CClinicalTrials.gg
CompletedNCT03975855PULSEUpdated Jun 6, 2023

Evaluation of NeoNavia® Biopsy System in Axillary Lymph Nodes

An observational study in Breast Cancer, sponsored by NeoDynamics AB. Completed at 7 sites in Germany. Open to participants aged 18 Years and older. Per ClinicalTrials.gov, last updated 2023-06-06.

Sponsored by NeoDynamics AB · Observational

Study type
Observational
Model
Case-only
Time perspective
Prospective
Enrollment
140
Ages
18 Years and older
Sex
All
01

Study summary

The aim of the study is to document performance characteristics of a biopsy device indicated for use in axillary lymph nodes, to provide basic insights into the complexity of axillary biopsy procedures and generate hypothesis for further larger comparative trials.

This is a Sponsor-initiated prospective, multicenter, registry trial. Patients that present with suspicious axillary lymph nodes at the time of breast cancer diagnosis undergo axillary sampling using the NeoNavia biopsy system. This is in accordance with clinical routine and current clinical guidelines. The system incorporates a new mechanism for controllable and precise needle insertion and a newly developed sampling needle for high yield sampling acquisition. It is approved for use in the breast and axillary lymph nodes.

Read the detailed description

Determining axillary nodal status at the time of diagnosis is paramount for optimal staging and treatment planning. SLNB is indicated for patients with a clinical and radiological negative axilla. 25%-43% of breast cancer patients are reported to present with radiologically suspicious axillary lymph nodes at the time of diagnosis. In these patients, a pre-operative ultrasound-guided needle sampling of suspicious axillary lymph tissue is indicated.

This can rationalize patient care by identifying those with axillary metastases using merely a minimally-invasive intervention. These patients can be counselled with regards to proceeding directly to definitive axillary surgery in the form of axillary lymph node dissection (ALND) rather than sentinel node biopsy (SLNB), thereby omitting a potentially unnecessary surgical procedure. Patients with a negative axillary status can proceed to SLNB for definitive nodal status determination. Furthermore, in the paradigm of neoadjuvant treatment, confirming a histopathologic involvement of lymph nodes by US-guided needle biopsies enables for decision on neoadjuvant chemotherapy without the need for a surgical procedure.

The main challenge in performing CNB (Core Needle Biopsy) within the axilla is to avoid damaging the major vessels and nerves. Technical, operator and procedural requirements that mitigate risks in CNB sampling of the axilla have been reported in the literature. It is suggested that the operator shall fully acknowledge the detailed anatomy including vessels and nerves in the axilla, have good hand-eye coordination as well as be experienced in US-guided interventions. Proper positioning of the patient is reported to be important. Color Doppler ultrasound shall be used to assess the location of large vessels relative to the intended biopsy track and to avoid sampling a vascular component of the node. Perfect guiding and visualization of the needle tip at all times is reported to be essential. It is suggested that a biopsy device with a controllable needle action is safer to use. Omitting the firing action gives the operator greater control over the final needle tip placement.

Due to the difficulty of the procedure there may be inclusion bias in the reported studies. In one series, patients presenting with nodes adjacent to a vessel or located very deep and difficult to access were not asked to participate in the study and hence not subjected to CNB. In another study FNA (Fine Needle Aspiration) was performed instead of CNB when the lymph nodes were in close proximity to vessels. A recent German survey showed that merely 79% of breast centers (41/52) perform biopsies in the axilla (data on file), and anecdotal evidence suggests that in certain departments only the most experienced physician performs CNB procedures in axillary lymph nodes, risking economic/operational inefficiencies.

For the purpose of documenting the prevalence and composition of cases deemed challenging in this study, an experienced expert panel has compiled a comprehensive list of risk parameters characterizing the anatomic complexity and procedural difficulty of axillary lymph node needle biopsies.

Recently a new biopsy device indicated for the use in breast and axillary lymph nodes (NeoNavia biopsy system, NeoDynamics, Sweden) has become available. It incorporates a pneumatic needle insertion mechanism that is intended to provide better control of needle progression and enable stepwise insertion without noticeable deformation or displacement of surrounding tissue as visualized under ultrasound. Furthermore a new method of tissue acquisition is employed that has pre-clinically shown a higher sampling yield compared to CNB. These characteristics indicate that the device could be well suited for tackling even the most challenging cases of axillary lymph node biopsies. Initial clinical results indicate that in axillary lesions deemed "technically difficult", i.e. where prior US-guided biopsies with CNB or FNA had yielded non-diagnostic histology results, the NeoNavia device performed successfully thereby significantly altering clinical management.

