ClinicalTrials.gg
RecruitingNCT03976011VOCALEUpdated Jun 7, 2023

Post Thyroidectomy Echographic Method for Study of Vocal Fold Motion

An interventional study of Transcutaneous Laryngeal Ultrasonography in Recurrent Laryngeal Nerve Palsy and Postoperative Dysphonia, sponsored by Assistance Publique - Hôpitaux de Paris. Recruiting at 5 sites in France. Open to participants aged 18 Years and older. Per ClinicalTrials.gov, last updated 2023-06-07.

Sponsored by Assistance Publique - Hôpitaux de Paris · Not applicable, Interventional, and Diagnostic

From the registry’s dates

  • Primary completion was expected by Jan 2024, 2 years 10 months ago, but the record still lists the study as recruiting.
  • Started Oct 2019; still recruiting 7 years later.
Phase
Not applicable
Study type
Interventional
Enrollment
500
Allocation
Not applicable
Ages
18 Years and older
Sex
All
01

Study summary

One of the major risks of endocrine surgery is recurrent nerve palsy (RNP), leading to vocal folds (VF) immobility. It happens in 5% of cases, leading to high morbidity: dysphonia, aspirations, impossibility to work. Guidelines recommend to systematically perform a nasofibroscopy before and after surgery to check vocal fold mobility. However, due to the decreasing number of specialists, the cost of decontamination, and discomfort of this procedure, these guidelines are insufficiently followed.

Transcutaneous Laryngeal Ultrasonography (TLU) appears a good alternative to nasofibroscopy in evaluating VF mobility, as assessed by the recent flourishing literature. Our team is a leader in this research by having developed a dedicated software, which provides objective measures of VF mobility. The aim of the present protocol is to validate the power of TLU for the diagnosis of RNP on a large cohort of patients operated on endocrine surgery. It is a prospective multicentric study that will blindly compare TLU and nasofibroscopy, the latter being the gold standard. TLU is cost effective and painless; its learning curve is fast. If validated, it may be offered as a good alternative to nasofibroscopy in RNP detection and prognosis.

Read the detailed description

The rationale of this study is that Transcutaneous Laryngeal Ultrasonography (TLU) may be a relevant and reliable tool in assessing vocal folds (VF) paralysis secondary to endocrine surgery (thyroid and parathyroid surgery). According to the literature and to our own publications, subjective impression of VF (im)mobility seems sufficient to diagnose a paralysis. However, the investigators think that objective measures, based on a dedicated semi-automatic software, may offer a much powerful implement and needs to be compared to the gold standard technique, i.e. the nasofibroscopy (NF), in a large prospective multicentric cohort.

In a preliminary study, the investigators described TLU anatomical landmarks first in an ex vivo study and secondary in a prospective study based on 50 patients with VF paralysis compared to 50 controls. These three landmarks, the two arytenoids and the anterior insertion of the two vocal folds on the thyroid cartilage, are easy to recognize, and independent of the postoperative delay and the person performing TLU. They define two symmetrical hemi-larynges in healthy subjects. The investigators designed an original software, aiming at offering two quantitative criteria of laryngeal mobility and symmetry, taking into account motion symmetry (symmetry index) and amplitude (mobility index) of the two hemi-larynges. When a subject presented with a unilateral VF paralysis, the mean symmetry index was significantly larger compared to the control group (20.4% ±13.8% versus 6.7% ±4.7%, p\<0.0001) and the mean lower mobility index was significantly smaller (2.2% ±17.4% versus 20.5% ±14.8%, p\<0.0001). The sensitivity and specificity of this first version of our automatized protocol were 82%.

The aim of the present study is to validate TLU as an alternative to NF in a large independent cohort of patients operated on endocrine surgery. The main goal is to improve the sensitivity and specificity of the objective measures and implement new parameters in the software. By a ready to use tool, the investigators would like to offer the opportunity to any practitioner to assess and quantify VF (im)mobility with their usual US machine.

The subjects will be recruited in the three different clinical centers, highly specialized in endocrine surgery. The aim of 500 subjects included seems feasible thanks to the high activity of these centers. Moreover the latter already have sufficient and qualified staff and technical tools to perform clinical follow up, US, and NF.

