ClinicalTrials.gg
CompletedNCT04038359TEMPOUpdated Sep 19, 2024Results posted

A Phase 2 Study Comparing 2 Intermittent Dosing Schedules of Duvelisib in Participants With Indolent Non-Hodgkin Lymphoma

A Phase 2 interventional study of Duvelisib in Indolent Non-Hodgkin Lymphoma, sponsored by SecuraBio. Completed at 28 sites in 8 countries. Open to participants aged 18 Years and older. Per ClinicalTrials.gov, last updated 2024-09-19.

Sponsored by SecuraBio · Phase 2, Interventional, and Treatment

Phase
Phase 2
Study type
Interventional
Enrollment
103
Allocation
Randomized
Ages
18 Years and older
Sex
All
01

Study summary

This study examined the effects of predefined 2-week duvelisib dose holidays on tumor responses and safety/tolerability.

Read the detailed description

This was a Phase 2, randomized, open-label, 2-arm study designed to evaluate the efficacy and safety of prescribed drug holidays of duvelisib treatment in participants with relapsed or refractory (R/R) indolent non-Hodgkin lymphoma (iNHL) who have received at least 1 prior systemic therapy.

02

Conditions studied

  • Indolent Non-Hodgkin Lymphoma

Keywords

  • PI3K Inhibitor
03

In context

Lead sponsor

SecuraBio is the lead sponsor of 25 studies on the registry; 2 are open to participants now.

Counted across the registry records on this site, refreshed daily.

04

Who can participate

Ages eligible
18 Years and older
Sexes eligible
All
Accepts healthy volunteers
No

Go through the criteria one by one — yes, no or not sure — and take the list to your doctor or the study team. Kept in this browser only.

Inclusion criteria

  • performance status ≤ 2
  • confirmed diagnosis of iNHL (subtypes include follicular lymphoma [FL] Grades 1 to 3a), marginal zone lymphoma (splenic, nodal, or extranodal), or small lymphocytic lymphoma
  • Must have received 1 prior systemic regimen for iNHL
  • Must have documented radiologic evidence of disease progression, at least 1 bi-dimensionally ≥ 1.5 centimeters (which has not been previously irradiated), according to 2007 revised International Working Group criteria, and be a candidate for a subsequent .
  • Must have adequate organ function defined by the following laboratory parameters:

    • ≥ 1.0 × 10\^9/liter (L)
    • count ≥ 75 × 10\^9/L
    • ≥ 8 grams/deciliter
    • Estimated ≥ 60 milliliters/minute, as determined by the Cockcroft-Gault method
    • Total ≤ 1.5 × (ULN) (exception: participants with Gilbert's Syndrome may have a bilirubin > 1.5 × ULN)
    • /serum glutamic-oxaloacetic transaminase and alanine aminotransferase/serum pyruvic transaminase ≤ 3.0 × ULN

Exclusion criteria

Exclusion Criteria:

  • Anticancer treatment, major surgery, or use of any drug within 28 days before the start of study intervention; palliative radiation therapy is allowed if > 7 days before planned first dose of study interventions, and any toxicity is Grade ≤ 1
  • Clinical or histological evidence of transformation to a more aggressive subtype of lymphoma or grade 3b FL or Richters' transformation or chronic lymphocytic leukemia
  • Prior hematopoietic stem cell transplant; prior treatment with a PI3K inhibitor
  • History of drug-induced colitis or pneumonitis; tuberculosis treatment ≤ 2 years prior to randomization; administration of a live or within 6 weeks of randomization
  • Ongoing treatment with chronic or systemic or treatment for systemic bacterial, fungal, or viral infection
  • Active cytomegalovirus or Epstein-Barr virus infection
  • Unable to receive prophylactic treatment for pneumocystis, herpes simplex virus, or herpes zoster at screening
  • Concurrent administration of medications or foods that are strong inhibitors or inducers of cytochrome P450 3A. No prior use within 2 weeks before the start of study intervention.
  • Baseline corrected with Fridericia's method > 500 milliseconds
  • Concurrent active other than non-melanoma skin cancer or carcinoma in situ of the cervix, bladder cancer, or prostate cancer not requiring treatment. Participants with previous malignancies are eligible if they have been disease-free for 2 years or more.
  • Unstable or severe uncontrolled medical condition that would, in the Investigator's judgment, increase the participant's risk to participating in this study.
Terms in these criteria, in plain language(18)

Underlined terms in the criteria open these too. Explained by clinicaltrials.gg, not part of the registry record. The study team decides who can take part.

