ClinicalTrials.gg
CompletedNCT03985800Updated Sep 3, 2025Results posted

Specialty Medical Homes to Improve Outcomes for Patients With IBD and Behavioral Health Conditions

An interventional study of TEAM and TECH in Inflammatory Bowel Disease and Behavioral Symptoms, sponsored by University of Pittsburgh. Completed at 1 site in United States. Open to participants aged 18 Years to 60 Years. Per ClinicalTrials.gov, last updated 2025-09-03.

Sponsored by University of Pittsburgh · Not applicable, Interventional, and Other

Phase
Not applicable
Study type
Interventional
Enrollment
657
Allocation
Randomized
Ages
18 Years to 60 Years
Sex
All
01

Study summary

A comparative effectiveness study using an individual-level randomized design along with a pragmatic, mixed-methods approach to compare two strategies (e.g. in-person supported care, technology-supported care) all of which include evidence-based components for delivering IBD and BH care. Quantitative (e.g. self-report, electronic health record, process) and qualitative (e.g., interviews) data will be collected across multiple time points during the study period.

Read the detailed description

The investigators propose to conduct a comparative effectiveness research (CER) study of two evidence-based, patient-centered approaches implemented within an existing Specialty Medical Home (SMH) model: TEAM, an in-person, multidisciplinary team-based approach delivered at point of care and TECH, a technology-based (digital therapeutics, and telehealth) approach delivered at the patient's convenience with the guidance of health coaches. Both are designed to support care for adult patients with complex, chronic health conditions and behavioral health (BH) disorders, and will be tested in three of the nation's largest and most established SMHs for inflammatory bowel disease (IBD). IBD serves as an exemplary chronic disease model where untreated BH issues have been associated with poor medical outcomes.

Primary outcomes are composite scores of measures focused on 1) IBD Symptom Severity, and 2) BH Symptom Severity. IBD Symptom Severity is measured via a composite IBD Complexity Score involving responses to two patient-reported scales: the PROMIS-GI measure and either the Harvey Bradshaw Index (for participants with Crohn's disease) or ulcerative colitis activity index (for participants with ulcerative colitis). BH Symptom Severity was measured utilizing the Patient Health Questionnaire Anxiety-Depression Scale (PHQ-ADS), a composite of two patient-reported scale for measuring anxiety (Generalized Anxiety Disorder scale (GAD-7) and depression (Patient Health Questionnaire depression scale (PHQ-8). Scales are further defined in Results, Outcome Measures.

02

Conditions studied

  • Inflammatory Bowel Disease
  • Behavioral Symptoms
03

In context

Inflammatory Bowel Diseases

1,550 studies on the registry are indexed under Inflammatory Bowel Diseases; 426 are open to participants now.

This study's enrollment of 657 is above the median of 68 across 870 interventional studies indexed under Inflammatory Bowel Diseases.

Browse Inflammatory Bowel Diseases studies →

Lead sponsor

University of Pittsburgh is the lead sponsor of 1,419 studies on the registry; 168 are open to participants now.

Of its 9 completed or terminated interventional studies of FDA-regulated products, 4 (44%) have results posted.

Counted across the registry records on this site, refreshed daily.

04

Who can participate

Ages eligible
18 Years to 60 Years
Sexes eligible
All
Accepts healthy volunteers
No

Go through the criteria one by one — yes, no or not sure — and take the list to your doctor or the study team. Kept in this browser only.

Inclusion criteria

  • Inflammatory Bowel Disease Diagnosis of Crohn's or Ulcerative Colitis. Behavioral health symptoms mild to severe, defined as a score of >= 6 on the Personal Health Questionnaire 4 (PHQ4)

Exclusion criteria

Exclusion Criteria:

  • Lack of smart phone, and/or are unable to speak, read or understand English at the minimum-required level.
05

Study design

Phase
Not applicable
Primary purpose
Other
Allocation
Randomized
Intervention model
Parallel assignment
Masking
None (open label)
Enrollment
657 participants (actual)

Study arms

  • Active comparator
    TEAM-care as usual approach

    Patients will be triaged based on their physical health (PH) and behavioral health (BH) complexity to determine the frequency of in-person visits and how much of these visits will be devoted to medical versus BH issues. Minor modifications were made to the TEAM approach during the COVID-19 public health emergency to account for reduced face-to-face time without changing the underlying differentiation between the two models of delivering SMH care.

