ClinicalTrials.gg
CompletedNCT03960437Parsabiv-MBDUpdated Sep 21, 2023Results posted

The Effect of Etelcalcetide on CKD-MBD

A Phase 2 interventional study of Etelcalcetide in Chronic Kidney Disease Mineral and Bone Disorder, Renal Osteodystrophy and Vascular Calcification, sponsored by Thomas Nickolas, MD MS. Completed at 1 site in United States. Open to participants aged 18 Years and older. Per ClinicalTrials.gov, last updated 2023-09-21.

Sponsored by Thomas Nickolas, MD MS · Phase 2, Interventional, and Treatment

From the registry’s dates

  • Registered 8 months after the study started (first participant enrolled Sep 2018, registered May 2019).
Phase
Phase 2
Study type
Interventional
Enrollment
22
Allocation
Not applicable
Ages
18 Years and older
Sex
All
01

Study summary

The proposed study will investigate the effects of etelcalcetide on the bone and blood-vessel health in patients with CKD-MBD. The investigators will test if etelcalcetide makes bone and blood-vessels healthier. The study hypotheses are that are that etelcalcetide keeps bones strong and lowers the risk of calcium deposits in blood vessels. In Aim 1, the investigators will test if 9-months of treatment with etelcalcetide improves bone strength in twenty ESKD patients with hyperparathyroidism (HPT) by bone biopsy. In Aim 2, the investigators will test if 9-months of treatment with etelcalcetide decreases serum propensity to calcify blood vessels. The potential significance of this study is to provide first-time data on the ability of etelcalcetide to protect bone and blood-vessel health in patients with ESKD.

Read the detailed description

Chronic kidney disease - mineral and bone disease (CKD-MBD) is a disorder of bone and mineral metabolism in patients with CKD. When kidney function is poor, levels of vitamin D, phosphate and parathyroid hormone become abnormal and patients are at risk for bone disease and fractures (renal osteodystrophy) and the deposition of calcium in blood vessels and muscles. CKD-MBD increases the risk of fractures, heart attacks, strokes, and death. Treatment of CKD-MBD is focused on lowering levels of parathyroid hormone (PTH) by giving vitamin D and lowering levels of phosphorous by giving phosphate binders. In patients with end stage kidney disease (ESKD), target levels of PTH recommended by the Kidney Disease Improving Global Outcomes (KDIGO) guidelines are in the range of 2-9 times the upper limit of normal (ULN) for the PTH assay. In many cases, in patients with long-standing ESKD, the parathyroid gland may no longer respond to treatment with vitamin D and phosphate lowering. In these cases, treatment with a calcimimetic, a medicine that increases the sensitivity of the parathyroid gland to serum levels of calcium, can restore PTH levels to goal.

02

Conditions studied

  • Chronic Kidney Disease Mineral and Bone Disorder
  • Renal Osteodystrophy
  • Vascular Calcification
  • Hyperparathyroidism; Secondary, Renal

Keywords

  • Kidney disease
  • Bone disease
  • Etelcalcetide
  • Parsabiv
03

In context

Chronic Kidney Disease-Mineral and Bone Disorder

73 studies on the registry are indexed under Chronic Kidney Disease-Mineral and Bone Disorder; 20 are open to participants now.

This study's enrollment of 22 is below the median of 54 across 34 interventional studies indexed under Chronic Kidney Disease-Mineral and Bone Disorder.

Browse Chronic Kidney Disease-Mineral and Bone Disorder studies →

Lead sponsor

Thomas Nickolas, MD MS is the lead sponsor of 2 studies on the registry; none are open to participants now.

Counted across the registry records on this site, refreshed daily.

04

Who can participate

Ages eligible
18 Years and older
Sexes eligible
All
Accepts healthy volunteers
No

Go through the criteria one by one — yes, no or not sure — and take the list to your doctor or the study team. Kept in this browser only.

