CClinicalTrials.gg
CompletedNCT03972163SPECTORxUpdated May 21, 2025Results posted

Standardized Patient-Centered Medication Review in Home Hospice

An interventional study of NIA Medication Management - Active Comparator and STOPPFrail (Screening Tool of Older Persons Prescriptions) in Hospices, Poly Pharmacy and Deprescriptions, sponsored by University of Massachusetts, Worcester. Completed at 1 site in United States. Open to participants aged 65 Years to 110 Years. Per ClinicalTrials.gov, last updated 2025-05-21.

Sponsored by University of Massachusetts, Worcester · Not applicable, Interventional, and Supportive care

Phase
Not applicable
Study type
Interventional
Enrollment
23
Allocation
Randomized
Ages
65 Years to 110 Years
Sex
All
01

Study summary

This is a pilot cluster randomized trial that tests the effect of a novel intervention that trains hospice staff to 1. regularly review, simplify, and align patients' prescribed medications with their goals of care as their illness progresses, and 2. support family caregivers with education that empowers them to understand each medication's use, develop skills for safe administration, and 3. understand when stopping medications may be beneficial.

Read the detailed description

A tremendous challenge in home hospice care is ensuring that medication prescribing is appropriately aligned to patients' goals of care and that medications are appropriately managed by family caregivers. Therefore, the Investigators propose a novel intervention that trains hospice staff to 1. regularly review, simplify, and align patients' prescribed medications with their goals of care as their illness progresses, and 2. support family caregivers with education that empowers them to understand each medication's use, develop skills for safe administration, and understand when stopping medications may be beneficial. This program is called Standardized PatiEnt-CenTered medicatiOn Review (SPECTORx) in Home Hospice, and is based on a combination of 3 existing, complementary, educational programs that, together, train hospice staff to create a comprehensive, patient-centered, medication management care plan. The program also creates an online learning community that promotes ongoing education and practice change for hospice clinicians. This pilot study aims to demonstrate the feasibility of conducting a clinical trial to evaluate the efficacy of SPECTORx. The long-term objective is to test the hypothesis that SPECTORx reduces inappropriate medication prescribing and improves family caregiver reported quality of care. However, to accomplish this, the Investigators must first address challenging questions regarding the design, feasibility, and execution of trials in home hospice. The Investigators will accomplish this using a stakeholder engagement process to refine the SPECTORx intervention and trial protocol. The Investigators will then conduct a pilot cluster randomized trial and compare outcomes within and across 2 large, multi-office, hospice agencies from Utah and Massachusetts. Within each hospice agency, the Investigators will randomize 1 office to intervention and 1 office to attention control. Target enrollment is n=60 family caregiver-patient dyads of patients aged ≥65 years with advanced, life-limiting illness. Primary outcomes are acceptability and feasibility of the SPECTORx intervention by hospice stakeholders, and acceptability, burden and completion of family caregiver assessments (Family Caregiver Medication Administration Hassle Scale at baseline, 2 weeks, 4 weeks, 12 weeks, and quarterly). The overarching goal of this research is to align patient's prescribed medications with their goals of care at each stage of their advanced illness and to support family caregivers' medication management challenges. Ultimately, the Investigators want to improve the quality of medication prescribing, reduce treatment complexity and medication-related harm, and improve family caregiver outcomes for the almost 600,000 elderly Americans who receive home hospice services annually.

02

Conditions studied

  • Hospices
  • Poly Pharmacy
  • Deprescriptions
  • Caregivers
  • Palliative Care
  • Prescription Drug Overuse
  • Interdisciplinary Communication
03

In context

Prescription Drug Overuse

33 studies on the registry are indexed under Prescription Drug Overuse; 1 is open to participants now.

This study's enrollment of 23 is below the median of 62 across 28 interventional studies indexed under Prescription Drug Overuse.

Browse Prescription Drug Overuse studies →

Lead sponsor

University of Massachusetts, Worcester is the lead sponsor of 288 studies on the registry; 54 are open to participants now.

Of its 25 completed or terminated interventional studies of FDA-regulated products, 18 (72%) have results posted.

Counted across the registry records on this site, refreshed daily.

04

Who can participate

Ages eligible
65 Years to 110 Years
Sexes eligible
All
Accepts healthy volunteers
No

Inclusion criteria

Patient - Newly admitted home hospice enrollees, aged ≥65 years old with:

    1. advanced life-limiting illness;
    1. an estimated life expectancy of >1 month;
    1. recent functional status decline (defined as change in Karnofsky Performance Status [KPS] to \< 80% in prior 3 months);
    1. polypharmacy (defined as ≥ 5 regularly scheduled medications [excluding antimicrobials]);
    1. cognitive ability to provide informed consent based on a Short Portable Mental Status Questionnaire (SPMSQ) score ≥6 OR, with a legally authorized representative who is willing and able to provide proxy consent.

