ClinicalTrials.gg
CompletedNCT03939013CT2Updated Feb 2, 2021

Hepatitis C: Community Testing and Treatment (CT2 Study Myanmar)

An interventional study of Xpert HCV VL in Hepatitis C, sponsored by Macfarlane Burnet Institute for Medical Research and Public Health Ltd. Completed at 2 sites in Myanmar. Open to participants aged 18 Years and older, including healthy volunteers. Per ClinicalTrials.gov, last updated 2021-02-02.

Sponsored by Macfarlane Burnet Institute for Medical Research and Public Health Ltd · Not applicable, Interventional, and Diagnostic

Phase
Not applicable
Study type
Interventional
Enrollment
634
Allocation
Not applicable
Ages
18 Years and older
Sex
All
01

Study summary

Implementation-effectiveness hybrid trial assessing acceptability, feasibility and cost-effectiveness of community-based point-of-care testing and treatment for hepatitis C. Utilises Cepheid GeneXpert HCV VL device as diagnostic tool (diagnosis of chronic infection and assessment of treatment outcome) and sofosbuvir/daclatasvir for HCV therapy (local standard of care).

Read the detailed description

Historically, testing and treatment for hepatitis C has been confined to centralised laboratories and tertiary hospitals respectively. Recent advancements in point-of-care testing for hepatitis C (anti-HCV antibody and HCV RNA/VL) and treatment options with the introduction of direct acting antivirals allows for testing and treatment to occur in de-centralised primary care settings.

This study is an effectiveness-implementation hybrid study to assess the feasibility, acceptability, effectiveness and cost-effectiveness of a de-centralised approach to hepatitis C testing and treatment at community-based clinics in Yangon, Myanmar. Generalist doctors trained in hepatitis C treatment will prescribe direct acting antiviral therapy to eligible participants.

The study will utilise SD Bioline HCV RDT and Cepheid GeneXpert HCV VL test; and sofosbuvir/daclatasvir to treat hepatitis C. Test of cure will be performed at 12 weeks post-treatment completion to assess sustained virological response (SVR).

Study inclusion criteria prior to recruitment into study:

  • Aged ