CClinicalTrials.gg
TerminatedNCT03960008SBRTvsTACEUpdated Aug 28, 2024Results posted

Stereotactic Body Radiation Therapy (SBRT) vs Trans-Arterial Chemoembolization (TACE) as Bridge to Transplant

A Phase 3 interventional study of Stereotactic Body Radiation Therapy (SBRT) and Trans-Arterial Chemoembolization (TACE) in Hepatocellular Carcinoma and HCC, sponsored by Lahey Clinic. Terminated at 5 sites in 2 countries. Open to participants aged 18 Years and older. Per ClinicalTrials.gov, last updated 2024-08-28.

Sponsored by Lahey Clinic · Phase 3, Interventional, and Treatment

Why this study was terminated
This study was closed early due to lack of enrollments and insufficient funding.
Phase
Phase 3
Study type
Interventional
Enrollment
9
Allocation
Randomized
Ages
18 Years and older
Sex
All
01

Study summary

This study will compare stereotactic body radiation therapy (SBRT) to trans-arterial chemoembolization (TACE) as a bridging strategy for patients with HCC undergoing liver transplantation. We propose that SBRT will be associated with longer time intervals between initial treatment and the need for retreatment, compared to TACE, as a "bridge" to liver transplantation in subjects with HCC.

Read the detailed description

For patients with hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC) who are waiting for a liver transplant, local treatment of their disease has become the standard of care in an effort to decrease dropout rates and as a means of reducing tumor recurrence after transplantation. For patients undergoing local regional therapy as a bridge to transplantation, trans-arterial chemoembolization (TACE) is the most commonly utilized treatment. However, the best modality for patients undergoing treatment as a bridge to transplantation is unclear. A newer strategy for the treatment of HCC is stereotactic body radiation therapy (SBRT). This study will compare SBRT to TACE as a bridging strategy for patients with HCC undergoing liver transplantation.

02

Conditions studied

  • Hepatocellular Carcinoma
  • HCC

Keywords

  • Hepatocellular Carcinoma (HCC)
  • Liver transplant
  • Bridge to transplant
  • Stereotactic body radiation therapy (SBRT)
  • Trans-arterial chemoembolization (TACE)
03

In context

Carcinoma

6,741 studies on the registry are indexed under Carcinoma; 1,161 are open to participants now.

This study's enrollment of 9 is below the median of 45 across 5,170 interventional studies indexed under Carcinoma.

Browse Carcinoma studies →

Lead sponsor

Lahey Clinic is the lead sponsor of 58 studies on the registry; 4 are open to participants now.

Of its 5 completed or terminated interventional studies of FDA-regulated products, 4 (80%) have results posted.

Counted across the registry records on this site, refreshed daily.

04

Who can participate

Ages eligible
18 Years and older
Sexes eligible
All
Accepts healthy volunteers
No

Inclusion criteria

  1. Subjects with HCC are eligible for this trial. HCC is defined as having at least one of the following:

    • Biopsy proven HCC or:
    • A discrete hepatic tumor(s) as defined by the Barcelona (29) criteria for cirrhotic subjects, ≥2cm with arterial hypervascularity and venous or delayed phase washout on CT or MRI.
  2. Subjects are liver transplant candidates (actively awaiting organ transplant per transplant services in documentation), or, potential liver transplant candidates (at the discretion of the liver team and/or Principal Investigator) advised by liver transplant services as needing local treatment prior to liver transplant evaluation.
  3. Subjects must be within UCSF criteria (one solitary tumor smaller than 6.5 cm, or patients having 3 or fewer nodules, with the largest lesion being smaller than 4.5 cm or having a total tumor diameter less than 8.5 cm without vascular invasion) and eligible for potential liver transplant.
  4. Subjects must be eligible per standard of care for either TACE or SBRT procedures.
  5. Subjects must have a life expectancy of at least 12 weeks.
  6. Subjects must be 18 years of age or older. Adult subjects of all ages, both sexes and all races will be included in this study.
  7. Subjects must sign an informed consent form approved for this purpose by the Institutional Review Board (IRB) of record .
  8. Subjects must have a Child-Turcotte-Pugh (CTP) score ≤8.
  9. Patients must have adequate organ function within 2 weeks of enrollment.

