A Phase 1/2 interventional study of hu14.18-IL2 and Radiation Therapy in Melanoma, sponsored by University of Wisconsin, Madison. Terminated at 1 site in United States. Open to participants aged 18 Years and older. Per ClinicalTrials.gov, last updated 2026-06-03.
Sponsored by University of Wisconsin, Madison · Phase 1/2, Interventional, and Treatment
This phase I/II trial is designed to determine the maximum tolerated dose or the maximum administered dose of intratumoral administration of hu14.18-IL2 and to evaluate side effects of intratumoral hu14.18-IL2 when given alone, after radiation therapy, after radiation therapy and in combination with nivolumab, and after radiation therapy and in combination with nivolumab and ipilimumab in patients with melanoma that is advanced (stage IV) or with melanoma that cannot be removed by surgery and is considered surgically incurable. Hu14.18-IL2 is a molecule called a fusion protein that can bind to some tumor cells and cause immune cells to become activated to kill tumor cells. Radiation therapy is a type of cancer treatment that uses beams of high energy x-rays to kill tumor cells and shrink tumors. Immunotherapy with immune checkpoint inhibitors, such as nivolumab and ipilimumab, can help the body's immune system attack cancer by releasing the "brakes" on the immune system to allow cancer fighting immune cells to remain activated. This study will evaluate whether giving intratumoral hu14.18-IL2 with radiation therapy, nivolumab and ipilimumab has antitumor activity for participants with advanced melanoma.
After completion of study treatment, participants are followed up at 30 days, every 12 weeks for up to 2 years, and then every 6 months thereafter.
PRIMARY OBJECTIVES:
I. Determine the maximum tolerated dose (MTD) or maximum administered dose (MAD) of intratumoral (IT)-Hu14.18-IL2 fusion protein (hu14.18-IL2) in subjects with advanced melanoma (Phase IA)
II. Evaluate the safety and tolerability of IT-hu14.18-IL2 when given alone (Phase IA)
III. Determine the maximum tolerated dose (MTD) or maximum administered dose (MAD) of IT-hu14.18-IL2 after receiving palliative radiation therapy (RT) in subjects with advanced melanoma (Phase IB)
IV. Evaluate the safety and tolerability of the combination of palliative RT with IT-hu14.18-IL2 (Phase IB)
V. Determine the maximum tolerated dose (MTD) or maximum administered dose (MAD) of IT-hu14.18-IL2 after receiving palliative RT and in combination with nivolumab in subjects with advanced melanoma (Phase IC)
VI. Evaluate the safety and tolerability of the combination of palliative RT, nivolumab and IT-hu14.18-IL2 (Phase IC)
VII. Determine the maximum tolerated dose (MTD) or maximum administered dose (MAD) of IT-hu14.18-IL2 after receiving palliative RT and in combination with nivolumab and ipilimumab in subjects with advanced melanoma (Phase ID)
VIII. Evaluate the safety and tolerability of the combination of palliative RT, nivolumab, ipilimumab and IT-hu14.18-IL2 (Phase ID)
IX. Evaluate local and systemic objective tumor responses to treatment with IT-hu14.18-IL2 in combination with palliative RT, nivolumab, and ipilimumab (Phase ID)
SECONDARY OBJECTIVES:
I. Evaluate progression-free survival (PFS), overall survival (OS), clinical benefit (CB, defined as complete response (CR) + partial response (PR) + stable disease (SD)) and duration of response to hu14.18-IL2 in combination with RT, nivolumab and ipilimumab.
II. Evaluate pathologic (tissue) evidence of immune response at the injection site and untreated sites.
III. Evaluate PFS, CB and duration of response to hu14.18-IL2 in combination with palliative RT, nivolumab and ipilimumab based on resistance to prior treatment with anti-CTLA-4 and/or anti PD1/PD-L1 antibody.
IV. Evaluate serial serum samples to determine the pharmacokinetics of hu14.18-IL2 administered intratumorally.
V. Evaluate each subject's tumor cells for expression of GD2 and PD-L1, and determine if either antitumor activity or selected treatment-associated biologic effects are more likely for tumors that are GD2+ then GD2- and PD-L1+ than PD-L1-.
VI. Evaluate whether PD-L1 expression is induced or augmented from baseline following initiation of treatment (by comparing serial biopsies).
VII. Evaluate the immunologic activation induced in vivo by IT-hu14.18-IL2, addressed by in vitro cellular, serologic and flow cytometry immune assays.
VIII. Evaluate for histological evidence of antitumor activity based on the presence of necrotic tumor cells, inflammatory infiltrate, cellular phenotype of infiltrate, and presence of hu14.18-IL2 within the tumor at selected post-treatment timepoints.
IX. Evaluate circulating tumor cells, exosomes, endogenous antibodies, and/or deoxyribonucleic acid (DNA) as exploratory biomarkers associated with clinical response to IT-hu14.18-IL2 in combination with RT, nivolumab and ipilimumab.