Inclusion criteria

For All Aims:

  1. Patient has provided .
  2. Patient is 18 years of age or older.
  3. Patient must be receiving maintenance hemodialysis for at least 3 months, with adequate hemodialysis with a delivered Kt/V 1.2 or urea reduction ratio (URR) 65% within 4 weeks prior to screening laboratory assessments.
  4. Dialysate calcium concentration must be stable for at least 4 weeks prior to screening laboratory assessments.
  5. Patient must have severe HPT as defined by two laboratory screening pre-dialysis serum PTH values >9-times for the PTH assay, measured on two consecutive monthly lab checks prior to entering the study.
  6. The patient has an uncontrolled PTH defined by KDIGO as a PTH greater than 9 times the upper limit of normal of the assay (720 pg/mL for Rogosin):

    AND one of the following:

    • The patient has never been on cinacalcet OR,
    • The patient received daily cinacalcet for less than 3 months and has been off cinacalcet for at least 3 months prior to enrollment OR ,
    • The patient received daily cinacalcet for more than 3 months and has been off cinacalcet for at least 6 months prior to enrollment OR,
    • The patient received a modified dose of three times weekly cinacalcet and has been off cinacalcet for at least one month prior to enrollment.
  7. Scheduled to receive etelcalcetide for the treatment of HPT per standard of care.
  8. If receiving vitamin D sterols, patient must have had no more than a maximum dose change of 50% within the 4 weeks prior to screening laboratory assessments, remain stable through randomization, and be expected to maintain stable doses for the duration of the study, except for adjustments allowed per protocol*.
  9. Patient must have one screening pre-dialysis serum Ca laboratory value at least at the lower limit of normal for the assay measured within 4 weeks prior to entering the study.
  10. A patient receiving calcium supplements must have had no more than a maximum dose change of 50% within 2 weeks prior to screening laboratory assessments and remain stable throughout the study, except for adjustments allowed per protocol*.
  11. A patient receiving phosphate binders must have had no more than a maximum dose change of 50% within the 2 weeks prior to screening laboratory assessments, remain stable through, and be expected to maintain stable dose for the duration of the study, except for adjustments allowed per protocol*.
  12. The treating physician considers the etelcalcetide dose and timing points described in this protocol as acceptable/optimal for their patient.
  13. Female patients must be willing to use highly effective during the study and for 3 months after the last dose of etelcalcetide (unless or surgically sterilized).

For Aim 1:

  1. Total alkaline phosphatase ≥ the upper tertile of the reference range for the assay

Exclusion criteria

Exclusion Criteria:

For All Aims:

  1. Currently receiving treatment in an device or drug study, or less than 30 days since ending treatment on an investigational device or drug study(s).
  2. Currently receiving investigational procedures while participating in this study.
  3. Patient with controlled PTH as defined by KDIGO as a PTH of 2 to 9 times the of the assay.
  4. Patients has received a bisphosphonate, denosumab or teriparatide during the 12 months prior to screening.
  5. Anticipated or scheduled parathyroidectomy during the study period.
  6. Patient has received a parathyroidectomy within 6 months prior to dosing.
  7. Scheduled kidney transplant during the study period or anticipated living donor evaluation within three months of recruitment
  8. Patient has an unstable medical condition based on medical history, physical examination, and routine laboratory tests, or is otherwise unstable in the judgment of the Investigator.
  9. Bilateral lower extremity amputations or non-ambulatory
  10. Metabolic bone diseases not related to the kidney (i.e., Pagets, Osteogenesis Imprefecta)
  11. Untreated hyperthyroidism or hypoparathyroidism
  12. within the last 5 years (except non-melanoma skin cancers or cervical carcinoma in situ).
  13. Patient is pregnant or nursing.
  14. Patient likely to not be available to complete all protocol-required study visits or procedures, and/or to comply with all required study procedures to the best of the patient and Investigator's knowledge.
  15. Weight >300 pounds

For Aim 1 (Bone ):

  1. Allergy to tetracycline or demeclocycline.
Terms in these criteria, in plain language(7)

Underlined terms in the criteria open these too. Explained by clinicaltrials.gg, not part of the registry record. The study team decides who can take part.

Informed consent

Before you join, the study team explains what taking part involves — its purpose, what happens, the risks and possible benefits — and answers your questions, so you can decide freely. Consent is usually recorded on a form (the informed consent form, ICF) signed by you or, where the law allows, by someone legally authorised to decide for you.

You can keep asking questions during the study, you are told of new information that matters, and you can choose to leave at any time.

ULN (upper limit of normal)

The top of the normal range for a blood test, as set by the laboratory that runs it. Each lab prints its own range next to your result.

“≤ 2.5 × ULN” means the result can be up to two and a half times that top value.

Contraception

Ways of preventing pregnancy. “Highly effective” methods fail less than 1% of the time a year when used correctly — for example an IUD or an implant.