    • Bone marrow: Platelets ≥30,000/mm3
    • Renal: BUN ≤40 mg/dl; creatinine ≤2.0 mg/dl
    • Hepatic: INR ≤ 1.5 or correctable by Vitamin K, unless anti-coagulated for another medical reason
    • Bilirubin \< 3.0 mg/dl (in the absence of obstruction or pre-existing disease of the biliary tract, e.g. primary sclerosing cholangitis).
  10. Patients uninvolved liver volume will be estimated and must be > 700ml.
  11. Patients must have a Zubrod performance status of ≤2.

Exclusion criteria

Exclusion Criteria:

  1. Subjects in a "special category" designated by the Public Health Service, Including subjects younger than 18, pregnant women, and prisoners.
  2. Refractory ascites that requires paracentesis for management.
  3. Known allergy to intravenous iodinated contrast agents unresponsive to prednisone pre-treatment.
  4. History of prior radiation to the liver.
  5. Evidence of metastatic disease.
  6. Presence of a Trans-jugular intra-hepatic porto-systemic shunt (TIPS).
05

Study design

Phase
Phase 3
Primary purpose
Treatment
Allocation
Randomized
Intervention model
Parallel assignment
Masking
None (open label)
Enrollment
9 participants (actual)

Study arms

  • Other
    Stereotactic Body Radiation Therapy (SBRT)

    Radiation Therapy

    Radiation: Stereotactic Body Radiation Therapy (SBRT)

  • Other
    Trans-Arterial Chemoembolization (TACE)

    Procedure/Surgery - Chemoembolization Drug: Doxorubin

    Procedure: Trans-Arterial Chemoembolization (TACE) · Drug: Doxorubin

Interventions

  • RadiationStereotactic Body Radiation Therapy (SBRT)

    SBRT will be delivered in five total fractions, with at a minimum of one day between any two treatments. The entire treatment must be delivered within 15 total days.

    Also known as: Radiation Therapy

  • ProcedureTrans-Arterial Chemoembolization (TACE)

    First day will be administered and a second TACE will be administered after 4 weeks and subsequently if imaging is showing disease progression. Following each TACE procedure all patients will remain in hospital for observation

    Also known as: Chemoembolization

  • DrugDoxorubin

    This procedure will be completed with 2 vials of drug eluting beads each loaded with 50 mg of Doxorubin.

    Also known as: Doxorubin bead therapy

06

What researchers measure

Primary outcomes

  1. To Compare the Duration of Disease Control in Treated Lesions When Utilizing SBRT Versus TACE as a Bridging Strategy for Patients With HCC Eligible for Liver Transplantation

    To compare whether or not there was disease present in treated lesions in both the SBRT and TACE arms in patients eligible for liver transplant at 1 year post treatment.

    Time frame: 1 year post treatment

Secondary outcomes

  1. To Compare Participants With Treatment-related Adverse Events as Assessed by CTCAE v5.0

    To compare treatment related adverse events between both arms, SBRT and TACE.

    Time frame: At each treatment, 2 weeks post treatment, 2 months post treatment, 5 months post treatment, every 3 months until 24 months post treatment

  2. Number of Further Interventions

    To compare the number of further interventions between the SBRT and TACE arms.

    Time frame: 2 weeks post treatment, 2 months post treatment, 5 months post treatment, every 3 months until 24 months post treatment

  3. Rate of Pathological Response of Treated Lesion(s)

    Complete pathologic response of lesions will be analyzed on the explant liver specimen after liver transplant. The pathology note will be consulted.

    Time frame: Review of pathology report after liver transplant

  4. Rate of Radiological Response of Treated Lesion(s)

    Response of treated lesions will be analyzed at protocol specified time frames. The response rate between both treatment arms will be compared.

    Time frame: Baseline, 2 months post-treatment, 5 months post-treatment, every 3 months thereafter until 2 years post treatment

  5. To Assess Quality of Life by Functional Assessment of Cancer Therapy-Hepatobiliary (FACT-Hep) Questionnaire

    A 45-item self-report instrument to measure health-related quality of life (HRQL) in patients with hepatobiliary cancers and is one of the most widely-used instruments in this clinical area. The FACT-Hep consists of the 27-item FACT-G, assesses HRQL, and the 18-item Hepatobiliary Subscale (HS), assesses disease-specific issues such as pain, appetite, and cramping. The FACT-G evaluates physical well-being, social/family well-being, emotional well-being, and functional well-being. Sections have a 7-day reference period and are scored from 0-4 ("not at all" to "very much"), with higher scores indicating better HRQL. Score ranges are 0-28 for physical well-being, 0-28 for social/family well-being, 0-24 for emotional well-being, 0-28 for functional well-being, and 0-72 for the HS. All subscale scores from the FACT-G and HS can be summed together to create a total FACT-Hep score, with a possible range of 0-180. The FACT-Hep takes approximately 10 minutes to complete.

