CClinicalTrials.gg
Status unknownNCT03946787Updated May 13, 2019

EMDR in Adolescents With Bipolar Disorder and History of Trauma

An interventional study of Eye Movement Desensitization and Reprocessing (EMDR) Therapy and Treatment as Usual in Bipolar Disorder, sponsored by Hospital de Clinicas de Porto Alegre. Status unknown at 1 site in Brazil. Open to participants aged 12 Years to 17 Years. Per ClinicalTrials.gov, last updated 2019-05-13.

Sponsored by Hospital de Clinicas de Porto Alegre · Not applicable, Interventional, and Prevention

The sponsor has not verified this record recently (last verified Apr 2019), so the status shown — last known as Recruiting — may be out of date.
Phase
Not applicable
Study type
Interventional
Enrollment
82
Allocation
Randomized
Ages
12 Years to 17 Years
Sex
All
01

Study summary

In this research, EMDR protocol model specific for bipolar patients with a history of trauma, developed by Benedikt Ahmann et al (2017), who applies EMDR in adults with Bipolar Disorder (BD) and history of trauma will be adapted for adolescents. This protocol consists of a detailed survey of traumatic events, intervention and processing of these events according to the standard protocol developed by Shapiro.

The main hypothesis is that the use of EMDR in adolescents with BD and history of trauma, as a complement to the pharmacological treatment (Usual Treatment), would have beneficial effects in the course of the disease. Thus, the overall objective of this study is to examine whether EMDR therapy in adolescents with BD and history of traumatic events can reduce affective relapses within a 12-month period. In addition, improvement in biological markers related to BD is expected to be found when compared to the Usual Treatment. It is also expected that patients treated with EMDR will present a better neurocognitive functioning profile, assessed by means of a neuropsychological evaluation battery before and after the intervention, since recent studies show that the profile of humoral dysregulation, impulsiveness, difficulty in dealing with frustrations and social feedback in children and adolescents with BD is associated with poor cognitive control and executive function deficits.

Read the detailed description

This will be a randomized controlled trial. Participants will be assigned to Eye Movement Desensitization and Reprocessing (EMDR) Therapy or Treatment as Usual (TAU) through block randomization. This process will be done using the program available at www. randomization.com.

In this study, EMDR Therapy will be applied in adolescents with BD and compared to the Usual Treatment. The neuropsychological profile of the patients will be evaluated before and after the interventions. In addition, the collection of the biological markers related to BD will be done by measuring the levels of salivary cortisol and serum levels of C-reactive protein (CRP), Brain Derived Neurotrophic Factor (BDNF), Interleukin (IL) - 1β, IL - 2, IL - 4, IL - 6, IL - 10, Interferon gamma (IFN-γ) and Tumor Necrosis Factor alpha(TNF-α) in these patients, since a study proposing the use of serological biomarkers for BD diagnosis concluded that the use of a single biomarker would be of little use and a combination of several biomarkers would be necessary.

02

Conditions studied

  • Bipolar Disorder

Browse trials for

03

In context

Bipolar Disorder

1,601 studies on the registry are indexed under Bipolar Disorder; 254 are open to participants now.

This study's planned enrollment of 82 is above the median of 64 across 1,223 interventional studies indexed under Bipolar Disorder.

Browse Bipolar Disorder studies →

Lead sponsor

Hospital de Clinicas de Porto Alegre is the lead sponsor of 450 studies on the registry; 61 are open to participants now.

Counted across the registry records on this site, refreshed daily.

04

Who can participate

Ages eligible
12 Years to 17 Years
Sexes eligible
All
Accepts healthy volunteers
No

Inclusion criteria

  1. age between 12 and 17 years and 11 months;
  2. current clinical state of euthymia (patient stable or euthymic) after clinical evaluation, defined as the presence of clinical remission (CDRS ≤ 40, YMRS ≤ 12.5 and CGAS (Children's Global Assessment Scale) ≥ 51), being the presence of subsyndromic symptoms (YMRS> 8 and \<14) admissible;
  3. Presence of one or more distressing traumatic events, assessed by:

    1. Trauma subscale of the Post Traumatic Stress Disorder Questionnaire from the Schedule for Affective Disorders and Schizophrenia for School Aged Children Present and Lifetime Version (K-SADS-PL) , with frequency> 1;
    2. Holmes Rahes Stress Inventory for non-adults (H-RLSI) with frequency> 1;
    3. Children Revised Impact of Event Scale (CRIES)> 0;
    4. Childhood Trauma Questionnaire (CTQ)> 0; and
    5. at least 5 points in the disturbance assessment by the Subjective Units of Disturbance (SUDS) scale.

