CClinicalTrials.gg
CompletedNCT04030026CANALUpdated May 29, 2025Results posted

A Study of Nalbuphine (Extended Release) ER in Idiopathic Pulmonary Fibrosis (IPF) for Treatment of Cough

A Phase 2 interventional study of NAL ER and Placebo in Idiopathic Pulmonary Fibrosis, sponsored by Trevi Therapeutics. Completed at 11 sites in United Kingdom. Open to participants aged 18 Years to 80 Years. Per ClinicalTrials.gov, last updated 2025-05-29.

Sponsored by Trevi Therapeutics · Phase 2, Interventional, and Treatment

Phase
Phase 2
Study type
Interventional
Enrollment
42
Allocation
Randomized
Ages
18 Years to 80 Years
Sex
All
01

Study summary

To evaluate the safety and tolerability of nalbuphine ER tablets in the study population and to evaluate the effect of NAL ER tablets on the mean daytime cough frequency (coughs per hour) at Day 22 (dose 162 mg BID) as compared to placebo tablets.

02

Conditions studied

  • Idiopathic Pulmonary Fibrosis

Keywords

  • Nalbuphine
  • Cough
  • Idiopathic Pulmonary Fibrosis
  • Pharmacokinetics
03

In context

Pulmonary Fibrosis

680 studies on the registry are indexed under Pulmonary Fibrosis; 119 are open to participants now.

This study's enrollment of 42 is below the median of 50 across 419 interventional studies indexed under Pulmonary Fibrosis.

Browse Pulmonary Fibrosis studies →

Lead sponsor

Trevi Therapeutics is the lead sponsor of 16 studies on the registry; 2 are open to participants now.

Of its 9 completed or terminated interventional studies of FDA-regulated products, 6 (67%) have results posted.

Counted across the registry records on this site, refreshed daily.

04

Who can participate

Ages eligible
18 Years to 80 Years
Sexes eligible
All
Accepts healthy volunteers
No

Inclusion criteria

  1. Individuals diagnosed with Idiopathic Pulmonary Fibrosis
  2. Chronic cough > 8 weeks.
  3. Daytime cough severity score ≥ 4 on Cough Severity Numerical Rating Scale at screening.

Exclusion criteria

Exclusion Criteria:

  1. The following conditions are excluded:

    1. Interstitial lung disease (ILD) known to be caused by domestic and occupational environmental exposures.
    2. Interstitial lung disease (ILD) known to be caused by connective tissue disease.
    3. Interstitial lung disease (ILD) known to be caused by drug related toxicity.

      1. Currently on continuous oxygen therapy.
      1. History of substance abuse that, as determined by the Investigator, may interfere with the conduct of the study.
05

Study design

Phase
Phase 2
Primary purpose
Treatment
Allocation
Randomized
Intervention model
Crossover assignment
Masking
Quadruple (Participant, Care provider, Investigator, Outcomes assessor)
Enrollment
42 participants (actual)

Study arms

  • Experimental
    NAL ER then placebo

    Participants received NAL ER in treatment period 1 at dose 27 mg once daily (QD) to 54 mg twice daily (BID) over a 5-day period and then maintained at 54 mg BID for 4 days. Dose was increased to 108 mg BID for 1 week then to 162 mg BID for 6 days, followed by placebo matching NAL ER for 3 weeks in treatment period 2. Both the treatment periods were separated by 2 weeks of washout period.

    Drug: NAL ER · Drug: Placebo

  • Experimental
    Placebo then NAL ER

    Participants received placebo matching NAL ER for 3 weeks in treatment period 1 followed by NAL ER in treatment period 2 at dose 27 mg QD to 54 mg BID over a 5-day period and then maintained at 54 mg BID for 4 days. Dose was increased to 108 mg BID for 1 week then to 162 mg BID for 6 days. Both the treatment periods were separated by 2 weeks of washout period.

    Drug: NAL ER · Drug: Placebo

Interventions

  • DrugNAL ER

    Participants received NAL ER 27 mg QD, 27 mg BID, 54 mg BID, 108 mg BID, 162 mg BID.

    Also known as: Nalbuphine

  • DrugPlacebo

    Participants received Placebo tablet (matching NAL ER ).

    Also known as: Placebo matched to NAL ER

06

What researchers measure

Primary outcomes

  1. Number of Participants Who Experienced at Least One Treatment Emergent Adverse Events (TEAEs)

    An AE was defined as any untoward medical occurrence in a participant or clinical investigation participant administered a pharmaceutical product and which does not necessarily have to have a causal relationship with the treatment. An AE can therefore be any unfavorable and unintended sign (including an abnormal laboratory finding, for example), symptom, or disease temporally associated with the use of a medicinal product, whether or not considered related to the medicinal product. A TEAE was defined as any AE that occurs after the first dose of study drug. TEAEs included both serious and non-serious TEAEs.