    Other: TEAM

  • Active comparator
    TECH-telehealth approach

    Each patient will have an initial face-to-face visit with the core treatment team described above and undergo the same triage process to determine their PH/BH care needs. Each TECH patient will participate in one face-to-face treatment team visit per year unless more frequent visits are deemed to be medically necessary; however, all other interactions will be conducted via technology-supported modalities

    Other: TECH

Interventions

  • OtherTEAM

    TEAM incorporates team-based care with traditional in-person clinic visits. The care team includes a gastroenterologist, nurse practitioner, nutritionist, social worker/behavioral health specialist, and a psychologist or psychiatrist.

  • OtherTECH

    TECH uses team-based care similar to TEAM, but in-person care is substituted with telemedicine (i.e., video visits and consultations) and digital behavioral health tools.

06

What researchers measure

Primary outcomes

  1. IBD Symptom Severity

    IBD symptom severity was measured via a composite IBD Complexity Score developed by clinical researchers to quantify both biological and psychosocial domains of IBD within an SMH setting. It includes the sum of patient-reported responses to two scales: the PROMIS GI symptoms scale, evaluating four domains of gastrointestinal symptoms; and disease-specific PRO-2 disease severity indices taken from the Harvey Bradshaw Index (for individuals with Crohn's disease) and Ulcerative Colitis Activity Index (for individuals with ulcerative colitis). The complexity score is calculated by adding the value of the patient's PRO-2 to the cumulative PROMIS-GI score. Lower scores indicate lower symptom severity; higher scores indicate higher symptom severity. The minimum score is 0; the maximum score is open-ended based on patient response. Only the total IBD Complexity Score is reported.

    Time frame: Compare scores at Baseline, 6-month and 12-month for any changes

  2. Behavioral Health Symptom Severity

    Behavioral health symptom severity was measured utilizing the Patient Health Questionnaire Anxiety-Depression Scale (PHQ-ADS) - which combines the PHQ-8 and GAD-7 scales - as a composite measure of depression and anxiety. The Patient Health Questionnaire 8-item depression scale (PHQ-8) and 7-item Generalized Anxiety Disorder scale (GAD-7) are among the best validated and most commonly used depression and anxiety measures, respectively. The PHQ-ADS is the sum of the PHQ-8 and GAD-7, where a decrease in scores indicates a decrease in BH symptom severity; a decrease of 3-4 points indicates MCID. Lower scores indicate lower levels of behavioral health symptom severity; higher scores indicate higher symptom severity. The minimum score is 0; the maximum score is 45. Only the total PHQ-ADS is reported.

    Time frame: Compare at Baseline, 6-month and 12-month for any changes

Secondary outcomes

  1. Functional Impairment

    Functional impairment was measured using the validated Short Form 12 Health Survey Version 2 (SF-12v2) which includes 12 items from the Short-Form 36 Health Survey and yields a physical and mental composite score as well as 8 subscale values: physical functioning, role-physical, bodily pain, general health, vitality, social functioning, role-emotional, and mental health. Responses are tallied via a norm-based scoring algorithm provided by the assessment licensing company. Lower scores correspond with poorer health-related functioning; higher scores indicate better health-related functioning. The minimum score is 18.5; the maximum score is 142.6. Only the total composite score (the sum of both the physical and mental scales) is reported.

    Time frame: Compare at baseline, 6-month and 12-month for any changes

  2. IBD-IBS Symptom Severity

    IBD-IBS Symptom Severity was measured using the Irritable Bowel Syndrome Symptom Severity Scale (IBS-SSS) to more accurately capture IBD symptom severity for many individuals with IBD, particularly those with inactive IBD but persistent functional GI symptoms (e.g., IBD-IBS). The IBS-SSS scores pain severity, pain frequency, abdominal bloating, bowel satisfaction and interference with life on a 0-100 scale with a total score of 500. A 50-point or more reduction in this score is considered clinically meaningful. Total scores range from 0 to 500 with higher scores indicating more severe symptoms. Answers to all questions are summed to achieve the total score. Subjects can be categorized as having mild (75-175), moderate (175-300), or severe (\>300) IBS. Only total scores are reported.

    Time frame: Compare at baseline, 6-month and 12-month for any changes

  3. Health Care Utilization

    Health care utilization was captured through EHR data to measure categorical (yes or no) instances of ED visits and inpatient hospitalizations at both 6- and 12-months post-enrollment.