The technical acquisition is as follow. The TLU is performed with a 7-14 MHz linear probe, using a portable machine. Subjects are lying on the back, neck slightly extended, with the probe placed over the laryngeal prominence of the thyroid cartilage, including the arytenoids in the axial view. The images are acquired in B-mode, during normal breathing at rest. Typical values for acquisition are: frequency 10 MHz, depth of field of view 4 cm, mechanical index 0.6, gain 45%, dynamic range 85 decibels. A video clip of 10 seconds (30 images per second) is recorded in order to include 5 to 6 complete respiratory cycles. Two images corresponding to physiological abduction and adduction during the same breath cycle are selected. The landmarks, previously described, are selected on the images and tracked by the software.

All patients operated on endocrine surgery in the three referral centers and responding to the inclusion criteria will be included after obtaining their writing consent. The gold standard NF will be performed between D1 and D15, as usually performed after these surgeries. TLU will be performed during the same time period by an investigator blind to the NF results. The subject will be his own control, NF and TLU being compared. When facing VF immobility, the subject will benefit from the usual clinical follow up: consultation with NF at 6 weeks and 6 months. TLU will be added to these appointments.

02

Conditions studied

  • Recurrent Laryngeal Nerve Palsy
  • Postoperative Dysphonia

Browse trials for

Keywords

  • Postoperative dysphonia
  • Thyroidectomy
  • Parathyroidectomy
  • Inferior laryngeal nerve palsy
  • Trans laryngeal ultrasonography
  • Quantitative vocal fold motion evaluation
  • Postoperative recurrent Laryngeal Nerve Palsy
03

In context

Vocal Cord Paralysis

61 studies on the registry are indexed under Vocal Cord Paralysis; 16 are open to participants now.

This study's planned enrollment of 500 is above the median of 39 across 43 interventional studies indexed under Vocal Cord Paralysis.

Browse Vocal Cord Paralysis studies →

Lead sponsor

Assistance Publique - Hôpitaux de Paris is the lead sponsor of 3,592 studies on the registry; 1,033 are open to participants now.

Counted across the registry records on this site, refreshed daily.

04

Who can participate

Ages eligible
18 Years and older
Sexes eligible
All
Accepts healthy volunteers
No

Go through the criteria one by one — yes, no or not sure — and take the list to your doctor or the study team. Kept in this browser only.

Inclusion criteria

  1. 18 years old patient and older
  2. Free of the patient obtained during the preoperative consultation or, failing this, the day before the intervention during the preoperative hospitalization
  3. Thyroid / parathyroid surgery scheduled within 3 months, regardless of the indication or extension
  4. Affiliation to a social security system (recipient or assign) excluding AME.

Exclusion criteria

Exclusion criteria

  1. Known preoperative history of recurrent nerve palsy
  2. History of thyroid or parathyroid surgery or cervicotomy for another pathology
  3. History of laryngeal tumor or vocal folds
  4. Patient under guardianship or curatorship or deprived of liberty or under judicial protection
  5. Pregnant, breastfeeding and parturient women
Terms in these criteria, in plain language(1)

Underlined terms in the criteria open these too. Explained by clinicaltrials.gg, not part of the registry record. The study team decides who can take part.

Informed consent

Before you join, the study team explains what taking part involves — its purpose, what happens, the risks and possible benefits — and answers your questions, so you can decide freely. Consent is usually recorded on a form (the informed consent form, ICF) signed by you or, where the law allows, by someone legally authorised to decide for you.

You can keep asking questions during the study, you are told of new information that matters, and you can choose to leave at any time.

05

Study design

Phase
Not applicable
Primary purpose
Diagnostic
Allocation
Not applicable
Intervention model
Single group
Masking
None (open label)
Enrollment
500 participants (estimated)

Study arms

  • Experimental
    Transcutaneous Laryngeal Ultrasonography

    All patients operated on endocrine surgery in the three referral centers and responding to the inclusion criteria will be included after obtaining their writing consent. The gold standard NF will be performed between D1 and D15, as usually performed after these surgeries. TLU will be performed during the same time period by an investigator blind to the NF results. The subject will be his own control, NF and TLU being compared. When facing VF immobility, the subject will benefit from the usual clinical follow up: consultation with NF at 6 weeks and 6 months. TLU will be added to these appointments.