X. Evaluate serial peripheral blood mononuclear cell (PBMC) samples to monitor the induction of T cell responses to melanoma-associated antigens.
XI. Evaluate objective tumor responses, both locally and systemically (by immune-related response criteria), in Phases IA, IB and IC of this trial (involving IT-hu14.18-IL2 alone and in combinations with palliative RT, and with palliative RT and nivolumab, respectively).
OUTLINE: This is a dose escalation study of hu14.18-IL2 fusion protein.
PHASE IA: Participants receive hu14.18-IL2 fusion protein intratumorally (IT) once daily (QD) on days 1-3. Treatment repeats every 21 days for cycles 1-4. Participants who are eligible may continue to receive hu14.18-IL2 fusion protein maintenance therapy QD on days 1-3 beginning with cycle 5. Maintenance cycles repeat every 28 days for up to 13 cycles in the absence of disease progression or unacceptable toxicity. A total of 9-18 participants will be enrolled in 3 escalating dose levels to determine the Maximum Tolerated Dose (MTD)/Maximum Administered Dose (MAD) of hu14.18-IL2 in Phase IA.
PHASE IB: Participants undergo palliative RT on days -8 to -4 of cycle 1 only. Participants also receive hu14.18-IL2 fusion protein IT as in phase IA. Treatment with hu14.18-IL2 repeats every 21 days for cycles 1-4. Participants who are eligible may continue to receive hu14.18-IL2 fusion protein maintenance therapy QD on days 1-3 beginning with cycle 5. Maintenance cycles repeat every 28 days for up to 13 cycles in the absence of disease progression or unacceptable toxicity. The MTD/MAD of IT-hu14.18-IL2 following palliative RT will be determined starting 1 dose level below the Phase IA determined MTD/MAD of IT-hu14.18-IL2 up to the Phase IA determined MTD/MAD.
PHASE IC: Participants undergo palliative RT on days -8 to -4 of cycle 1 only. Nivolumab (3 mg/kg) is given every 2 weeks for up to 1 year with the initial dose given between day -7 and day -1 of cycle 1. Participants also receive hu14.18-IL2 fusion protein IT as in phase IA. Treatment with hu14.18-IL2 repeats every 21 days for cycles 1-4. Participants who are eligible may continue to receive hu14.18-IL2 fusion protein maintenance therapy QD on days 1-3 beginning with cycle 5. Maintenance cycles repeat every 28 days for up to 13 cycles in the absence of disease progression or unacceptable toxicity. The MTD/MAD of IT-hu14.18-IL2 following palliative RT in combination with nivolumab will be determined starting 1 dose level below the Phase IB determined MTD/MAD of IT-hu14.18-IL2 up to the Phase IB determined MTD/MAD.
PHASE ID: Participants undergo palliative RT on days -8 to -4 of cycle 1 only. Nivolumab (1 mg/kg) in combination with ipilimumab (3 mg/kg) is given every 3 weeks for 4 cycles with the initial dose given between day -7 and day -1 of cycle 1. Following 4 cycles, no additional ipilimumab will be administered. Following cycle 4, maintenance nivolumab (3 mg/kg) can be given for up to one year. Participants also receive hu14.18-IL2 fusion protein IT as in phase IA. Treatment with hu14.18-IL2 repeats every 21 days for cycles 1-4. Participants who are eligible may continue to receive hu14.18-IL2 fusion protein maintenance therapy QD on days 1-3 beginning with cycle 5. Maintenance cycles repeat every 28 days for up to 13 cycles in the absence of disease progression or unacceptable toxicity. The MTD/MAD of IT-hu14.18-IL2 following palliative RT in combination with nivolumab and ipilimumab will be determined starting 1 dose level below the Phase IC determined MTD/MAD of IT-hu14.18-IL2 up to the Phase IC determined MTD/MAD. A total of 28 participants will be enrolled at the Phase ID MTD/MAD of IT-hu14.18-IL2.
3,006 studies on the registry are indexed under Melanoma; 520 are open to participants now.
This study's enrollment of 8 is below the median of 38 across 2,351 interventional studies indexed under Melanoma.
Browse Melanoma studies →University of Wisconsin, Madison is the lead sponsor of 1,161 studies on the registry; 182 are open to participants now.
Of its 151 completed or terminated interventional studies of FDA-regulated products, 114 (75%) have results posted.
Counted across the registry records on this site, refreshed daily.
Subjects must have at least one (1), but preferably two (2), sites of readily accessible, superficial disease (i.e., cutaneous, subcutaneous, and/or readily-palpable lymphadenopathy) that are amenable to repeated hu14.18-IL2 injections and two (2) to four (4) biopsies (designated Lesions A (index lesion) and B). These lesions must be at least 1 cm, but no greater than 5 cm, in longest diameter.
