CClinicalTrials.gg
Status unknownNCT03959709Updated Apr 27, 2022

Pre-pectoral Versus Sub-pectoral Implant Placement in Immediate Breast Reconstruction

An interventional study of immediate acellular dermal matrix-assisted implant-based breast reconstruction with prepectoral implant placement. and Immediate acellular dermal matrix-assisted implant-based breast reconstruction with subpectoral implant placement in Mastectomy and Breast Cancer, sponsored by Ottawa Hospital Research Institute. Status unknown at 1 site in Canada. Open to female participants aged 20 Years to 80 Years. Per ClinicalTrials.gov, last updated 2022-04-27.

Sponsored by Ottawa Hospital Research Institute · Not applicable, Interventional, and Treatment

The sponsor has not verified this record recently (last verified Apr 2022), so the status shown — last known as Recruiting — may be out of date.
Phase
Not applicable
Study type
Interventional
Enrollment
56
Allocation
Randomized
Ages
20 Years to 80 Years
Sex
Female
01

Study summary

Despite the popularity and proved safety of prepectoral implant-based reconstruction, there is little evidence on long-term results and variables which could influence surgical outcome. So far, no specific guidelines or indications have been developed for prepectoral technique and heterogeneous inclusion criteria had been used in previous reports. There is a lack of studies documenting outcomes following ADM-assisted prepectoral breast reconstruction, and there are no randomised controlled trial studies that drawing a direct comparison of clinical or patient-reported outcomes between subpectoral and prepectoral groups.

The investigators hypothesized that immediate acellular dermal matrix-assisted implant-based breast reconstruction with prepectoral implant placement would result in less early postoperative pain but more reported implant rippling, requirement of more fat grafting and an equitable safety profile compared with ADM-assisted implant-based breast reconstruction with subpectoral implant placement.

The aim of this study is to evaluate the postsurgical pain, complications and patient-reported outcomes of prepectoral breast reconstruction versus subpectoral implant placement in immediate breast reconstruction.

Read the detailed description

The investigators will employ a single centre RCT with duration of two years (July 1, 2019 - June 30, 2021). Participant recruitment and enrolment will occur at the Women's Health Center for 1 year (July 1, 2019 to June 30, 2020), followed by one year (June 30, 2021) of follow-up data collection, data analyses and dissemination.

At the preoperative consultation, the surgeon will determine if the patient is eligible for implant-based immediate reconstruction, using the inclusion and exclusion criteria.

A total of 56 patients or 23 patients per arm will be recruited. Randomization will be accomplished using randomly permuted blocks, and the randomization list will be prepared by a biostatistician with no clinical involvement in this trial. Randomization will be stratified on the basis of center and laterality of reconstruction (i.e., unilateral versus bilateral reconstruction).

The allocation sequence will be concealed by placing each randomization assignment in a sequentially numbered, opaque, sealed envelope. Consecutive envelopes will be delivered to the operating room by the on-site research study assistant once the mastectomy is complete. To prevent subversion of the allocation sequence, envelopes will not be opened until the attending surgeon confirms the absence of significant mastectomy flap necrosis and the fact that the patient does not undergo a concurrent axillary lymph node dissection.

All patients will be blinded to their treatment arm. Once the treatment arm is revealed, the attending surgeon will advise the surgical team (surgical assistants and operating room nurses) the surgical plan. While the surgical team will be aware of the randomization code, the rest of the postoperative care team (including recovery room staff, day surgery nursing staff, and clinic staff during follow-up visit), outcome assessors, and data analysts will be kept blinded to the intervention performed.

Outcome measures:

At the baseline visit, following informed consent, demographic data (age, BMI, laterality and comorbidities) will be collected. The participant will then complete the following questionnaires: Pre-operative Breast-Q™: The Breast-Q™ Reconstruction Module is a validated PRO developed specifically for patients undergoing breast reconstruction. The questionnaire evaluates patient-reported satisfaction, psychosocial, physical and sexual quality of life [1] Primary outcome: Postoperative Pain scores and 24-hour narcotic consumption Secondary outcomes: All outcomes are measured within or at 12 months of the initial surgery.

02

Conditions studied

  • Mastectomy
  • Breast Cancer
03

In context

Lead sponsor

Ottawa Hospital Research Institute is the lead sponsor of 538 studies on the registry; 100 are open to participants now.