ECOG performance status

A scale of how much an illness limits everyday activity. For people being assessed to join a study, scores run from 0 (fully active) to 4; lower is more active.

0
Fully active, no restrictions.
1
Limited in strenuous activity, but walking and able to do light work, such as housework or office work.
2
Walking and able to look after yourself, but unable to work; up and about more than half of waking hours.
3
Able to look after yourself only in part; in bed or a chair more than half of waking hours.
4
Unable to look after yourself at all; in bed or a chair all day.

Studies most often ask for 0–1 or 0–2. Your doctor gives the score; the WHO scale uses the same steps. The full scale also has 5, which records death.

Histologically or cytologically confirmed

The diagnosis was confirmed by looking at a sample under a microscope: tissue from a biopsy or surgery (histology), or cells from a fluid or needle sample (cytology).

Your pathology report is the document that shows this.

Measurable disease

The amount of disease can be tracked with a defined measurement, so the study can see whether it shrinks or grows. It might be a tumour measured on a scan or, in some blood cancers such as myeloma, a marker measured in blood or urine.

The criteria or the study team say which measurement counts — having no tumour visible on a scan does not by itself rule you out.

Line of therapy

A line of therapy is one course of treatment, which may combine several drugs. First-line is the first course given; second-line follows when that stops working or is not tolerated.

“Two prior lines” means two courses that count separately under the study’s rules — not simply two drugs. Ask the study team if you are unsure how yours are counted.

Absolute neutrophil count (ANC)

The number of neutrophils, white blood cells that help fight infection, in a given amount of blood. Too few raises the risk of infection.

It is a count, not a percentage of the white cells. Limits are written in units that mean the same: ≥ 1.5 × 10⁹/L is ≥ 1,500 per mm³ (µL). Each lab has its own reference range.

Platelets

Blood cells that help blood clot. Too few raises the risk of bleeding and bruising. A usual adult range is about 150–400 × 10⁹/L (150,000–400,000 per µL); each lab has its own reference range.

Hemoglobin (Hb)

The protein in red blood cells that carries oxygen. A low level is anaemia, which can cause tiredness and breathlessness. Measured in g/dL or g/L (9 g/dL is 90 g/L).

Creatinine clearance (CrCl)

How quickly the kidneys clear creatinine, a waste product, from the blood. A study may estimate it from a blood test with age, weight and sex (often by the Cockcroft–Gault formula), or measure it using blood and urine collected over a set time. Given in mL/min; higher is better.

Bilirubin

A yellow substance made when red blood cells are broken down, which the liver clears. A high level can mean a problem with the liver or the bile ducts.

Criteria often allow more for people with Gilbert’s syndrome, a harmless inherited condition that raises bilirubin.

ULN (upper limit of normal)

The top of the normal range for a blood test, as set by the laboratory that runs it. Each lab prints its own range next to your result.

“≤ 2.5 × ULN” means the result can be up to two and a half times that top value.

ALT and AST (liver enzymes)

Two enzymes measured in a routine blood test of the liver. Higher levels can mean the liver is under strain or damaged. SGPT and SGOT are older names for ALT and AST.

Criteria usually give a limit as a multiple of the upper limit of normal (ULN), often higher when cancer has spread to the liver.

Investigational drug or device

A drug or device being studied in a clinical trial.

It may be new, or already approved and being studied for another use, dose or form. Criteria often leave out people who took part in another study of one within a recent period, commonly 30 days or five half-lives.

Allogeneic and autologous transplant

Stem cell (bone marrow) transplants. Allogeneic uses cells from a donor; autologous uses your own cells, collected earlier and given back.

