CClinicalTrials.gg
CompletedNCT04017013Updated Sep 26, 2022

Therapeutic Efficacy of Intravenous Lidocaine Infusion Compared With Epidural Analgesia for Postoperative Pain Control in Adult Patients Undergoing Major Abdominal Surgery: Non-Inferiority Clinical Trial

A Phase 4 interventional study of Epidural Analgesia and Lidocaine Infusion in Pain, Postoperative and Opioid Use, sponsored by Universidad de Antioquia. Completed at 1 site in Colombia. Open to participants aged 18 Years and older, including healthy volunteers. Per ClinicalTrials.gov, last updated 2022-09-26.

Sponsored by Universidad de Antioquia · Phase 4, Interventional, and Treatment

Phase
Phase 4
Study type
Interventional
Enrollment
210
Allocation
Randomized
Ages
18 Years and older
Sex
All
01

Study summary

Major abdominal surgery continues is one of the most performed surgical procedures in the world, both electively and urgently. One of the main problems of this type of intervention is postoperative pain. it is shown that it increases health costs related to longer recovery times, longer hospital stay and related complications such as the increased risk of presenting chronic POP pain, which it has been estimated up to 20%, much higher if the surgery involves surgery in the gastrointestinal system.

The goal of analgesia in the postoperative setting is precisely to provide comfort to patients, minimize adverse effects and complications arising from the procedure.

The epidural analgesic technique (has been proposed as an analgesic management standard, since multiple studies have shown that it reduces opioid consumption, improves recovery and is a useful strategy for pain control. However, it is an invasive technique, with risk of complications such as hematomas and epidural abscesses, and it may be difficult to perform.

Currently it has been shown in multiple studies that the intravenous infusion of a local anesthetic, such as lidocaine, in this type of surgical scenarios can reduce the intensity of pain, opioid consumption, hospital stay and ileus with few adverse effects. In addition, these studies propose that, being a less invasive technique, it could be easier to implement and even be safer than the epidural technique.

The main hypothesis of this study is precisely that the infusion of lidocaine may be non-inferior to epidural analgesia in the analgesic management of patients undergoing major abdominal surgery.

02

Conditions studied

  • Pain, Postoperative
  • Opioid Use

Browse trials for

Keywords

  • Pain
  • Abdominal Surgery
  • Epidural analgesia
  • lidocaine
03

In context

Pain, Postoperative

5,093 studies on the registry are indexed under Pain, Postoperative; 1,140 are open to participants now.

This study's enrollment of 210 is above the median of 75 across 4,344 interventional studies indexed under Pain, Postoperative.

Browse Pain, Postoperative studies →

Lead sponsor

Universidad de Antioquia is the lead sponsor of 79 studies on the registry; 9 are open to participants now.

Counted across the registry records on this site, refreshed daily.

04

Who can participate

Ages eligible
18 Years and older
Sexes eligible
All
Accepts healthy volunteers
Yes

Inclusion criteria

  • Patient over 18 years.
  • Elective major open intra-abdominal surgery:

    • Cholecystectomy.
    • Total or subtotal gastrectomy.
    • Colectomy or Hemicolectomy.
    • Pancreatoduodenectomy.
    • Hepatectomy 1 or 2 segments.
    • Exploration and / or reconstruction of the bile duct.
    • Abdominal demolition.
    • Sigmoidectomy.
  • Patient classified as ASA (American Association of Anesthesiology) 1, 2 or 3.

Exclusion criteria

Exclusion Criteria:

  • Pregnant woman
  • Patient with contraindication for epidural analgesic techniques:

    1. Anticoagulated patient
    2. Active infection in the puncture site.
    3. Malformation in spinal cord.
    4. Sepsis without antibiotic treatment.
    5. Patient with contraindication for the use of intravenous lidocaine: Arrhythmias of any type not treated.
    6. Patient with known allergy to opioids and / or local anesthetics.
    7. Patient with chronic pain in previous management with strong opioids, gabapentinoids or epidural technique.
    8. Patient with liver failure or terminal renal failure.
    9. Patient who is scheduled for intubated admission to an intensive care unit after the procedure.
    10. Patient who refuses to participate in the study or who refuses to receive epidural analgesia.
    11. Patient who was technically impossible to place an epidural catheter in surgery.
05

Study design

Phase
Phase 4
Primary purpose
Treatment
Allocation
Randomized
Intervention model
Parallel assignment
Masking
Triple (Participant, Investigator, Outcomes assessor)
Enrollment
210 participants (actual)

Study arms

  • Active comparator
    Epidural Analgesia

    The placement of the thoracic epidural catheter will be located depending on surgical incision as follows: * Surgery of the upper abdomen: T7-T8. * Surgery of lower abdomen: T8-T9. The epidural catheter placement technique will be determined by the treating anesthesiologist. However, once the epidural space is located and the respective catheter is inserted, the correct location of the catheter should be tested with lidocaine at 2% CE 5 cc and a sensitivity test with temperature should be performed on the target dermatomes. A negative test for an adequate location of the catheter indicates that the procedure should be repeated until the epidural space is correctly located. Once this is achieved, the catheter will be left 4 cm away from the skin. The catheter will be fixed according to the institutional protocol.

