An interventional study of Initial phase: personalized instant messaging (PIM) and Second phase: optional cocktail interventions (OCI) in Smoking Cessation, sponsored by The University of Hong Kong. Status unknown at 1 site in Hong Kong. Open to participants aged 18 Years and older. Per ClinicalTrials.gov, last updated 2020-08-20.
Sponsored by The University of Hong Kong · Not applicable, Interventional, and Health services research
The present study will examine (1) effectiveness of a combined intervention of AWARD advice, active referral, instant messaging and optional cocktail intervention to increase abstinence using a sequential multiple assignment randomised trial (SMART) and (2) explore the use of CBPR model to build capacity and to engage community partners in taking on this important public health issue for sustainability in the community. In addition, a process evaluation will be conducted to assess the effectiveness of the recruitment activity and how it is linked with the overall program outcomes.
Although smoking prevalence is decreasing in Hong Kong, there are still 615,000 daily cigarette smokers in Hong Kong in 2017 and half will be killed by smoking which accounts for over 7,000 deaths per year. Smoking also accounts for a large amount of medical cost, long-term care and productivity loss of US$688 million (0.6% Hong Kong GDP). Smoking is a highly addictive behavior and it is difficult for smokers with strong nicotine dependence to quit without assistance. On the other hand, reaching and helping the many smokers who have no intention to quit is a challenge, because they are unlikely to seek professional help from smoking cessation services.
The Quit and Win programme provides an opportunity to reach and encourage a large group of smokers to make quit attempt and maintain abstinence. The Quit and Win model posits that smokers participating in the contest will have higher motivation to quit with incentives and better social support. Studies have found that such quitting contests or incentive programs appeared to reach a large number of smokers and demonstrated a significantly higher quit rate for the quit and win group than for the control group.
We propose to use adaptive design for the QTW 2019 specifically a two-phase adaptive design, i.e., a sequential, multiple assignment, randomized trial (SMART) design. Optional cocktail cessation supports will be provided based on smokers' smoking status and preference. The supports, including multimedia messages, active referral plus financial incentive, phone counseling, social support and medications, are empirically evidence-supported and most have been used in our previous QTW interventions.
Therefore, the present study will examine (1) effectiveness of a combined intervention of AWARD advice, active referral, instant messaging and optional cocktail intervention to increase abstinence using a SMART design and (2) explore the use of CBPR model to build capacity and to engage community partners in taking on this important public health issue for sustainability in the community. In addition, a process evaluation will be conducted to assess the effectiveness of the recruitment activity and how it is linked with the overall program outcomes.
The University of Hong Kong is the lead sponsor of 1,262 studies on the registry; 340 are open to participants now.
Of its 8 completed or terminated interventional studies of FDA-regulated products, 0 (0%) have results posted.
Counted across the registry records on this site, refreshed daily.
Exclusion Criteria:
Personalized instant messaging (PIM) + optional cocktail interventions (OCI) + AWARD advice + referral card + warning leaflet+ COSH booklet
Behavioral: Initial phase: personalized instant messaging (PIM) · Behavioral: Second phase: optional cocktail interventions (OCI) · Behavioral: AWARD advice · Behavioral: Warning leaflet · Behavioral: Referral card · Behavioral: COSH booklet
Regular instant messaging (RIM) + personalized instant messaging (PIM) + AWARD advice + referral card + warning leaflet+ COSH booklet
Behavioral: Initial phase: regular instant messaging (RIM) · Behavioral: Second phase: personalized instant messaging (PIM) · Behavioral: AWARD advice · Behavioral: Warning leaflet · Behavioral: Referral card · Behavioral: COSH booklet
intervention Group participants will receive three months of personalized interaction through IM Apps (e.g. WhatsApp, WeChat). Our counsellors will trigger the conversation and encourage the participants to set a quit day. A total of pre-set 26 messages will be sent with the schedule of once daily for 1 week (the week across the quit date), 3 times a week for 4 weeks (2 weeks each before and after the week with quit date) and once a week for remaining 7 weeks. These messages covered generic information about the benefits of quitting, methods to avoid/ manage craving or withdrawal symptoms, and encouragement to quit and use SC services. At the end of the initial phase (1-month), complete responders (quitters) will continue to receive PIM (subgroup C). Incomplete responders (smokers) will be randomized to continue PIM (subgroup B) or receive OCI (subgroup A).
For incomplete respondents (subgroup A) randomized to OCI, the available intervention options include multi-media messages, active referral plus financial incentive, phone counseling, family/peer support and medications (NRT). Participants will be guided by cessation counsellors at 1-month follow-up telephone survey to choose any combination of OCI based on their preference. If OCI participants cannot be followed up at 1-month, they will receive multi-media messages by default.
Participants enrolled in the Control Group will receive regular messages via IM services (e.g. WhatsApp, WeChat) since initial contact and until 3-month after baseline with a tapering schedule: 1) Baseline to 4-week (1-month): 2 times/ week (8 in total); 2) 4-week to 12-week (2- \& 3-month): 1 time/week (8 in total). SC messages will generally include benefits of SC, encouragement on abstinence and use of SC services, tips on avoiding/ handling craving and reminder of participating in telephone follow-up. A reminder to participate in the telephone follow-up will also be sent at 1-, 2-, 3- and 6-month, making up a total of 20 messages. At the end of the initial phase (1-month), complete responders (quitters) will continue to receive RIM (subgroup F). Incomplete responders (smokers) will be second randomized to continue RIM (subgroup E) or receive PIM (subgroup D). Those who are unable to follow up at 1-month will be considered as nonresponsive to the intervention.
