ClinicalTrials.gg
TerminatedNCT04002037Updated Jun 26, 2024Results posted

Differential Efficacy of Corticosteroid Solutions for Non-Operative Treatment of Digit Flexor Tenosynovitis

A Phase 4 interventional study of Triamcinolone Acetonide 40mg/mL and Triamcinolone Acetonide 10mg/mL in Trigger Finger, sponsored by University of Missouri-Columbia. Terminated at 1 site in United States. Open to participants aged 18 Years and older. Per ClinicalTrials.gov, last updated 2024-06-26.

Sponsored by University of Missouri-Columbia · Phase 4, Interventional, and Treatment

Why this study was terminated
Preliminary analysis revealed no difference
Phase
Phase 4
Study type
Interventional
Enrollment
95
Allocation
Randomized
Ages
18 Years and older
Sex
All
01

Study summary

Trigger finger is a common cause of hand pain and dysfunction. Its due to chronic inflammation of the flexor tendon that leads to a pulley system mismatch. Historically it has been managed either conservatively with corticosteroid injections or through a surgical release of the A1 pulley. Several corticosteroids have been used for injection- dexamethasone, methylprednisolone, triamcinolone, betamethasone, paramethasone, etc. The purpose of out study is to determine if a 0.5 cc injection of Triamcinolone 40 mg/mL will be the most effective steroid injection for the non-surgical treatment. Approximately 200 subjects will be enrolled and randomized to one of three treatment arms: Triamcinolone 40mg/mL, Triamcinolone 10mg/mL and Soluble dexamethasone 4mg/mL. Treatment success will be defined as lack of conversion to surgical treatment, or no desire to proceed with surgery during study period (3 months).

Read the detailed description

Idiopathic stenosing tenosynovitis of the digits, more commonly known as "trigger finger", is a common cause of hand pain and dysfunction. Many previous studies have described the pathophysiology of this condition and it can be summarized as inflammation of the flexor tendons leading to a size mismatch between the tendon and the flexor pulley system. By far the most common location of this mismatch is at the A1 pulley.

The current mainstay of treatment has been:

  1. Injection of corticosteroid into the area immediately surrounding the A1 pulley and flexor tendon
  2. Surgical release of the A1 pulley

Several corticosteroids have been used for injection- dexamethasone, methylprednisolone, triamcinolone, betamethasone, paramethasone, etc. Less commonly used treatment strategies have included: topical NSAIDs and extracorporeal shock therapy. The typical progression of treatment is one or two steroid injections and then surgical release if injections have failed.

To our knowledge, there have been no head to head comparison studies of the efficacy of different corticosteroid formulations in preventing conversion to surgical treatment. In our study, the investigators will look at the efficacy of two of the most commonly used steroids: triamcinolone and dexamethasone.

Objectives:

Primary outcome: Treatment success, defined as lack of conversion to surgical treatment, or no desire to proceed with surgery during study period (3 months).

Secondary outcomes: Grade of triggering (Green classification of trigger finger severity1), QuickDASH (Disabilities of the Arm, Shoulder and Hand) and PROMIS Upper Extremity scores, VAS.

Inclusion/Exclusion:

Inclusion criteria:

  1. Adults aged 18 years and older
  2. At least one symptomatic trigger finger
  3. Patients recommended to receive corticosteroid injections

Exclusion criteria:

  1. Previous surgeries/injections for trigger fingers in digit being treated for study
  2. Participating in another clinical trial
  3. Inability to receive corticosteroid injections (i.e. allergies, adverse reactions, etc.)
  4. Unable to sign informed consent
  5. Pregnant or plan to become pregnant

Study Procedures/Methods:

Enrollment/Randomization/Treatment Visit:

Eligible patients presenting with primary flexor tenosynovitis will be enrolled on a voluntary basis. Prior to the injection, subjects will be asked to complete the PROMIS and QuickDASH surveys to collect data at baseline.

Enrolled patients will be randomized to one of three treatment arms:

  1. Triamcinolone 40mg/mL
  2. Triamcinolone 10mg/mL
  3. Soluble dexamethasone 4mg/mL

Each study patient will receive the appropriate corticosteroid injection in the affected digit(s), consisting of a 1:1 mixture of 1% lidocaine plain and corticosteroid, total volume 1cc.

Blinding:

Syringes will be prepared and masked with opaque tape by the clinic nurses, thus providing blinding for providers administering the injection.