Family ("any relative, partner, friend or neighbor who has a significant personal relationship with, and provides a broad range of assistance) Caregiver -

  • self-identification as "usually" or "always" providing care to the eligible patient;
  • English-speaking;
  • telephone access; and
  • cognitive ability to participate.

Exclusion criteria

Exclusion Criteria:

Patient:

  • Imminent death;
  • pain crisis;
  • no family caregiver or health care proxy

Family Caregiver:

  • no telephone access;
  • cognitive impairment.
05

Study design

Phase
Not applicable
Primary purpose
Supportive care
Allocation
Randomized
Intervention model
Parallel assignment
Masking
Single (Participant)
Enrollment
23 participants (actual)

Study arms

  • Experimental
    SPECTORx Educational Intervention

    The program intervention is based on a combination of 3 existing, complementary, educational programs that, together, equip hospice staff to create a comprehensive, patient-centered, medication management care plan.

    Behavioral: STOPPFrail (Screening Tool of Older Persons Prescriptions) · Behavioral: "Discontinuing Medication Appropriately" and "Understanding the Art of Communication about Deprescribing" · Behavioral: "Key Approaches to Support Informal Family Caregivers in Managing Medications"

  • Active comparator
    Attention Control

    As the attention control, we will refer staff in control offices to the National Institute of Aging (NIA)'s website on "Medicines and Medication Management" to review content and materials for use in Family Care Giver (FCG) support.

    Behavioral: NIA Medication Management - Active Comparator

Interventions

  • BehavioralNIA Medication Management - Active Comparator

    As the attention control, we will refer staff in control offices to the National Institution on Aging (NIA)'s website on "Medicines and Medication Management" to review content and materials for use in Family Care Giver (FCG) support.

  • BehavioralSTOPPFrail (Screening Tool of Older Persons Prescriptions)

    A screening tool used by clinicians with frail older adults with life-limiting illness to review medications

  • Behavioral"Discontinuing Medication Appropriately" and "Understanding the Art of Communication about Deprescribing"

    Education resoruce used by clinicians to simplify and align medications with goals of care

  • Behavioral"Key Approaches to Support Informal Family Caregivers in Managing Medications"

    Education resource used by clinicians to support Family Care Givers (FCGs)

06

What researchers measure

Primary outcomes

  1. Intervention Training Completion by Hospice Staff

    Number of Completed Intervention Trainings

    Time frame: Baseline

  2. Patient and Family Caregiver Eligibility Screens

    Number of Eligible Dyad Participants (i.e. participant = 1 dyad) screened for potential eligibility to inform subsequent eligibility criteria to obtain a sufficient study population.

    Time frame: 2 weeks prior to enrollment

  3. Patient and Family Caregiver Enrollment

    Number of Patients and Family Caregivers who enrolled

    Time frame: Baseline

  4. Completion of Primary Patient Outcome--Retention

    Number of Dyads who completed the Medication Regimen Complexity Score at Baseline

    Time frame: Baseline

Secondary outcomes

  1. Family Caregiver Medication Administration Hassle Scale

    The 24-item Family Caregiver Medication Administration Hassle Scale has four subscales: Information Seeking/Sharing, Safety Issues, Scheduling Logistics, and Polypharmacy. The theoretical range of the scores across 4 subscales is 0 to 120. Higher scores indicate greater burden. Overall scale reliability is .95.

    Time frame: Baseline, 2, 4, 6, 8 12, 16, 20, 24 weeks(or death)

  2. Medication Regimen Complexity Index

    Medication Regimen Complexity Index (MCRI) will characterize patients' chronic disease and preventive medication regimens (i.e. drugs initiated prior to hospice admission, not End of Life (EOL) symptom medications \[e.g. haloperidol\] because these increase over time). MRCI score weights dosage form, dosing frequency and administration instructions. Minimum MRCI is 1.5 \[a single tablet once a day\] and maximum score increases with medication number. Higher scores indicate greater complexity. MRCI score of 0 indicates no medication use. There is no established maximum score.