Subjects must have adequate bone marrow, liver, and renal function as defined by:
Exclusion Criteria:
Subjects with a diagnosed auto-immune disease (exceptions: subjects with controlled diabetes mellitus type I, thyroid disease, vitiligo and alopecia areata not requiring treatment with immunosuppressants are eligible)
Women of childbearing potential will be excluded if they are pregnant, nursing, or not willing to use effective contraception, as discussed with the treating physician, during the treatment period. A negative pregnancy test (serum or urine) is required for women of child bearing potential within 14 days before study registration.
A person of childbearing potential is anyone (regardless of sexual orientation, gender identity, having undergone tubal ligation, or remaining celibate by choice) who was born with a uterus and at least one ovary and meets the following criteria
PHASE IA: As described above. Participants receive hu14.18-IL2 fusion protein intratumorally (IT). PHASE IB: As described above. Participants undergo palliative RT and hu14.18-IL2 fusion protein IT as in phase IA. PHASE IC: As described above. Participants undergo palliative RT, receive nivolumab, and hu14.18-IL2 fusion protein IT as in phase IA. PHASE ID: As described above. Participants undergo palliative RT, receive nivolumab in combination with ipilimumab, and hu14.18-IL2 fusion protein IT as in phase IA.
Biological: hu14.18-IL2 · Radiation: Radiation Therapy · Biological: Nivolumab · Biological: Ipilimumab
A recombinant fusion protein linking the monoclonal antibody (mAb) hu14.18 with interleukin-2 (IL2), administered IT
Also known as: immunocytokine
Palliative radiation therapy
Also known as: Radiotherapy
Human programmed death receptor (PD-1) blocking antibody, given IV
Also known as: anti-PD-1
Monoclinal antibody that targets cytoxic T-lymphocyte-associated protein 4 (CTLA-4), given IV
Also known as: anti-CTLA-4
Incidence of Adverse Events
The number and severity of toxicity incidents per (Common Terminology Criteria for Adverse Events (CTCAE) v 5.0 will be summarized with frequency and proportion. The 95% confidence interval for the proportion of subjects with severe complications (grade 3 or higher toxicities) will be constructed.
Time frame: up to 2 years
Maximum Tolerated Dose (MTD)
The MTD is defined as the highest dose level at which less than 33% of the subjects experience a Dose Limiting Toxicity (DLT). DLT will be defined as grade 3 or 4 toxicity that is possibly, probably or definitely related to IT-hu14.18-IL2 graded according to CTCAE v. 5.0. A standard 3+3 design and descriptive statistics will primarily be generated to summarize the data.
Time frame: up to 21 days
Maximum Administered Dose (MAD)
The MAD is defined as the highest safely tolerated dose where less than 33% subjects experience a DLT but no higher dose level has been assessed. Descriptive statistics will primarily be generated to summarize the data.
Time frame: up to 21 days
Objective Tumor Response (OR)
OR will be summarized using descriptive statistics. Furthermore, a point estimate along with the 95% confidence interval for the proportion of subjects with OR will be provided. Clinical outcome of OR will be summarized by dose level for Phase IC.
Time frame: Up to 5 years
Progression Free Survival (PFS)
The length of time from the start of treatment until disease progression or death. Kaplan-Meier method will be used to estimate the survival distribution of progression-free survival for the Phase ID expansion cohort.
Time frame: Up to 5 years
Overall Survival (OS)
The length of time from the start of treatment until death from any cause. Kaplan-Meier method will be used to estimate the survival distribution of overall survival for the Phase ID expansion cohort.
Time frame: Up to 5 years
Clinical Benefit (CB)
The status of achieving complete response, partial response or stable disease in response to treatment.
Time frame: Planned to be collected for up to 5 years, study closed early and this data was collected for approximately 8 months
Duration of Response
The length of time from documentation of tumor response until disease progression. Kaplan-Meier method will be used to estimate the survival distribution for the Phase ID expansion cohort.
Time frame: Up to 5 years
Immunologic Parameters: Change in Antibody Dependent Cell-Mediated Toxicity (ADCC) Function
Immunologic activation induced in vivo by intratumoral (IT)-hu14.18-IL2 fusion protein will be evaluated using both in vivo and in vitro analyses. Changes between assessment time points will be evaluated using a paired t-test or non-parametric Wilcoxon signed rank test, depending on the scale and distribution of the endpoint.
Time frame: Baseline, Cycle 3 day 1, Cycle 5 day 1, End of Treatment (up to 13 cycles) (cycles 1-4 are 21 days, 5+ are 28 days)
Immunologic Parameters: Change in Natural Killer (NK) Cell Function
Immunologic activation induced in vivo by intratumoral (IT)-hu14.18-IL2 fusion protein will be evaluated using both in vivo and in vitro analyses. Changes between assessment time points will be evaluated using a paired t-test or non-parametric Wilcoxon signed rank test, depending on the scale and distribution of the endpoint.
