, North Carolina 28562, United States
  • Research Site
    Columbus, Ohio 43215, United States
  • Research Site
    Edmond, Oklahoma 73034, United States
  • Research Site
    Medford, Oregon 97504, United States
  • Research Site
    Philadelphia, Pennsylvania 19140, United States
  • Research Site
    Pittsburgh, Pennsylvania 15213, United States
  • Research Site
    Mount Pleasant, South Carolina 29464, United States
  • Research Site
    Rock Hill, South Carolina 29732, United States
  • Research Site
    Rapid City, South Dakota 57702, United States
  • Research Site
    McKinney, Texas 75069, United States
  • Research Site
    Abingdon, Virginia 24210, United States
  • Research Site
    Everett, Washington 98208, United States
  • Research Site
    Calgary, Alberta T2N 4Z6, Canada
  • Research Site
    Sherwood Park, Alberta T8L 0N2, Canada
  • Research Site
    Vancouver, British Columbia V5Z 1M9, Canada
  • Research Site
    Truro, Nova Scotia B2N 1L2, Canada
  • Research Site
    Burlington, Ontario L7N 3V2, Canada
  • Research Site
    Hamilton, Ontario L8N 3Z5, Canada
  • Research Site
    Montréal, Quebec H1M 1B1, Canada
  • Research Site
    St Charles Borromee, Quebec J6E 2B4, Canada
  • Research Site
    Trois-Rivières, Quebec G8T 7A1, Canada
  • Research Site
    Quebec, G1V 4G5, Canada
  • Research Site
    Quebec, G3K 2P8, Canada
  • Research Site
    Aarhus N, 8200, Denmark
  • Research Site
    Hvidovre, 2650, Denmark
  • Research Site
    København NV, 2400, Denmark
  • Research Site
    Odense C, 5000, Denmark
  • Research Site
    Roskilde, 4000, Denmark
  • Research Site
    Vejle, 7100, Denmark
  • Research Site
    Ålborg, 9000, Denmark
  • Research Site
    Amiens Cedex 1, 80054, France
  • Research Site
    Brest Cedex 2, 29609, France
  • Research Site
    Grenoble Cedex, 38043, France
  • Research Site
    Lyon Cedex 04, 69317, France
  • Research Site
    Marseille, 13015, France
  • Research Site
    Montpellier, 34090, France
  • Research Site
    Nantes Cedex 1, 44093, France
  • Research Site
    Berlin, 12203, Germany
  • Research Site
    Frankfurt, 60596, Germany
  • Research Site
    Grosshansdorf, 20927, Germany
  • Research Site
    Lübeck, 23552, Germany
  • Research Site
    Mainz, 55131, Germany
  • Research Site
    Ashkelon, 7830604, Israel
  • Research Site
    Beer Sheva, 84101, Israel
  • Research Site
    Haifa, 34362, Israel
  • Research Site
    Jerusalem, 91031, Israel
  • Research Site
    Jerusalem, 91120, Israel
  • Research Site
    Kfar Saba, 49281, Israel
  • Research Site
    Rehovot, 7661041, Israel
  • Research Site
    Daegu, 42415, Korea, Republic of
  • Research Site
    Incheon, 21431, Korea, Republic of
  • Research Site
    Jeonju-si, 54907, Korea, Republic of
  • Research Site
    Seoul, 03312, Korea, Republic of
  • Research Site
    Seoul, 03722, Korea, Republic of
  • Research Site
    Seoul, 05030, Korea, Republic of
  • Research Site
    Seoul, 05505, Korea, Republic of
  • Research Site
    Seoul, 06591, Korea, Republic of
  • Research Site
    Seoul, 06973, Korea, Republic of
  • Research Site
    Uijeongbu-si, 11765, Korea, Republic of
  • Research Site
    Eindhoven, 5623 EJ, Netherlands
  • Research Site
    Heerlen, 6419 PC, Netherlands
  • Research Site
    Rotterdam, 3045 PM, Netherlands
  • Research Site
    Rotterdam, 3083 AN, Netherlands
  • Research Site
    Zutphen, 7207 AE, Netherlands
  • Research Site
    Alzira, 46410, Spain
  • Research Site
    Barcelona, 08025, Spain
  • Research Site
    Granada, 18014, Spain
  • Research Site
    Málaga, 29010, Spain
  • Research Site
    Mérida (Badajoz), 06800, Spain
  • Research Site
    Bradford, BND9 6RJ, United Kingdom
  • Research Site
    Chertsey, KT16 0PZ, United Kingdom
  • Research Site
    Cottingham, HU16 5JQ, United Kingdom
  • Research Site
    Glasgow, G12 0YN, United Kingdom
  • Research Site
    London, SW10 9NH, United Kingdom
  • Research Site
    Newcastle-upon-Tyne, NE1 4LP, United Kingdom
  • Research Site
    Wakefield, WF1 4DG, United Kingdom
09

References and documents

Related links

Study documents

  • Study protocol · Oct 18, 2022
  • Statistical analysis plan · Nov 28, 2023

Documents are hosted by the registry — open the source record to download them.

10

Updates

Tracking since Sep 25, 2026
No changes since tracking began. The registry record was last updated on Feb 18, 2025, before this site started recording changes on Sep 25, 2026. Its history is on ClinicalTrials.gov ↗
11

Registry details

Key details

Study ID
NCT04039113
Lead sponsor
AstraZeneca
Collaborators
Amgen
Responsible party
Sponsor
First posted
Jul 31, 2019
Start date
Jul 30, 2019
Primary completion
Nov 10, 2023
Completion
Jan 31, 2024
Results posted
Feb 18, 2025
Last update
Feb 18, 2025

Study contacts

Dave Singh, MD
principal investigator · Division of Infection, Immunity & Resp Medicine, The University of Manchester, United Kingdom

Oversight

Data monitoring committee
Yes
FDA-regulated drug
Yes
FDA-regulated device
No
View the source record on ClinicalTrials.gov ↗

Not currently enrolling

This study is completed, as verified in Feb 2025. You cannot join it, but the record below documents what was studied.

Follow this study

Get an email when the registry record changes — status, dates, results — or when someone posts here.

Sign in to follow

Discussion

Questions and observations about this study, from anyone following it. Not medical advice, and not a channel to the study team — their contact details are on the registry record.

Sign in to join the discussion. Reading takes no account; posting does. You choose a display name, and a pseudonym is the default.

Nothing here yet. If you are running this trial, taking part in it, or weighing whether to, this is the place to say so.

Start the discussion