Follow-Up/Clinic Visits:

Subjects will be re-evaluated at 6 weeks post-injection and, if still symptomatic, will undergo a second injection of the same corticosteroid solution. At final follow-up (12 weeks), symptomatic patients who have failed treatment after 2 injections will be offered surgical release of the A1 pulley. Subjects who refuse a second injection at 6 weeks follow-up will be offered surgery, and the reason for refusal (treatment failure) will be recorded.

The visits and all research activity will be outlined below:

6 Week Follow-Up:

Objective Measures:

  • Grade of triggering (Green classification of trigger finger severity1)

Subjective Measures:

  • QuickDASH
  • PROMIS scores
  • VAS Second Corticosteroid injection (if subject still symptomatic)

    12 Week (3 Month) Follow-Up (if applicable):

Objective Measures:

  • Grade of triggering (Green classification of trigger finger severity1)

Subjective Measures:

  • QuickDASH
  • PROMIS scores
  • VAS

6 Month Follow-Up: The patient will be contacted to check on the status of their condition. If they are still experiencing a degree of triggering they will be advised by their physician to return to clinic for a standard of care visit. If they are no longer experiencing triggering, they will be asked to complete a survey over the phone or online only.

Specimen Collection: If a patient is recommended to undergo surgery at the end of the study, the tenosynovium that is normally resected and discarded after surgery will be collected for analysis. After collection these tissues and data will be identified from the patient and assigned a number for use in study analysis. The investigators seek to only collect tissues from patients that are normally removed and discarded during trigger finger release procedures. None of the patients will undergo additional surgical procedures for the collection of tissues in this study. For simplification purposes, potential subjects must agree to the collection of these specimens to participate in the study, even if they do not end up needing surgical intervention.

02

Conditions studied

  • Trigger Finger

Keywords

  • Trigger Finger
03

In context

Trigger Finger Disorder

93 studies on the registry are indexed under Trigger Finger Disorder; 22 are open to participants now.

This study's enrollment of 95 is above the median of 66 across 75 interventional studies indexed under Trigger Finger Disorder.

Browse Trigger Finger Disorder studies →

Lead sponsor

University of Missouri-Columbia is the lead sponsor of 365 studies on the registry; 69 are open to participants now.

Of its 43 completed or terminated interventional studies of FDA-regulated products, 29 (67%) have results posted.

Counted across the registry records on this site, refreshed daily.

04

Who can participate

Ages eligible
18 Years and older
Sexes eligible
All
Accepts healthy volunteers
No

Go through the criteria one by one — yes, no or not sure — and take the list to your doctor or the study team. Kept in this browser only.

Inclusion criteria

  1. Adults aged 18 years and older
  2. At least one symptomatic trigger finger
  3. Patients recommended to receive injections

Exclusion criteria

Exclusion Criteria:

  1. Previous surgeries/injections for trigger fingers in digit being treated for study
  2. Participating in another clinical trial
  3. Inability to receive injections (i.e. allergies, adverse reactions, etc.)
  4. Unable to sign
  5. Pregnant or plan to become pregnant
Terms in these criteria, in plain language(2)

Underlined terms in the criteria open these too. Explained by clinicaltrials.gg, not part of the registry record. The study team decides who can take part.

Corticosteroids (steroids)

Anti-inflammatory medicines such as prednisone, prednisolone and dexamethasone — not the anabolic steroids used for muscle.

Studies differ in what they allow: check which steroid medicines, routes (tablets, injections, creams, inhalers, eye drops) and doses this study accepts.

Informed consent

Before you join, the study team explains what taking part involves — its purpose, what happens, the risks and possible benefits — and answers your questions, so you can decide freely. Consent is usually recorded on a form (the informed consent form, ICF) signed by you or, where the law allows, by someone legally authorised to decide for you.

You can keep asking questions during the study, you are told of new information that matters, and you can choose to leave at any time.

05

Study design

Phase
Phase 4
Primary purpose
Treatment
Allocation
Randomized
Intervention model
Parallel assignment
Masking
Double (Participant, Investigator)
Enrollment
95 participants (actual)

Study arms

  • Active comparator
    Triamcinolone 40mg/mL

    A corticosteroid injection of Triamcinolone 40mg/mL will be given to subjects to treat their symptoms of trigger finger.