    Time frame: Up to Day 72

  2. Number of Participants With Clinically Significant Abnormalities in Laboratory Parameters

    The clinical laboratory parameters included the urinalysis, hematology, serum chemistry, coagulation and liver function parameters. Clinical significance was determined by the investigator.

    Time frame: Up to Day 72

  3. Number of Participants With Clinically Significant Changes in Vital Sign Parameters

    Vital signs measurements included blood pressure, heart rate, and respiration rate, body temperature, pulse oximetry, and weight. Clinical significance was determined by the investigator.

    Time frame: Up to Day 72

  4. Number of Participants With Clinically Significant Changes in Physical Examination Parameters

    Physical examination included examination of the following body systems: general appearance, eyes, ears, nose, throat, head and neck, chest and lungs, cardiovascular, abdomen, musculoskeletal, lymphatic, dermatological, neurological, and extremities. Clinical significance was determined by the investigator.

    Time frame: Up to Day 72

  5. Number of Participants With Clinically Significant Abnormalities in 12-Lead Electrocardiogram (ECG)

    Changes in ECG data such as heart rate, rhythm, and other clinically significant abnormalities (left ventricular hypertrophy, pathological Q-waves) were measured. Clinical significance was determined by the investigator.

    Time frame: Up to Day 72

  6. Change From Baseline in Forced Vital Capacity (FVC) at Day 21

    Spirometry was used to assess FVC. It was used to assess pulmonary breathing mechanics.

    Time frame: Baseline, Day 21

  7. Subjective Opiate Withdrawal (SOWS) Total Raw Score

    The SOWS is a self-administered scale for grading opioid withdrawal symptoms and was collected via the study issued e-diary. It consisted of 16 symptoms related to how the participant felt. Each symptom was scored between 0 to 4. The total score ranges between 0 to 64, higher score indicates more severe symptoms.

    Time frame: Up to Day 72

  8. Daytime Cough Frequency at Baseline

    Daytime cough was defined as cough that occurs between the time that the participant is a wake in the 24 hours after the digital cough monitor was applied for use. Assessment was done using objective digital cough monitoring. Baseline was defined as the last available assessment prior to the first Treatment Period 1 IP intake.

    Time frame: At Baseline

  9. Percent Change From Baseline in Daytime Cough Frequency at Day 22

    Daytime cough was defined as cough that occurs between the time that the participant is a wake in the 24 hours after the digital cough monitor was applied for use. Assessment was done using objective digital cough monitoring. Percent change in daytime cough frequency (coughs per hour) from baseline was assessed. Baseline was defined as the last available assessment prior to the first Treatment Period 1 IP intake.

    Time frame: Baseline, Day 22

Secondary outcomes

  1. Change From Baseline in Daytime Cough Frequency at Day 22

    Daytime cough was defined as cough that occurs between the time that the participant wakes up and the time that the participant goes to bed. Assessment was done using objective digital cough monitoring. The change in daytime cough frequency (coughs per hour) from baseline was assessed. Baseline was defined as the last available assessment prior to the first Treatment Period 1 IP intake.

    Time frame: Baseline, Day 22

  2. Percent Change From Baseline in 24-Hour Cough Frequency at Day 22

    Percent change in 24-hour (combined daytime and nighttime) cough frequency (coughs per hour) from baseline was assessed. Assessment was done using objective digital cough monitoring. Baseline was defined as the last available assessment prior to the first Treatment Period 1 IP intake.

    Time frame: Baseline, Day 22

  3. Percent Change From Baseline in Nighttime Cough Frequency at Day 22

    Nighttime cough frequency was intended as the average coughs per hour while the participant was flagged as being asleep. Assessment was done using objective digital cough monitoring. Percent change in cough frequency (coughs per hour) from baseline was assessed. Baseline was defined as the last available assessment prior to the first Treatment Period 1 IP intake.

    Time frame: Baseline, Day 22

  4. Mean Change From Baseline in the Evaluating Respiratory Symptoms (E-RS) Diary Cough Subscale at Days 9, 16, and 22

    E-RS daily diary instrument has four separate respiratory symptom domain scales which is a valid, reliable and sensitive measure of four distinct respiratory symptoms. The four domain scales that included cough \[E-RS item 2- How often did you cough today?;score range 0 (not at all)-4 (almost constantly)\], and other items such as breathlessness \[score 0(not at all)-23(severe symptoms)\], sputum \[0(not at all)-8(severe symptoms)\], and chest symptoms \[0(not at all)-12(severe symptoms)\]. The raw totals for the E-RS score and for each of the subscales were converted to a scale range of 0 to 100 (least symptomatic to most symptomatic). A higher score on the scale indicates a more severe grade to the symptom. Negative score indicates improvement in the symptom. The mean change from baseline in the E-RS diary cough scores was assessed. Baseline was defined as the last available assessment prior to the first Treatment Period 1 IP intake.