02

Conditions studied

  • Breast Cancer

Browse trials for

Keywords

  • Breast Cancer
  • Axillary Lymph Nodes
  • Biopsy
03

In context

Breast Neoplasms

12,544 studies on the registry are indexed under Breast Neoplasms; 2,892 are open to participants now.

This study's enrollment of 140 is below the median of 184 across 2,642 observational studies indexed under Breast Neoplasms.

Browse Breast Neoplasms studies →

Lead sponsor

NeoDynamics AB is the lead sponsor of 2 studies on the registry; 1 is open to participants now.

Counted across the registry records on this site, refreshed daily.

04

Who can participate

Ages eligible
18 Years and older
Sexes eligible
All
Accepts healthy volunteers
No
Sampling method
Non-probability sample

Study population

Patients recruited from eight university hospitals in Germany

Inclusion criteria

  • cT1-4c (multifocality / multicentricity permitted)
  • Female / male patient aged ≥ 18 years
  • cN+ based on the following criteria (at least one criteria must be met):

    • lymph node is palpable
    • cortical asymmetry (focal or diffuse cortical thickening of >3mm) under US
    • cortex:hilum ratio >2:1 under US
    • loss of hilum/cortex structure under US
  • Written informed consent (ICF)

Exclusion criteria

Exclusion Criteria:

  • Suspicious lymph nodes after neoadjuvant therapy
  • No confirmed breast cancer and no abnormality in the breast
  • Patient uses Marcumar
  • Pregnant and lactating women
  • Known hypersensitivity reaction against local anesthesia
  • Prior chemo or radiation therapy in breast or axilla
  • Missing written informed consent
05

Study design

Observational model
Case-only
Time perspective
Prospective
Enrollment
140 participants (actual)
Patient registry
No

Groups and cohorts

  • Suspicious axillary lymph nodes

    All patients with histologically confirmed breast cancer or highly suspicious breast lesions presenting with suspicious axillary lymph nodes

    Device: NeoNavia® Biopsy System

Interventions

  • DeviceNeoNavia® Biopsy System

    Biopsy of axillary lymph node using the NeoNavia Biopsy System. The investigator shall obtain as many/large samples as judged adequate and sufficient for diagnosis.

06

What researchers measure

Primary outcomes

  1. Rate of successful biopsies (= success rates)

    Lymph node tissue present in biopsy samples as assessed by histopathologist

    Time frame: after histopathological analysis af tissue samples, up to 1 week after biopsy

Secondary outcomes

  1. Rate of patients presenting with risk parameters for an anatomically complex procedure

    Based on a list of parameters established by an expert panel to characterize the anatomic complexity of axillary biopsy procedures

    Time frame: time of biopsy, 1 day

  2. Rate of cases in which it was possible to target the selected lymph node or, if present, the lesion inside the node

    Time frame: time of biopsy, 1 day

  3. Rate of cases in which pulses facilitated control during needle insertion

    Time frame: time of biopsy, 1 day

  4. Sensitivity

    Time frame: post-surgery, up to 200 days

  5. Specificity

    Time frame: post-surgery, up to 200 days

07

Study locations

7 sites
  • Klinikum Esslingen
    Esslingen, BW 73730, Germany
  • Universitätsfrauenklinik Tübingen
    Tübingen, BW 72076, Germany
  • Agaplesion Markus Krankenhaus
    Frankfurt, HE 60431, Germany
  • Universitäts-Frauenklinik
    Rostock, MV 18059, Germany
  • HJK Erkelenz
    Erkelenz, NRW 41812, Germany
  • Kliniken Essen-Mitte
    Essen, NRW 45136, Germany
  • Uniklinik Köln
    Köln, NRW 50226, Germany
08