    Time frame: Baseline, during treatment, 2 months post-treatment, 5 months post-treatment, every 3 months until 24 months post treatment

  6. To Assess Over Survival

    Overall survival will be compared in both arms at protocol specified time frames.

    Time frame: Baseline, during treatment, 2 months post-treatment, 5 months post-treatment, every 3 months until 24 months post treatment

  7. To Assess 90 Day Post-transplant Morbidity

    Compare the morbidity at 90 days post transplant between both arms.

    Time frame: Disease status to be captured 90 days post-transplantation (+/- 2 weeks)

  8. To Assess 90 Day Post-transplant Mortality

    Will assess the mortality of post-transplant patients between the two arms.

    Time frame: Survival status to be captured 90 days post-transplantation (+/- 2 weeks)

07

Results

Posted Aug 28, 2024
Limitations and caveats
This study closed to accrual early, with the limited number of participants, we were unable to analyze the data.

Participant flow

Participant flow — Overall Study
MilestoneStereotactic Body Radiation Therapy (SBRT)Trans-Arterial Chemoembolization (TACE)
Started45
Completed00
Not completed45

Outcome measures

PrimaryTo Compare the Duration of Disease Control in Treated Lesions When Utilizing SBRT Versus TACE as a Bridging Strategy for Patients With HCC Eligible for Liver Transplantation

To compare whether or not there was disease present in treated lesions in both the SBRT and TACE arms in patients eligible for liver transplant at 1 year post treatment.

Time frame:
1 year post treatment

No measurements were reported for this outcome.

SecondaryTo Compare Participants With Treatment-related Adverse Events as Assessed by CTCAE v5.0

To compare treatment related adverse events between both arms, SBRT and TACE.

Time frame:
At each treatment, 2 weeks post treatment, 2 months post treatment, 5 months post treatment, every 3 months until 24 months post treatment

No measurements were reported for this outcome.

SecondaryNumber of Further Interventions

To compare the number of further interventions between the SBRT and TACE arms.

Time frame:
2 weeks post treatment, 2 months post treatment, 5 months post treatment, every 3 months until 24 months post treatment

No measurements were reported for this outcome.

SecondaryRate of Pathological Response of Treated Lesion(s)

Complete pathologic response of lesions will be analyzed on the explant liver specimen after liver transplant. The pathology note will be consulted.

Time frame:
Review of pathology report after liver transplant

No measurements were reported for this outcome.

SecondaryRate of Radiological Response of Treated Lesion(s)

Response of treated lesions will be analyzed at protocol specified time frames. The response rate between both treatment arms will be compared.

Time frame:
Baseline, 2 months post-treatment, 5 months post-treatment, every 3 months thereafter until 2 years post treatment

No measurements were reported for this outcome.

SecondaryTo Assess Quality of Life by Functional Assessment of Cancer Therapy-Hepatobiliary (FACT-Hep) Questionnaire

A 45-item self-report instrument to measure health-related quality of life (HRQL) in patients with hepatobiliary cancers and is one of the most widely-used instruments in this clinical area. The FACT-Hep consists of the 27-item FACT-G, assesses HRQL, and the 18-item Hepatobiliary Subscale (HS), assesses disease-specific issues such as pain, appetite, and cramping. The FACT-G evaluates physical well-being, social/family well-being, emotional well-being, and functional well-being. Sections have a 7-day reference period and are scored from 0-4 ("not at all" to "very much"), with higher scores indicating better HRQL. Score ranges are 0-28 for physical well-being, 0-28 for social/family well-being, 0-24 for emotional well-being, 0-28 for functional well-being, and 0-72 for the HS. All subscale scores from the FACT-G and HS can be summed together to create a total FACT-Hep score, with a possible range of 0-180. The FACT-Hep takes approximately 10 minutes to complete.

Time frame:
Baseline, during treatment, 2 months post-treatment, 5 months post-treatment, every 3 months until 24 months post treatment

No measurements were reported for this outcome.

SecondaryTo Assess Over Survival

Overall survival will be compared in both arms at protocol specified time frames.