Exclusion criteria

Exclusion Criteria:

  1. substance abuse / dependence within 3 months prior to participation;
  2. neurological disease or history of brain trauma;
  3. autism;
  4. Intelligence Quotient \<70;
  5. suicidal or homicidal ideation;
  6. prior involvement in trauma-focused therapy;
  7. psychotherapy during the study and months of follow-up, and;
  8. a score greater than 25 on the Adolescent Dissociative Experience Scale, since the presence of massive dissociation requires different and more extensive treatment protocols.
05

Study design

Phase
Not applicable
Primary purpose
Prevention
Allocation
Randomized
Intervention model
Parallel assignment
Masking
None (open label)
Enrollment
82 participants (estimated)

Study arms

  • Active comparator
    EMDR Therapy + TAU

    Patients will be submitted to 20 individual sessions of Eye Movement Desensitization and Reprocessing (EMDR) Therapy of 60 minutes each, combined to the Treatment as usual (TAU). It's an eight-step process aimed at the traumatic events, also used to address current situations that evoke emotional disturbances so they do not trigger more symptomatic reactions. In addition, it is helpful to assist the patient in developing the specific skills and behaviors required for a healthy functional life. Our group will adapt the EMDR protocol model specific for bipolar patients with a history of trauma, developed by Ahmann et al (2017), who applies EMDR in adults with Bipolar Disorder (BD) and history of trauma.

    Other: Eye Movement Desensitization and Reprocessing (EMDR) Therapy · Other: Treatment as Usual

  • Placebo comparator
    TAU (Treatment as Usual)

    Patients will receive the Treatment as Usual. TAU will consist of the psychopharmacological approach appropriate to each patient according to the evaluation of a psychiatrist of childhood and adolescence's outpatient service. Patients are expected to be euthymic (or with subsyndromal symptoms) with the same medication for at least 3 months. Although the medications used by patients are relevant and taken into account in future analyzes, our group will not interfere with drug treatment. Thus, patients who require any type of drug intervention will be considered losses.

    Other: Treatment as Usual

Interventions

  • OtherEye Movement Desensitization and Reprocessing (EMDR) Therapy

    The reprocessing and desensitization of each traumatic memory occurs in eight phases. In the first two phases, the therapist identifies targets and develops a treatment plan, enhances and develops personal resources, before working on traumatic memories. In stages 3 to 6, reprocessing and desensitization of memory is done. The patient focuses on the image of the event, negative beliefs and associated bodily sensations, while moving the eyes from side to side, following the therapist's fingers or other dual attention stimuli (eg, manual touch, auditory stimulation). Phases 7 and 8 are closing and reassessing, where the therapist determines if the memory has been processed properly.

    Also known as: EMDR Therapy

  • OtherTreatment as Usual

    TAU will consist of the psychopharmacological approach appropriate to each patient according to the evaluation of a psychiatrist of childhood and adolescence's outpatient service.

    Also known as: TAU

06

What researchers measure

Primary outcomes

  1. Reduction in the number of manic switches.

    To verify if treatment with EMDR leads to a reduction in the number of manic episodes within a period of 12 months.This will be evaluated through the Young Mania Rating Scale (YMRS).

    Time frame: 12 months

  2. Reduction in the number of depressive episodes

    To verify if treatment with EMDR leads to a reduction in the number of depressive episodes within a period of 12 months.This will be evaluated through the Children's Depression Rating Scale (CDRS).

    Time frame: 12 months

Secondary outcomes

  1. Change in biological markers measured by morning salivary cortisol levels in 6 months

    To analyze the biological markers related to BD, through the measurement of morning salivary cortisol levels.

    Time frame: 6 months

  2. Change in biological markers measured by morning salivary cortisol levels in 12 months

    To analyze the biological markers related to BD, through the measurement of morning salivary cortisol levels.

    Time frame: 12 months

  3. Change in biological markers measured by C-reactive protein levels in 6 months.

    To analyze the biological markers related to BD, through the measurement of C-reactive protein levels.

    Time frame: 6 months

  4. Change in biological markers measured by C-reactive protein levels in 12 months.

    To analyze the biological markers related to BD, through the measurement of C-reactive protein levels.

    Time frame: 12 months

  5. Change in biological markers measured by Brain Derived Neurotrophic Factor levels in 6 months.

    To analyze the biological markers related to BD, through the measurement of Brain Derived Neurotrophic Factor levels.