Criteria usually say which methods count and how long to keep using them after the last dose, sometimes for male participants too. Some studies accept a partner’s vasectomy if it was confirmed successful and that person is the participant’s only sexual partner.

Postmenopausal

Periods have stopped for good: usually no period for 12 months in a row without another medical reason, sometimes confirmed by a blood test (FSH).

Investigational drug or device

A drug or device being studied in a clinical trial.

It may be new, or already approved and being studied for another use, dose or form. Criteria often leave out people who took part in another study of one within a recent period, commonly 30 days or five half-lives.

Cancer (malignancy)

Malignancy means cancer. Criteria about another or earlier malignancy ask whether you have had a different cancer, usually within a set number of years.

Some are commonly allowed, such as treated skin cancers other than melanoma and early cancers removed completely — check the exceptions this study lists.

Biopsy and archival tissue

A biopsy takes a small piece of tissue to examine. “Archival tissue” is a sample already taken, for example at diagnosis, and kept by the hospital.

Whether a stored sample will do depends on when it was taken, how much there is and what the study needs. Ask whether the study accepts your stored sample or needs a new biopsy.

05

Study design

Phase
Phase 2
Primary purpose
Treatment
Allocation
Not applicable
Intervention model
Single group
Masking
None (open label)
Enrollment
22 participants (actual)

Study arms

  • Other
    Study Participant

    Every study participant will receive etelcalcetide prescribed by their treating physician for the duration of the study.

    Drug: Etelcalcetide

Interventions

  • Administered intravenously at the end of each dialysis session. Dosing ranges from 5 mg to 15 mg set by the patient's physician.

    Also known as: Parsabiv

06

What researchers measure

Primary outcomes

  1. Percent Change in PTH Levels

    Mean percent change in parathyroid hormone (PTH) levels will be calculated.

    Time frame: Baseline and 9 months

  2. Change in Bone Mineral Density (BMD) of the Femoral Neck by Dual-energy X-ray Absorptiometry (DXA)

    To test if 9-months of treatment with etelcalcetide changes femoral neck areal BMD, a change in age and sex adjusted Z-Score will be calculated from baseline to 9 months. A Z-Score of zero represent the population mean and higher Z-Scores indicate a better outcome.

    Time frame: Baseline and 9 months

  3. Propensity as Measured by T50

    The propensity to calcify soft tissues will be measured by T50 for 9 months of treatment. T50 is a novel serum-based marker that assesses the propensity of calcification in serum. Shorter T50 indicates greater propensity to calcify.

    Time frame: 9 months

  4. Percent Change in Mean Hardness

    Hardness will be measured by Ramen nano-indentation and mineralization measured by histomorphometry obtained (in GPa).

    Time frame: Baseline and 9 months

Secondary outcomes

  1. Change in Bone Mineral Density (BMD) of the Spine by DXA

    To test if 9-months of treatment with etelcalcetide improves spine BMD, a change in age and sex adjusted Z-Score will be calculated from baseline to 9 months. A Z-Score of zero represent the population mean and higher Z-Scores indicate a better outcome.

    Time frame: Baseline and 9 months

  2. Change in Bone Mineral Density (BMD) of Total Hip by DXA

    To test if 9-months of treatment with etelcalcetide improves total hip BMD, the change in age and sex adjusted Z-Score will be calculated from baseline to 9 months. A Z-Score of zero represent the population mean and higher Z-Scores indicate a better outcome.

    Time frame: Baseline and 9 months

  3. Change in Bone Formation Rate

    A quadruple label method will be used to assess effects of etelcalcetide on the bone formation rate. A tetracycline double label will be used pre-etelcalcetide and a declomycin double label will be used post-etelcalcetide in a protocol that administers label 3-days on, 12-days interlude, 3-days on. A single bone biopsy will be performed 1 to 10 days after completion of the second double label. Biopsy cores will be placed into 70% ethanol then serially dehydrated and embedded in methyl methacrylate. Four-micron thick sections will be cut and left unstained for dynamic histomorphometry. A region of interest including all trabecular bone and excluding cortical bone will be analyzed separately for each tetracycline or declomycin label. Standard analysis techniques will be used to measure single, double and no labelled surfaces and distances between the two labels of each fluorescence. Standard calculations of the bone formation rate/bone surface (um3/um2/year) will be made.