Time frame:
Baseline, during treatment, 2 months post-treatment, 5 months post-treatment, every 3 months until 24 months post treatment

No measurements were reported for this outcome.

SecondaryTo Assess 90 Day Post-transplant Morbidity

Compare the morbidity at 90 days post transplant between both arms.

Time frame:
Disease status to be captured 90 days post-transplantation (+/- 2 weeks)

No measurements were reported for this outcome.

SecondaryTo Assess 90 Day Post-transplant Mortality

Will assess the mortality of post-transplant patients between the two arms.

Time frame:
Survival status to be captured 90 days post-transplantation (+/- 2 weeks)

No measurements were reported for this outcome.

Adverse events

Collected over Baseline, During Treatment, post treatment follow-up visit, 3 Month, 6 Month, then every 3 months until 24 month time point.. Non-serious events are listed at a 5% frequency threshold.

Adverse event summary by group
GroupDeathsSeriousOther
Stereotactic Body Radiation Therapy (SBRT)0/4 (0%)0/4 (0%)0/4 (0%)
Trans-Arterial Chemoembolization (TACE)0/5 (0%)0/5 (0%)0/5 (0%)

Baseline characteristics

Age, Categorical
Age, Categorical(Participants)Stereotactic Body Radiation Therapy (SBRT)Trans-Arterial Chemoembolization (TACE)Total
<=18 years000
Between 18 and 65 years235
>=65 years224
Age, Continuous
Age, Continuous(years)Stereotactic Body Radiation Therapy (SBRT)Trans-Arterial Chemoembolization (TACE)Total
Mean65.8 ± 3.960.6 ± 7.662.8 ± 6.5
Sex: Female, Male
Sex: Female, Male(Participants)Stereotactic Body Radiation Therapy (SBRT)Trans-Arterial Chemoembolization (TACE)Total
Female000
Male459
Race (NIH/OMB)
Race (NIH/OMB)(Participants)Stereotactic Body Radiation Therapy (SBRT)Trans-Arterial Chemoembolization (TACE)Total
American Indian or Alaska Native000
Asian000
Native Hawaiian or Other Pacific Islander000
Black or African American000
White459
More than one race000
Unknown or Not Reported000
Region of Enrollment
Region of Enrollment(participants)Stereotactic Body Radiation Therapy (SBRT)Trans-Arterial Chemoembolization (TACE)Total
Canada112
United States347
08

Study locations

5 sites
  • Lahey Hospital & Medical Center
    Burlington, Massachusetts 01805, United States
  • Mayo Clinic
    Rochester, Minnesota 55905, United States
  • University of Nebraska Medical Center
    Omaha, Nebraska 68198, United States
  • The Ohio State University Comprehensive Cancer Center
    Columbus, Ohio 43202, United States
  • Princess Margaret Hospital, UHN
    Toronto, Ontario M5G 1X6, Canada
09

References and documents

Study documents

  • Protocol and statistical analysis plan · Aug 20, 2021

Documents are hosted by the registry — open the source record to download them.

10

Updates

Tracking since Sep 25, 2026
No changes since tracking began. The registry record was last updated on Aug 28, 2024, before this site started recording changes on Sep 25, 2026. Its history is on ClinicalTrials.gov ↗
11

Registry details

Key details

Study ID
NCT03960008
Lead sponsor
Lahey Clinic
Collaborators
Varian Medical Systems, Merit Medical Systems, Inc.
Responsible party
Sponsor
First posted
May 22, 2019
Start date
Mar 1, 2020
Primary completion
Feb 28, 2024
Completion
Feb 28, 2024
Results posted
Aug 28, 2024
Last update
Aug 28, 2024

Study contacts

Corrine Zarwan, MD
principal investigator · Lahey Hospital & Medical Center

Oversight

Data monitoring committee
Yes
FDA-regulated drug
Yes
FDA-regulated device
No
View the source record on ClinicalTrials.gov ↗

Not currently enrolling

This study is terminated, as verified in Aug 2024. You cannot join it, but the record below documents what was studied.

Follow this study

Get an email when the registry record changes — status, dates, results — or when someone posts here.

Sign in to follow

Discussion

Questions and observations about this study, from anyone following it. Not medical advice, and not a channel to the study team — their contact details are on the registry record.

Sign in to join the discussion. Reading takes no account; posting does. You choose a display name, and a pseudonym is the default.

Nothing here yet. If you are running this trial, taking part in it, or weighing whether to, this is the place to say so.

Start the discussion