    Procedure: Epidural Analgesia

  • Experimental
    Lidocaine Infussion

    Intravenous lidocaine

    Drug: Lidocaine Infusion

Interventions

  • ProcedureEpidural Analgesia

    The epidural infusion will be as follows: * Isobaric Bupivacaine 0.5% 40 cc * Morphine 4 mg (1 ampoule up to 10 cc and 4 cc of the mixture will be applied) * Saline solution 0.9% 156 cc. * Total Volume: 200 cc. This mixture will be prepared by a nurse outside the research group outside the operating room once indicated. The infusion will be scheduled at 7 cc / hour per continuous infusion set and will be connected to the epidural catheter after its placement.

  • DrugLidocaine Infusion

    2% Lidocaine IV without epinephrine: 1 mg/kg/ hour for up to 24 hours, started immediately after anesthetic induction.

06

What researchers measure

Primary outcomes

  1. Posoperative Pain

    Numerical Rating Scale (NRS) for pain. The NRS for pain is a unidimensional measure of pain intensity in adults.The pain NRS is a single 11-point numeric scale. An 11-point numeric scale (NRS 11) with 0 representing one pain extreme (e.g., "no pain") and 10 representing the other pain extreme (e.g., "pain as bad as you can imagine" and "worst pain imaginable").

    Time frame: 24 hours after surgery

Secondary outcomes

  1. Posoperative Pain

    Numerical Rating Scale (NRS) for pain. The NRS for pain is a unidimensional measure of pain intensity in adults.The pain NRS is a single 11-point numeric scale. An 11-point numeric scale (NRS 11) with 0 representing one pain extreme (e.g., "no pain") and 10 representing the other pain extreme (e.g., "pain as bad as you can imagine" and "worst pain imaginable").

    Time frame: 2, 6, 12, 48 and 72 hours after surgery

  2. Posoperative opioid use

    mg of morphine

    Time frame: 24 hours after surgery

  3. Hospital Stay

    days

    Time frame: From date of randomization until the date day of discharge or date of death from any cause, whichever came first, assessed up to 100 months

  4. Perioperative Satisfaction

    Evaluation du Vecu de l'Anesthesie Generale (EVAN G scale). The EVAN questionnaire is composed of 6 dimensions (attention, privacy, information, pain, discomfort and waiting times), which in turn consist of 26 items. Each item is evaluated with in an ordinal scale. The minimum value is 1, meaning the worst value for the item and the maximum value is 5, meaning the better value for the item.

    Time frame: 24 hours

  5. Toxicity by local anesthetics proportion

    Proportion of patients presenting signs of toxicity by local anesthetics. * Metal taste * Tinnitus * Hypotension (SBP less than 80 mmHg) * Tachycardia (FC greater than 130) * Bradycardia (FC less than 40) * Alterations of the mental state. It is positive for this outcome with 3 signs or if patient presents seizures or coma without a non-surgical or medical cause associated with the patient's clinical status.

    Time frame: 24 hours after surgery

  6. Posoperative nausea and vomiting

    Proportion of patients with at least one episode of nausea or vomiting in the postoperative period.

    Time frame: 24 hours after surgey

07

Study locations

1 site
  • Antioquias Univervesity Health Institution
    Medellin, Antioquia, Colombia
08