Time frame: Baseline, Cycle 3 day 1, Cycle 5 day 1, End of Treatment (up to 13 cycles) (cycles 1-4 are 21 days, 5+ are 28 days)
Immunologic Parameters: Change in Soluble Interleukin-2 Receptor Alpha (IL-2 Alpha) Levels
Immunologic activation induced in vivo by intratumoral (IT)-hu14.18-IL2 fusion protein will be evaluated using both in vivo and in vitro analyses. Changes between assessment time points will be evaluated using a paired t-test or non-parametric Wilcoxon signed rank test, depending on the scale and distribution of the endpoint.
Time frame: Baseline; Cycle 1 days 1,4,8; Cycle 4 days 1,4,8; Cycle 7 days 1,4,8; Cycle 10 day 1,4,8 (cycles 1-4 are 21 days, 5+ are 28 days)
Histological Parameters: Change in Necrotic Tumor Cells From Baseline
For the primary parameters to be assessed on the resected melanoma an objective scoring system will be established by a pathologist, grading each specimen with a score of 0, +, ++, +++. Changes in number of Necrotic Tumor Cells from baseline will be evaluated using a paired McNemar's test for binary outcomes. Quantitative assessment of necrosis of tumor cells will be measured and scored with a value ranging from 0% - 100% of tumor area.
Time frame: Baseline, Cycle 1, Cycle 2, Cycle 4 (cycles 1-4 are 21 days)
Histological Parameters: Change in Apoptosis From Baseline
For the primary parameters to be assessed on the resected melanoma an objective scoring system will be established by a pathologist, grading each specimen with a score of 0, +, ++, +++.
Time frame: Baseline, Cycle 1, Cycle 2, Cycle 4 (cycle length is 21 days)
Histological Parameters: Change in Inflammatory Infiltrate in the Tumor From Baseline
For the primary parameters to be assessed on the resected melanoma an objective scoring system will be established by a pathologist, grading each specimen with a score of 0, +, ++, +++.
Time frame: Baseline, Cycle 1, Cycle 2, Cycle 4 (cycle length is 21 days)
Histological Parameters: Change in Cellular Phenotype of Infiltrate
Cellular phenotype of infiltrate within the tumor will be summarized by descriptive statistics. Changes from baseline will be evaluated using a paired McNemar's test for binary outcomes.
Time frame: Baseline, Cycle 1, Cycle 2, Cycle 4 (cycle length is 21 days)
Histological Parameters: Change in hu14.18-IL2 in the Tumor From Baseline
Presence hu14.18-IL2 within the tumor will be summarized by descriptive statistics. Changes from baseline will be evaluated using a paired McNemar's test for binary outcomes.
Time frame: Baseline, Cycle 1, Cycle 2, Cycle 4 (cycle length is 21 days)
Pharmacokinetic (PK) Parameters: Alpha Half-life
Pharmacokinetic assessments will be performed on multiple serum specimens for each subject. The analysis of all PK parameters will be performed using the PK analysis population. The distribution half-life called alpha half-life (t1/2 alpha) will be summarized by dose level with simple summary statistics.
Time frame: At baseline, course 1 day 5, and day 5 of courses 2 & 4 (cycle length is 21 days)
Pharmacokinetic (PK) Parameters: Beta Half-life
Pharmacokinetic assessments will be performed on multiple serum specimens for each subject. The analysis of all PK parameters will be performed using the PK analysis population. The elimination half-life called beta half-life (t1/2 beta) will be summarized by dose level with simple summary statistics.
Time frame: At baseline, course 1 day 5, and day 5 of courses 2 & 4 (cycle length is 21 days)
Pharmacokinetic (PK) Parameters: Area Under the Curve (AUC)
Pharmacokinetic assessments will be performed on multiple serum specimens for each subject. The analysis of all PK parameters will be performed using the PK analysis population. AUC will be summarized by dose level with simple summary statistics.
Time frame: At baseline, course 1 day 5, and day 5 of courses 2 & 4 (cycle length is 21 days)
Pharmacokinetic Parameters: Clearance (CL)
Pharmacokinetic assessments will be performed on multiple serum specimens for each subject. The analysis of all PK parameters will be performed using the PK analysis population. Clearance will be summarized by dose level with simple summary statistics.
Time frame: At baseline, course 1 day 5, and day 5 of courses 2 & 4 (cycle length is 21 days)
Pharmacokinetic (PK) Parameters: Relationship Between Dose and AUC
Scatterplots will be used to explore possible associations between the dose and area under the curve (AUC). The Jonckheere-Terpstra trend test will be performed to determine the significance of the association between increasing dose level and AUC.
Time frame: At baseline, course 1 day 5, and day 5 of courses 2 & 4 (cycle length is 21 days)
Pharmacokinetic (PK) Parameters: Relationship PK Parameters and Toxicity
Logistic regression analyses will be performed to correlate PK parameters with toxicity (grade \>= 3 vs. grade 0-2) and response.
Time frame: At baseline, course 1 day 5, and day 5 of courses 2 & 4 (cycle length is 21 days)
Analysis of Antibody Resistance: OR
Clinical outcomes such as OR, duration of response, CB, PFS, and OS will be analyzed separately among subjects who were resistant to prior treatment with anti-CTLA-4 and/or anti-PD1/PD-L1 antibodies and those who lacked resistance in a subgroup analysis. This comparison is by necessity exploratory in nature and hypothesis generating.