    Time frame: Baseline, Days 9, 16, and 22

  5. Mean Change From Baseline in E-RS Breathlessness Score at Days 9, 16, and 22

    E-RS daily diary instrument has four separate respiratory symptom domain scales which is a valid, reliable and sensitive measure of four distinct respiratory symptoms. The four domain scales included breathlessness \[E-RS items 7 (were you breathless today), 8 (how breathless were you today), 9 (breathlessness doing personal care activities),10 (breathlessness doing indoor activities) \& 11 (breathlessness doing outdoor activities); score =0: not at all) - 23: almost constantly\]. Other items were cough (0: not at all-4: severe), sputum (0: not at all-8: severe), and chest symptoms (0: not at all)-12: severe symptoms). The raw totals for the E-RS score and for subscales were converted to a scale of 0 to 100 (least to most symptoms). Higher score=more severe grade to the symptom. Negative score=improvement in symptom. The mean change from baseline was assessed. Baseline was defined as the last available assessment prior to the first Treatment Period 1 IP intake.

    Time frame: Baseline, Days 9, 16, and 22

  6. Mean Change From Baseline in the Cough Severity Numerical Rating Scale (NRS) at Days 8, 15, and 21

    The Cough Severity NRS instrument is a single-dimension 11-point Likert scale ranging from 0 (no cough) to 10 (worst possible cough). Negative score indicates improvement in the symptoms. Participants completed the cough numerical severity rating via the study specific e-diary. The mean change from baseline in the Cough Severity Numerical Rating Scale was assessed. Baseline was defined as the last available assessment prior to the first Treatment Period 1 IP intake.

    Time frame: Baseline, Days 8, 15, and 21

  7. Mean Change From Baseline in the 14-item EXAcerbation of Chronic Pulmonary Disease Tool (EXACT) v1.1 e-Diary Tool Total Score at Days 9, 16, and 22

    The EXACT tool is a 14-item Daily Diary Tool Patient-reported outcome (PRO) instrument that was developed to quantify and measure exacerbations of chronic obstructive pulmonary disease (COPD). It provides a total score and subscale scores for breathlessness, cough and sputum, and chest symptoms. The 14 items have interval-level scale ranging between 0 to 100. The total score of each domain of breathlessness, cough and sputum, and chest symptoms ranges from 0 to 100. A higher score indicates a more severe condition. Negative score indicated improvement in the symptoms. Baseline was defined as the last available assessment prior to the first Treatment Period 1 IP intake.

    Time frame: Baseline, Days 9, 16, and 22

  8. Mean Change From Baseline in the Patient Reported Outcomes Measurement Information System (PROMIS) Item Bank v1.0 Fatigue Short Form 7a Scale Total Score at Day 21

    The PROMIS Fatigue Short Form 7a is a self-administered Likert-type rating 5-point scale of 7 questions that assess tiredness, exhaustion, energy, fatigue limit, tiredness to think, tiredness impact on hygiene and impact on ability to exercise strenuously over the past 7 days. It consisted of 7 items with each item was scored between 1 to 5. The total score could range between 1 to 35, higher score indicates more severe symptoms. Baseline was defined as the last available assessment prior to the first Treatment Period 1 IP intake.

    Time frame: Baseline, Day 21

  9. Clinical Global Impression of Change (CGI-C) Over Time Measured at Day 21

    The CGI-C is a one-item measure evaluating change from the initiation of treatment on a 7-point scale. It provides an overall clinician-determined summary measure that takes into account all available information, including knowledge of the patient's history, psychosocial circumstances, symptoms, behavior, and the impact of the symptoms on the patient's ability to function. The total score ranges between 0 (very much improved) to 7 (very much worse). The lower scores indicate an improvement in respiratory symptoms.

    Time frame: At Day 21

07

Results

Posted May 29, 2025

Participant flow

Participants were enrolled at 11 sites in the United Kingdom from 29 October 2019 to 27 May 2022.