    Time frame: Compare at baseline, 6-month and 12-months for any changes

  4. Patient Engagement

    Patient engagement was measured using the validated IBD Self-Efficacy Scale (IBD-SES) which assesses one's confidence level in managing stress and emotions, managing medical care, managing symptoms and disease, and maintaining remission. The IBD-SES measures self-management activities across four subscales (Stress and Emotions; Medical Care; Symptoms and Disease; Remission), with higher scores indicating greater confidence in self-management. Responses for each question are summed to produce one overall and four subscale scores. The total score range is between 29 and 290, with 29 indicating the lowest level of self-efficacy and 290 indicating the highest. Each item is scored 1-10, with 1 being assigned for responses of "Not confident at all" and a score of 10 assigned for responses of "Totally confident." Only total scores are reported.

    Time frame: Compare at baseline, 6-month and 12-month for any changes

  5. Quality of Life

    Quality of life was evaluated using the Short Quality of Life in Inflammatory Bowel Disease Questionnaire (SIBDQ), a validated tool which measures physical, social, and emotional health-related quality of life (QOL) for patients with Crohn's disease and ulcerative colitis. On a 7-point scale, lower scores correspond with a lower perceived QOL, while higher scores represent a higher perceived QOL. Responses for each question are summed for a total score between 10 and 70, with 10 reflecting poor QOL and 70 reflecting high QOL. Each item is scored 1-7, with 1 being assigned for responses indicating the highest severity of symptoms, and 7 being assigned for those reflecting the lowest severity of symptoms. Only total scores are reported.

    Time frame: Compare at baseline, 6-month and 12-month for any changes

07

Results

Posted Sep 3, 2025
Limitations and caveats
Sensitivity analyses confirmed that the COVID-19 pandemic did not have a significant impact on outcomes. Heterogeneity of patient and clinical factors could have introduced confounders that were not the focus of our primary analyses (e.g. specific comorbid medical diagnoses, the contribution of pharmacological treatment). Adherence/dose-effect was not examined beyond exploratory per-protocol analyses. Longer-term follow-up may have been needed to show impact on healthcare utilization.

Participant flow

Recruitment began on July 1, 2019 and was completed on February 28, 2024. A brief pause in recruitment occurred between March 13 and September 13, 2020 to account for disruptions related to the COVID-19 pandemic. All participants were recruited from one of three specialty medical home clinics at large urban academic centers in the northeastern US: UPMC in Pittsburgh, Mount Sinai Hospital in New York, and the Cleveland Clinic in Cleveland.

Participant flow — Overall Study
MilestoneTEAMTECH
Started329328
Completed323320
Not completed68
Withdrew: Death12
Withdrew: Withdrawal by subject36
Withdrew: Protocol violation20

Outcome measures

PrimaryIBD Symptom Severity

IBD symptom severity was measured via a composite IBD Complexity Score developed by clinical researchers to quantify both biological and psychosocial domains of IBD within an SMH setting. It includes the sum of patient-reported responses to two scales: the PROMIS GI symptoms scale, evaluating four domains of gastrointestinal symptoms; and disease-specific PRO-2 disease severity indices taken from the Harvey Bradshaw Index (for individuals with Crohn's disease) and Ulcerative Colitis Activity Index (for individuals with ulcerative colitis). The complexity score is calculated by adding the value of the patient's PRO-2 to the cumulative PROMIS-GI score. Lower scores indicate lower symptom severity; higher scores indicate higher symptom severity. The minimum score is 0; the maximum score is open-ended based on patient response. Only the total IBD Complexity Score is reported.

Time frame:
Compare scores at Baseline, 6-month and 12-month for any changes
Reported as:
Mean · Score on a scale
IBD Symptom Severity
Score on a scaleTEAMTECH
Score at baseline75.9 ± 31.079.9 ± 31.3
Score at 6-month follow-up63.5 ± 30.065.0 ± 33.2
Score at 12-month follow-up62.3 ± 31.264.4 ± 32.2
Statistical analysis
  • TEAM vs TECH · Mixed Models Analysis · p = 0.53 (The threshold for statistical significance was .05.) · Type iii wald chi-squared: 1.26The Chi-squared statistic for the group\*time interaction term is 1.26 with two degrees of freedom.
  • TEAM vs TECH · Mixed Models Analysis · p = 0.57 (The threshold for statistical significance was .05.) · Type iii wald chi-squared: 1.14The Chi-squared statistic for the group\*time\*age interaction term is 1.14 with two degrees of freedom.
  • TEAM vs TECH · Mixed Models Analysis · p = 0.96 (The threshold for statistical significance was .05.) · Type iii wald chi-squared: 0.08The Chi-squared statistic for the group\*time\*diagnosis interaction term is 0.08 with two degrees of freedom.
  • TEAM vs TECH · Mixed Models Analysis · p = 0.17 (The threshold for statistical significance was .05.) · Type iii wald chi-squared: 6.41The Chi-squared statistic for the group\*time\*site interaction term is 6.41 with two degrees of freedom.
  • TEAM vs TECH · Mixed Models Analysis · p = 0.27 (The threshold for statistical significance was .05.) · Type iii wald chi-squared: 2.6The Chi-squared statistic for the group\*time\*site interaction term is 2.6 with two degrees of freedom.
PrimaryBehavioral Health Symptom Severity