    Device: Transcutaneous Laryngeal Ultrasonography

Interventions

  • DeviceTranscutaneous Laryngeal Ultrasonography

    TLU will be performed during the same time period of The gold standard NF (who is performed as usually after endocrine surgeries) by an investigator blind to the NF results, between D1 and D15. The subject will be his own control, NF and TLU being compared. When facing VF immobility, the subject will benefit from the usual clinical follow up: consultation with NF at 6 weeks and 6 months. TLU will be added to these appointments.

06

What researchers measure

Primary outcomes

  1. Diagnostic performance associated with the postoperative quantitative TLU (i.e. measured by asymmetry in vocal cord mobility obtained with our dedicated software of image analysis) for the diagnostic of postoperative recurrent nerve palsy (RNP).

    The diagnostic performance of the postoperative measurement of asymmetry in vocal cord mobility obtained with the quantitative TLU will be evaluated by the area under the roc curve and its 95% confidence interval. The gold standard for diagnosis of postoperative RNP will be the nasofibroscopy performed between Day 1 and Day15.

    Time frame: Between Day 1(the day after the surgery) and Day 15

Secondary outcomes

  1. Diagnostic performance associated with the postoperative qualitative TLU (i.e. obtained by the operator during TLU, without the use of our dedicated software for the diagnostic of postoperative recurrent nerve palsy (RNP).

    The diagnostic performance of the postoperative qualitative evaluation of asymmetry in vocal cord mobility obtained by the operator during TLU will be evaluated using sensitivity, specificity, positive and negative predictive value and and their 95% confidence interval. The gold standard for diagnosis of postoperative RNP will be the nasofibroscopy performed between Day 1 and Day 15.

    Time frame: Between Day 1(the day after the surgery) and Day 15

  2. Predictive performance associated with the postoperative quantitative TLU for the diagnosis of final recovery of RNP, among subjects with postoperative RNP.

    The predictive performance of the measurement of asymmetry in vocal cord mobility obtained with the postoperative quantitative TLU will be evaluated among patients with postoperative RNP by the area under the roc curve and its 95% confidence interval. The gold standard for diagnosis of final recovery of RNP will be the nasofibroscopy performed 6 months after surgery.

    Time frame: 6 months after surgery

  3. Predictive performance associated with the postoperative qualitative TLU for the diagnosis of final recovery of RNP, among subjects with postoperative RNP.

    The predictive performance of the postoperative qualitative evaluation of asymmetry in vocal cord mobility obtained by the operator during TLU will be evaluated using sensitivity, specificity, positive and negative predictive value and and their 95% confidence interval. The gold standard for diagnosis of final recovery of RNP will be the nasofibroscopy performed 6 months after surgery.

    Time frame: 6 months (e.g. 6 months after surgery)

  4. Predictive performance associated with the quantitative TLU performed 6 weeks after surgery for the diagnosis of final recovery of RNP, among subjects with postoperative RNP.

    The predictive performance of the measurement of asymmetry in vocal cord mobility obtained with the quantitative TLU 6 weeks after surgery will be evaluated among patients with postoperative RNP by the area under the roc curve and its 95% confidence interval. The gold standard for diagnosis of final recovery of RNP will be the nasofibroscopy performed 6 months after surgery.

    Time frame: 6 months after surgery

  5. Predictive performance associated with the qualitative TLU performed 6 weeks after surgery for the diagnosis of final recovery of RNP, among subjects with postoperative.

    The predictive performance of the qualitative evaluation of asymmetry in vocal cord mobility obtained by the operator during TLU performed 6 weeks after surgery will be evaluated using sensitivity, specificity, positive and negative predictive value and and their 95% confidence interval. The gold standard for diagnosis of final recovery of RNP will be the nasofibroscopy performed 6 months after surgery.

    Time frame: 6 months after surgery

  6. Diagnostic performance associated with the quantitative TLU performed 6 months after surgery for the diagnosis of final recovery of RNP, among subjects with postoperative RNP.