Treatment Period 1 (22 Days)
Participant flow — Treatment Period 1 (22 Days)
MilestoneFirst NAL ER Then PlaceboFirst Placebo Then NAL ER
Started2121
Safety analysis set2021
Completed1919
Not completed22
Withdrew: Covid-19 pandemic restrictions01
Withdrew: Withdrawal by participant10
Withdrew: Protocol deviation01
Withdrew: Physician decision10
Treatment Period 2 (22 Days)
Participant flow — Treatment Period 2 (22 Days)
MilestoneFirst NAL ER Then PlaceboFirst Placebo Then NAL ER
Started1919
Completed1810
Not completed19
Withdrew: Adverse event06
Withdrew: Covid-19 pandemic restrictions11
Withdrew: Withdrawal by participant02

Outcome measures

PrimaryNumber of Participants Who Experienced at Least One Treatment Emergent Adverse Events (TEAEs)

An AE was defined as any untoward medical occurrence in a participant or clinical investigation participant administered a pharmaceutical product and which does not necessarily have to have a causal relationship with the treatment. An AE can therefore be any unfavorable and unintended sign (including an abnormal laboratory finding, for example), symptom, or disease temporally associated with the use of a medicinal product, whether or not considered related to the medicinal product. A TEAE was defined as any AE that occurs after the first dose of study drug. TEAEs included both serious and non-serious TEAEs.

Time frame:
Up to Day 72
Reported as:
Count of participants · Participants
Number of Participants Who Experienced at Least One Treatment Emergent Adverse Events (TEAEs)
ParticipantsNAL ERPlacebo
Number of Participants Who Experienced at Least One Treatment Emergent Adverse Events (TEAEs)3526
PrimaryNumber of Participants With Clinically Significant Abnormalities in Laboratory Parameters

The clinical laboratory parameters included the urinalysis, hematology, serum chemistry, coagulation and liver function parameters. Clinical significance was determined by the investigator.

Time frame:
Up to Day 72
Reported as:
Count of participants · Participants
Number of Participants With Clinically Significant Abnormalities in Laboratory Parameters
ParticipantsNAL ERPlacebo
Urinalysis00
Hematology10
Serum Chemistry11
Coagulation01
Liver Function Parameters00
PrimaryNumber of Participants With Clinically Significant Changes in Vital Sign Parameters

Vital signs measurements included blood pressure, heart rate, and respiration rate, body temperature, pulse oximetry, and weight. Clinical significance was determined by the investigator.

Time frame:
Up to Day 72
Reported as:
Count of participants · Participants
Number of Participants With Clinically Significant Changes in Vital Sign Parameters
ParticipantsNAL ERPlacebo
Number of Participants With Clinically Significant Changes in Vital Sign Parameters00
PrimaryNumber of Participants With Clinically Significant Changes in Physical Examination Parameters

Physical examination included examination of the following body systems: general appearance, eyes, ears, nose, throat, head and neck, chest and lungs, cardiovascular, abdomen, musculoskeletal, lymphatic, dermatological, neurological, and extremities. Clinical significance was determined by the investigator.

Time frame:
Up to Day 72
Reported as:
Count of participants · Participants
Number of Participants With Clinically Significant Changes in Physical Examination Parameters
ParticipantsNAL ERPlacebo
Number of Participants With Clinically Significant Changes in Physical Examination Parameters00
PrimaryNumber of Participants With Clinically Significant Abnormalities in 12-Lead Electrocardiogram (ECG)

Changes in ECG data such as heart rate, rhythm, and other clinically significant abnormalities (left ventricular hypertrophy, pathological Q-waves) were measured. Clinical significance was determined by the investigator.

Time frame:
Up to Day 72
Reported as:
Count of participants · Participants
Number of Participants With Clinically Significant Abnormalities in 12-Lead Electrocardiogram (ECG)
ParticipantsNAL ERPlacebo
Number of Participants With Clinically Significant Abnormalities in 12-Lead Electrocardiogram (ECG)11
PrimaryChange From Baseline in Forced Vital Capacity (FVC) at Day 21

Spirometry was used to assess FVC. It was used to assess pulmonary breathing mechanics.

Time frame:
Baseline, Day 21
Reported as:
Mean · litre(s)
Change From Baseline in Forced Vital Capacity (FVC) at Day 21
litre(s)NAL ERPlacebo
Change From Baseline in Forced Vital Capacity (FVC) at Day 21-2.3 ± 5.58-1.0 ± 5.56
PrimarySubjective Opiate Withdrawal (SOWS) Total Raw Score

The SOWS is a self-administered scale for grading opioid withdrawal symptoms and was collected via the study issued e-diary. It consisted of 16 symptoms related to how the participant felt. Each symptom was scored between 0 to 4. The total score ranges between 0 to 64, higher score indicates more severe symptoms.

Time frame:
Up to Day 72
Reported as:
Mean · score on a scale
Subjective Opiate Withdrawal (SOWS) Total Raw Score
score on a scaleNAL ERPlacebo
Subjective Opiate Withdrawal (SOWS) Total Raw Score4.7055 ± 5.00192.4082 ± 3.5561
PrimaryDaytime Cough Frequency at Baseline

Daytime cough was defined as cough that occurs between the time that the participant is a wake in the 24 hours after the digital cough monitor was applied for use. Assessment was done using objective digital cough monitoring. Baseline was defined as the last available assessment prior to the first Treatment Period 1 IP intake.