Counted across the registry records on this site, refreshed daily.

04

Who can participate

Ages eligible
20 Years to 80 Years
Sexes eligible
Female
Accepts healthy volunteers
No

Inclusion criteria

  • Female patient
  • Ages 20-80
  • All patients undergoing mastectomy for breast cancer or prophylaxis for breast cancer with immediate implant-based reconstruction
  • Able to provide informed consent

Exclusion criteria

Exclusion Criteria:

  • Patients who have had prior chest wall or irradiation on the reconstructed side
  • Patients not undergoing immediate breast reconstruction at the time of mastectomy
  • Any patient with a contraindication to immediate breast reconstruction.
  • Patients with history of smoking, BMI> 40, and D cup breast size or grade III ptosis are all contraindications to immediate breast reconstruction as the risk of postoperative complications are significantly higher (wound infection, dehiscence, implant loss, seroma) than the average patient and thus these patients would be excluded from the study.
05

Study design

Phase
Not applicable
Primary purpose
Treatment
Allocation
Randomized
Intervention model
Parallel assignment
Masking
Triple (Participant, Care provider, Outcomes assessor)
Enrollment
56 participants (estimated)

Study arms

  • Experimental
    Prepectoral implant placement

    Immediate acellular dermal matrix-assisted implant-based breast reconstruction with prepectoral implant placement.

    Procedure: immediate acellular dermal matrix-assisted implant-based breast reconstruction with prepectoral implant placement.

  • Active comparator
    Subpectoral implant placement

    Immediate acellular dermal matrix-assisted implant-based breast reconstruction with subpectoral implant placement.

    Procedure: Immediate acellular dermal matrix-assisted implant-based breast reconstruction with subpectoral implant placement

Interventions

  • Procedureimmediate acellular dermal matrix-assisted implant-based breast reconstruction with prepectoral implant placement.

    On the day of surgery, after the completion of the mastectomy, the vascularity of the mastectomy flaps will be evaluated, and debridement is performed where necessary. A temporary implant sizer is placed in the pocket to assess the position and shape of the prepectoral pocket. The pocket is adjusted where necessary. A sheet of ADM (DermAcell) is then selected. The DermAcell will be prepared as per the manufacture's instructions and fenestrated using size 11 blade. The DermACELL piece will be trimmed to the appropriate shape and sutured to the superior medial and lateral edges of the pectoralis major muscle. The inferior edge will be sutured to the fascia at the level of the inframammary fold. Two closed suction drains will be placed (one below the mastectomy skin flap, and one below DermACELL). The implant will be inserted to the pre-pectoral pocket and several anchor sutures will be used to secure the superior-medial edge of DermACELL to mastectomy flap.

  • ProcedureImmediate acellular dermal matrix-assisted implant-based breast reconstruction with subpectoral implant placement

    On the day of surgery, after the completion of the mastectomy, the vascularity of the mastectomy flaps will be evaluated, and debridement is performed where necessary. The reconstructive operative procedure will then proceeded with (1) elevation of the pectoralis major muscle with release of inferior attachments; (2) placement of implant subpectorally; (3) placement and suturing of DermACELL to constitute the inferolateral breast pocket; (4) placement of two closed suction drains (one superiorly between the pectoralis major and skin, and one inferiorly between the DermACELL and skin); (5) removal of sizer and placement of permanent to the pocket and (6) suture the inferior edge of DermACELL to the inferior edge of the pectoral major muscle. The skin will be closed and the dressing will be applied as standard protocol.

06

What researchers measure

Primary outcomes

  1. Postoperative Pain and 24-hour narcotic consumption

    Postoperative Pain will be scored using Numerical rating scale. The scale ranges from 0 to 10 indicating the level of pain. Zero indicates the absence of pain, while 10 represents the most intense pain (no pain = 0, mild = 1-3, moderate = 4-6, severe = 7-10).

