CClinicalTrials.gg
SuspendedNCT03978572DARTUpdated Sep 16, 2020

Dual-benefits of Aerobic and Resistance Training

An interventional study of Resistance Training and Moderate-Intensity Continuous Cycling in Sarcopenia, Aging and Disability Physical, sponsored by Ohio University. Suspended at 1 site in United States. Open to participants aged 60 Years to 75 Years, including healthy volunteers. Per ClinicalTrials.gov, last updated 2020-09-16.

Sponsored by Ohio University · Not applicable, Interventional, and Other

Why this study was suspended
Temporarily paused due to COVID-19 and expected to resume. Not of IRB approval

From the registry’s dates

  • Registered 4 months after the study started (first participant enrolled Feb 2019, registered Jun 2019).
Phase
Not applicable
Study type
Interventional
Enrollment
30
Allocation
Randomized
Ages
60 Years to 75 Years
Sex
All
01

Study summary

This study evaluates the effect of three different exercise strategies on physical function in older adults. Participants will be randomly assigned to one of three exercise groups: resistance training, moderate-intensity continuous cycling on a stationary bicycle, and high-intensity interval training on a stationary bicycle.

Read the detailed description

This project is confronting age-related physical disability by optimizing exercise strategies for older adults. Aerobic training is recommended to improve cardiorespiratory (heart and lung) function, while strength training is recommended for muscular function. These exercise effects are necessary for building healthier lives and reducing mortality and disability risk, but most older adults who do exercise typically only perform one type of exercise. In doing so they are missing a key component for healthy aging. This study will address whether stationary-cycling high-intensity interval training results in both cardiorespiratory and muscular improvements, and it will be the first controlled study comparing adaptations to high-intensity interval, aerobic, and strength training in sedentary older adults.

It is unclear whether the lack of muscular adaptations to traditional aerobic training is due to the low intensity/high volume model that is currently prescribed, and thus the central hypothesize of the study is that stationary-cycling high-intensity interval training can improve both cardiorespiratory and muscular function. To test this hypothesis, the investigators will measure heart, lung, and muscle function, as well as physical performance in sedentary older adults, before and after 12 weeks of supervised training using one of three exercise strategies; stationary-cycling high-intensity interval training, stationary-cycling moderate-intensity continuous training, or strength training. By comparing the outcomes across these three groups, the investigators will be able to confirm if short intervals of high-intensity exercise can elicit both cardiorespiratory and muscular benefits.

This work will demonstrate that older adults can improve their cardiovascular health and muscular strength with a single exercise strategy. Establishing in detail the cardiovascular and muscular benefits of this exercise can lead to the implementation of new and improved exercise guidelines for cardiovascular health and reduced physical disability in older adults. Incidentally, it will also provide a framework for future studies to investigate the importance of intensity in exercise. At the end of this study the investigators will be able to disseminate a new evidence-based exercise protocol that will address a significant barrier to healthy aging.

02

Conditions studied

  • Sarcopenia
  • Aging
  • Disability Physical

Browse trials for

Keywords

  • Exercise
03

In context

Sarcopenia

1,208 studies on the registry are indexed under Sarcopenia; 402 are open to participants now.

This study's planned enrollment of 30 is below the median of 60 across 775 interventional studies indexed under Sarcopenia.

Browse Sarcopenia studies →

Lead sponsor

Ohio University is the lead sponsor of 64 studies on the registry; 5 are open to participants now.

Counted across the registry records on this site, refreshed daily.

04

Who can participate

Ages eligible
60 Years to 75 Years
Sexes eligible
All
Accepts healthy volunteers
Yes

Inclusion criteria

  • Age 60-75 years with no significant health issues or conditions that, in the investigator's opinion, would limit the subject's ability to complete the study per protocol or that would impact the capability to get an accurate measurement of study endpoints.
  • Body mass index between 18.0 and 35 kg/m2.
  • Willingness to maintain current diet and adhere to the intervention programs described for the study and willing to undergo all testing procedures.
  • Able to read, understand, and complete study-related questionnaires
  • Able to read and understand, and willing to sign the informed consent form (ICF).
  • 6-minute walk distance of 450-725 meters for men and 400-675 meters for women.