Time frame:
At Baseline
Reported as:
Mean · coughs per hour
Daytime Cough Frequency at Baseline
coughs per hourNAL ERPlacebo
Daytime Cough Frequency at Baseline27.99 ± 23.70427.99 ± 23.704
PrimaryPercent Change From Baseline in Daytime Cough Frequency at Day 22

Daytime cough was defined as cough that occurs between the time that the participant is a wake in the 24 hours after the digital cough monitor was applied for use. Assessment was done using objective digital cough monitoring. Percent change in daytime cough frequency (coughs per hour) from baseline was assessed. Baseline was defined as the last available assessment prior to the first Treatment Period 1 IP intake.

Time frame:
Baseline, Day 22
Reported as:
Geometric mean · percent change
Percent Change From Baseline in Daytime Cough Frequency at Day 22
percent changeNAL ERPlacebo
Percent Change From Baseline in Daytime Cough Frequency at Day 22-75.11 (-82.655 to -67.567)-22.62 (-42.531 to 2.715)
Statistical analysis
  • NAL ER vs Placebo · Mixed-effects model · p = < 0.0001 (Mixed-effects model: unstructured, heterogeneous toeplitz and autoregressive covariance matrices. Dependent variable: change from baseline in log-transformed scale of Daytime Cough Frequency. Fixed effects: sequence (arm), period and treatment.) · Geometric mean ratio: 0.32 · 95% CI 0.208 to 0.431
SecondaryChange From Baseline in Daytime Cough Frequency at Day 22

Daytime cough was defined as cough that occurs between the time that the participant wakes up and the time that the participant goes to bed. Assessment was done using objective digital cough monitoring. The change in daytime cough frequency (coughs per hour) from baseline was assessed. Baseline was defined as the last available assessment prior to the first Treatment Period 1 IP intake.

Time frame:
Baseline, Day 22
Reported as:
Mean · coughs per hour
Change From Baseline in Daytime Cough Frequency at Day 22
coughs per hourNAL ERPlacebo
Change From Baseline in Daytime Cough Frequency at Day 22-19.386 ± 19.5688-6.264 ± 12.4006
SecondaryPercent Change From Baseline in 24-Hour Cough Frequency at Day 22

Percent change in 24-hour (combined daytime and nighttime) cough frequency (coughs per hour) from baseline was assessed. Assessment was done using objective digital cough monitoring. Baseline was defined as the last available assessment prior to the first Treatment Period 1 IP intake.

Time frame:
Baseline, Day 22
Reported as:
Geometric mean · percent change
Percent Change From Baseline in 24-Hour Cough Frequency at Day 22
percent changeNAL ERPlacebo
Percent Change From Baseline in 24-Hour Cough Frequency at Day 22-76.10 (-83.133 to -69.075)-25.29 (-43.894 to -6.690)
Statistical analysis
  • NAL ER vs Placebo · Mixed-effects model · p = <0.0001 (Mixed-effects model: unstructured, heterogeneous toeplitz and autoregressive covariance matrices. Dependent variable: change from baseline in log-transformed scale of Daytime Cough Frequency. Fixed effects: sequence (arm), period and treatment.) · Geometric mean ratio: 0.32 · 95% CI 0.208 to 0.431
SecondaryPercent Change From Baseline in Nighttime Cough Frequency at Day 22

Nighttime cough frequency was intended as the average coughs per hour while the participant was flagged as being asleep. Assessment was done using objective digital cough monitoring. Percent change in cough frequency (coughs per hour) from baseline was assessed. Baseline was defined as the last available assessment prior to the first Treatment Period 1 IP intake.

Time frame:
Baseline, Day 22
Reported as:
Geometric mean · percent change
Percent Change From Baseline in Nighttime Cough Frequency at Day 22
percent changeNAL ERPlacebo
Percent Change From Baseline in Nighttime Cough Frequency at Day 22-62.27 (-79.588 to -44.957)-20.30 (-51.391 to 10.783)
Statistical analysis
  • NAL ER vs Placebo · Mixed-effects model · p = 0.0087 (Mixed-effects model: unstructured, heterogeneous toeplitz and autoregressive covariance matrices. Dependent variable: change from baseline in log-transformed scale of Daytime Cough Frequency. Fixed effects: sequence (arm), period and treatment.) · Geometric mean ratio: 0.47 · 95% CI 0.230 to 0.717
SecondaryMean Change From Baseline in the Evaluating Respiratory Symptoms (E-RS) Diary Cough Subscale at Days 9, 16, and 22