Time frame: Up to 5 years
Analysis of Antibody Resistance: Duration of Response
Clinical outcomes such as OR, duration of response, CB, PFS, and OS will be analyzed separately among subjects who were resistant to prior treatment with anti-CTLA-4 and/or anti-PD1/PD-L1 antibodies and those who lacked resistance in a subgroup analysis. This comparison is by necessity exploratory in nature and hypothesis generating.
Time frame: Up to 5 years
Analysis of Antibody Resistance: CB
Clinical outcomes such as OR, duration of response, CB, PFS, and OS will be analyzed separately among subjects who were resistant to prior treatment with anti-CTLA-4 and/or anti-PD1/PD-L1 antibodies and those who lacked resistance in a subgroup analysis. This comparison is by necessity exploratory in nature and hypothesis generating.
Time frame: Up to 5 years
Analysis of Antibody Resistance: PFS
Clinical outcomes such as OR, duration of response, CB, PFS, and OS will be analyzed separately among subjects who were resistant to prior treatment with anti-CTLA-4 and/or anti-PD1/PD-L1 antibodies and those who lacked resistance in a subgroup analysis. This comparison is by necessity exploratory in nature and hypothesis generating.
Time frame: Up to 5 years
Analysis of Antibody Resistance: OS
Clinical outcomes such as OR, duration of response, CB, PFS, and OS will be analyzed separately among subjects who were resistant to prior treatment with anti-CTLA-4 and/or anti-PD1/PD-L1 antibodies and those who lacked resistance in a subgroup analysis. This comparison is by necessity exploratory in nature and hypothesis generating.
Time frame: Up to 5 years
Analysis of GD2+ vs GD2- Patients: OR
Clinical outcomes such as OR, duration of response, CB, PFS and OS and treatment associated selected biologic effects will be analyzed separately among patients who are GD2+ and those who are GD2- in a subgroup analysis. These outcome measures will be compared using two-sample t-test, log rank test and chi-square/Fisher's exact test between the two groups of patients who are GD2+ and who are GD2-.
Time frame: Up to 5 years
Analysis of GD2+ vs GD2- Patients: Duration of Response
Clinical outcomes such as OR, duration of response, CB, PFS and OS and treatment associated selected biologic effects will be analyzed separately among patients who are GD2+ and those who are GD2- in a subgroup analysis. These outcome measures will be compared using two-sample t-test, log rank test and chi-square/Fisher's exact test between the two groups of patients who are GD2+ and who are GD2-.
Time frame: Up to 5 years
Analysis of GD2+ vs GD2- Patients: CB
Clinical outcomes such as OR, duration of response, CB, PFS and OS and treatment associated selected biologic effects will be analyzed separately among patients who are GD2+ and those who are GD2- in a subgroup analysis. These outcome measures will be compared using two-sample t-test, log rank test and chi-square/Fisher's exact test between the two groups of patients who are GD2+ and who are GD2-.
Time frame: Up to 5 years
Analysis of GD2+ vs GD2- Patients: PFS
Clinical outcomes such as OR, duration of response, CB, PFS and OS and treatment associated selected biologic effects will be analyzed separately among patients who are GD2+ and those who are GD2- in a subgroup analysis. These outcome measures will be compared using two-sample t-test, log rank test and chi-square/Fisher's exact test between the two groups of patients who are GD2+ and who are GD2-.
Time frame: Up to 5 years
Analysis of GD2+ vs GD2- Patients: OS
Clinical outcomes such as OR, duration of response, CB, PFS and OS and treatment associated selected biologic effects will be analyzed separately among patients who are GD2+ and those who are GD2- in a subgroup analysis. These outcome measures will be compared using two-sample t-test, log rank test and chi-square/Fisher's exact test between the two groups of patients who are GD2+ and who are GD2-.
Time frame: Up to 5 years
PD-L1 Expression
PD-L1 expression level will be compared between baseline and after initiation of treatment using linear mixed effects model after suitable transformation of PD-L1 expression level. Clinical outcomes such as OR, duration of response, CB, PFS and OS and treatment associated selected biologic effects will be analyzed separately among patients who are PDL1+ and those who are PD-L1- in a subgroup analysis. In addition, these outcome measures will be compared using two-sample t-test, log rank test and chi-square/Fisher's exact test between the two groups of patients who are PD-L1+ and who are PD-L1-.