Live vaccines

Vaccines made with a weakened form of the germ, such as measles–mumps–rubella (MMR), chickenpox and yellow fever. They can be risky when the immune system is weakened. Flu injections are not live; the nasal flu spray is.

Immunosuppression

A weakened immune system. It can come from an illness, such as HIV or some blood cancers, or from medicines that turn the immune system down, for example after an organ transplant or for an autoimmune disease; steroids at higher doses count.

Read whether the line is about a condition or about medicines, and which medicines and doses it means.

Corticosteroids (steroids)

Anti-inflammatory medicines such as prednisone, prednisolone and dexamethasone — not the anabolic steroids used for muscle.

Studies differ in what they allow: check which steroid medicines, routes (tablets, injections, creams, inhalers, eye drops) and doses this study accepts.

QT and QTc

On an ECG, the QT interval is the time the heart’s lower chambers take to activate electrically and recover in each beat. QTc is that time adjusted for heart rate (QTcF by Fridericia’s formula, QTcB by Bazett’s). Some medicines lengthen it, and a long QTc can raise the risk of a dangerous heart rhythm.

The study may name a correction formula and a limit in milliseconds, often around 450–480.

Cancer (malignancy)

Malignancy means cancer. Criteria about another or earlier malignancy ask whether you have had a different cancer, usually within a set number of years.

Some are commonly allowed, such as treated skin cancers other than melanoma and early cancers removed completely — check the exceptions this study lists.

05

Study design

Phase
Phase 2
Primary purpose
Treatment
Allocation
Randomized
Intervention model
Parallel assignment
Masking
None (open label)
Enrollment
103 participants (actual)

Study arms

  • Experimental
    Duvelisib, Continuous and Intermittent Dosing

    Duvelisib 25 milligrams (mg) twice daily (BID) continuously for 10 weeks, followed by 25 mg BID dosed 2 weeks off and 2 weeks on for each subsequent 4-week cycle.

    Drug: Duvelisib

  • Experimental
    Duvelisib, Intermittent Dosing

    Duvelisib 25 mg BID dosed 2 weeks on and 2 weeks off.

    Drug: Duvelisib

Interventions

  • Phosphoinositide 3-kinase (PI3K) inhibitor

    Also known as: Copiktra, VS-0145, IPI-145

06

What researchers measure

Primary outcomes

  1. Overall Response Rate (ORR) According to the 2007 Revised International Working Group (IWG) Criteria

    ORR was defined as the percentage of participants achieving a complete response (CR) or partial response (PR) and assessed using the 2007 revised IWG criteria. The 2007 revised IWG criteria defined CR as the disappearance of all evidence of disease and PR as the regression of measurable disease and no new sites.

    Time frame: Up to 14 months

Secondary outcomes

  1. Progression-free Survival (PFS)

    PFS was defined as the time from first dose to first progressive disease (PD) or death (progression date/death date - treatment start date + 1) or, for participants without PD or documented death, as the time from first dose to censoring date (censoring date - treatment start date + 1). The 2007 revised IWG criteria defined PD as any new lesion or increase by ≥50% of previously involved sites from nadir. The 2014 Lugano criteria defined PD as a progressive metabolic response (according to positron emission tomography-computed tomography \[PET-CT\]) and progressive disease (according to computed tomography \[CT\]). Results reported as months.

    Time frame: Up to 2 years

  2. ORR At Specific Timepoints

    ORR at 6, 12, 18, and 24 months after first dose of study intervention was defined as the percentage of participants achieving CR or PR at each timepoint and was assessed using both the 2007 revised IWG criteria and the 2014 Lugano criteria. The 2007 revised IWG criteria defined CR as the disappearance of all evidence of disease and PR as the regression of measurable disease and no new sites. The 2014 Lugano criteria defined CR as a complete metabolic response (according to PET-CT) and a complete radiologic response (according to CT) and PR as partial metabolic response (according to PET-CT) and partial remission (according to CT). The response was cumulative for each timepoint; a participant was considered a responder if their first response occurred up to the end of that timepoint.