    Time frame: Baseline, 2, 4, 6, 8, 12, 16, 20, 24 weeks(or death)

  3. Potential Adverse Event

    Hospitalizations and Emergency Department (ED) visits will be abstracted from the hospice record. Potential Adverse Drug Event (ADE)s and Adverse Drug Withdrawal Events (ADWEs) will be determined from medical record review

    Time frame: Week 2, 4, 6, 8, 12, 16, 20, 24

07

Results

Posted May 21, 2025

Participant flow

Recruitment occurred at two hospice organizations where each hospice organization randomized 1 office to intervention and 1 office to control

Participant flow — Overall Study
MilestoneSPECTORx Educational InterventionAttention Control
Started716
Hospice 1512
Hospice 224
Completed715
Not completed01
Withdrew: Death01

Outcome measures

PrimaryIntervention Training Completion by Hospice Staff

Number of Completed Intervention Trainings

Time frame:
Baseline
Reported as:
Count of participants · Participants
Intervention Training Completion by Hospice Staff
ParticipantsSPECTORx Educational InterventionAttention Control
Intervention Training Completion by Hospice Staff170
PrimaryPatient and Family Caregiver Eligibility Screens

Number of Eligible Dyad Participants (i.e. participant = 1 dyad) screened for potential eligibility to inform subsequent eligibility criteria to obtain a sufficient study population.

Time frame:
2 weeks prior to enrollment
Reported as:
Number · Dyads
Patient and Family Caregiver Eligibility Screens
DyadsSPECTORx Educational InterventionAttention Control
Patient and Family Caregiver Eligibility Screens77184
PrimaryPatient and Family Caregiver Enrollment

Number of Patients and Family Caregivers who enrolled

Time frame:
Baseline
Reported as:
Number · Dyads
Patient and Family Caregiver Enrollment
DyadsSPECTORx Educational InterventionAttention Control
Patient and Family Caregiver Enrollment715
PrimaryCompletion of Primary Patient Outcome--Retention

Number of Dyads who completed the Medication Regimen Complexity Score at Baseline

Time frame:
Baseline
Reported as:
Number · Dyads
Completion of Primary Patient Outcome--Retention
DyadsSPECTORx Educational InterventionAttention Control
Completion of Primary Patient Outcome--Retention715
SecondaryFamily Caregiver Medication Administration Hassle Scale

The 24-item Family Caregiver Medication Administration Hassle Scale has four subscales: Information Seeking/Sharing, Safety Issues, Scheduling Logistics, and Polypharmacy. The theoretical range of the scores across 4 subscales is 0 to 120. Higher scores indicate greater burden. Overall scale reliability is .95.

Time frame:
Baseline, 2, 4, 6, 8 12, 16, 20, 24 weeks(or death)
Reported as:
Mean · score on a scale
Family Caregiver Medication Administration Hassle Scale
score on a scaleSPECTORx Educational InterventionAttention Control
Baseline13.6 ± 21.131 ± 16.7
2 weeks19.7 ± 30.637 ± 17.5
4 weeks16.7 ± 19.536.1 ± 17.5
6 weeks22.5 ± 13.426.8 ± 12.2
8 weeks21.5 ± 23.326.5 ± 9.5
12 weeks1033.3 ± 3.9
16 weeks730
20 weeks—47
24 weeks (or death)—21
SecondaryMedication Regimen Complexity Index

Medication Regimen Complexity Index (MCRI) will characterize patients' chronic disease and preventive medication regimens (i.e. drugs initiated prior to hospice admission, not End of Life (EOL) symptom medications \[e.g. haloperidol\] because these increase over time). MRCI score weights dosage form, dosing frequency and administration instructions. Minimum MRCI is 1.5 \[a single tablet once a day\] and maximum score increases with medication number. Higher scores indicate greater complexity. MRCI score of 0 indicates no medication use. There is no established maximum score.

Time frame:
Baseline, 2, 4, 6, 8, 12, 16, 20, 24 weeks(or death)
Reported as:
Mean · score on a scale
Medication Regimen Complexity Index
score on a scaleSPECTORx Educational InterventionAttention Control
baseline39 ± 8.823.5 ± 8.2
2 weeks43.5 ± 13.131.0 ± 10.3
4 weeks43.3 ± 12.932.5 ± 11.2
6 weeks46.4 ± 13.933.6 ± 12.8
8 weeks44 ± 19.431.1 ± 12.4
12 weeks43.8 ± 21.126.8 ± 12.5
16 weeks51.1 ± 11.329 ± 15.2
20 weeks52.3 ± 12.333.4 ± 15.0
24 weeks (or death)47 ± 16.923.5 ± 22.6
SecondaryPotential Adverse Event

Hospitalizations and Emergency Department (ED) visits will be abstracted from the hospice record. Potential Adverse Drug Event (ADE)s and Adverse Drug Withdrawal Events (ADWEs) will be determined from medical record review

Time frame:
Week 2, 4, 6, 8, 12, 16, 20, 24
Reported as:
Number · Adverse Events
Potential Adverse Event
Adverse EventsSPECTORx Educational InterventionAttention Control
Baseline00
Week 200
Week 400
Week 600
week 800
Week 1200
Week 1600
Week 2000
Week 2400

Adverse events

Collected over AE were measured up to 24 weeks (or death). Non-serious events are listed at a 0% frequency threshold.