Time frame: up to 5 years
| Milestone | Phase IA | Phase IB | Phase IC | Phase ID |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Started | 4 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| Completed treatment | 4 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| On follow up | 2 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| Completed | 2 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| Not completed | 2 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| Withdrew: Death | 2 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| Milestone | Phase IA | Phase IB | Phase IC | Phase ID |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Started | 0 | 4 | 0 | 0 |
| Completed treatment | 0 | 3 | 0 | 0 |
| Completed | 0 | 3 | 0 | 0 |
| Not completed | 0 | 1 | 0 | 0 |
| Withdrew: Withdrawal by subject | 0 | 1 | 0 | 0 |
| Milestone | Phase IA | Phase IB | Phase IC | Phase ID |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Started | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| Completed | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| Not completed | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| Milestone | Phase IA | Phase IB | Phase IC | Phase ID |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Started | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| Completed | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| Not completed | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
The number and severity of toxicity incidents per (Common Terminology Criteria for Adverse Events (CTCAE) v 5.0 will be summarized with frequency and proportion. The 95% confidence interval for the proportion of subjects with severe complications (grade 3 or higher toxicities) will be constructed.
| events | Phase IA | Phase IB | Phase IC | Phase ID |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Grade 3 | 1 | 1 | — | — |
| Grade 4 | 0 | 0 | — | — |
| Grade 5 | 0 | 1 | — | — |
The MTD is defined as the highest dose level at which less than 33% of the subjects experience a Dose Limiting Toxicity (DLT). DLT will be defined as grade 3 or 4 toxicity that is possibly, probably or definitely related to IT-hu14.18-IL2 graded according to CTCAE v. 5.0. A standard 3+3 design and descriptive statistics will primarily be generated to summarize the data.
| milligrams per meter squared | Phase IA | Phase IB | Phase IC | Phase ID |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Maximum Tolerated Dose (MTD) | 2 | NA | — | — |
The MAD is defined as the highest safely tolerated dose where less than 33% subjects experience a DLT but no higher dose level has been assessed. Descriptive statistics will primarily be generated to summarize the data.
| milligrams per meter squared | Phase IA | Phase IB | Phase IC | Phase ID |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Maximum Administered Dose (MAD) | 2 | 1 | — | — |
OR will be summarized using descriptive statistics. Furthermore, a point estimate along with the 95% confidence interval for the proportion of subjects with OR will be provided. Clinical outcome of OR will be summarized by dose level for Phase IC.
Results for this outcome have not been posted.
The length of time from the start of treatment until disease progression or death. Kaplan-Meier method will be used to estimate the survival distribution of progression-free survival for the Phase ID expansion cohort.
Results for this outcome have not been posted.
The length of time from the start of treatment until death from any cause. Kaplan-Meier method will be used to estimate the survival distribution of overall survival for the Phase ID expansion cohort.
Results for this outcome have not been posted.
The status of achieving complete response, partial response or stable disease in response to treatment.
| Participants | Phase IA | Phase IB | Phase IC | Phase ID |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| first assessment date, up to 3 months — Complete Response | 0 | 0 | — | — |
| first assessment date, up to 3 months — Stable Disease | 1 | 1 | — | — |
| first assessment date, up to 3 months — Disease Progression | 3 | 1 | — | — |
| first assessment date, up to 3 months — Mixed Response - Concern for Recurrence | 0 | 0 | — | — |
| second assessment date, up to 8 months — Complete Response | 0 | 0 | — | — |
| second assessment date, up to 8 months — Stable Disease | 0 | 0 | — | — |
| second assessment date, up to 8 months — Disease Progression | 1 | 0 | — | — |
| second assessment date, up to 8 months — Mixed Response - Concern for Recurrence | 0 | 1 | — | — |
The length of time from documentation of tumor response until disease progression. Kaplan-Meier method will be used to estimate the survival distribution for the Phase ID expansion cohort.
Results for this outcome have not been posted.
Immunologic activation induced in vivo by intratumoral (IT)-hu14.18-IL2 fusion protein will be evaluated using both in vivo and in vitro analyses. Changes between assessment time points will be evaluated using a paired t-test or non-parametric Wilcoxon signed rank test, depending on the scale and distribution of the endpoint.
Results for this outcome have not been posted.
Immunologic activation induced in vivo by intratumoral (IT)-hu14.18-IL2 fusion protein will be evaluated using both in vivo and in vitro analyses. Changes between assessment time points will be evaluated using a paired t-test or non-parametric Wilcoxon signed rank test, depending on the scale and distribution of the endpoint.
Results for this outcome have not been posted.
Immunologic activation induced in vivo by intratumoral (IT)-hu14.18-IL2 fusion protein will be evaluated using both in vivo and in vitro analyses. Changes between assessment time points will be evaluated using a paired t-test or non-parametric Wilcoxon signed rank test, depending on the scale and distribution of the endpoint.
Results for this outcome have not been posted.
For the primary parameters to be assessed on the resected melanoma an objective scoring system will be established by a pathologist, grading each specimen with a score of 0, +, ++, +++. Changes in number of Necrotic Tumor Cells from baseline will be evaluated using a paired McNemar's test for binary outcomes. Quantitative assessment of necrosis of tumor cells will be measured and scored with a value ranging from 0% - 100% of tumor area.
Results for this outcome have not been posted.
For the primary parameters to be assessed on the resected melanoma an objective scoring system will be established by a pathologist, grading each specimen with a score of 0, +, ++, +++.