E-RS daily diary instrument has four separate respiratory symptom domain scales which is a valid, reliable and sensitive measure of four distinct respiratory symptoms. The four domain scales that included cough \[E-RS item 2- How often did you cough today?;score range 0 (not at all)-4 (almost constantly)\], and other items such as breathlessness \[score 0(not at all)-23(severe symptoms)\], sputum \[0(not at all)-8(severe symptoms)\], and chest symptoms \[0(not at all)-12(severe symptoms)\]. The raw totals for the E-RS score and for each of the subscales were converted to a scale range of 0 to 100 (least symptomatic to most symptomatic). A higher score on the scale indicates a more severe grade to the symptom. Negative score indicates improvement in the symptom. The mean change from baseline in the E-RS diary cough scores was assessed. Baseline was defined as the last available assessment prior to the first Treatment Period 1 IP intake.

Time frame:
Baseline, Days 9, 16, and 22
Reported as:
Mean · score on a scale
Mean Change From Baseline in the Evaluating Respiratory Symptoms (E-RS) Diary Cough Subscale at Days 9, 16, and 22
score on a scaleNAL ERPlacebo
Change at Day 9-0.7 ± 0.77-0.1 ± 0.70
Change at Day 16-0.9 ± 0.82-0.2 ± 0.59
Change at Day 22-1.0 ± 0.94-0.2 ± 0.85
Statistical analysis
  • NAL ER vs Placebo · Student's T-test · p = 0.0014 (Student's T-test was used to evaluate if the difference in mean change from baseline is different between planned treatments (NAL ER vs placebo).)
  • NAL ER vs Placebo · Student's T-test · p = 0.0001 (Student's T-test was used to evaluate if the difference in mean change from baseline is different between planned treatments (NAL ER vs placebo).)
  • NAL ER vs Placebo · Student's T-test · p = 0.001 (Student's T-test was used to evaluate if the difference in mean change from baseline is different between planned treatments (NAL ER vs placebo).)
SecondaryMean Change From Baseline in E-RS Breathlessness Score at Days 9, 16, and 22

E-RS daily diary instrument has four separate respiratory symptom domain scales which is a valid, reliable and sensitive measure of four distinct respiratory symptoms. The four domain scales included breathlessness \[E-RS items 7 (were you breathless today), 8 (how breathless were you today), 9 (breathlessness doing personal care activities),10 (breathlessness doing indoor activities) \& 11 (breathlessness doing outdoor activities); score =0: not at all) - 23: almost constantly\]. Other items were cough (0: not at all-4: severe), sputum (0: not at all-8: severe), and chest symptoms (0: not at all)-12: severe symptoms). The raw totals for the E-RS score and for subscales were converted to a scale of 0 to 100 (least to most symptoms). Higher score=more severe grade to the symptom. Negative score=improvement in symptom. The mean change from baseline was assessed. Baseline was defined as the last available assessment prior to the first Treatment Period 1 IP intake.

Time frame:
Baseline, Days 9, 16, and 22
Reported as:
Mean · score on a scale
Mean Change From Baseline in E-RS Breathlessness Score at Days 9, 16, and 22
score on a scaleNAL ERPlacebo
Change at Day 9-0.5 ± 2.681.1 ± 2.74
Change at Day 160.0 ± 2.301.2 ± 2.26
Change at Day 220.1 ± 2.450.8 ± 2.43
Statistical analysis
  • NAL ER vs Placebo · Student's T-test · p = 0.0198 (Student's T-test was used to evaluate if the difference in mean change from baseline is different between planned treatments (NAL ER vs placebo).)
  • NAL ER vs Placebo · Student's T-test · p = 0.0374 (Student's T-test was used to evaluate if the difference in mean change from baseline is different between planned treatments (NAL ER vs placebo).)
  • NAL ER vs Placebo · Student's T-test · p = 0.2982 (Student's T-test was used to evaluate if the difference in mean change from baseline is different between planned treatments (NAL ER vs placebo).)
SecondaryMean Change From Baseline in the Cough Severity Numerical Rating Scale (NRS) at Days 8, 15, and 21

The Cough Severity NRS instrument is a single-dimension 11-point Likert scale ranging from 0 (no cough) to 10 (worst possible cough). Negative score indicates improvement in the symptoms. Participants completed the cough numerical severity rating via the study specific e-diary. The mean change from baseline in the Cough Severity Numerical Rating Scale was assessed. Baseline was defined as the last available assessment prior to the first Treatment Period 1 IP intake.