    Time frame: 6, 12, 18, and 24 months after first dose of study intervention

  3. Duration of Response (DOR)

    DOR was defined for participants with CR or PR as the time from the date of first documentation of response (CR or PR) to date of the first documentation of PD or death. The 2007 revised IWG criteria defined CR as the disappearance of all evidence of disease, PR as the regression of measurable disease and no new sites, and PD as any new lesion or increase by ≥50% of previously involved sites from nadir. The 2014 Lugano criteria defined CR as a complete metabolic response (according to PET-CT) and a complete radiologic response (according to CT), PR as partial metabolic response (according to PET-CT) and partial remission (according to CT), and PD as a progressive metabolic response (according to PET-CT) and progressive disease (according to CT). Results are reported as months.

    Time frame: Up to 2 years

  4. Overall Survival (OS)

    OS was the time from first dose to death (death date - treatment start date + 1). Participants without documented death were censored at their last known alive date (last known alive date - treatment start date + 1). Results reported as months.

    Time frame: Up to 2 years

  5. Lymph Node Response Rate (LNRR)

    LNRR was calculated as the percentage of participants achieving ≥50% decrease in the sum of the product of the diameters of target lymph nodes. The confidence interval for LNRR was calculated only for participants who had at least 1 nodal target lesion, using the Clopper-Pearson exact method for binomial proportions. Participants whose target lesions were all extranodal were excluded from this analysis.

    Time frame: 14 months

  6. Time To First Response (TTFR)

    For participants with CR or PR, TTFR was defined as the time from first dose of study intervention to time of first CR or PR and was calculated as: the date of first CR or PR - randomization date + 1. The 2007 revised IWG criteria defined CR as the disappearance of all evidence of disease and PR as the regression of measurable disease and no new sites. The 2014 Lugano criteria defined CR as a complete metabolic response (according to PET-CT) and a complete radiologic response (according to CT) and PR as partial metabolic response (according to PET-CT) and partial remission (according to CT). Results are reported as months.

    Time frame: Up to 14 months

  7. Time To Treatment Failure (TTF)

    TTF was calculated as the time from first dose of study treatment to discontinuation for any reason (discontinuation date - treatment start date + 1). Participants who were still ongoing treatment at time of data cut were censored (last dose date - treatment start date + 1). Results reported as months.

    Time frame: Up to 2 years

  8. ORR According to 2014 Lugano Criteria

    ORR was defined as the percentage of participants achieving a CR or PR and was assessed using the 2014 Lugano criteria. The 2014 Lugano criteria defined CR as a complete metabolic response (according to PET-CT) and a complete radiologic response (according to CT) and PR as partial metabolic response (according to PET-CT) and partial remission (according to CT).

    Time frame: Up to 14 months

07

Results

Posted Sep 19, 2024

Participant flow

Participant flow — Overall Study
MilestoneDuvelisib, Continuous and Intermittent DosingDuvelisib, Intermittent Dosing
Started5251
Received at least 1 dose of study drug5151
Completed3236
Not completed2015
Withdrew: Consent withdrawn prior to receiving study drug10
Withdrew: Death87
Withdrew: Lost to follow-up30
Withdrew: Participant moved10
Withdrew: Withdrawal by subject43
Withdrew: Physician decision32
Withdrew: Adverse event02
Withdrew: Progressive disease01

Outcome measures

PrimaryOverall Response Rate (ORR) According to the 2007 Revised International Working Group (IWG) Criteria

ORR was defined as the percentage of participants achieving a complete response (CR) or partial response (PR) and assessed using the 2007 revised IWG criteria. The 2007 revised IWG criteria defined CR as the disappearance of all evidence of disease and PR as the regression of measurable disease and no new sites.

