An observational study in Fetal Growth Abnormality, sponsored by University of Campania Luigi Vanvitelli. Completed at 1 site in Italy. Open to female participants aged 18 Years to 45 Years. Per ClinicalTrials.gov, last updated 2019-05-24.
Sponsored by University of Campania Luigi Vanvitelli · Observational
The hypothesis is to increase the predictability of the ultrasound examination evaluating new fetal parameters: in fact the thickness of the soft tissues can contribute significantly to the fetal weight and the characteristics of the thoracic cage may correlate with the fetal weight.
Estimation of fetal weight (EFW: Estimated Fetal Weight) with ultrasound examination is a common practice in obstetrics and is important for planning the mode and timing of birth, especially in pregnancies at risk for altered fetal growth.
The conditions most commonly associated with impaired fetal growth are:
In the 1970s the estimate of fetal weight was based on the measurement of the symphysis-fundus uterine distance (SFH) for which:
At present, the fetal weight estimate is performed with biometric ultrasound parameters:
The fetal weight is calculated using mathematical formulas automatically obtained from ultrasound equipment of which the most used:
Even if the guidelines provide for three ultrasound examinations for physiological pregnancies (one for each trimester of pregnancy), it is common practice to evaluate the biometric ultrasound parameters at the end of pregnancy and in any case when the patient is admitted for the delivery. It is obvious that in this time of pregnancy a closer correlation between biometric parameters and fetal weight is observed.
The problems related to the ultrasound estimation of fetal weight are represented by:
University of Campania Luigi Vanvitelli is the lead sponsor of 174 studies on the registry; 28 are open to participants now.
Counted across the registry records on this site, refreshed daily.
single pregnancies, free of complications, with delivery completed between 37 and 42 weeks, but within a week of the last ultrasound examination performed. Patients are selected among those candidates with elective caesarean section, pregnant who come to hospital for prodroma of labor and conditions that require induction of childbirth such as prolonged pregnancy or PROM.
Go through the criteria one by one — yes, no or not sure — and take the list to your doctor or the study team. Kept in this browser only.
Exclusion Criteria:
Obstetric Ultrasonography
biparietal diameter
Evaluation of biparietal diameter
Time frame: 9 months
head circumference
evaluation of head circumference
Time frame: 9 months
abdominal circumference
Evaluation of abdominal circumference
Time frame: 9 months
femur length
Evaluation of femur length
Time frame: 9 months
transtentorial diameter
Evaluation of transtentorial diameter
Time frame: 9 months
distance between L1-L4 lumbar vertebrae
Evaluation of distance between L1-L4
Time frame: 9 months
Fetal Weight
Evaluation of Fetal Weight
Time frame: 9 months
Plan to share: No
No publications or documents are linked to this record.
This study is completed, as verified in May 2019. You cannot join it, but the record below documents what was studied.
Get an email when the registry record changes — status, dates, results — or when someone posts here.
Sign in to followQuestions and observations about this study, from anyone following it. Not medical advice, and not a channel to the study team — their contact details are on the registry record.
Sign in to join the discussion. Reading takes no account; posting does. You choose a display name, and a pseudonym is the default.
Nothing here yet. If you are running this trial, taking part in it, or weighing whether to, this is the place to say so.
University of Campania Luigi Vanvitelli →