CClinicalTrials.gg
CompletedNCT03961464Updated May 23, 2019

The Effect of D-cycloserine on Emotional Processing

An interventional study of d-cycloserine and Placebo in Cycloserine and Healthy Volunteer, sponsored by University of Oxford. Completed at 1 site in United Kingdom. Open to participants aged 18 Years to 40 Years, including healthy volunteers. Per ClinicalTrials.gov, last updated 2019-05-23.

Sponsored by University of Oxford · Not applicable, Interventional, and Basic science

From the registry’s dates

  • Registered 6 months after the study started (first participant enrolled Aug 2018, registered Mar 2019).
Phase
Not applicable
Study type
Interventional
Enrollment
40
Allocation
Randomized
Ages
18 Years to 40 Years
Sex
All
01

Study summary

To investigate the effects of N-methyl-D-aspartate (NMDA) partial agonist DCS on emotional processing, memory and stress tasks

Read the detailed description

The aim of the present study is to assess the effect of DCS on emotional processing relevant to antidepressant drug activity. For this, 40 healthy volunteers will be recruited to the study and randomized to receive a single session of 250mg DCS or placebo. 3 hours and 24 hours after active drug/placebo administration, the effects of emotional processing via the use of cognitive tasks will be assessed. Also, given the important role of DCS in memory and stress, we also include tasks to explore changes in autobiographical memory and in psychological and physiological measures of stress and arousal.

02

Conditions studied

  • Cycloserine
  • Healthy Volunteer

Keywords

  • Emotion processing
  • Autobiographical memory
  • Stress
03

In context

Lead sponsor

University of Oxford is the lead sponsor of 794 studies on the registry; 117 are open to participants now.

Counted across the registry records on this site, refreshed daily.

04

Who can participate

Ages eligible
18 Years to 40 Years
Sexes eligible
All
Accepts healthy volunteers
Yes

Inclusion criteria

  • Male or female
  • Willing and able to give informed consent for participation in the study
  • Body mass index (BMI) within the range of 19-30kg/m2
  • Sufficiently fluent English to understand and complete the task

Exclusion criteria

Exclusion Criteria:

  • Currently take any psychoactive medication.
  • Have taken any CNS-active medication during the last 6 weeks.
  • Currently take any medication with cycloserine, ethionamide or isoniazid
  • Have suffered from any past or current psychiatric disorder (e.g. depression, anxiety)
  • Have lifetime history of epilepsy or other significant disease or disorder which, in the opinion of the investigator, may either put the participants at risk because of participation in the study, or may influence the result of the study, or the participant's ability to participate in the study.
  • Have history of heart disease, significant hypertension
  • Have history of Megaloblastic Anaemia, Sideroblastic Anaemia
  • Have history of kidney disease with reduction in kidney function
  • Have severe renal impairment
  • Have suffered from lactose intolerance
  • Are currently pregnant, breastfeeding or trying to get pregnant
  • Have a current or past history of drug or alcohol dependency
  • Have participated in a psychological or medical study involving the use of medication within the last 3 months
  • Have previously participated in a study using the same, or similar, emotional processing tasks
  • Smoke more than 5 cigarettes per day
  • Have dyslexia (given the nature of the computer tasks)
05

Study design

Phase
Not applicable
Primary purpose
Basic science
Allocation
Randomized
Intervention model
Parallel assignment
Masking
Triple (Participant, Care provider, Investigator)
Enrollment
40 participants (actual)

Study arms

  • Experimental
    d-cycloserine

    oral, capsule, 250 mg

    Drug: d-cycloserine

  • Experimental
    Placebo

    oral, capsule, lactose

    Drug: Placebo

Interventions

  • Drugd-cycloserine

    Single dose

  • DrugPlacebo

    Single dose

06

What researchers measure

Primary outcomes

  1. Performance in a facial expression recognition task

    Participants are presented with individual pictures of facial expressions of emotions. Each presented face displays one of six basic emotions (anger, disgust, fear, happiness, sadness, or surprise). Each emotional expression is presented at different levels of intensity which have been created by combining shape and texture features of the two extremes "neutral" (0%) and "full prototypical emotion" (100%) to varying degrees. Examples of neutral facial expressions are presented as well. Participants are instructed to correctly classify each facial expression as angry, disgusted, fearful, happy, sad, surprised or neutral both as quickly and as accurately as possible. Responses are made by pushing one out of seven labelled keys on a response box. Hit rates, false alarm rates, and reaction times for correct classifications are measured separately for each emotion.

    Time frame: 3 hours after drug/placebo administration

  2. Performance in an emotional recall task

    Following a delay period after the emotional categorisation task (about 15 min), emotional recall memory is assessed. Participants are asked to recall and write down as many words as possible from the emotional categorization task. Numbers of correctly and incorrectly recalled positive and negative words are measured.

    Time frame: 3 hours after drug/placebo administration

  3. Performance in an autobiographical memory task

    The autobiographical memory cues are presented visually on computer screen in a fixed order, with positive, negative, and neutral words alternating, each word will be presented only once. Participants are instructed that, for each cue word, they should respond with a memory of an autobiographical event which had lasted less than 1 day and which had occurred at a specific time and place. They are told that the event could have occurred recently or a long time ago and could have been important or trivial but that no responses should be repeated for a subsequent word. Correct and incorrect examples are given. Responses are tape-recorded for subsequent coding.