    Time frame: 6 months

  6. Change in biological markers measured by Brain Derived Neurotrophic Factor levels in 12 months.

    To analyze the biological markers related to BD, through the measurement of Brain Derived Neurotrophic Factor levels.

    Time frame: 12 months

  7. Change in biological markers measured by Interleukin-1 Beta levels in 6 months.

    To analyze the biological markers related to BD, through the measurement of Interleukin-1 Beta levels.

    Time frame: 6 months

  8. Change in biological markers measured by Interleukin-1 Beta levels in 12 months.

    To analyze the biological markers related to BD, through the measurement of Interleukin-1 Beta levels.

    Time frame: 12 months

  9. Change in biological markers measured by Interleukin-2 levels in 6 months.

    To analyze the biological markers related to BD, through the measurement of Interleukin-2 levels.

    Time frame: 6 months

  10. Change in biological markers measured by Interleukin-2 levels in 12 months.

    To analyze the biological markers related to BD, through the measurement of Interleukin-2 levels.

    Time frame: 12 months

  11. Change in biological markers measured by Interleukin-4 levels in 6 months.

    To analyze the biological markers related to BD, through the measurement of Interleukin-4 levels.

    Time frame: 6 months

  12. Change in biological markers measured by Interleukin-4 levels in 12 months.

    To analyze the biological markers related to BD, through the measurement of Interleukin-4 levels.

    Time frame: 12 months

  13. Improvement in biological markers measured by Interleukin-6 levels in 6 months.

    To analyze the biological markers related to BD, through the measurement of Interleukin-6 levels.

    Time frame: 6 months

  14. Change in biological markers measured by Interleukin-6 levels in 12 months.

    To analyze the biological markers related to BD, through the measurement of Interleukin-6 levels.

    Time frame: 12 months

  15. Change in biological markers measured by Interleukin-10 levels in 6 months.

    To analyze the biological markers related to BD, through the measurement of Interleukin-10 levels.

    Time frame: 6 months

  16. Change in biological markers measured by Interleukin-10 levels in 12 months.

    To analyze the biological markers related to BD, through the measurement of Interleukin-10 levels.

    Time frame: 12 months

  17. Change in biological markers measured by Interferon-gamma levels in 6 months.

    To analyze the biological markers related to BD, through the measurement of Interferon-gamma levels.

    Time frame: 6 months

  18. Change in biological markers measured by Interferon-gamma levels in 12 months.

    To analyze the biological markers related to BD, through the measurement of Interferon-gamma levels.

    Time frame: 12 months

  19. Change in biological markers measured by Tumor Necrosis Factor alpha levels in 6 months.

    To analyze the biological markers related to BD, through the measurement of Tumor Necrosis Factor alpha levels.

    Time frame: 6 months

  20. Change in biological markers measured by Tumor Necrosis Factor alpha levels in 12 months.

    To analyze the biological markers related to BD, through the measurement of Tumor Necrosis Factor alpha levels.

    Time frame: 12 months

  21. Modification in neurocognitive functioning through the WASI test.

    To verify if the patients treated with EMDR will present a better profile of neurocognitive functioning, evaluated by means of the Wechsler Abbreviated Intelligence Scale (WASI).

    Time frame: 12 months

  22. Modification in neurocognitive functioning through the WISC-III test.

    To verify if the patients treated with EMDR will present a better profile of neurocognitive functioning, evaluated by means of the Wechsler Intelligence Scale for Children (WISC-III) in adolescents aged up to 17 years.

    Time frame: 12 months

  23. Modification in neurocognitive functioning through the WAIS-III test.

    To verify if the patients treated with EMDR will present a better profile of neurocognitive functioning, evaluated by means of the Wechsler Intelligence Scale for Adults - Third Edition (WAIS-III) for adolescents over 17 years of age.

    Time frame: 12 months

  24. Modification in neurocognitive functioning through the MAC Battery.

    To verify if patients treated with EMDR will present an improvement in processing speed, access to semantic memory, and inhibitory control evaluated by means of the Verbal Fluency Tasks of the Montreal Communication Assessment Battery (MAC Battery).

    Time frame: 12 months

  25. Modification in neurocognitive functioning through the Hayling Test.

    To verify if patients treated with EMDR will show an improvement in the signs of inattention, impulsivity (inhibitory failure), processing speed, semantic memory, language and cognitive flexibility through the Hayling Test.