References and documents

Publications

  • Shipton EA. The transition from acute to chronic post surgical pain. Anaesth Intensive Care. 2011 Sep;39(5):824-36. doi: 10.1177/0310057X1103900506. PubMed 21970126 ↗
  • Kranke P, Jokinen J, Pace NL, Schnabel A, Hollmann MW, Hahnenkamp K, Eberhart LH, Poepping DM, Weibel S. Continuous intravenous perioperative lidocaine infusion for postoperative pain and recovery. Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2015 Jul 16;(7):CD009642. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD009642.pub2. PubMed 26184397 ↗
  • Couceiro TC, Valenca MM, Lima LC, de Menezes TC, Raposo MC. Prevalence and influence of gender, age, and type of surgery on postoperative pain. Rev Bras Anestesiol. 2009 May-Jun;59(3):314-20. doi: 10.1590/s0034-70942009000300006. English, Portuguese. PubMed 19488544 ↗
  • Singh PK, Saikia P, Lahakar M. Prevalence of acute post-operative pain in patients in adult age-group undergoing inpatient abdominal surgery and correlation of intensity of pain and satisfaction with analgesic management: A cross-sectional single institute-based study. Indian J Anaesth. 2016 Oct;60(10):737-743. doi: 10.4103/0019-5049.191686. PubMed 27761037 ↗
  • Bouman EA, Theunissen M, Bons SA, van Mook WN, Gramke HF, van Kleef M, Marcus MA. Reduced incidence of chronic postsurgical pain after epidural analgesia for abdominal surgery. Pain Pract. 2014 Feb;14(2):E76-84. doi: 10.1111/papr.12091. Epub 2013 Jun 12. PubMed 23758753 ↗
  • Li M, Li L, Xu Y, Wang X. Intravenous analgesics for pain management in post- operative patients : a comparative study of their efficacy and adverse effects. 2016;15(August):1799-806.
  • Singh AP, Singh D, Singh Y, Jain G. Postoperative analgesic efficacy of epidural tramadol as adjutant to ropivacaine in adult upper abdominal surgeries. Anesth Essays Res. 2015 Sep-Dec;9(3):369-73. doi: 10.4103/0259-1162.161805. PubMed 26712976 ↗
  • Nworah U. From documentation to the problem: controlling postoperative pain. Nurs Forum. 2012 Apr-Jun;47(2):91-9. doi: 10.1111/j.1744-6198.2012.00262.x. PubMed 22512766 ↗
  • Sun Y, Li T, Wang N, Yun Y, Gan TJ. Perioperative systemic lidocaine for postoperative analgesia and recovery after abdominal surgery: a meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials. Dis Colon Rectum. 2012 Nov;55(11):1183-94. doi: 10.1097/DCR.0b013e318259bcd8. Erratum In: Dis Colon Rectum. 2013 Feb;52(2):271. PubMed 23044681 ↗
  • Ventham NT, Kennedy ED, Brady RR, Paterson HM, Speake D, Foo I, Fearon KC. Efficacy of Intravenous Lidocaine for Postoperative Analgesia Following Laparoscopic Surgery: A Meta-Analysis. World J Surg. 2015 Sep;39(9):2220-34. doi: 10.1007/s00268-015-3105-6. PubMed 26044546 ↗
  • Kahokehr A, Sammour T, Soop M, Hill AG. Intraperitoneal local anaesthetic in abdominal surgery - a systematic review. ANZ J Surg. 2011 Apr;81(4):237-45. doi: 10.1111/j.1445-2197.2010.05573.x. Epub 2010 Nov 17. PubMed 21418466 ↗
  • Yu N, Long X, Lujan-Hernandez JR, Succar J, Xin X, Wang X. Transversus abdominis-plane block versus local anesthetic wound infiltration in lower abdominal surgery: a systematic review and meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials. BMC Anesthesiol. 2014 Dec 15;14:121. doi: 10.1186/1471-2253-14-121. eCollection 2014. PubMed 25580086 ↗
  • Ventham NT, Hughes M, O'Neill S, Johns N, Brady RR, Wigmore SJ. Systematic review and meta-analysis of continuous local anaesthetic wound infiltration versus epidural analgesia for postoperative pain following abdominal surgery. Br J Surg. 2013 Sep;100(10):1280-9. doi: 10.1002/bjs.9204. PubMed 24244968 ↗
  • Nimmo SM, Harrington LS. What is the role of epidural analgesia in abdominal surgery? Contin Educ Anaesthesia, Crit Care Pain. 2014;14(5):224-9.
  • Nishimori M, Ballantyne JC, Low JH. Epidural pain relief versus systemic opioid-based pain relief for abdominal aortic surgery. Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2006 Jul 19;(3):CD005059. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD005059.pub2. PubMed 16856074 ↗
  • Peters ML, Sommer M, de Rijke JM, Kessels F, Heineman E, Patijn J, Marcus MA, Vlaeyen JW, van Kleef M. Somatic and psychologic predictors of long-term unfavorable outcome after surgical intervention. Ann Surg. 2007 Mar;245(3):487-94. doi: 10.1097/01.sla.0000245495.79781.65. PubMed 17435557 ↗
  • Block BM, Liu SS, Rowlingson AJ, Cowan AR, Cowan JA Jr, Wu CL. Efficacy of postoperative epidural analgesia: a meta-analysis. JAMA. 2003 Nov 12;290(18):2455-63. doi: 10.1001/jama.290.18.2455. PubMed 14612482 ↗
  • Jorgensen H, Wetterslev J, Moiniche S, Dahl JB. Epidural local anaesthetics versus opioid-based analgesic regimens on postoperative gastrointestinal paralysis, PONV and pain after abdominal surgery. Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2000;(4):CD001893. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD001893. PubMed 11034732 ↗
  • Popping DM, Zahn PK, Van Aken HK, Dasch B, Boche R, Pogatzki-Zahn EM. Effectiveness and safety of postoperative pain management: a survey of 18 925 consecutive patients between 1998 and 2006 (2nd revision): a database analysis of prospectively raised data. Br J Anaesth. 2008 Dec;101(6):832-40. doi: 10.1093/bja/aen300. Epub 2008 Oct 22. PubMed 18945716 ↗
  • Terkawi AS, Tsang S, Kazemi A, Morton S, Luo R, Sanders DT, Regali LA, Columbano H, Kurtzeborn NY, Durieux ME. A Clinical Comparison of Intravenous and Epidural Local Anesthetic for Major Abdominal Surgery. Reg Anesth Pain Med. 2016 Jan-Feb;41(1):28-36. doi: 10.1097/AAP.0000000000000332. PubMed 26650426 ↗
  • Koppert W, Weigand M, Neumann F, Sittl R, Schuettler J, Schmelz M, Hering W. Perioperative intravenous lidocaine has preventive effects on postoperative pain and morphine consumption after major abdominal surgery. Anesth Analg. 2004 Apr;98(4):1050-1055. doi: 10.1213/01.ANE.0000104582.71710.EE. PubMed 15041597 ↗
  • Wongyingsinn M, Baldini G, Charlebois P, Liberman S, Stein B, Carli F. Intravenous lidocaine versus thoracic epidural analgesia: a randomized controlled trial in patients undergoing laparoscopic colorectal surgery using an enhanced recovery program. Reg Anesth Pain Med. 2011 May-Jun;36(3):241-8. doi: 10.1097/AAP.0b013e31820d4362. PubMed 21519309 ↗
  • Yardeni IZ, Beilin B, Mayburd E, Levinson Y, Bessler H. The effect of perioperative intravenous lidocaine on postoperative pain and immune function. Anesth Analg. 2009 Nov;109(5):1464-9. doi: 10.1213/ANE.0b013e3181bab1bd. PubMed 19843784 ↗
  • Staikou C, Avramidou A, Ayiomamitis GD, Vrakas S, Argyra E. Effects of intravenous versus epidural lidocaine infusion on pain intensity and bowel function after major large bowel surgery: a double-blind randomized controlled trial. J Gastrointest Surg. 2014 Dec;18(12):2155-62. doi: 10.1007/s11605-014-2659-1. Epub 2014 Sep 23. PubMed 25245767 ↗
  • Khan JS, Yousuf M, Victor JC, Sharma A, Siddiqui N. An estimation for an appropriate end time for an intraoperative intravenous lidocaine infusion in bowel surgery: a comparative meta-analysis. J Clin Anesth. 2016 Feb;28:95-104. doi: 10.1016/j.jclinane.2015.07.007. Epub 2015 Sep 3. PubMed 26342631 ↗

Individual participant data

Plan to share: No

09

Updates

Tracking since Sep 25, 2026
No changes since tracking began. The registry record was last updated on Sep 26, 2022, before this site started recording changes on Sep 25, 2026. Its history is on ClinicalTrials.gov ↗
10

Registry details

Key details

Study ID
NCT04017013
Lead sponsor
Universidad de Antioquia
Collaborators
IPS Universitaria-Universidad de Antioquia
Responsible party
Sponsor
First posted
Jul 12, 2019
Start date
Mar 1, 2020
Primary completion
Sep 5, 2022
Completion
Sep 5, 2022
Last update
Sep 26, 2022

Study contacts

Fabian Casas, Dr
principal investigator · Univeridad de Antioquia's Professor

Oversight

Data monitoring committee
Yes
FDA-regulated drug
No
FDA-regulated device
No
View the source record on ClinicalTrials.gov ↗

Not currently enrolling

This study is completed, as verified in May 2022. You cannot join it, but the record below documents what was studied.

Follow this study

Get an email when the registry record changes — status, dates, results — or when someone posts here.

Sign in to follow

Discussion

Questions and observations about this study, from anyone following it. Not medical advice, and not a channel to the study team — their contact details are on the registry record.

Sign in to join the discussion. Reading takes no account; posting does. You choose a display name, and a pseudonym is the default.

Nothing here yet. If you are running this trial, taking part in it, or weighing whether to, this is the place to say so.

Start the discussion