    Time frame: 3 hours after drug/placebo administration

Secondary outcomes

  1. Performance in an emotional categorisation task

    Participants are presented with positive and negative personality descriptors and are asked to classify the valence of each word. These words describe either extremely agreeable/positive characteristics (e.g. "cheerful", "honest", "optimistic") or extremely disagreeable/negative characteristics (e.g. "domineering", "untidy", "hostile") and are presented individually in the centre of the screen. Participants are instructed to imagine themselves overhearing someone describing them with each of the words and to indicate as quickly and accurately as possible whether they would like or dislike to be described with each of the words. Responses are made by pressing a correspondingly labelled key on a button box. Reaction times for correct classifications are measured separately for positive and negative words.

    Time frame: 3 hours after drug/placebo administration

  2. Performance in an emotional faces dot probe task

    Pictures of positive and negative emotional stimuli (happy and fearful facial expressions) are presented individually together with a matched neutral stimulus (neutral face). On each trial, one stimulus is shown above and the other below a central fixation point. Subsequently, a probe appears behind one of the stimuli and participants have to correctly classify the probe as quickly and as accurately as possible. Stimuli can be masked (i.e. presented very briefly and followed by a jumbled face) or unmasked (i.e. presented for a longer period without a subsequent masking stimulus). Reaction times for correct responses are recorded and vigilance scores are calculated for masked and unmasked positive and negative stimuli by subtracting reaction time data from trials when the probe appeared in the same position as the emotional stimulus (congruent trials) from trials when the probe appeared in the opposite position to the emotional stimulus (incongruent trials).

    Time frame: 3 hours after drug/placebo administration

  3. Performance in an emotional recognition task

    3 hours after drug/placebo administration

    Time frame: Emotional recognition memory is assessed by presenting participants with the original personality descriptors plus an equal number of matched distractor words (50% positive, 50% negative). Participants are asked to ind

  4. Performance in a cognitive stress task

    The computer stress task is designed to induce psychological stress.It is presented as a series of mental arithmetic, verbal and visuospatial challenges on the screen which participants are required to solve. In the stress condition, there is a time limit for completing each challenge, which is displayed on the screen as a time bar. To induce a high failure rate, the timing for each challenge is set depending on individual's previous performance at 10% less than the time that it took to previously correctly solve challenges. The difficulty of the challenges is automatically varied to ensure that participants are getting only 20-40% of the challenges correctly completed within the time. To ensure a high failure rate, some of the verbal challenges (anagrams) are impossible to solve. Participants are given feedback on their performance on the screen which indicates that they are performing badly.

    Time frame: 3 hours after drug/placebo administration

  5. Performance in a facial expression recognition task

    Participants are presented with individual pictures of facial expressions of emotions. Each presented face displays one of six basic emotions (anger, disgust, fear, happiness, sadness, or surprise). Each emotional expression is presented at different levels of intensity which have been created by combining shape and texture features of the two extremes "neutral" (0%) and "full prototypical emotion" (100%) to varying degrees. Examples of neutral facial expressions are presented as well. Participants are instructed to correctly classify each facial expression as angry, disgusted, fearful, happy, sad, surprised or neutral both as quickly and as accurately as possible. Responses are made by pushing one out of seven labelled keys on a response box. Hit rates, false alarm rates, and reaction times for correct classifications are measured separately for each emotion.

    Time frame: 24 hours after drug/placebo administration

  6. Performance in an emotional recall task

    Participants are asked to recall and write down as many words as possible from yesterday's emotional categorization task. Numbers of correctly and incorrectly recalled positive and negative words are measured.

    Time frame: 24 hours after drug/placebo administration

  7. Performance in an autobiographical memory task

    The autobiographical memory cues are presented visually on computer screen in a fixed order, with positive, negative, and neutral words alternating, each word will be presented only once. Participants are instructed that, for each cue word, they should respond with a memory of an autobiographical event which had lasted less than 1 day and which had occurred at a specific time and place. They are told that the event could have occurred recently or a long time ago and could have been important or trivial but that no responses should be repeated for a subsequent word. Correct and incorrect examples are given. Responses are tape-recorded for subsequent coding.

    Time frame: 24 hours after drug/placebo administration

Other outcomes

  1. Change in subjective mood

    Positive and Negative Affect Schedule. Standard questionnaire for subjectively felt positive and negative affect. Two scores: (1) Positive score: ranging from 10 to 50 (higher score representing greater extent of positive affect). (2) Negative score: ranging from 10 to 50 (higher score representing greater extent of negative affect).

    Time frame: 3 hours after drug/placebo administration

  2. Change in subjective anxiety

    State Anxiety Inventory. Standard questionnaire for subjectively felt anxiety. State anxiety: ranging from 20 to 80 (higher scores indicating higher state anxiety levels).