    Time frame: Baseline and 9 months

07

Results

Posted Sep 21, 2023

Participant flow

Participant flow — Overall Study
MilestoneStudy Participant
Started22
Completed13
Not completed9
Withdrew: Removed by pi4
Withdrew: Lost to follow-up2
Withdrew: Withdrawal by subject1
Withdrew: Death2

Outcome measures

PrimaryPercent Change in PTH Levels

Mean percent change in parathyroid hormone (PTH) levels will be calculated.

Time frame:
Baseline and 9 months
Reported as:
Mean · percentage of change in PTH levels
Percent Change in PTH Levels
percentage of change in PTH levelsStudy Participant
Baseline0 ± 0
6 months-54.14 ± 11.50
9 months-64.04 ± 8.62
PrimaryChange in Bone Mineral Density (BMD) of the Femoral Neck by Dual-energy X-ray Absorptiometry (DXA)

To test if 9-months of treatment with etelcalcetide changes femoral neck areal BMD, a change in age and sex adjusted Z-Score will be calculated from baseline to 9 months. A Z-Score of zero represent the population mean and higher Z-Scores indicate a better outcome.

Time frame:
Baseline and 9 months
Reported as:
Mean · Z-score
Change in Bone Mineral Density (BMD) of the Femoral Neck by Dual-energy X-ray Absorptiometry (DXA)
Z-scoreStudy Participant
Change in Bone Mineral Density (BMD) of the Femoral Neck by Dual-energy X-ray Absorptiometry (DXA)0.43 ± 0.1
PrimaryPropensity as Measured by T50

The propensity to calcify soft tissues will be measured by T50 for 9 months of treatment. T50 is a novel serum-based marker that assesses the propensity of calcification in serum. Shorter T50 indicates greater propensity to calcify.

Time frame:
9 months

No measurements were reported for this outcome.

PrimaryPercent Change in Mean Hardness

Hardness will be measured by Ramen nano-indentation and mineralization measured by histomorphometry obtained (in GPa).

Time frame:
Baseline and 9 months
Reported as:
Mean · percent of change in hardness
Percent Change in Mean Hardness
percent of change in hardnessStudy Participant
Percent Change in Mean Hardness2.68 ± 8.92
SecondaryChange in Bone Mineral Density (BMD) of the Spine by DXA

To test if 9-months of treatment with etelcalcetide improves spine BMD, a change in age and sex adjusted Z-Score will be calculated from baseline to 9 months. A Z-Score of zero represent the population mean and higher Z-Scores indicate a better outcome.

Time frame:
Baseline and 9 months
Reported as:
Mean · Z-score
Change in Bone Mineral Density (BMD) of the Spine by DXA
Z-scoreStudy Participant
Change in Bone Mineral Density (BMD) of the Spine by DXA0.27 ± 0.1
SecondaryChange in Bone Mineral Density (BMD) of Total Hip by DXA

To test if 9-months of treatment with etelcalcetide improves total hip BMD, the change in age and sex adjusted Z-Score will be calculated from baseline to 9 months. A Z-Score of zero represent the population mean and higher Z-Scores indicate a better outcome.

Time frame:
Baseline and 9 months
Reported as:
Mean · Z-score
Change in Bone Mineral Density (BMD) of Total Hip by DXA
Z-scoreStudy Participant
Change in Bone Mineral Density (BMD) of Total Hip by DXA0.12 ± 0.07
SecondaryChange in Bone Formation Rate

A quadruple label method will be used to assess effects of etelcalcetide on the bone formation rate. A tetracycline double label will be used pre-etelcalcetide and a declomycin double label will be used post-etelcalcetide in a protocol that administers label 3-days on, 12-days interlude, 3-days on. A single bone biopsy will be performed 1 to 10 days after completion of the second double label. Biopsy cores will be placed into 70% ethanol then serially dehydrated and embedded in methyl methacrylate. Four-micron thick sections will be cut and left unstained for dynamic histomorphometry. A region of interest including all trabecular bone and excluding cortical bone will be analyzed separately for each tetracycline or declomycin label. Standard analysis techniques will be used to measure single, double and no labelled surfaces and distances between the two labels of each fluorescence. Standard calculations of the bone formation rate/bone surface (um3/um2/year) will be made.