    The diagnostic performance of the measurement of asymmetry in vocal cord mobility obtained with the quantitative TLU 6 months after surgery will be evaluated among patients with postoperative RNP by the area under the roc curve and its 95% confidence interval. The gold standard for diagnosis of final recovery of RNP will be the nasofibroscopy performed 6 months after surgery.

    Time frame: 6 months after surgery

  7. Diagnostic performance associated with the qualitative TLU performed 6 months after surgery for the diagnosis of final recovery of RNP, among subjects with postoperative RNP.

    The diagnostic performance of the qualitative evaluation of asymmetry in vocal cord mobility obtained by the operator during TLU performed 6 months after surgery will be evaluated using sensitivity, specificity, positive and negative predictive value and and their 95% confidence interval. The gold standard for diagnosis of final recovery of RNP will be the nasofibroscopy performed 6 months after surgery.

    Time frame: 6 months after surgery

  8. Correlation between the postoperative Voice Handicap Index (VHI) and the postoperative quantitative TLU.

    Pearson correlation coefficient between postoperative quantitative TLU and VHI

    Time frame: Between Day 1(the day after the surgery) and Day 15

  9. Correlation between the Voice Handicap Index (VHI) measured 6 weeks after surgery and the quantitative TLU measured 6 weeks after surgery, among subjects with postoperative RNP.

    Pearson correlation coefficient between quantitative TLU and VHI at 6 weeks

    Time frame: 6 weeks after surgery (+/- 15 days)

  10. Correlation between the Voice Handicap Index (VHI) measured 6 months after surgery and the quantitative TLU measured 6 months after surgery, among subjects with postoperative RNP.

    Pearson correlation coefficient between quantitative TLU and VHI at 6 months

    Time frame: 6 months after surgery

  11. Pearson correlation coefficient between postoperative quantitative TLU and loss or diminution of the intraoperative stimulation of the inferiors laryngeal nerves, expressed in microvolts, measured during the surgery.

    Time frame: Between Day 1(the day after the surgery) and Day 15

  12. Postoperative patient's satisfaction regarding TLU examination: six-point satisfaction questionnaire

    Patient's satisfaction regarding TLU examination will be evaluated using a structured questionnaire (Strongly disagree; Slightly disagree; Neither agree nor disagree; Slightly agree; Strongly agree; Without opinion)

    Time frame: Between Day 1 and Day 15

  13. Postoperative patient's satisfaction regarding nasofibroscopic examination: six-point satisfaction questionnaire

    Postoperative patient's satisfaction regarding nasofibroscopic examination will be evaluated using a structured six-point satisfaction six-point satisfaction questionnaire (Strongly disagree; Slightly disagree; Neither agree nor disagree; Slightly agree; Strongly agree; Without opinion)

    Time frame: Between Day 1 and Day 15

  14. Comparison between the costs associated with the nasofibroscopy of the one hand, and the TLU on the other hand.

    The costs of nasofibroscopy on the one hand, and the TLU on the other, will be determined taking into account of the french social security system and its repayment as well as the time required to carry out the examinations, the purchase cost of the devices and its maintenance. The costs associated with the two examinations will be compared using the incremental cost-effectiveness ratio (ICER) and its 95% confidence interval

    Time frame: 6 months

Other outcomes

  1. Diagnostic performance associated with the postoperative measurements obtained with the interactive software developed by the Mindray company of different points of the laryngeal anatomy for the diagnostic of postoperative recurrent nerve palsy (RNP).

    The diagnostic performance of the postoperative measurement of asymmetry in vocal cord mobility obtained with the interactive software developed by the Mindray company will be evaluated by the area under the roc curve and its 95% confidence interval. The gold standard for diagnosis of postoperative RNP will be the nasofibroscopy performed between Day 1 and Day 15.

    Time frame: Between Day 1 (the day after the surgery) and D15

  2. Diagnostic performance comparison of the postoperative measure obtained with an interactive software developed by the Mindray company and with quantitative TLU measured by asymmetry in vocal cord mobility with our dedicated software of image analysis.

    Comparison between the area under the roc curve of these two measurements, using Delong test.

    Time frame: Between Day 1 (the day after the surgery) and Day 15

  3. Concordance between the postoperative measure obtained with an interactive software developed by the Mindray company and with quantitative TLU (i.e. measured by asymmetry in vocal cord mobility obtained with our dedicated software of image analysis).