    Time frame: 24 hours

Secondary outcomes

  1. Mastectomy flap necrosis

    Skin loss of mastectomy flap

    Time frame: 4 weeks

  2. Rate of seroma

    Episodes of seroma formation requiring aspiration

    Time frame: 4 weeks

  3. Rate of infection

    Cellulitis and abscess

    Time frame: 3 months

  4. Rate of Explantation

    Loss of implant

    Time frame: 1 year

  5. Number of Revisional surgeries

    return to operating room for more surgeries

    Time frame: 1 year

  6. Rate of Wound

    incision dehiscence or debridement

    Time frame: 3 months

  7. Rate of Capsular contracture

    Tightening, firmness and pain of reconstructive breast

    Time frame: 1 year

  8. BREAST-Q© Pre-operative scale

    The BREAST-Q© modules is comprised of the following two overarching themes (or domains): 1) Health-Related Quality of Life (QOL) and 2) Patient Satisfaction. Under each of these domains, there are six subthemes; QOL: 1) Psychosocial, 2) Physical and 3) Sexual well-being; and Patient Satisfaction: 4) Satisfaction with Breasts, 5) Satisfaction with Outcome and 6) Satisfaction with Care. Body image is an important concept for breast surgery patients. Preoperative scales: Satisfaction with Breasts, Psychosocial, Sexual and Physical Well-being Chest There is no overall or total BREAST-Q© score, only scores for each independent scale. All BREAST-Q© scales are transformed into scores that range from 0-100. The scores are computed by adding the response items together and then converting the raw sum scale score to a score from 0-100. For all BREAST-Q© scales, a higher score means greater satisfaction or better QOL (depending on the scale). The score is from 0 (worst) to 100 (best).

    Time frame: Before Surgery

  9. BREAST-Q© Post-operative

    The BREAST-Q© modules is comprised of the following two overarching themes (or domains): 1) Health-Related Quality of Life (QOL) and 2) Patient Satisfaction. Under each of these domains, there are six subthemes; QOL: 1) Psychosocial, 2) Physical and 3) Sexual well-being; and Patient Satisfaction: 4) Satisfaction with Breasts, 5) Satisfaction with Outcome and 6) Satisfaction with Care. Body image is an important concept for breast surgery patients. Postoperative scales: Satisfaction with Doctor, Medical Team and Office Staff There is no overall or total BREAST-Q© score, only scores for each independent scale. All BREAST-Q© scales are transformed into scores that range from 0-100. The scores are computed by adding the response items together and then converting the raw sum scale score to a score from 0-100. For all BREAST-Q© scales, a higher score means greater satisfaction or better QOL (depending on the scale). The score is from 0 (worst) to 100 (best).

    Time frame: 3 months and 12 months

07

Study locations

1 of 1 sites recruiting
  • The Ottawa Hospital
    Ottawa, Ontario, Canada
    • Jing Zhang · Contact
    • Jing Zhang, MD · Principal investigator
    • Angel Arnaout, MD · Sub investigator
    Recruiting
08

References and documents

Individual participant data

Plan to share: No

No publications or documents are linked to this record.

09

Updates

Tracking since Sep 25, 2026
No changes since tracking began. The registry record was last updated on Apr 27, 2022, before this site started recording changes on Sep 25, 2026. Its history is on ClinicalTrials.gov ↗
10

Registry details

Key details

Study ID
NCT03959709
Lead sponsor
Ottawa Hospital Research Institute
Responsible party
Sponsor
First posted
May 22, 2019
Start date
Aug 22, 2019
Primary completion
Dec 30, 2022 (estimated)
Completion
Dec 30, 2023 (estimated)
Last update
Apr 27, 2022

Study contacts

Jing Zhang, MD
Contact
jzhang1@toh.ca
(613) 798-5555 ext. 13165
Bahareh Ghaedi, MSc
Contact
bghaedi@ohri.ca
(613) 798-5555 ext. 13165
Jing Zhang, MD
principal investigator · Ottawa Hospital Research Institute

Oversight

Data monitoring committee
Yes
FDA-regulated drug
No
FDA-regulated device
No
View the source record on ClinicalTrials.gov ↗

Not currently enrolling

This study is status unknown, as verified in Apr 2022. You cannot join it, but the record below documents what was studied.

Follow this study

Get an email when the registry record changes — status, dates, results — or when someone posts here.

Sign in to follow

Discussion

Questions and observations about this study, from anyone following it. Not medical advice, and not a channel to the study team — their contact details are on the registry record.

Sign in to join the discussion. Reading takes no account; posting does. You choose a display name, and a pseudonym is the default.

Nothing here yet. If you are running this trial, taking part in it, or weighing whether to, this is the place to say so.

Start the discussion