    Drug: Triamcinolone Acetonide 40mg/mL

  • Active comparator
    Triamcinolone 10mg/mL

    A corticosteroid injection of Triamcinolone 10mg/mL will be given to subjects to treat their symptoms of trigger finger.

    Drug: Triamcinolone Acetonide 10mg/mL

  • Active comparator
    Soluble dexamethasone 4mg/mL

    A corticosteroid injection of Soluble Dexamethasone 4mg/mL will be given to subjects to treat their symptoms of trigger finger.

    Drug: Dexamethasone 4 mg/ml

Interventions

  • DrugTriamcinolone Acetonide 40mg/mL

    Drug page: Triamcinolone Acetonide

    Corticosteroid injection will occur up to two times if trigger finger symptoms are not resolved.

  • DrugTriamcinolone Acetonide 10mg/mL

    Drug page: Triamcinolone Acetonide

    Corticosteroid injection will occur up to two times if trigger finger symptoms are not resolved.

  • DrugDexamethasone 4 mg/ml

    Drug page: Dexamethasone

    Corticosteroid injection will occur up to two times if trigger finger symptoms are not resolved.

06

What researchers measure

Primary outcomes

  1. Disabilities of the Arm, Shoulder and Hand (DASH)

    The patient will be asked to complete a questionnaire with questions related to their hand. Their answers will be scored on a scale of 0-100 with 0 being no disability and 100 being the highest level of disability.

    Time frame: 6 Weeks

  2. Disabilities of the Arm, Shoulder and Hand (DASH)

    The patient will be asked to complete a questionnaire with questions related to their hand. Their answers will be scored on a scale of 0-100 with 0 being no disability and 100 being the highest level of disability.

    Time frame: 12 Weeks

  3. Disabilities of the Arm, Shoulder and Hand (DASH)

    The patient will be asked to complete a questionnaire with questions related to their hand. Their answers will be scored on a scale of 0-100 with 0 being no disability and 100 being the highest level of disability.

    Time frame: 6 Month

  4. Pain Visual Analog Score (VAS)

    The patient will be asked to report their pain on a scale of 0 - 10 using the Visual Analog Scale with 0 being no pain and 10 being the worst pain the patient can imagine.

    Time frame: 6 Weeks

  5. Pain Visual Analog Score (VAS)

    The patient will be asked to report their pain on a scale of 0 - 10 using the Visual Analog Scale with 0 being no pain and 10 being the worst pain the patient can imagine.

    Time frame: 12 Weeks

  6. Pain Visual Analog Score (VAS)

    The patient will be asked to report their pain on a scale of 0 - 10 using the Visual Analog Scale with 0 being no pain and 10 being the worst pain the patient can imagine.

    Time frame: 6 Month

  7. Patient Reported Outcomes Measurement Information System (PROMIS) Upper Extremity Scores

    PROMIS Physical Function - Upper Extremity is a self-reported performance measure assessing physical function of the upper extremity focusing on nine activities that require use of the upper extremity including shoulder, arm, and hand activities. Responses are as follows: 5 = Without any difficulty; 4 = With a little difficulty; 3=With some difficulty; 2=With much difficulty; and 1=Unable to do. The PROMIS Upper Extremity assessment evaluates upper extremity function, with raw scores typically ranging from 8 to 40, depending on the specific form used. These raw scores are converted to T-scores using a standardized table, with a mean of 50 and a standard deviation of 10. These T-scores range from 15 to 61. A higher T-score indicates better upper extremity function, while a lower T-score signifies greater impairment.

    Time frame: 6 Weeks

  8. Patient Reported Outcomes Measurement Information System (PROMIS) Upper Extremity Scores

    PROMIS Physical Function - Upper Extremity is a self-reported performance measure assessing physical function of the upper extremity focusing on nine activities that require use of the upper extremity including shoulder, arm, and hand activities. Responses are as follows: 5 = Without any difficulty; 4 = With a little difficulty; 3=With some difficulty; 2=With much difficulty; and 1=Unable to do. The PROMIS Upper Extremity assessment evaluates upper extremity function, with raw scores typically ranging from 8 to 40, depending on the specific form used. These raw scores are converted to T-scores using a standardized table, with a mean of 50 and a standard deviation of 10. These T-scores range from 15 to 61. A higher T-score indicates better upper extremity function, while a lower T-score signifies greater impairment.