    The concordance between these two measurements will be evaluated using a Bland and Altman plot

    Time frame: Between Day 1 (the day after the surgery) and Day 15

07

Study locations

3 of 5 sites recruiting
08

References and documents

Publications

  • Bergeret-Cassagne H, Lazard DS, Lefort M, Hachi S, Leenhardt L, Menegaux F, Russ G, Tresallet C, Frouin F. Sonographic Dynamic Description of the Laryngeal Tract: Definition of Quantitative Measures to Characterize Vocal Fold Motion and Estimation of Their Normal Values. J Ultrasound Med. 2017 May;36(5):1037-1044. doi: 10.7863/ultra.16.05014. Epub 2017 Jan 10. PubMed 28072470 ↗
  • Lazard DS, Bergeret-Cassagne H, Lefort M, Leenhardt L, Russ G, Frouin F, Tresallet C. Transcutaneous Laryngeal Ultrasonography for Laryngeal Immobility Diagnosis in Patients with Voice Disorders After Thyroid/Parathyroid Surgery. World J Surg. 2018 Jul;42(7):2102-2108. doi: 10.1007/s00268-017-4428-2. PubMed 29299645 ↗

Individual participant data

Plan to share: No

09

Timeline

Tracking since Sep 25, 2026
ElapsedEstimatedEstimated, not yet reachedSimilar studies: half by the dot; the band is the middle halfHalf of similar studies reached it by the dot; the band is the middle half, from a quarter to three quarters

Started Oct 2019 (actual). Primary completion is estimated for Jan 2024, 51 months after the start.

Of 20 interventional studies with no phase under Vocal Cord Paralysis, half reached primary completion within 25 months of starting (the median), counting those still running; a quarter within 11 and three quarters within 46. This study's planned 51 months is above that.

How these figures are worked out, and which studies are left out of them.

Registered
May 24, 2019
First posted
Jun 5, 2019
StartActual
Oct 20, 2019
Primary completionEst.
Jan 2024
CompletionEst.
Apr 2024
Last update
Jun 7, 2023
What these dates mean
Start.
When the first participant enrolled; while estimated, when the study expects to open to recruitment.
Primary completion.
When the last participant was examined or treated to collect data for the study's main question, its primary outcome. A study that stopped early gives the date its data collection stopped.
Completion.
When the last participant's last visit took place, for every outcome, secondary ones and side effects included: the end of the study. Often later than primary completion, sometimes the same day.
Actual and Est.
Actual means the registry says the date has happened. Est. (estimated) is a date the sponsor plans or expects. It can still move, and the sponsor is expected to change it to actual once it has passed.
No changes since tracking began. The registry record was last updated on Jun 7, 2023, before this site started recording changes on Sep 25, 2026. Its history is on ClinicalTrials.gov ↗
10

Registry details

Key details

Study ID
NCT03976011
Collaborators
MINDRAY
Responsible party
Sponsor
First posted
Jun 5, 2019
Start date
Oct 20, 2019
Primary completion
Jan 2024 (estimated)
Completion
Apr 2024 (estimated)
Last update
Jun 7, 2023

Study contacts

Christophe TRESALLET, MD PhD
Contact
christophe.tresallet@aphp.fr
01 42 17 66 39
Frédérique FROUIN
Contact
frederique.frouin@inserm.fr
01 69 86 77 39
Christophe TRESALLET, MD PhD
principal investigator · Assistance Publique - Hôpitaux de Paris

Oversight

Data monitoring committee
No
FDA-regulated drug
No
FDA-regulated device
No
View the source record on ClinicalTrials.gov ↗

Interested in this study?

Eligibility is decided by the study team. Share this record with your doctor or contact the team directly.

Contact study team

Follow this study

Get an email when the registry record changes — status, dates, results — or when someone posts here.

Sign in to follow

Discussion

Questions and observations about this study, from anyone following it. Not medical advice, and not a channel to the study team — their contact details are on the registry record.

Sign in to join the discussion. Reading takes no account; posting does. You choose a display name, and a pseudonym is the default.

Nothing here yet. If you are running this trial, taking part in it, or weighing whether to, this is the place to say so.

Start the discussion