Behavioral health symptom severity was measured utilizing the Patient Health Questionnaire Anxiety-Depression Scale (PHQ-ADS) - which combines the PHQ-8 and GAD-7 scales - as a composite measure of depression and anxiety. The Patient Health Questionnaire 8-item depression scale (PHQ-8) and 7-item Generalized Anxiety Disorder scale (GAD-7) are among the best validated and most commonly used depression and anxiety measures, respectively. The PHQ-ADS is the sum of the PHQ-8 and GAD-7, where a decrease in scores indicates a decrease in BH symptom severity; a decrease of 3-4 points indicates MCID. Lower scores indicate lower levels of behavioral health symptom severity; higher scores indicate higher symptom severity. The minimum score is 0; the maximum score is 45. Only the total PHQ-ADS is reported.

Time frame:
Compare at Baseline, 6-month and 12-month for any changes
Reported as:
Mean · Score on a scale
Behavioral Health Symptom Severity
Score on a scaleTEAMTECH
Score at baseline25.4 ± 7.8826.2 ± 7.94
Score at 6-month follow-up18.7 ± 10.919.7 ± 10.9
Score at 12-month follow-up18.0 ± 11.219.2 ± 11.5
Statistical analysis
  • TEAM vs TECH · Mixed Models Analysis · p = 0.90 (The threshold for statistical significance was .05.) · Type iii wald chi-squared: 0.21The Chi-squared statistic for the group\*time interaction term is 0.21 with two degrees of freedom.
  • TEAM vs TECH · Mixed Models Analysis · p = 0.55 (Threshold for statistical significance was 0.05.) · Type iii wald chi-squared: 1.21
  • TEAM vs TECH · Mixed Models Analysis · p = 0.50 (Threshold for statistical significance was 0.05.) · Type iii wald chi-squared: 1.37The Chi-squared statistic for the group\*time\*age interaction term is 1.37 with two degrees of freedom.
  • TEAM vs TECH · Mixed Models Analysis · p = 0.08 (Threshold for statistical significance was 0.05.) · Type iii wald chi-squared: 5.16The Chi-squared statistic for the group\*time\*diagnosis interaction term is 5.16 with two degrees of freedom.
  • TEAM vs TECH · Mixed Models Analysis · p = 1.0 (Threshold for statistical significance was 0.05.) · Type iii wald chi-squared: 0.11The Chi-squared statistic for the group\*time\*site interaction term is 0.11 with two degrees of freedom.
  • TEAM vs TECH · Mixed Models Analysis · p = 0.20 (Threshold for statistical significance was 0.05) · Type iii wald chi-squared: 3.23The Chi-squared statistic for the group\*time\*eHealth literacy interaction term is 3.23 with two degrees of freedom.
SecondaryFunctional Impairment

Functional impairment was measured using the validated Short Form 12 Health Survey Version 2 (SF-12v2) which includes 12 items from the Short-Form 36 Health Survey and yields a physical and mental composite score as well as 8 subscale values: physical functioning, role-physical, bodily pain, general health, vitality, social functioning, role-emotional, and mental health. Responses are tallied via a norm-based scoring algorithm provided by the assessment licensing company. Lower scores correspond with poorer health-related functioning; higher scores indicate better health-related functioning. The minimum score is 18.5; the maximum score is 142.6. Only the total composite score (the sum of both the physical and mental scales) is reported.