Results for this outcome have not been posted.
For the primary parameters to be assessed on the resected melanoma an objective scoring system will be established by a pathologist, grading each specimen with a score of 0, +, ++, +++.
Results for this outcome have not been posted.
Cellular phenotype of infiltrate within the tumor will be summarized by descriptive statistics. Changes from baseline will be evaluated using a paired McNemar's test for binary outcomes.
Results for this outcome have not been posted.
Presence hu14.18-IL2 within the tumor will be summarized by descriptive statistics. Changes from baseline will be evaluated using a paired McNemar's test for binary outcomes.
Results for this outcome have not been posted.
Pharmacokinetic assessments will be performed on multiple serum specimens for each subject. The analysis of all PK parameters will be performed using the PK analysis population. The distribution half-life called alpha half-life (t1/2 alpha) will be summarized by dose level with simple summary statistics.
Results for this outcome have not been posted.
Pharmacokinetic assessments will be performed on multiple serum specimens for each subject. The analysis of all PK parameters will be performed using the PK analysis population. The elimination half-life called beta half-life (t1/2 beta) will be summarized by dose level with simple summary statistics.
Results for this outcome have not been posted.
Pharmacokinetic assessments will be performed on multiple serum specimens for each subject. The analysis of all PK parameters will be performed using the PK analysis population. AUC will be summarized by dose level with simple summary statistics.
Results for this outcome have not been posted.
Pharmacokinetic assessments will be performed on multiple serum specimens for each subject. The analysis of all PK parameters will be performed using the PK analysis population. Clearance will be summarized by dose level with simple summary statistics.
Results for this outcome have not been posted.
Scatterplots will be used to explore possible associations between the dose and area under the curve (AUC). The Jonckheere-Terpstra trend test will be performed to determine the significance of the association between increasing dose level and AUC.
Results for this outcome have not been posted.
Logistic regression analyses will be performed to correlate PK parameters with toxicity (grade \>= 3 vs. grade 0-2) and response.
Results for this outcome have not been posted.
Clinical outcomes such as OR, duration of response, CB, PFS, and OS will be analyzed separately among subjects who were resistant to prior treatment with anti-CTLA-4 and/or anti-PD1/PD-L1 antibodies and those who lacked resistance in a subgroup analysis. This comparison is by necessity exploratory in nature and hypothesis generating.
Results for this outcome have not been posted.
Clinical outcomes such as OR, duration of response, CB, PFS, and OS will be analyzed separately among subjects who were resistant to prior treatment with anti-CTLA-4 and/or anti-PD1/PD-L1 antibodies and those who lacked resistance in a subgroup analysis. This comparison is by necessity exploratory in nature and hypothesis generating.
Results for this outcome have not been posted.
Clinical outcomes such as OR, duration of response, CB, PFS, and OS will be analyzed separately among subjects who were resistant to prior treatment with anti-CTLA-4 and/or anti-PD1/PD-L1 antibodies and those who lacked resistance in a subgroup analysis. This comparison is by necessity exploratory in nature and hypothesis generating.
Results for this outcome have not been posted.
Clinical outcomes such as OR, duration of response, CB, PFS, and OS will be analyzed separately among subjects who were resistant to prior treatment with anti-CTLA-4 and/or anti-PD1/PD-L1 antibodies and those who lacked resistance in a subgroup analysis. This comparison is by necessity exploratory in nature and hypothesis generating.
Results for this outcome have not been posted.
Clinical outcomes such as OR, duration of response, CB, PFS, and OS will be analyzed separately among subjects who were resistant to prior treatment with anti-CTLA-4 and/or anti-PD1/PD-L1 antibodies and those who lacked resistance in a subgroup analysis. This comparison is by necessity exploratory in nature and hypothesis generating.
Results for this outcome have not been posted.
Clinical outcomes such as OR, duration of response, CB, PFS and OS and treatment associated selected biologic effects will be analyzed separately among patients who are GD2+ and those who are GD2- in a subgroup analysis. These outcome measures will be compared using two-sample t-test, log rank test and chi-square/Fisher's exact test between the two groups of patients who are GD2+ and who are GD2-.
Results for this outcome have not been posted.
Clinical outcomes such as OR, duration of response, CB, PFS and OS and treatment associated selected biologic effects will be analyzed separately among patients who are GD2+ and those who are GD2- in a subgroup analysis. These outcome measures will be compared using two-sample t-test, log rank test and chi-square/Fisher's exact test between the two groups of patients who are GD2+ and who are GD2-.
Results for this outcome have not been posted.
Clinical outcomes such as OR, duration of response, CB, PFS and OS and treatment associated selected biologic effects will be analyzed separately among patients who are GD2+ and those who are GD2- in a subgroup analysis. These outcome measures will be compared using two-sample t-test, log rank test and chi-square/Fisher's exact test between the two groups of patients who are GD2+ and who are GD2-.
Results for this outcome have not been posted.
