An observational study in Intensive Care Unit, sponsored by Capital Medical University. Completed at 1 site in China. Open to participants aged 18 Years and older. Per ClinicalTrials.gov, last updated 2019-06-05.
Sponsored by Capital Medical University · Observational
Sedation and analgesia is necessary management for patients in the intensive care units. The high-level studies of sedation and analgesia in China are still deficient, especially in patients with brain injuries who even have been excluded from the relevant studies.
Sedation and analgesia is necessary management for patients in the intensive care units. The high-level studies of sedation and analgesia in China are still deficient, especially in patients with brain injuries who even have been excluded from the relevant studies. In the present study, a multicenter, 1-day point cross-sectional study about the sedation and analgesia among patients in China, particularly brain-injured will be investigated. The objectives are to investigate sedation and analgesia among patients in China and to compare sedation and analgesia between brain injuries and other patients.
2,125 studies on the registry are indexed under Brain Injuries; 384 are open to participants now.
This study's enrollment of 387 is above the median of 100 across 692 observational studies indexed under Brain Injuries.
Browse Brain Injuries studies →Capital Medical University is the lead sponsor of 293 studies on the registry; 91 are open to participants now.
Counted across the registry records on this site, refreshed daily.
All the patients at 9am on the on-site investigation day in the participating ICUs will be screened and enrolled according to the inclusion and exclusion criteria.
Go through the criteria one by one — yes, no or not sure — and take the list to your doctor or the study team. Kept in this browser only.
Exclusion Criteria:
Use the common GCS, RASS and self-reported pain assessment for evaluating consciousness, agitation/sedation and analgesia.
Also known as: The Richmond Agitation-Sedation Scale (RASS), The self-reported pain assessment
Performance of sedation assessment
The percentage of patients receiving sedation assessment
Time frame: The previous 24 hours prior to the on-site investigation
Performance of pain assessment
The percentage of patients receiving pain assessment
Time frame: The previous 24 hours prior to the on-site investigation
Use of sedatives
The percentage of patients receiving sedatives
Time frame: The previous 24 hours prior to the on-site investigation
Use of analgesics
The percentage of patients receiving analgesics
Time frame: The previous 24 hours prior to the on-site investigation
ICU mortality
The percentage of patients dead in the ICU
Time frame: Within 60 days after on-site investigation
Hospital mortality
The percentage of patients dead in the hospital
Time frame: Within 60 days after on-site investigation
Plan to share: Undecided
This study is completed, as verified in Jun 2019. You cannot join it, but the record below documents what was studied.
Get an email when the registry record changes — status, dates, results — or when someone posts here.
Sign in to followQuestions and observations about this study, from anyone following it. Not medical advice, and not a channel to the study team — their contact details are on the registry record.
Sign in to join the discussion. Reading takes no account; posting does. You choose a display name, and a pseudonym is the default.
Nothing here yet. If you are running this trial, taking part in it, or weighing whether to, this is the place to say so.