    Time frame: 12 Weeks

  9. Patient Reported Outcomes Measurement Information System (PROMIS) Upper Extremity Scores

    PROMIS Physical Function - Upper Extremity is a self-reported performance measure assessing physical function of the upper extremity focusing on nine activities that require use of the upper extremity including shoulder, arm, and hand activities. Responses are as follows: 5 = Without any difficulty; 4 = With a little difficulty; 3=With some difficulty; 2=With much difficulty; and 1=Unable to do. The PROMIS Upper Extremity assessment evaluates upper extremity function, with raw scores typically ranging from 8 to 40, depending on the specific form used. These raw scores are converted to T-scores using a standardized table, with a mean of 50 and a standard deviation of 10. These T-scores range from 15 to 61. A higher T-score indicates better upper extremity function, while a lower T-score signifies greater impairment.

    Time frame: 6 Month

07

Results

Posted Jun 26, 2024

Participant flow

Participant flow — Overall Study
MilestoneTriamcinolone 40mg/mLTriamcinolone 10mg/mLSoluble Dexamethasone 4mg/mL
Started244328
Completed244328
Not completed000

Outcome measures

PrimaryDisabilities of the Arm, Shoulder and Hand (DASH)

The patient will be asked to complete a questionnaire with questions related to their hand. Their answers will be scored on a scale of 0-100 with 0 being no disability and 100 being the highest level of disability.

Time frame:
6 Weeks
Reported as:
Mean · score on a scale
Disabilities of the Arm, Shoulder and Hand (DASH)
score on a scaleTriamcinolone 40mg/mLTriamcinolone 10mg/mLSoluble Dexamethasone 4mg/mL
Disabilities of the Arm, Shoulder and Hand (DASH)12.69 ± 19.8718.69 ± 18.7324.72 ± 13.74
PrimaryDisabilities of the Arm, Shoulder and Hand (DASH)

The patient will be asked to complete a questionnaire with questions related to their hand. Their answers will be scored on a scale of 0-100 with 0 being no disability and 100 being the highest level of disability.

Time frame:
12 Weeks
Reported as:
Mean · score on a scale
Disabilities of the Arm, Shoulder and Hand (DASH)
score on a scaleTriamcinolone 40mg/mLTriamcinolone 10mg/mLSoluble Dexamethasone 4mg/mL
Disabilities of the Arm, Shoulder and Hand (DASH)17.66 ± 19.8818.09 ± 17.7123.38 ± 22.91
PrimaryDisabilities of the Arm, Shoulder and Hand (DASH)

The patient will be asked to complete a questionnaire with questions related to their hand. Their answers will be scored on a scale of 0-100 with 0 being no disability and 100 being the highest level of disability.

Time frame:
6 Month
Reported as:
Mean · score on a scale
Disabilities of the Arm, Shoulder and Hand (DASH)
score on a scaleTriamcinolone 40mg/mLTriamcinolone 10mg/mLSoluble Dexamethasone 4mg/mL
Disabilities of the Arm, Shoulder and Hand (DASH)22.73 ± 19.5322.12 ± 20.5513.64 ± 16.24
PrimaryPain Visual Analog Score (VAS)

The patient will be asked to report their pain on a scale of 0 - 10 using the Visual Analog Scale with 0 being no pain and 10 being the worst pain the patient can imagine.

Time frame:
6 Weeks
Reported as:
Mean · score on a scale
Pain Visual Analog Score (VAS)
score on a scaleTriamcinolone 40mg/mLTriamcinolone 10mg/mLSoluble Dexamethasone 4mg/mL
Pain Visual Analog Score (VAS)1.08 ± 2.151.33 ± 2.22.04 ± 2.09
PrimaryPain Visual Analog Score (VAS)

The patient will be asked to report their pain on a scale of 0 - 10 using the Visual Analog Scale with 0 being no pain and 10 being the worst pain the patient can imagine.

Time frame:
12 Weeks
Reported as:
Mean · score on a scale
Pain Visual Analog Score (VAS)
score on a scaleTriamcinolone 40mg/mLTriamcinolone 10mg/mLSoluble Dexamethasone 4mg/mL
Pain Visual Analog Score (VAS)1.15 ± 1.912.38 ± 2.373.33 ± 3.22
PrimaryPain Visual Analog Score (VAS)

The patient will be asked to report their pain on a scale of 0 - 10 using the Visual Analog Scale with 0 being no pain and 10 being the worst pain the patient can imagine.