    Time frame: 3 hours after drug/placebo administration

  3. Change in subjective energy

    Zersen's Befindlichkeits-Skala. Standard questionnaire for subjectively felt mood and energy levels. Total score ranging from 0 to 112. Subscores: Mood (ranging from 0 to 94) and Energy (ranging from 0 to 18). Sum of subscores for mood and energy provide total score. Higher scores represent worse subjective mood and energy

    Time frame: 3 hours after drug/placebo administration

  4. Change in subjective state

    Visual Analogue Scales of different subjective states (happy, sad, interested, anxious, stressed, hostile, nausea, dizziness, dry mouth, headache, alert, agitation). Minimum = 0 mm ("Not at all") , Maximum = 100 mm ("Extremely"). Greater scores represent greater extent of felt emotions/side effects.

    Time frame: 3 hours after drug/placebo administration

  5. Change in subjective anxiety for cognitive stress task

    State Anxiety Inventory. Standard questionnaire for subjectively felt anxiety. State anxiety: ranging from 20 to 80 (higher scores indicating higher state anxiety levels).

    Time frame: After cognitive stress task

  6. Change in subjective mood for cognitive stress task

    Positive and Negative Affect Schedule. Standard questionnaire for subjectively felt positive and negative affect. Two scores: (1) Positive score: ranging from 10 to 50 (higher score representing greater extent of positive affect). (2) Negative score: ranging from 10 to 50 (higher score representing greater extent of negative affect).

    Time frame: After cognitive stress task

  7. Change in subjective state for cognitive stress task

    Visual Analogue Scales of different subjective states (happy, sad, interested, anxious, stressed, hostile, nausea, dizziness, dry mouth, headache, alert, agitation). Minimum = 0 mm ("Not at all") , Maximum = 100 mm ("Extremely"). Greater scores represent greater extent of felt emotions/side effects.

    Time frame: After cognitive stress task

  8. Physiological measures (Skin Conductance Response) for cognitive stress task

    The skin conductance response (SCR), also known as the electrodermal response is the phenomenon that the skin momentarily becomes a better conductor of electricity when either external or internal stimuli

    Time frame: During cognitive stress task

  9. Physiological measures (blood pressure) for cognitive stress task

    Systolic and diastolic blood pressure are the two values that determine whether participant's blood pressure is normal, too high or too low.

    Time frame: During cognitive stress task

  10. Change in subjective mood

    Positive and Negative Affect Schedule. Standard questionnaire for subjectively felt positive and negative affect. Two scores: (1) Positive score: ranging from 10 to 50 (higher score representing greater extent of positive affect). (2) Negative score: ranging from 10 to 50 (higher score representing greater extent of negative affect).

    Time frame: 24 hours after drug/placebo administration

  11. Change in subjective anxiety

    State Anxiety Inventory. Standard questionnaire for subjectively felt anxiety. State anxiety: ranging from 20 to 80 (higher scores indicating higher state anxiety levels).

    Time frame: 24 hours after drug/placebo administration

  12. Change in subjective energy

    Zersen's Befindlichkeits-Skala. Standard questionnaire for subjectively felt mood and energy levels. Total score ranging from 0 to 112. Subscores: Mood (ranging from 0 to 94) and Energy (ranging from 0 to 18). Sum of subscores for mood and energy provide total score. Higher scores represent worse subjective mood and energy

    Time frame: 24 hours after drug/placebo administration

  13. Change in subjective state

    Visual Analogue Scales of different subjective states (happy, sad, interested, anxious, stressed, hostile, nausea, dizziness, dry mouth, headache, alert, agitation). Minimum = 0 mm ("Not at all") , Maximum = 100 mm ("Extremely"). Greater scores represent greater extent of felt emotions/side effects.

    Time frame: 24 hours after drug/placebo administration

07

Study locations

1 site
  • University of Oxford
    Oxford, OX3 7JZ, United Kingdom
08

References and documents

Individual participant data

Plan to share: Undecided

No publications or documents are linked to this record.

09

Updates

Tracking since Sep 25, 2026
No changes since tracking began. The registry record was last updated on May 23, 2019, before this site started recording changes on Sep 25, 2026. Its history is on ClinicalTrials.gov ↗
10

Registry details

Key details

Study ID
NCT03961464
Lead sponsor
University of Oxford
Responsible party
Sponsor
First posted
May 23, 2019
Start date
Aug 10, 2018
Primary completion
Dec 5, 2018
Completion
Dec 5, 2018
Last update
May 23, 2019

Oversight

FDA-regulated drug
No
FDA-regulated device
No
View the source record on ClinicalTrials.gov ↗

Not currently enrolling

This study is completed, as verified in Jun 2018. You cannot join it, but the record below documents what was studied.

Follow this study

Get an email when the registry record changes — status, dates, results — or when someone posts here.

Sign in to follow

Discussion

Questions and observations about this study, from anyone following it. Not medical advice, and not a channel to the study team — their contact details are on the registry record.

Sign in to join the discussion. Reading takes no account; posting does. You choose a display name, and a pseudonym is the default.

Nothing here yet. If you are running this trial, taking part in it, or weighing whether to, this is the place to say so.

Start the discussion