Exclusion criteria

Exclusion Criteria:

  • Failure to provide informed consent.
  • 6-minute walk distance below 450 meters or above 725 meters for men, below 400 meters or above 675 meters for women
  • Any activities of daily living (ADL) disability (difficulty feeding, dressing, continence, bathing, toileting, and transferring).
  • Lives in a nursing home or assisted living facility
  • Known neuromuscular or neurological conditions affecting somatosensory or motor function or control (e.g., hemiplegia, multiple sclerosis, peripheral neuropathy, Parkinsons disease, Myasthenia Gravis, Ataxia, Apraxia, post-polio syndrome, mitochondrial myopathy, etc.).
  • Unable to communicate because of severe hearing loss or speech disorder.
  • Severe visual impairment, which would preclude completion of the assessments.
  • Cancer requiring treatment currently or in the past 2 years (except primary non-melanoma skin cancer or in situ cervical cancer)
  • Hospitalization (medical confinement for 24 hours), or immobilization, or major surgical procedure requiring general anesthesia within 12 weeks prior to screening, or any planned surgical procedures during the study period.
  • Chronic or relapsing/remitting gastrointestinal disorders such as inflammatory bowel disease and irritable bowel syndrome.
  • Known history of human immunodeficiency virus (HIV) antibody at screening.
  • Use of systemic glucocorticoids.
  • Any history of angina pectoris
  • Any history of heart failure
  • Any history of myocardial infarction
  • Any coronary artery bypass graft or percutaneous coronary intervention
  • Heart disease that limits exercise (valvular, congenital, ischaemic and hypertrophic cardiomyopathy)
  • Complex ventricular arrhythmias or heart block
  • Chronic obstructive pulmonary disease, cerebrovascular disease, or peripheral vascular disease
  • Diabetes mellitus
  • Severe neuropathy
  • Mini-mental state exam score (MMSE) below 19
  • Psychiatric conditions that warrant acute or chronic therapeutic intervention (e.g., major depressive disorder, bipolar disorder, panic disorder, schizophrenia) that in the investigators opinion may interfere with the conduct of study procedures
  • Unable to undergo magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) (e. g. body containing any metallic medical devices or equipment, including heart pacemakers, metal prostheses, implants or surgical clips, any prior injury from shrapnel or grinding metal, exposure to metallic dusts, metallic shavings or having tattoos containing metallic dyes).
  • Unable to reliably undergo exercise or strength tests described for this study.
  • Participation in progressive resistance exercise 2 or more days/week for most weeks over the 24 weeks prior to screening, OR 150+ minutes of accumulated aerobic exercise each week for most weeks over the 24 weeks prior to screening.
  • Current self-reported activity level that, in the investigator's opinion, is considered highly active for older adults
  • Participation in any clinical trial within 12 weeks prior to screening.
  • Limb amputation (except for toes) and/or any fracture within 24 weeks.
  • Any disorder that will not allow completion of the motions required for resistance or aerobic exercise
  • Conditions (such as myasthenia gravis, myositis, muscular dystrophy or myopathy, including drug-induced myopathy) leading to muscle loss, muscle weakness, muscle cramps or myalgia.
  • Acute viral or bacterial upper or lower respiratory infection at screening
  • Abnormal or uncontrolled blood pressure (BP) at the screening visit defined as BP > 170/100 mmHg. If taking anti-hypertensive medication, have to be on stable doses of medication for more than 3 months.
  • Current or recent history (within 1 year of screen) of heavy alcohol consumption or drug abuse that in the investigators opinion may interfere with the conduct of study procedures.
  • Reports being pregnant, lactating, or that they anticipate becoming pregnant in the next 3-months. If a woman becomes pregnant while on study protocol they will be withdrawn from the study

Prohibited Medications: Medications that, in the PIs opinion, would confound study integrity by interacting with study outcomes. For instance:

  • Anti-obesity drugs, nutraceuticals, and dietary supplements that may affect body mass and body composition.
  • Any drug or supplement known to influence muscle mass or performance including but not limited to anabolic steroids, insulin-like growth factor 1 (IGF-1), growth hormone (GH), replacement androgen therapy, anti-androgen therapy.
05

Study design

Phase
Not applicable
Primary purpose
Other
Allocation
Randomized
Intervention model
Parallel assignment
Masking
Single (Outcomes assessor)
Enrollment
30 participants (estimated)

Study arms

  • Active comparator
    Resistance Training

    12 weeks of whole-body progressive resistance training, three days per week, lower-extremity focused (60% of exercises targeting lower extremities)

    Behavioral: Resistance Training

  • Active comparator
    Moderate-intensity continuous cycling

    12 weeks of progressive endurance cycling on a stationary bicycle at a target heart rate, three days per week.