Time frame:
6 Month
Reported as:
Mean · score on a scale
Pain Visual Analog Score (VAS)
score on a scaleTriamcinolone 40mg/mLTriamcinolone 10mg/mLSoluble Dexamethasone 4mg/mL
Pain Visual Analog Score (VAS)1.53 ± 1.461.97 ± 2.411.38 ± 2.13
PrimaryPatient Reported Outcomes Measurement Information System (PROMIS) Upper Extremity Scores

PROMIS Physical Function - Upper Extremity is a self-reported performance measure assessing physical function of the upper extremity focusing on nine activities that require use of the upper extremity including shoulder, arm, and hand activities. Responses are as follows: 5 = Without any difficulty; 4 = With a little difficulty; 3=With some difficulty; 2=With much difficulty; and 1=Unable to do. The PROMIS Upper Extremity assessment evaluates upper extremity function, with raw scores typically ranging from 8 to 40, depending on the specific form used. These raw scores are converted to T-scores using a standardized table, with a mean of 50 and a standard deviation of 10. These T-scores range from 15 to 61. A higher T-score indicates better upper extremity function, while a lower T-score signifies greater impairment.

Time frame:
6 Weeks
Reported as:
Mean · score on a scale
Patient Reported Outcomes Measurement Information System (PROMIS) Upper Extremity Scores
score on a scaleTriamcinolone 40mg/mLTriamcinolone 10mg/mLSoluble Dexamethasone 4mg/mL
Patient Reported Outcomes Measurement Information System (PROMIS) Upper Extremity Scores48.24 ± 13.4544.49 ± 11.8937.55 ± 8.98
PrimaryPatient Reported Outcomes Measurement Information System (PROMIS) Upper Extremity Scores

PROMIS Physical Function - Upper Extremity is a self-reported performance measure assessing physical function of the upper extremity focusing on nine activities that require use of the upper extremity including shoulder, arm, and hand activities. Responses are as follows: 5 = Without any difficulty; 4 = With a little difficulty; 3=With some difficulty; 2=With much difficulty; and 1=Unable to do. The PROMIS Upper Extremity assessment evaluates upper extremity function, with raw scores typically ranging from 8 to 40, depending on the specific form used. These raw scores are converted to T-scores using a standardized table, with a mean of 50 and a standard deviation of 10. These T-scores range from 15 to 61. A higher T-score indicates better upper extremity function, while a lower T-score signifies greater impairment.

Time frame:
12 Weeks
Reported as:
Mean · score on a scale
Patient Reported Outcomes Measurement Information System (PROMIS) Upper Extremity Scores
score on a scaleTriamcinolone 40mg/mLTriamcinolone 10mg/mLSoluble Dexamethasone 4mg/mL
Patient Reported Outcomes Measurement Information System (PROMIS) Upper Extremity Scores48.28 ± 12.0944.82 ± 11.6843.44 ± 12.4
PrimaryPatient Reported Outcomes Measurement Information System (PROMIS) Upper Extremity Scores

PROMIS Physical Function - Upper Extremity is a self-reported performance measure assessing physical function of the upper extremity focusing on nine activities that require use of the upper extremity including shoulder, arm, and hand activities. Responses are as follows: 5 = Without any difficulty; 4 = With a little difficulty; 3=With some difficulty; 2=With much difficulty; and 1=Unable to do. The PROMIS Upper Extremity assessment evaluates upper extremity function, with raw scores typically ranging from 8 to 40, depending on the specific form used. These raw scores are converted to T-scores using a standardized table, with a mean of 50 and a standard deviation of 10. These T-scores range from 15 to 61. A higher T-score indicates better upper extremity function, while a lower T-score signifies greater impairment.

Time frame:
6 Month
Reported as:
Mean · score on a scale
Patient Reported Outcomes Measurement Information System (PROMIS) Upper Extremity Scores
score on a scaleTriamcinolone 40mg/mLTriamcinolone 10mg/mLSoluble Dexamethasone 4mg/mL
Patient Reported Outcomes Measurement Information System (PROMIS) Upper Extremity Scores38.46 ± 12.942.23 ± 11.4347.9 ± 11.51

Adverse events

Collected over Participant follow-up post enrollment was for 6 months.. Non-serious events are listed at a 0% frequency threshold.