Time frame:
Up to 14 months
Reported as:
Number · percentage of participants
Overall Response Rate (ORR) According to the 2007 Revised International Working Group (IWG) Criteria
percentage of participantsDuvelisib, Continuous and Intermittent DosingDuvelisib, Intermittent Dosing
mITT65.3 (50.4 to 78.3)52.9 (38.5 to 67.1)
PP62.2 (46.5 to 76.2)54.3 (39.0 to 69.1)
SecondaryProgression-free Survival (PFS)

PFS was defined as the time from first dose to first progressive disease (PD) or death (progression date/death date - treatment start date + 1) or, for participants without PD or documented death, as the time from first dose to censoring date (censoring date - treatment start date + 1). The 2007 revised IWG criteria defined PD as any new lesion or increase by ≥50% of previously involved sites from nadir. The 2014 Lugano criteria defined PD as a progressive metabolic response (according to positron emission tomography-computed tomography \[PET-CT\]) and progressive disease (according to computed tomography \[CT\]). Results reported as months.

Time frame:
Up to 2 years
Reported as:
Median · months
Progression-free Survival (PFS)
monthsDuvelisib, Continuous and Intermittent DosingDuvelisib, Intermittent Dosing
2007 Revised IWG Criteria16.0 (8.5 to 27.2)23.0 (12.5 to 34.3)
2014 Lugano Criteria16.0 (8.5 to 27.2)23.0 (12.5 to 34.3)
SecondaryORR At Specific Timepoints

ORR at 6, 12, 18, and 24 months after first dose of study intervention was defined as the percentage of participants achieving CR or PR at each timepoint and was assessed using both the 2007 revised IWG criteria and the 2014 Lugano criteria. The 2007 revised IWG criteria defined CR as the disappearance of all evidence of disease and PR as the regression of measurable disease and no new sites. The 2014 Lugano criteria defined CR as a complete metabolic response (according to PET-CT) and a complete radiologic response (according to CT) and PR as partial metabolic response (according to PET-CT) and partial remission (according to CT). The response was cumulative for each timepoint; a participant was considered a responder if their first response occurred up to the end of that timepoint.

Time frame:
6, 12, 18, and 24 months after first dose of study intervention
Reported as:
Number · percentage of participants
ORR At Specific Timepoints
percentage of participantsDuvelisib, Continuous and Intermittent DosingDuvelisib, Intermittent Dosing
6 months: 2007 Revised IWG Criteria63.3 (48.3 to 76.6)49.0 (34.8 to 63.4)
12 months: 2007 Revised IWG Criteria65.3 (50.4 to 78.3)52.9 (38.5 to 67.1)
18 months: 2007 Revised IWG Criteria65.3 (50.4 to 78.3)52.9 (38.5 to 67.1)
24 months: 2007 Revised IWG Criteria65.3 (50.4 to 78.3)52.9 (38.5 to 67.1)
6 months: 2014 Lugano Criteria63.3 (48.3 to 76.6)47.1 (32.9 to 61.5)
12 months: 2014 Lugano Criteria65.3 (50.4 to 78.3)51.0 (36.6 to 65.2)
18 months: 2014 Lugano Criteria65.3 (50.4 to 78.3)51.0 (36.6 to 65.2)
24 months: 2014 Lugano Criteria65.3 (50.4 to 78.3)51.0 (36.6 to 65.2)
SecondaryDuration of Response (DOR)

DOR was defined for participants with CR or PR as the time from the date of first documentation of response (CR or PR) to date of the first documentation of PD or death. The 2007 revised IWG criteria defined CR as the disappearance of all evidence of disease, PR as the regression of measurable disease and no new sites, and PD as any new lesion or increase by ≥50% of previously involved sites from nadir. The 2014 Lugano criteria defined CR as a complete metabolic response (according to PET-CT) and a complete radiologic response (according to CT), PR as partial metabolic response (according to PET-CT) and partial remission (according to CT), and PD as a progressive metabolic response (according to PET-CT) and progressive disease (according to CT). Results are reported as months.

Time frame:
Up to 2 years
Reported as:
Median · months
Duration of Response (DOR)
monthsDuvelisib, Continuous and Intermittent DosingDuvelisib, Intermittent Dosing
2007 Revised IWG Criteria21.4 (13.7 to NA)32.2 (17.5 to NA)
2014 Lugano Criteria21.4 (13.7 to NA)32.2 (13.8 to NA)
SecondaryOverall Survival (OS)

OS was the time from first dose to death (death date - treatment start date + 1). Participants without documented death were censored at their last known alive date (last known alive date - treatment start date + 1). Results reported as months.