Time frame:
Baseline, Days 8, 15, and 21
Reported as:
Mean · score on a scale
Mean Change From Baseline in the Cough Severity Numerical Rating Scale (NRS) at Days 8, 15, and 21
score on a scaleNAL ERPlacebo
Change at Day 8-1.7 ± 1.98-0.4 ± 1.54
Change at Day 15-2.7 ± 1.75-0.6 ± 1.74
Change at Day 21-2.5 ± 2.19-0.3 ± 1.85
Statistical analysis
  • NAL ER vs Placebo · Student's T-test · p = 0.0054 (Student's T-test was used to evaluate if the difference in mean change from baseline is different between planned treatments (NAL ER vs placebo))
  • NAL ER vs Placebo · Student's T-test · p = <0.0001 (Student's T-test was used to evaluate if the difference in mean change from baseline is different between planned treatments (NAL ER vs placebo).)
  • NAL ER vs Placebo · Student's T-test · p = 0.0001 (Student's T-test was used to evaluate if the difference in mean change from baseline is different between planned treatments (NAL ER vs placebo).)
SecondaryMean Change From Baseline in the 14-item EXAcerbation of Chronic Pulmonary Disease Tool (EXACT) v1.1 e-Diary Tool Total Score at Days 9, 16, and 22

The EXACT tool is a 14-item Daily Diary Tool Patient-reported outcome (PRO) instrument that was developed to quantify and measure exacerbations of chronic obstructive pulmonary disease (COPD). It provides a total score and subscale scores for breathlessness, cough and sputum, and chest symptoms. The 14 items have interval-level scale ranging between 0 to 100. The total score of each domain of breathlessness, cough and sputum, and chest symptoms ranges from 0 to 100. A higher score indicates a more severe condition. Negative score indicated improvement in the symptoms. Baseline was defined as the last available assessment prior to the first Treatment Period 1 IP intake.

Time frame:
Baseline, Days 9, 16, and 22
Reported as:
Mean · score on a scale
Mean Change From Baseline in the 14-item EXAcerbation of Chronic Pulmonary Disease Tool (EXACT) v1.1 e-Diary Tool Total Score at Days 9, 16, and 22
score on a scaleNAL ERPlacebo
Change at Day 9-2.0 ± 5.631.6 ± 5.55
Change at Day 16-1.8 ± 4.891.9 ± 5.46
Change at Day 22-1.6 ± 5.920.6 ± 5.76
Statistical analysis
  • NAL ER vs Placebo · Student's T-test · p = 0.0107 (Student's T-test was used to evaluate if the difference in mean change from baseline is different between planned treatments (NAL ER vs placebo).)
  • NAL ER vs Placebo · Student's T-test · p = 0.0051 (Student's T-test was used to evaluate if the difference in mean change from baseline is different between planned treatments (NAL ER vs placebo).)
  • NAL ER vs Placebo · Student's T-test · p = 0.1513 (Student's T-test was used to evaluate if the difference in mean change from baseline is different between planned treatments (NAL ER vs placebo).)
SecondaryMean Change From Baseline in the Patient Reported Outcomes Measurement Information System (PROMIS) Item Bank v1.0 Fatigue Short Form 7a Scale Total Score at Day 21

The PROMIS Fatigue Short Form 7a is a self-administered Likert-type rating 5-point scale of 7 questions that assess tiredness, exhaustion, energy, fatigue limit, tiredness to think, tiredness impact on hygiene and impact on ability to exercise strenuously over the past 7 days. It consisted of 7 items with each item was scored between 1 to 5. The total score could range between 1 to 35, higher score indicates more severe symptoms. Baseline was defined as the last available assessment prior to the first Treatment Period 1 IP intake.

Time frame:
Baseline, Day 21
Reported as:
Mean · score on a scale
Mean Change From Baseline in the Patient Reported Outcomes Measurement Information System (PROMIS) Item Bank v1.0 Fatigue Short Form 7a Scale Total Score at Day 21
score on a scaleNAL ERPlacebo
Mean Change From Baseline in the Patient Reported Outcomes Measurement Information System (PROMIS) Item Bank v1.0 Fatigue Short Form 7a Scale Total Score at Day 210.9 ± 3.980.0 ± 2.98
Statistical analysis
  • NAL ER vs Placebo · Student's T-test · p = 0.3601 (Student's T-test was used to evaluate if the difference in mean change from baseline is different between planned treatments (NAL ER vs placebo).)
SecondaryClinical Global Impression of Change (CGI-C) Over Time Measured at Day 21

The CGI-C is a one-item measure evaluating change from the initiation of treatment on a 7-point scale. It provides an overall clinician-determined summary measure that takes into account all available information, including knowledge of the patient's history, psychosocial circumstances, symptoms, behavior, and the impact of the symptoms on the patient's ability to function. The total score ranges between 0 (very much improved) to 7 (very much worse). The lower scores indicate an improvement in respiratory symptoms.