Adverse event summary by group
GroupDeathsSeriousOther
Patients: SPECTORx Educational Intervention2/7 (28.6%)0/7 (0%)0/7 (0%)
Patients: Attention Control10/15 (66.7%)0/15 (0%)0/15 (0%)
Family Caregivers: SPECTORx Educational Intervention———
Family Caregivers: Attention Control———

Baseline characteristics

Age, Categorical
Age, Categorical(Participants)Patients: SPECTORx Educational InterventionPatients: Attention ControlCaregivers SPECTORx Educational InterventionCaregivers: Attention ControlTotal
<=18 years00000
Between 18 and 65 years003811
>=65 years7153732
Age, Continuous
Age, Continuous(years)Patients: SPECTORx Educational InterventionPatients: Attention ControlCaregivers SPECTORx Educational InterventionCaregivers: Attention ControlTotal
Mean83.6 ± 14.579.5 ± 10.3——80.8 ± 11.6
Sex: Female, Male
Sex: Female, Male(Participants)Patients: SPECTORx Educational InterventionPatients: Attention ControlCaregivers SPECTORx Educational InterventionCaregivers: Attention ControlTotal
Female41141332
Male342211
Ethnicity (NIH/OMB)
Ethnicity (NIH/OMB)(Participants)Patients: SPECTORx Educational InterventionPatients: Attention ControlCaregivers SPECTORx Educational InterventionCaregivers: Attention ControlTotal
Hispanic or Latino01012
Not Hispanic or Latino71461441
Unknown or Not Reported00101
Race (NIH/OMB)
Race (NIH/OMB)(Participants)Patients: SPECTORx Educational InterventionPatients: Attention ControlCaregivers SPECTORx Educational InterventionCaregivers: Attention ControlTotal
American Indian or Alaska Native00000
Asian01102
Native Hawaiian or Other Pacific Islander00000
Black or African American10102
White61351337
More than one race00011
Unknown or Not Reported01012
Region of Enrollment
Region of Enrollment(participants)Patients: SPECTORx Educational InterventionPatients: Attention ControlCaregivers SPECTORx Educational InterventionCaregivers: Attention ControlTotal
United States71571522
08

Study locations

1 site
  • Care Dimensions
    Danvers, Massachusetts 01923, United States
09

References and documents

Publications

  • Tjia J, Clayton M, Chiriboga G, Staples B, Puerto G, Rappaport L, DeSanto-Madeya S. Stakeholder-engaged process for refining the design of a clinical trial in home hospice. BMC Med Res Methodol. 2021 Apr 30;21(1):92. doi: 10.1186/s12874-021-01275-0. PubMed 33941089 ↗

Study documents

  • Protocol and statistical analysis plan · Jan 30, 2020

Documents are hosted by the registry — open the source record to download them.

Individual participant data

Plan to share: No

10

Updates

Tracking since Sep 25, 2026
No changes since tracking began. The registry record was last updated on May 21, 2025, before this site started recording changes on Sep 25, 2026. Its history is on ClinicalTrials.gov ↗
11

Registry details

Key details

Study ID
NCT03972163
Lead sponsor
University of Massachusetts, Worcester
Collaborators
University of Utah, Boston College, National Institute on Aging (NIA)
Responsible party
Jennifer Tjia (Professor, University of Massachusetts, Worcester) — Principal investigator
First posted
Jun 3, 2019
Start date
Jan 15, 2020
Primary completion
Dec 31, 2022
Completion
Dec 31, 2023
Results posted
May 21, 2025
Last update
May 21, 2025

Study contacts

Jennifer Tjia, MD, MSCE
principal investigator · UMass Medical School

Oversight

Data monitoring committee
Yes
FDA-regulated drug
No
FDA-regulated device
No
View the source record on ClinicalTrials.gov ↗

Not currently enrolling

This study is completed, as verified in May 2025. You cannot join it, but the record below documents what was studied.

Follow this study

Get an email when the registry record changes — status, dates, results — or when someone posts here.

Sign in to follow

Discussion

Questions and observations about this study, from anyone following it. Not medical advice, and not a channel to the study team — their contact details are on the registry record.

Sign in to join the discussion. Reading takes no account; posting does. You choose a display name, and a pseudonym is the default.

Nothing here yet. If you are running this trial, taking part in it, or weighing whether to, this is the place to say so.

Start the discussion