Time frame:
Compare at baseline, 6-month and 12-month for any changes
Reported as:
Mean · Score on a scale
Functional Impairment
Score on a scaleTEAMTECH
Score at baseline37.6 ± 6.5738.4 ± 6.36
Score at 6-month follow-up34.2 ± 7.9834.7 ± 7.58
Score at 12-month follow-up33.3 ± 7.7033.5 ± 8.07
Statistical analysis
  • TEAM vs TECH · Mixed Models Analysis · p = 0.53 (The threshold for statistical significance was .05.) · Type iii wald chi-squared: 3.09The Chi-squared statistic for the group\*time interaction term is 3.09 with two degrees of freedom.
SecondaryIBD-IBS Symptom Severity

IBD-IBS Symptom Severity was measured using the Irritable Bowel Syndrome Symptom Severity Scale (IBS-SSS) to more accurately capture IBD symptom severity for many individuals with IBD, particularly those with inactive IBD but persistent functional GI symptoms (e.g., IBD-IBS). The IBS-SSS scores pain severity, pain frequency, abdominal bloating, bowel satisfaction and interference with life on a 0-100 scale with a total score of 500. A 50-point or more reduction in this score is considered clinically meaningful. Total scores range from 0 to 500 with higher scores indicating more severe symptoms. Answers to all questions are summed to achieve the total score. Subjects can be categorized as having mild (75-175), moderate (175-300), or severe (\>300) IBS. Only total scores are reported.

Time frame:
Compare at baseline, 6-month and 12-month for any changes
Reported as:
Mean · Score on a scale
IBD-IBS Symptom Severity
Score on a scaleTEAMTECH
Score at baseline222 ± 135238 ± 130
Score at 6-month follow-up185 ± 125175 ± 123
Score at 12-month follow-up174 ± 124179 ± 125
Statistical analysis
  • TEAM vs TECH · Mixed Models Analysis · p = 0.05 (The threshold for statistical significance was .05.) · Type iii wald chi-squared: 6.01The Chi-squared statistic for the group\*time interaction term is 6.01 with two degrees of freedom.
SecondaryHealth Care Utilization

Health care utilization was captured through EHR data to measure categorical (yes or no) instances of ED visits and inpatient hospitalizations at both 6- and 12-months post-enrollment.

Time frame:
Compare at baseline, 6-month and 12-months for any changes
Reported as:
Count of participants · Participants
Health Care Utilization
ParticipantsTEAMTECH
Hospitalizations — Yes3536
Hospitalizations — No292291
Hospitalizations — Missing21
ED Visits — Yes2731
ED Visits — No297297
ED Visits — Missing50
Statistical analysis
  • TEAM vs TECH · Mixed Models Analysis · p = 0.13 (The threshold for statistical significance was .05.) · Type iii wald chi-squared: 4.14For hospitalizations, the Chi-squared statistic for the group\*time interaction term is 4.14 with two degrees of freedom
  • TEAM vs TECH · Mixed Models Analysis · p = 0.67 (The threshold for statistical significance was .05.) · Type iii wald chi-squared: 0.82For ED visits, the Chi-squared statistic for the group\*time interaction term is 0.82 with two degrees of freedom.
SecondaryPatient Engagement

Patient engagement was measured using the validated IBD Self-Efficacy Scale (IBD-SES) which assesses one's confidence level in managing stress and emotions, managing medical care, managing symptoms and disease, and maintaining remission. The IBD-SES measures self-management activities across four subscales (Stress and Emotions; Medical Care; Symptoms and Disease; Remission), with higher scores indicating greater confidence in self-management. Responses for each question are summed to produce one overall and four subscale scores. The total score range is between 29 and 290, with 29 indicating the lowest level of self-efficacy and 290 indicating the highest. Each item is scored 1-10, with 1 being assigned for responses of "Not confident at all" and a score of 10 assigned for responses of "Totally confident." Only total scores are reported.

Time frame:
Compare at baseline, 6-month and 12-month for any changes
Reported as:
Mean · Score on a scale
Patient Engagement
Score on a scaleTEAMTECH
Score at baseline161 ± 40157 ± 35.8
Score at 6-month follow-up174 ± 47.5178 ± 46.9
Score at 12-month follow-up178 ± 54.0178 ± 49.7
Statistical analysis
  • TEAM vs TECH · Mixed Models Analysis · p = 0.37 (The threshold for statistical significance was .05.) · Type iii wald chi-squared: 1.98The Chi-squared statistic for the group\*time interaction term is 1.98 with two degrees of freedom.
SecondaryQuality of Life

Quality of life was evaluated using the Short Quality of Life in Inflammatory Bowel Disease Questionnaire (SIBDQ), a validated tool which measures physical, social, and emotional health-related quality of life (QOL) for patients with Crohn's disease and ulcerative colitis. On a 7-point scale, lower scores correspond with a lower perceived QOL, while higher scores represent a higher perceived QOL. Responses for each question are summed for a total score between 10 and 70, with 10 reflecting poor QOL and 70 reflecting high QOL. Each item is scored 1-7, with 1 being assigned for responses indicating the highest severity of symptoms, and 7 being assigned for those reflecting the lowest severity of symptoms. Only total scores are reported.