Time frame:
Baseline and 9 months
Reported as:
Mean · percentage of change
Change in Bone Formation Rate
percentage of changeStudy Participant
Change in Bone Formation Rate-84 ± 17

Adverse events

Collected over 9 months after baseline. Non-serious events are listed at a 0% frequency threshold.

Adverse event summary by group
GroupDeathsSeriousOther
Study Participant2/22 (9.1%)3/22 (13.6%)2/22 (9.1%)
Most frequent serious events
Most frequent serious events
EventStudy Participant
COVID-19 infectionInfections and infestations1/22
Cardiac EventCardiac disorders1/22
Vertigo/DizzinessGeneral disorders1/22
Most frequent other events
Most frequent other events
EventStudy Participant
Cold SoresInfections and infestations1/22
Gastrointestinal DisorderGastrointestinal disorders1/22

Baseline characteristics

Age, Categorical
Age, Categorical(Participants)Study Participant
<=18 years0
Between 18 and 65 years17
>=65 years5
Sex: Female, Male
Sex: Female, Male(Participants)Study Participant
Female11
Male11
Ethnicity (NIH/OMB)
Ethnicity (NIH/OMB)(Participants)Study Participant
Hispanic or Latino4
Not Hispanic or Latino18
Unknown or Not Reported0
Race (NIH/OMB)
Race (NIH/OMB)(Participants)Study Participant
American Indian or Alaska Native0
Asian3
Native Hawaiian or Other Pacific Islander0
Black or African American15
White4
More than one race0
Unknown or Not Reported0
Washout of Cinacalcet Required
Washout of Cinacalcet Required(Participants)Study Participant
Count of participants12
08

Study locations

1 site
  • Columbia University Irving Medical Center
    New York, New York 10032, United States
09

References and documents

Study documents

PDFs hosted by the registry, ClinicalTrials.gov.

10

Timeline

Tracking since Sep 25, 2026
ElapsedEstimatedEstimated, not yet reached

Ran from Sep 2018 to primary completion in Nov 2020, 26 months.

Results were first posted in Sep 2023, 2 years 10 months after primary completion.

How these figures are worked out, and which studies are left out of them.

Registered
May 21, 2019
First posted
May 23, 2019
StartActual
Sep 6, 2018
Primary completionActual
Nov 19, 2020
CompletionActual
Nov 19, 2020
Results first posted
Sep 21, 2023
Last update
Sep 21, 2023
What these dates mean
Start.
When the first participant enrolled; while estimated, when the study expects to open to recruitment.
Primary completion.
When the last participant was examined or treated to collect data for the study's main question, its primary outcome. A study that stopped early gives the date its data collection stopped.
Completion.
When the last participant's last visit took place, for every outcome, secondary ones and side effects included: the end of the study. Often later than primary completion, sometimes the same day.
Actual and Est.
Actual means the registry says the date has happened. Est. (estimated) is a date the sponsor plans or expects. It can still move, and the sponsor is expected to change it to actual once it has passed.
No changes since tracking began. The registry record was last updated on Sep 21, 2023, before this site started recording changes on Sep 25, 2026. Its history is on ClinicalTrials.gov ↗
11

Registry details

Key details

Study ID
NCT03960437
Lead sponsor
Thomas Nickolas, MD MS
Responsible party
Thomas Nickolas, MD MS (Associate Professor of Medicine, Columbia University) — Sponsor-investigator
First posted
May 23, 2019
Start date
Sep 6, 2018
Primary completion
Nov 19, 2020
Completion
Nov 19, 2020
Results posted
Sep 21, 2023
Last update
Sep 21, 2023

Study contacts

Thomas Nickolas, MD, MS
principal investigator · Columbia University

Oversight

Data monitoring committee
No
FDA-regulated drug
Yes
FDA-regulated device
No
View the source record on ClinicalTrials.gov ↗

Not currently enrolling

This study is completed, as verified in Aug 2023. You cannot join it, but the record below documents what was studied.

Follow this study

Get an email when the registry record changes — status, dates, results — or when someone posts here.

Sign in to follow

Discussion

Questions and observations about this study, from anyone following it. Not medical advice, and not a channel to the study team — their contact details are on the registry record.

Sign in to join the discussion. Reading takes no account; posting does. You choose a display name, and a pseudonym is the default.

Nothing here yet. If you are running this trial, taking part in it, or weighing whether to, this is the place to say so.

Studies of the drug tested here: Etelcalcetide

Start the discussion