For incomplete responders allocated to PIM (subgroup D), participants will receive the same intervention as the Group A delivered at the initial stage. Participants will receive two months of personalized interaction through IM application. Please refer to Intervention Group "Initial phase: personalized instant messaging (PIM)" for details.
Ask about smoking history, Warn about the high risk of smoking, Advise to quit as soon as possible, Refer to the smoking cessation services, and Do it again (if the smokers refused to set quit date).
Also known as: Ask, Warn, Advise, Refer, Do-it-again
The 2-sided color printed A4 leaflet, which systematically covers the most important messages to motivate smoking cessation
Also known as: Brief leaflet on health warning and smoking cessation
The 3-folded "Smoking Cessation Services" card consists of brief information and highlights of existing smoking cessation services, contact methods, motivation information and strong supporting messages or slogans
Also known as: Smoking Cessation Service Card
A general smoking cessation self-help booklet
Also known as: COSH self-help smoking cessation booklet
Validated abstinence of PIM + OCI vs. RIM + PIM
PIM + OCI (subgroup A+B+C) vs. RIM + PIM (subgroup D+E+F) on validated abstinence (exhaled CO \< 4 ppm and salivary cotinine \< 10 ng/ml)
Time frame: 6-month follow-up
Validated abstinence of OCI vs. RIM in incomplete responders
OCI (subgroup A) vs. RIM (subgroup E) in incomplete responders (those who are still smoking at 1-month) on validated abstinence (exhaled CO \< 4 ppm and salivary cotinine \< 10 ng/ml)
Time frame: 6-month follow-up
Validated abstinence of PIM + OCI vs. RIM + PIM adjusted for potential imbalance of baseline characteristic
PIM + OCI (subgroup A+B+C) vs. RIM + PIM (subgroup D+E+F) on validated abstinence (exhaled CO \< 4 ppm and salivary cotinine \< 10 ng/ml) adjusted for potential imbalance of baseline characteristic.
Time frame: 6-month follow-up
Validated abstinence of OCI vs. RIM in incomplete responders adjusted for potential imbalance of baseline characteristic
OCI (subgroup A) vs. RIM (subgroup E) in incomplete responders (those who are still smoking at 1-month) on validated abstinence (exhaled CO \< 4 ppm and salivary cotinine \< 10 ng/ml) adjusted for potential imbalance of baseline characteristic
Time frame: 6-month follow-up
Validated and self-reported abstinence of OCI vs. PIM in incomplete responders
OCI (subgroup A) vs. PIM (subgroup B) in incomplete responders (those who are still smoking with 1-month) on validated abstinence (exhaled CO \< 4 ppm and salivary cotinine \< 10 ng/ml) and self-reported abstinence
Time frame: 3- and 6-month follow-up
Validated and self-reported abstinence of PIM vs. RIM in incomplete responders
PIM (subgroup D) vs. RIM (subgroup E) in incomplete responders (those who are still smoking with 1-month) on validated abstinence (exhaled CO \< 4 ppm and salivary cotinine \< 10 ng/ml) and self-reported abstinence
Time frame: 3- and 6-month follow-up
Validated and self-reported abstinence of PIM vs. RIM
PIM (subgroup B+C) vs. RIM (subgroup E+F) on validated abstinence (exhaled CO \< 4 ppm and salivary cotinine \< 10 ng/ml) and self-reported abstinence
Time frame: 3- and 6-month follow-up
PIM intervention engagement on validated and self-reported abstinence
Difference between engagement of PIM intervention vs. no engagement of PIM intervention vs. RIM intervention on validated abstinence (exhaled CO \< 4 ppm and salivary cotinine \< 10 ng/ml) and self-reported abstinence. PIM intervention include subgroup B+C+D, RIM intervention include subgroup E+F.
Time frame: 3- and 6-month follow-up
OCI intervention engagement on validated and self-reported abstinence
Difference between engagement of OCI intervention vs. no engagement of OCI intervention vs. engagement of PIM intervention vs. no engagement of PIM intervention vs. RIM intervention on validated abstinence (exhaled CO \< 4 ppm and salivary cotinine \< 10 ng/ml) and self-reported abstinence. OCI intervention include subgroup A, PIM intervention include subgroup B+C+D, RIM intervention include subgroup E+F.
Time frame: 3- and 6-month follow-up
Smoking reduction rate change from baseline at 3- and 6-month follow-up
Rate of smoking reduction by at least half of baseline amount
Time frame: 3- and 6-month follow-up
Smoking cessation service use
Use of smoking cessation service
Time frame: 3- and 6-month follow-up
Nicotine independence (HSI) on abstinence and intervention engagement
Subgroup analyses of high nicotine independence vs. low nicotine independence on validated abstinence (exhaled CO \< 4 ppm and salivary cotinine \< 10 ng/ml) and self-reported abstinence, and intervention engagement (use of PIM and/or OCI intervention)
Time frame: 3- and 6-month follow-up
Intention to quit analyses on abstinence and intervention engagement
Subgroup analyses of high intention to quit vs. low intention to quit on validated abstinence (exhaled CO \< 4 ppm and salivary cotinine \< 10 ng/ml) and self-reported abstinence, and intervention engagement (use of OCI intervention and/or PIM intervention and/or RIM intervention).
Time frame: 3- and 6-month follow-up
Plan to share: No
This study is status unknown, as verified in Aug 2020. You cannot join it, but the record below documents what was studied.
Get an email when the registry record changes — status, dates, results — or when someone posts here.
Sign in to followQuestions and observations about this study, from anyone following it. Not medical advice, and not a channel to the study team — their contact details are on the registry record.
Sign in to join the discussion. Reading takes no account; posting does. You choose a display name, and a pseudonym is the default.
Nothing here yet. If you are running this trial, taking part in it, or weighing whether to, this is the place to say so.
The University of Hong Kong