References and documents

Publications

  • Schassburger KU, Paepke S, Saracco A, Azavedo E, Ekstrom C, Wiksell H. High velocity pulse biopsy device enables controllable and precise needle insertion and high yield tissue acquisition. Phys Med. 2018 Feb;46:25-31. doi: 10.1016/j.ejmp.2017.12.014. Epub 2018 Jan 30. PubMed 29519406 ↗
  • Gruber I, Hahn M, Fehm T, Hann von Weyhern C, Stabler A, Winckelmann A, Wallwiener D, Kuhn T. Relevance and methods of interventional breast sonography in preoperative axillary lymph node staging. Ultraschall Med. 2012 Aug;33(4):337-43. doi: 10.1055/s-0031-1273317. Epub 2011 May 26. PubMed 21618166 ↗
  • Nakamura R, Yamamoto N, Miyaki T, Itami M, Shina N, Ohtsuka M. Impact of sentinel lymph node biopsy by ultrasound-guided core needle biopsy for patients with suspicious node positive breast cancer. Breast Cancer. 2018 Jan;25(1):86-93. doi: 10.1007/s12282-017-0795-7. Epub 2017 Jul 22. PubMed 28735457 ↗
  • Garcia-Ortega MJ, Benito MA, Vahamonde EF, Torres PR, Velasco AB, Paredes MM. Pretreatment axillary ultrasonography and core biopsy in patients with suspected breast cancer: diagnostic accuracy and impact on management. Eur J Radiol. 2011 Jul;79(1):64-72. doi: 10.1016/j.ejrad.2009.12.011. Epub 2010 Jan 4. PubMed 20047809 ↗
  • Abe H, Schmidt RA, Kulkarni K, Sennett CA, Mueller JS, Newstead GM. Axillary lymph nodes suspicious for breast cancer metastasis: sampling with US-guided 14-gauge core-needle biopsy--clinical experience in 100 patients. Radiology. 2009 Jan;250(1):41-9. doi: 10.1148/radiol.2493071483. Epub 2008 Oct 27. PubMed 18955508 ↗
  • Kim KH, Son EJ, Kim EK, Ko KH, Kang H, Oh KK. The safety and efficiency of the ultrasound-guided large needle core biopsy of axilla lymph nodes. Yonsei Med J. 2008 Apr 30;49(2):249-54. doi: 10.3349/ymj.2008.49.2.249. PubMed 18452262 ↗
  • Ganott MA, Zuley ML, Abrams GS, Lu AH, Kelly AE, Sumkin JH, Chivukula M, Carter G, Austin RM, Bandos AI. Ultrasound Guided Core Biopsy versus Fine Needle Aspiration for Evaluation of Axillary Lymphadenopathy in Patients with Breast Cancer. ISRN Oncol. 2014 Feb 4;2014:703160. doi: 10.1155/2014/703160. eCollection 2014. PubMed 24649373 ↗
  • Damera A, Evans AJ, Cornford EJ, Wilson AR, Burrell HC, James JJ, Pinder SE, Ellis IO, Lee AH, Macmillan RD. Diagnosis of axillary nodal metastases by ultrasound-guided core biopsy in primary operable breast cancer. Br J Cancer. 2003 Oct 6;89(7):1310-3. doi: 10.1038/sj.bjc.6601290. PubMed 14520465 ↗
09

Updates

Tracking since Sep 25, 2026
No changes since tracking began. The registry record was last updated on Jun 6, 2023, before this site started recording changes on Sep 25, 2026. Its history is on ClinicalTrials.gov ↗
10

Registry details

Key details

Study ID
NCT03975855
Lead sponsor
NeoDynamics AB
Responsible party
Sponsor
First posted
Jun 5, 2019
Start date
Feb 14, 2019
Primary completion
Jun 30, 2021
Completion
Apr 11, 2023
Last update
Jun 6, 2023

Study contacts

Marc Thill, PD Dr.
principal investigator · Leading Principal Investigator

Oversight

Data monitoring committee
No
FDA-regulated drug
No
FDA-regulated device
No
View the source record on ClinicalTrials.gov ↗

Not currently enrolling

This study is completed, as verified in Jun 2023. You cannot join it, but the record below documents what was studied.

Follow this study

Get an email when the registry record changes — status, dates, results — or when someone posts here.

Sign in to follow

Discussion

Questions and observations about this study, from anyone following it. Not medical advice, and not a channel to the study team — their contact details are on the registry record.

Sign in to join the discussion. Reading takes no account; posting does. You choose a display name, and a pseudonym is the default.

Nothing here yet. If you are running this trial, taking part in it, or weighing whether to, this is the place to say so.

Start the discussion