Time frame:
Up to 2 years
Reported as:
Median · months
Overall Survival (OS)
monthsDuvelisib, Continuous and Intermittent DosingDuvelisib, Intermittent Dosing
Overall Survival (OS)NA (NA to NA)NA (NA to NA)
SecondaryLymph Node Response Rate (LNRR)

LNRR was calculated as the percentage of participants achieving ≥50% decrease in the sum of the product of the diameters of target lymph nodes. The confidence interval for LNRR was calculated only for participants who had at least 1 nodal target lesion, using the Clopper-Pearson exact method for binomial proportions. Participants whose target lesions were all extranodal were excluded from this analysis.

Time frame:
14 months
Reported as:
Number · percentage of participants
Lymph Node Response Rate (LNRR)
percentage of participantsDuvelisib, Continuous and Intermittent DosingDuvelisib, Intermittent Dosing
Lymph Node Response Rate (LNRR)64.3 (48.0 to 78.4)60.9 (45.4 to 74.9)
SecondaryTime To First Response (TTFR)

For participants with CR or PR, TTFR was defined as the time from first dose of study intervention to time of first CR or PR and was calculated as: the date of first CR or PR - randomization date + 1. The 2007 revised IWG criteria defined CR as the disappearance of all evidence of disease and PR as the regression of measurable disease and no new sites. The 2014 Lugano criteria defined CR as a complete metabolic response (according to PET-CT) and a complete radiologic response (according to CT) and PR as partial metabolic response (according to PET-CT) and partial remission (according to CT). Results are reported as months.

Time frame:
Up to 14 months
Reported as:
Median · months
Time To First Response (TTFR)
monthsDuvelisib, Continuous and Intermittent DosingDuvelisib, Intermittent Dosing
2007 Revised IWG Criteria2.30 (2.1 to 12.9)2.30 (2.1 to 12.5)
2014 Lugano Criteria2.30 (2.1 to 12.9)2.30 (2.1 to 12.5)
SecondaryTime To Treatment Failure (TTF)

TTF was calculated as the time from first dose of study treatment to discontinuation for any reason (discontinuation date - treatment start date + 1). Participants who were still ongoing treatment at time of data cut were censored (last dose date - treatment start date + 1). Results reported as months.

Time frame:
Up to 2 years
Reported as:
Median · months
Time To Treatment Failure (TTF)
monthsDuvelisib, Continuous and Intermittent DosingDuvelisib, Intermittent Dosing
Time To Treatment Failure (TTF)12.6 (6.2 to 17.1)14.3 (8.0 to 23.0)
SecondaryORR According to 2014 Lugano Criteria

ORR was defined as the percentage of participants achieving a CR or PR and was assessed using the 2014 Lugano criteria. The 2014 Lugano criteria defined CR as a complete metabolic response (according to PET-CT) and a complete radiologic response (according to CT) and PR as partial metabolic response (according to PET-CT) and partial remission (according to CT).

Time frame:
Up to 14 months
Reported as:
Number · percentage of participants
ORR According to 2014 Lugano Criteria
percentage of participantsDuvelisib, Continuous and Intermittent DosingDuvelisib, Intermittent Dosing
mITT65.3 (50.4 to 78.3)51.0 (36.6 to 65.2)
PP62.2 (46.5 to 76.2)52.2 (36.9 to 67.1)

Adverse events

Collected over Up to 37 months. Non-serious events are listed at a 5% frequency threshold.