    Behavioral: Moderate-Intensity Continuous Cycling

  • Experimental
    High-intensity interval cycling

    12 weeks of progressive high-intensity interval cycling on a stationary bicycle, three days per week.

    Behavioral: High-Intensity Interval Cycling

Interventions

  • BehavioralResistance Training

    Exercise intervention designed to improve muscular strength and power

  • BehavioralModerate-Intensity Continuous Cycling

    Exercise intervention designed to improve cardiorespiratory fitness and muscular endurance

  • BehavioralHigh-Intensity Interval Cycling

    Exercise intervention designed to improve cardiorespiratory fitness, muscular endurance, and muscular strength and power

06

What researchers measure

Primary outcomes

  1. Maximal Oxygen Consumption

    The primary endpoint is maximal oxygen consumption measured by both relative and absolute changes in maximal oxygen consumption obtained during a graded exercise test on a cycle ergometer.

    Time frame: Change from baseline at 12 weeks

  2. Knee extensor isokinetic power

    Maximal muscle power (maximal torque in foot-pounds) of the quadriceps using an isokinetic dynamometer

    Time frame: Change from baseline at 12 weeks

Secondary outcomes

  1. Knee extensor isometric force production

    Maximal muscle strength of the quadriceps (in foot-pounds) as measured by an isometric dynamometer

    Time frame: Change from baseline at 12 weeks

  2. Knee extensor isokinetic endurance

    Total power output (cumulative torque in foot-pounds) produced from 120 consecutive maximal knee extensions using an isokinetic dynamometer

    Time frame: Change from baseline at 12 weeks

07

Study locations

1 site
  • Ohio University
    Athens, Ohio 45701, United States
08

References and documents

Publications

  • Tavoian D, Russ DW, Law TD, Simon JE, Chase PJ, Guseman EH, Clark BC. A Randomized Clinical Trial Comparing Three Different Exercise Strategies for Optimizing Aerobic Capacity and Skeletal Muscle Performance in Older Adults: Protocol for the DART Study. Front Med (Lausanne). 2019 Oct 22;6:236. doi: 10.3389/fmed.2019.00236. eCollection 2019. PubMed 31750307 ↗

Individual participant data

Plan to share: No

09

Updates

Tracking since Sep 25, 2026
No changes since tracking began. The registry record was last updated on Sep 16, 2020, before this site started recording changes on Sep 25, 2026. Its history is on ClinicalTrials.gov ↗
10

Registry details

Key details

Study ID
NCT03978572
Lead sponsor
Ohio University
Collaborators
American Heart Association
Responsible party
Sponsor
First posted
Jun 7, 2019
Start date
Feb 1, 2019
Primary completion
Sep 30, 2021 (estimated)
Completion
Sep 30, 2021 (estimated)
Last update
Sep 16, 2020

Study contacts

Brian C Clark, PhD
study chair · Ohio University

Oversight

FDA-regulated drug
No
FDA-regulated device
No
View the source record on ClinicalTrials.gov ↗

Not currently enrolling

This study is suspended, as verified in Sep 2020. You cannot join it, but the record below documents what was studied.

Follow this study

Get an email when the registry record changes — status, dates, results — or when someone posts here.

Sign in to follow

Discussion

Questions and observations about this study, from anyone following it. Not medical advice, and not a channel to the study team — their contact details are on the registry record.

Sign in to join the discussion. Reading takes no account; posting does. You choose a display name, and a pseudonym is the default.

Nothing here yet. If you are running this trial, taking part in it, or weighing whether to, this is the place to say so.

Start the discussion