Time frame:
Compare at baseline, 6-month and 12-month for any changes
Reported as:
Mean · Score on a scale
Quality of Life
Score on a scaleTEAMTECH
Score at baseline37.7 ± 10.735.5 ± 10.7
Score at 6-month follow-up42.6 ± 12.041.4 ± 11.9
Score at 12-month follow-up43.0 ± 12.543.4 ± 12.4
Statistical analysis
  • TEAM vs TECH · Mixed Models Analysis · p = 0.06 (The threshold for statistical significance was .05.) · Type iii wald chi-squared: 5.57The Chi-squared statistic for the group\*time interaction term is 5.57 with two degrees of freedom.

Adverse events

Collected over From enrollment until end of follow-up (12 months after enrollment). Non-serious events are listed at a 0% frequency threshold.

Adverse event summary by group
GroupDeathsSeriousOther
TEAM1/329 (0.3%)0/329 (0%)0/329 (0%)
TECH2/328 (0.6%)0/328 (0%)0/328 (0%)

Baseline characteristics

All enrolled participants were included in baseline analysis.

Sex/Gender, Customized
Sex/Gender, Customized(Participants)TEAMTECHTotal
Gender — Female211213424
Gender — Male9390183
Gender — Other213
Gender — Prefer not to answer112
Gender — Missing222345
Ethnicity (NIH/OMB)
Ethnicity (NIH/OMB)(Participants)TEAMTECHTotal
Hispanic or Latino171330
Not Hispanic or Latino269275544
Unknown or Not Reported434083
Race (NIH/OMB)
Race (NIH/OMB)(Participants)TEAMTECHTotal
American Indian or Alaska Native000
Asian639
Native Hawaiian or Other Pacific Islander000
Black or African American241337
White254271525
More than one race51116
Unknown or Not Reported403070
IBD Diagnosis
IBD Diagnosis(Participants)TEAMTECHTotal
Crohn's disease222218440
Ulcerative colitis107110217
Steroid Use
Steroid Use(Participants)TEAMTECHTotal
Yes121119240
No208209417
Opioid use
Opioid use(Participants)TEAMTECHTotal
Yes108105213
No216218434
Missing5510
Advanced therapy
Advanced therapy(Participants)TEAMTECHTotal
Yes185169354
No144159303
Comorbidity
Comorbidity(Participants)TEAMTECHTotal
Yes147143290
No182185367

1 further baseline measures are reported on the registry.

08

Study locations

1 site
  • University of Pittsburgh Medical Center
    Pittsburgh, Pennsylvania 15213, United States
09

References and documents

Study documents

PDFs hosted by the registry, ClinicalTrials.gov.

Individual participant data

Plan to share: No — Individual Participant Data will not be shared. Data is shared at the aggregate level

10

Updates

Tracking since Sep 25, 2026
No changes since tracking began. The registry record was last updated on Sep 3, 2025, before this site started recording changes on Sep 25, 2026. Its history is on ClinicalTrials.gov ↗
11

Registry details

Key details

Study ID
NCT03985800
Collaborators
Mount Sinai Hospital, New York, The Cleveland Clinic, Patient-Centered Outcomes Research Institute
Responsible party
Eva Szigethy (Professor of Psychiatry and Medicine, University of Pittsburgh) — Principal investigator
First posted
Jun 14, 2019
Start date
Jul 1, 2019
Primary completion
Mar 28, 2025
Completion
Mar 28, 2025
Results posted
Sep 3, 2025
Last update
Sep 3, 2025

Study contacts

Eva Szigethy, MD, PhD
principal investigator · University of Pittsburgh Medical Center

Oversight

Data monitoring committee
Yes
FDA-regulated drug
No
FDA-regulated device
No
View the source record on ClinicalTrials.gov ↗

Not currently enrolling

This study is completed, as verified in Aug 2025. You cannot join it, but the record below documents what was studied.

Follow this study

Get an email when the registry record changes — status, dates, results — or when someone posts here.

Sign in to follow

Discussion

Questions and observations about this study, from anyone following it. Not medical advice, and not a channel to the study team — their contact details are on the registry record.

Sign in to join the discussion. Reading takes no account; posting does. You choose a display name, and a pseudonym is the default.

Nothing here yet. If you are running this trial, taking part in it, or weighing whether to, this is the place to say so.

Start the discussion