Clinical outcomes such as OR, duration of response, CB, PFS and OS and treatment associated selected biologic effects will be analyzed separately among patients who are GD2+ and those who are GD2- in a subgroup analysis. These outcome measures will be compared using two-sample t-test, log rank test and chi-square/Fisher's exact test between the two groups of patients who are GD2+ and who are GD2-.
Results for this outcome have not been posted.
Clinical outcomes such as OR, duration of response, CB, PFS and OS and treatment associated selected biologic effects will be analyzed separately among patients who are GD2+ and those who are GD2- in a subgroup analysis. These outcome measures will be compared using two-sample t-test, log rank test and chi-square/Fisher's exact test between the two groups of patients who are GD2+ and who are GD2-.
Results for this outcome have not been posted.
PD-L1 expression level will be compared between baseline and after initiation of treatment using linear mixed effects model after suitable transformation of PD-L1 expression level. Clinical outcomes such as OR, duration of response, CB, PFS and OS and treatment associated selected biologic effects will be analyzed separately among patients who are PDL1+ and those who are PD-L1- in a subgroup analysis. In addition, these outcome measures will be compared using two-sample t-test, log rank test and chi-square/Fisher's exact test between the two groups of patients who are PD-L1+ and who are PD-L1-.
Results for this outcome have not been posted.
Collected over up to 2 years. Non-serious events are listed at a 0% frequency threshold.
| Group | Deaths | Serious | Other |
|---|---|---|---|
| Phase IA | 2/4 (50%) | 1/4 (25%) | 4/4 (100%) |
| Phase IB | 3/4 (75%) | 2/4 (50%) | 3/4 (75%) |
| Phase IC | — | — | — |
| Phase ID | — | — | — |
| Event | Phase IA | Phase IB | Phase IC | Phase ID |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Injection Site ReactionGeneral disorders | 1/4 | 0/4 | — | — |
| HypotensionVascular disorders | 0/4 | 1/4 | — | — |
| Disease ProgressionHepatobiliary disorders | 0/4 | 1/4 | — | — |
| Event | Phase IA | Phase IB | Phase IC | Phase ID |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| ChillsGeneral disorders | 4/4 | 2/4 | — | — |
| Lymphocyte count decreasedInvestigations | 4/4 | 2/4 | — | — |
| NauseaGastrointestinal disorders | 3/4 | 3/4 | — | — |
| FatigueGeneral disorders | 2/4 | 3/4 | — | — |
| Injection site reactionGeneral disorders | 3/4 | 2/4 | — | — |
| HypotensionVascular disorders | 3/4 | 3/4 | — | — |
| VomitingGastrointestinal disorders | 2/4 | 2/4 | — | — |
| FeverGeneral disorders | 2/4 | 1/4 | — | — |
| Non-cardiac chest painGeneral disorders | 2/4 | 0/4 | — | — |
| Aspartate aminotransferase increasedInvestigations | 2/4 | 2/4 | — | — |
Study was closed to enrollment early per Sponsor
| Age, Customized(Participants) | Phase IA | Phase IB | Phase IC | Phase ID | Total |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 30 to 39 years | 1 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 1 |
| 40 to 49 years | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| 50 to 59 years | 1 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 1 |
| 60 to 69 years | 1 | 3 | 0 | 0 | 4 |
| 70 to 79 years | 1 | 1 | 0 | 0 | 2 |
| Sex: Female, Male(Participants) | Phase IA | Phase IB | Phase IC | Phase ID | Total |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Female | 1 | 3 | 0 | 0 | 4 |
| Male | 3 | 1 | 0 | 0 | 4 |
| Ethnicity (NIH/OMB)(Participants) | Phase IA | Phase IB | Phase IC | Phase ID | Total |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Hispanic or Latino | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| Not Hispanic or Latino | 4 | 4 | 0 | 0 | 8 |
| Unknown or Not Reported | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| Race (NIH/OMB)(Participants) | Phase IA | Phase IB | Phase IC | Phase ID | Total |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| American Indian or Alaska Native | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| Asian | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| Native Hawaiian or Other Pacific Islander | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| Black or African American | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| White | 4 | 4 | 0 | 0 | 8 |
| More than one race | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| Unknown or Not Reported | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| Region of Enrollment(participants) | Phase IA | Phase IB | Phase IC | Phase ID | Total |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| United States | 4 | 4 | — | — | 8 |
Documents are hosted by the registry — open the source record to download them.
Plan to share: No
This study is terminated, as verified in May 2026. You cannot join it, but the record below documents what was studied.
Get an email when the registry record changes — status, dates, results — or when someone posts here.
Sign in to followQuestions and observations about this study, from anyone following it. Not medical advice, and not a channel to the study team — their contact details are on the registry record.
Sign in to join the discussion. Reading takes no account; posting does. You choose a display name, and a pseudonym is the default.
Nothing here yet. If you are running this trial, taking part in it, or weighing whether to, this is the place to say so.
University of Wisconsin, Madison