Adverse event summary by group
GroupDeathsSeriousOther
Duvelisib, Continuous and Intermittent Dosing8/51 (15.7%)13/51 (25.5%)49/51 (96.1%)
Duvelisib, Intermittent Dosing7/51 (13.7%)16/51 (31.4%)50/51 (98%)
Most frequent serious events
Showing 10 of 32
Most frequent serious events
EventDuvelisib, Continuous and Intermittent DosingDuvelisib, Intermittent Dosing
COVID-19 pneumoniaInfections and infestations3/513/51
COVID-19Infections and infestations2/511/51
DyspnoeaRespiratory, thoracic and mediastinal disorders0/512/51
Pleural effusionRespiratory, thoracic and mediastinal disorders0/512/51
Febrile neutropeniaBlood and lymphatic system disorders1/510/51
AnaemiaBlood and lymphatic system disorders0/511/51
Cardiac arrestCardiac disorders1/510/51
Cardiac failureCardiac disorders0/511/51
Myocardial infarctionCardiac disorders0/511/51
PylorospasmGastrointestinal disorders1/510/51
Most frequent other events
Showing 10 of 37
Most frequent other events
EventDuvelisib, Continuous and Intermittent DosingDuvelisib, Intermittent Dosing
NeutropeniaBlood and lymphatic system disorders10/5117/51
DiarrhoeaGastrointestinal disorders17/5110/51
Alanine aminotransferase increasedInvestigations15/518/51
Aspartate aminotransferase increasedInvestigations15/516/51
COVID-19Infections and infestations8/5110/51
PyrexiaGeneral disorders9/519/51
NauseaGastrointestinal disorders7/518/51
HeadacheNervous system disorders8/511/51
FatigueGeneral disorders7/515/51
ConstipationGastrointestinal disorders6/513/51

Baseline characteristics

All-Treated (AT) Analysis Set: All participants who receive at least 1 dose of duvelisib.

Age, Continuous
Age, Continuous(years)Duvelisib, Continuous and Intermittent DosingDuvelisib, Intermittent DosingTotal
Mean60.5 ± 12.1563.9 ± 11.4062.2 ± 11.85
Sex: Female, Male
Sex: Female, Male(Participants)Duvelisib, Continuous and Intermittent DosingDuvelisib, Intermittent DosingTotal
Female282755
Male232447
Ethnicity (NIH/OMB)
Ethnicity (NIH/OMB)(Participants)Duvelisib, Continuous and Intermittent DosingDuvelisib, Intermittent DosingTotal
Hispanic or Latino101
Not Hispanic or Latino485098
Unknown or Not Reported213
Race (NIH/OMB)
Race (NIH/OMB)(Participants)Duvelisib, Continuous and Intermittent DosingDuvelisib, Intermittent DosingTotal
American Indian or Alaska Native000
Asian14923
Native Hawaiian or Other Pacific Islander000
Black or African American101
White364278
More than one race000
Unknown or Not Reported000
08

Study locations

28 sites
  • Florida Cancer Specialists - Fort Myers
    Fort Myers, Florida 33901, United States
  • Florida Cancer Specialists & Research Institute - Lecanto
    Lecanto, Florida 34461, United States
  • Mid-Florida Cancer Centers
    Orange City, Florida 32763, United States
  • Robert H. Lurie Comprehensive Cancer Center
    Chicago, Illinois 60611, United States
  • Comprehensive Cancer Centers of Nevada
    Las Vegas, Nevada 89169, United States
  • Tennessee Oncology
    Nashville, Tennessee 37203, United States
  • FN Hradec Kralove
    Hradec Králové, 500 05, Czechia
  • Vseobecna fakultni nemocnice v Praze
    Praha 2, 128 08, Czechia
  • Universitaetsklinikum Bonn AöR
    Bonn, 53127, Germany
  • Oncology Istituto Romagnolo per lo Studio dei Tumori (IRST) Dino Amadori
    Meldola, Forli 47014, Italy
  • IEO - Istituto Europeo di Oncologia, IRCCS
    Milano, 20141, Italy
  • AUSL di Reggio Emilia IRCCS, Arcispedale Santa Maria Nuova di Reggio Emilia
    Reggio Emilia, 42123, Italy
  • Azienda Ospedaliera Santa Maria di Terni
    Terni, 05100, Italy
  • Ospedale di Circolo, PO Varese, AO Ospedale di Circolo e Fondazione Macchi
    Varese, 21100, Italy
  • Seoul National University Bundang Hospital
    Seongnam-si, 13620, Korea, Republic of
  • Seoul National University Hospital
    Seoul, 03080, Korea, Republic of
  • Severance Hospital, Yonsei University Health System
    Seoul, 03722, Korea, Republic of
  • Asan Medical Center - Oncology
    Seoul, 05505, Korea, Republic of
  • Samsung Medical Center - Hematology-Oncology
    Seoul, 06351, Korea, Republic of
  • Wojewodzki Szpital Specjalistyczny im. Janusza Korczaka w Slupsku Sp. z o.o.
    Slupsk, Pomorskie 76-200, Poland
  • Pratia Onkologia Katowice
    Katowice, 40-519, Poland
  • Centrum Medyczne Pratia Poznan
    Skórzewo, 60-185, Poland
  • State Budgetary Healthcare Institution of Moscow City Moscow Multidisciplinary Clinical Center "Kommunarka" of the Department of Healthcare of Moscow City
    Moscow, 108814, Russian Federation
  • City Clinical Hospital n.a. Botkin
    Moscow, 125284, Russian Federation
  • First Saint-Petersburg State Medical University n.a. I.P. Pavlov
    Sankt-Peterburg, 197022, Russian Federation
  • NHS Greater Glasgow & Clyde - CRUK Clinical Trials Unit
    Glasgow, G12 0YN, United Kingdom
  • Royal Liverpool Hospital [Hematology/Transfusion Medicine]
    Liverpool, L7 8XP, United Kingdom
  • Christie Hospital NHS Foundation Trust
    Manchester, M20 4BX, United Kingdom
09

