An interventional study of Resistance Training and Moderate-Intensity Continuous Cycling in Sarcopenia, Aging and Disability Physical, sponsored by Ohio University. Suspended at 1 site in United States. Open to participants aged 60 Years to 75 Years, including healthy volunteers. Per ClinicalTrials.gov, last updated 2020-09-16.
Sponsored by Ohio University · Not applicable, Interventional, and Other
This study evaluates the effect of three different exercise strategies on physical function in older adults. Participants will be randomly assigned to one of three exercise groups: resistance training, moderate-intensity continuous cycling on a stationary bicycle, and high-intensity interval training on a stationary bicycle.
This project is confronting age-related physical disability by optimizing exercise strategies for older adults. Aerobic training is recommended to improve cardiorespiratory (heart and lung) function, while strength training is recommended for muscular function. These exercise effects are necessary for building healthier lives and reducing mortality and disability risk, but most older adults who do exercise typically only perform one type of exercise. In doing so they are missing a key component for healthy aging. This study will address whether stationary-cycling high-intensity interval training results in both cardiorespiratory and muscular improvements, and it will be the first controlled study comparing adaptations to high-intensity interval, aerobic, and strength training in sedentary older adults.
It is unclear whether the lack of muscular adaptations to traditional aerobic training is due to the low intensity/high volume model that is currently prescribed, and thus the central hypothesize of the study is that stationary-cycling high-intensity interval training can improve both cardiorespiratory and muscular function. To test this hypothesis, the investigators will measure heart, lung, and muscle function, as well as physical performance in sedentary older adults, before and after 12 weeks of supervised training using one of three exercise strategies; stationary-cycling high-intensity interval training, stationary-cycling moderate-intensity continuous training, or strength training. By comparing the outcomes across these three groups, the investigators will be able to confirm if short intervals of high-intensity exercise can elicit both cardiorespiratory and muscular benefits.
This work will demonstrate that older adults can improve their cardiovascular health and muscular strength with a single exercise strategy. Establishing in detail the cardiovascular and muscular benefits of this exercise can lead to the implementation of new and improved exercise guidelines for cardiovascular health and reduced physical disability in older adults. Incidentally, it will also provide a framework for future studies to investigate the importance of intensity in exercise. At the end of this study the investigators will be able to disseminate a new evidence-based exercise protocol that will address a significant barrier to healthy aging.
1,208 studies on the registry are indexed under Sarcopenia; 402 are open to participants now.
This study's planned enrollment of 30 is below the median of 60 across 775 interventional studies indexed under Sarcopenia.
Browse Sarcopenia studies →Ohio University is the lead sponsor of 64 studies on the registry; 5 are open to participants now.
Counted across the registry records on this site, refreshed daily.
Exclusion Criteria:
Prohibited Medications: Medications that, in the PIs opinion, would confound study integrity by interacting with study outcomes. For instance:
12 weeks of whole-body progressive resistance training, three days per week, lower-extremity focused (60% of exercises targeting lower extremities)
Behavioral: Resistance Training
12 weeks of progressive endurance cycling on a stationary bicycle at a target heart rate, three days per week.
Behavioral: Moderate-Intensity Continuous Cycling
12 weeks of progressive high-intensity interval cycling on a stationary bicycle, three days per week.
Behavioral: High-Intensity Interval Cycling
Exercise intervention designed to improve muscular strength and power
Exercise intervention designed to improve cardiorespiratory fitness and muscular endurance
Exercise intervention designed to improve cardiorespiratory fitness, muscular endurance, and muscular strength and power
Maximal Oxygen Consumption
The primary endpoint is maximal oxygen consumption measured by both relative and absolute changes in maximal oxygen consumption obtained during a graded exercise test on a cycle ergometer.
Time frame: Change from baseline at 12 weeks
Knee extensor isokinetic power
Maximal muscle power (maximal torque in foot-pounds) of the quadriceps using an isokinetic dynamometer
Time frame: Change from baseline at 12 weeks
Knee extensor isometric force production
Maximal muscle strength of the quadriceps (in foot-pounds) as measured by an isometric dynamometer
Time frame: Change from baseline at 12 weeks
Knee extensor isokinetic endurance
Total power output (cumulative torque in foot-pounds) produced from 120 consecutive maximal knee extensions using an isokinetic dynamometer
Time frame: Change from baseline at 12 weeks
Plan to share: No
This study is suspended, as verified in Sep 2020. You cannot join it, but the record below documents what was studied.
Get an email when the registry record changes — status, dates, results — or when someone posts here.
Sign in to followQuestions and observations about this study, from anyone following it. Not medical advice, and not a channel to the study team — their contact details are on the registry record.
Sign in to join the discussion. Reading takes no account; posting does. You choose a display name, and a pseudonym is the default.
Nothing here yet. If you are running this trial, taking part in it, or weighing whether to, this is the place to say so.
Ohio University