Time frame:
At Day 21
Reported as:
Mean · score on a scale
Clinical Global Impression of Change (CGI-C) Over Time Measured at Day 21
score on a scaleNAL ERPlacebo
Clinical Global Impression of Change (CGI-C) Over Time Measured at Day 213.0 ± 1.503.9 ± 0.91

Adverse events

Collected over Up to Day 72. Non-serious events are listed at a 5% frequency threshold.

Adverse event summary by group
GroupDeathsSeriousOther
NAL ER0/42 (0%)1/38 (2.6%)35/38 (92.1%)
Placebo0/42 (0%)1/40 (2.5%)26/40 (65%)
Most frequent serious events
Most frequent serious events
EventNAL ERPlacebo
UrosepsisInfections and infestations1/380/40
PneumoniaInfections and infestations0/381/40
Most frequent other events
Showing 10 of 14
Most frequent other events
EventNAL ERPlacebo
NauseaGastrointestinal disorders16/380/40
FatigueGeneral disorders12/383/40
ConstipationGastrointestinal disorders11/382/40
DizzinessNervous system disorders10/380/40
SomnolenceNervous system disorders9/381/40
VomitingGastrointestinal disorders7/385/40
DyspneaRespiratory, thoracic and mediastinal disorders6/382/40
DiarrhoeaGastrointestinal disorders3/386/40
CoughRespiratory, thoracic and mediastinal disorders3/386/40
HeadacheNervous system disorders5/385/40

Baseline characteristics

Randomized analysis set included all participants who were randomized.

Age, Customized
Age, Customized(years)First NAL ER Then PlaceboFirst Placebo Then NAL ERTotal
18-64 years314
65-85 years181937
85 years and above011
Sex: Female, Male
Sex: Female, Male(Participants)First NAL ER Then PlaceboFirst Placebo Then NAL ERTotal
Female246
Male191736
Race/Ethnicity, Customized
Race/Ethnicity, Customized(Participants)First NAL ER Then PlaceboFirst Placebo Then NAL ERTotal
Asian134
White201838
Race/Ethnicity, Customized
Race/Ethnicity, Customized(Participants)First NAL ER Then PlaceboFirst Placebo Then NAL ERTotal
Not Hispanic or Latino202040
Not Reported112
08

Study locations

11 sites
  • 09
    Cambridge, CB23 3RE, United Kingdom
  • 08
    Cottingham, HU16 5JQ, United Kingdom
  • 17
    Dundee, DD1 9SY, United Kingdom
  • 13
    Edinburgh, United Kingdom
  • 04
    London, NW1 2BU, United Kingdom
  • 01
    London, SW3 6NP, United Kingdom
  • 02
    Manchester, M23 9LT, United Kingdom
  • 10
    Newcastle Upon Tyne, NE1 4LP, United Kingdom
  • 06
    Nottingham, NG5 1PB, United Kingdom
  • 14
    Oxford, United Kingdom
  • 03
    Southampton, SO16 6YD, United Kingdom
09

References and documents

Study documents

  • Study protocol · Dec 14, 2021
  • Statistical analysis plan · Jun 8, 2022

Documents are hosted by the registry — open the source record to download them.

Individual participant data

Plan to share: No

10

Updates

Tracking since Sep 25, 2026
No changes since tracking began. The registry record was last updated on May 29, 2025, before this site started recording changes on Sep 25, 2026. Its history is on ClinicalTrials.gov ↗
11

Registry details

Key details

Study ID
NCT04030026
Lead sponsor
Trevi Therapeutics
Collaborators
Parexel
Responsible party
Sponsor
First posted
Jul 23, 2019
Start date
Oct 29, 2019
Primary completion
May 27, 2022
Completion
May 27, 2022
Results posted
May 29, 2025
Last update
May 29, 2025

Study contacts

Thomas Sciascia
study director · Trevi Therapeutics, Inc

Oversight

Data monitoring committee
Yes
FDA-regulated drug
Yes
FDA-regulated device
No
View the source record on ClinicalTrials.gov ↗

Not currently enrolling

This study is completed, as verified in May 2025. You cannot join it, but the record below documents what was studied.

Follow this study

Get an email when the registry record changes — status, dates, results — or when someone posts here.

Sign in to follow

Discussion

Questions and observations about this study, from anyone following it. Not medical advice, and not a channel to the study team — their contact details are on the registry record.

Sign in to join the discussion. Reading takes no account; posting does. You choose a display name, and a pseudonym is the default.

Nothing here yet. If you are running this trial, taking part in it, or weighing whether to, this is the place to say so.

Start the discussion