References and documents

Study documents

PDFs hosted by the registry, ClinicalTrials.gov.

10

Timeline

Tracking since Sep 25, 2026
ElapsedEstimatedEstimated, not yet reached

Ran from Sep 2019 to primary completion in Jul 2023, 46 months.

Results were first posted in Sep 2024, 1 year 1 month after primary completion.

How these figures are worked out, and which studies are left out of them.

Registered
Jul 10, 2019
First posted
Jul 30, 2019
StartActual
Sep 24, 2019
Primary completionActual
Jul 24, 2023
CompletionActual
Jul 24, 2023
Results first posted
Sep 19, 2024
Last update
Sep 19, 2024
What these dates mean
Start.
When the first participant enrolled; while estimated, when the study expects to open to recruitment.
Primary completion.
When the last participant was examined or treated to collect data for the study's main question, its primary outcome. A study that stopped early gives the date its data collection stopped.
Completion.
When the last participant's last visit took place, for every outcome, secondary ones and side effects included: the end of the study. Often later than primary completion, sometimes the same day.
Actual and Est.
Actual means the registry says the date has happened. Est. (estimated) is a date the sponsor plans or expects. It can still move, and the sponsor is expected to change it to actual once it has passed.
No changes since tracking began. The registry record was last updated on Sep 19, 2024, before this site started recording changes on Sep 25, 2026. Its history is on ClinicalTrials.gov ↗
11

Registry details

Key details

Study ID
NCT04038359
Lead sponsor
SecuraBio
Responsible party
Sponsor
First posted
Jul 30, 2019
Start date
Sep 24, 2019
Primary completion
Jul 24, 2023
Completion
Jul 24, 2023
Results posted
Sep 19, 2024
Last update
Sep 19, 2024

Oversight

Data monitoring committee
No
FDA-regulated drug
Yes
FDA-regulated device
No
View the source record on ClinicalTrials.gov ↗

Not currently enrolling

This study is completed, as verified in Sep 2024. You cannot join it, but the record below documents what was studied.

Follow this study

Get an email when the registry record changes — status, dates, results — or when someone posts here.

Sign in to follow

Discussion

Questions and observations about this study, from anyone following it. Not medical advice, and not a channel to the study team — their contact details are on the registry record.

Sign in to join the discussion. Reading takes no account; posting does. You choose a display name, and a pseudonym is the default.

Nothing here yet. If you are running this trial, taking part in it, or weighing whether to, this is the place to say so.

Studies of the drug tested here: Duvelisib

Start the discussion