Adverse event summary by group
GroupDeathsSeriousOther
Triamcinolone 40mg/mL0/24 (0%)0/24 (0%)0/24 (0%)
Triamcinolone 10mg/mL0/43 (0%)0/43 (0%)0/43 (0%)
Soluble Dexamethasone 4mg/mL0/28 (0%)0/28 (0%)0/28 (0%)

Baseline characteristics

Age, Continuous
Age, Continuous(years)Triamcinolone 40mg/mLTriamcinolone 10mg/mLSoluble Dexamethasone 4mg/mLTotal
Mean64.54 ± 9.9963.77 ± 10.6561.75 ± 9.1163.37 ± 0
Sex: Female, Male
Sex: Female, Male(Participants)Triamcinolone 40mg/mLTriamcinolone 10mg/mLSoluble Dexamethasone 4mg/mLTotal
Female17302269
Male713626
Race (NIH/OMB)
Race (NIH/OMB)(Participants)Triamcinolone 40mg/mLTriamcinolone 10mg/mLSoluble Dexamethasone 4mg/mLTotal
American Indian or Alaska Native0000
Asian2103
Native Hawaiian or Other Pacific Islander0000
Black or African American0202
White22402890
More than one race0000
Unknown or Not Reported0000
08

Study locations

1 site
  • University of Missouri Health Care
    Columbia, Missouri 65212, United States
09

References and documents

Publications

  • 1- Wolfe SW, Hotchkiss RN, Pederson WC, Kozin SH, Tendinopathy, in: Green's Operative Hand Surgery, 6th edition, Churchill Livingstone, Chap. 62, p. 5, 2011.

Study documents

PDFs hosted by the registry, ClinicalTrials.gov.

10

Timeline

Tracking since Sep 25, 2026
ElapsedEstimatedEstimated, not yet reached

Ran from Jun 2019 to primary completion in May 2022, 34 months.

Results were first posted in Jun 2024, 2 years 1 month after primary completion.

How these figures are worked out, and which studies are left out of them.

Registered
Jun 21, 2019
First posted
Jun 28, 2019
StartActual
Jun 25, 2019
Primary completionActual
May 19, 2022
CompletionActual
Jan 1, 2023
Results first posted
Jun 26, 2024
Last update
Jun 26, 2024
What these dates mean
Start.
When the first participant enrolled; while estimated, when the study expects to open to recruitment.
Primary completion.
When the last participant was examined or treated to collect data for the study's main question, its primary outcome. A study that stopped early gives the date its data collection stopped.
Completion.
When the last participant's last visit took place, for every outcome, secondary ones and side effects included: the end of the study. Often later than primary completion, sometimes the same day.
Actual and Est.
Actual means the registry says the date has happened. Est. (estimated) is a date the sponsor plans or expects. It can still move, and the sponsor is expected to change it to actual once it has passed.
No changes since tracking began. The registry record was last updated on Jun 26, 2024, before this site started recording changes on Sep 25, 2026. Its history is on ClinicalTrials.gov ↗
11

Registry details

Key details

Study ID
NCT04002037
Responsible party
Daniel London (Assistant Professor, Orthopaedic Surgery, University of Missouri-Columbia) — Principal investigator
First posted
Jun 28, 2019
Start date
Jun 25, 2019
Primary completion
May 19, 2022
Completion
Jan 1, 2023
Results posted
Jun 26, 2024
Last update
Jun 26, 2024

Study contacts

Daniel London, MD
principal investigator · University of Missouri-Columbia

Oversight

FDA-regulated drug
Yes
FDA-regulated device
No
View the source record on ClinicalTrials.gov ↗

Not currently enrolling

This study is terminated, as verified in Jun 2024. You cannot join it, but the record below documents what was studied.

Follow this study

Get an email when the registry record changes — status, dates, results — or when someone posts here.

Sign in to follow

Discussion

Questions and observations about this study, from anyone following it. Not medical advice, and not a channel to the study team — their contact details are on the registry record.

Sign in to join the discussion. Reading takes no account; posting does. You choose a display name, and a pseudonym is the default.

Nothing here yet. If you are running this trial, taking part in it, or weighing whether to, this is the place to say so.

Studies of the drugs tested here: Triamcinolone Acetonide · Dexamethasone

Start the discussion