    Time frame: 12 months

  26. Change in neurocognitive functioning through the MAC Battery Test.

    To verify if patients treated with EMDR will present an improvement in short term memory, verbal work memory and inference processing through the Oral Narrative Discourse - MAC Battery test.

    Time frame: 12 months

  27. Change in neurocognitive functioning through the DNE test.

    To verify if patients treated with EMDR will show an improvement in Reading Comprehension through the DNE (Discurso Narrativo Escrito or Written Narrative Speech) test.

    Time frame: 12 months

  28. Change in neurocognitive functioning through the NEUROPSILIN test.

    Check if patients treated with EMDR will show an improvement in Sentence Writing (syntax) through the Spontaneous Sentence Writing Subtest - NEUPSILIN (Instrumento de Avaliação Neuropsicológica Breve Infantil or Child Brief Neuropsychological Assessment Instrument).

    Time frame: 12 months

  29. Change in neurocognitive functioning through the evaluation of Comprehension of Written language.

    To verify if patients treated with EMDR will present an improvement in Comprehension of written language through the Subtest Comprehension Writing - NEUPSILIN.

    Time frame: 12 months

  30. Change in neurocognitive functioning through the evaluation of the Visuospatial Working Memory.

    To verify if patients treated with EMDR will show an improvement in the Visuospatial Working Memory through the Visuospatial Working Memory Subtest - NEUPSILIN-INF.

    Time frame: 12 months

  31. Change in neurocognitive functioning through the Go-no-Go Subtest.

    To verify if patients treated with EMDR will show an improvement in attention and inhibitory control through the Go-no-go Subtest - NEUPSILIN-INF.

    Time frame: 12 months

  32. Change in neurocognitive functioning through the Words Span in Sentences Subtest.

    To verify if patients treated with EMDR will present an improvement in verbal work memory through the Words Span in Sentences Subtest.

    Time frame: 12 months

  33. Change in neurocognitive functioning through the Five Digit Test.

    To verify if patients treated with EMDR will present an improvement in the automatic and controlled processes of attention, inhibitory control, impulsivity, self-monitoring, cognitive flexibility through the Five Digit Test.

    Time frame: 12 months

  34. Change in neurocognitive functioning through the Psychological Attention Battery.

    To verify if patients treated with EMDR will show an improvement in the attention alternated, concentrated, and divided through the Psychological Attention Battery.

    Time frame: 12 months

  35. Change in neurocognitive functioning through the Test of School Performance.

    To verify if patients treated with EMDR will present an improvement in the school performance in writing of words in reading, writing of isolated words and arithmetic through the Test of School Performance.

    Time frame: 12 months

07

Study locations

1 of 1 sites recruiting
  • Centro de Pesquisas Clínicas do Hospital de Clínicas de Porto Alegre
    Porto Alegre, Rio Grande Do Sul 90035-007, Brazil
    Recruiting
08

References and documents

Individual participant data

Plan to share: Undecided

No publications or documents are linked to this record.

09

Updates

Tracking since Sep 25, 2026
No changes since tracking began. The registry record was last updated on May 13, 2019, before this site started recording changes on Sep 25, 2026. Its history is on ClinicalTrials.gov ↗
10

Registry details

Key details

Study ID
NCT03946787
Lead sponsor
Hospital de Clinicas de Porto Alegre
Responsible party
Sponsor
First posted
May 13, 2019
Start date
Feb 5, 2019
Primary completion
Aug 2019 (estimated)
Completion
Jan 2020 (estimated)
Last update
May 13, 2019

Study contacts

Ives C Passos, PhD
Contact
ivescp1@gmail.com
+555133598845
Tatiana L Peruzzolo
Contact
tatiperuzzolo@gmail.com
+555133598000
Ives C Passos, PhD
principal investigator · Federal University of Health Science of Porto Alegre

Oversight

Data monitoring committee
No
FDA-regulated drug
No
FDA-regulated device
No
View the source record on ClinicalTrials.gov ↗

Not currently enrolling

This study is status unknown, as verified in Apr 2019. You cannot join it, but the record below documents what was studied.

Follow this study

Get an email when the registry record changes — status, dates, results — or when someone posts here.

Sign in to follow

Discussion

Questions and observations about this study, from anyone following it. Not medical advice, and not a channel to the study team — their contact details are on the registry record.

Sign in to join the discussion. Reading takes no account; posting does. You choose a display name, and a pseudonym is the default.

Nothing here yet. If you are running this trial, taking part in it, or weighing whether to, this is the place to say so.

Start the discussion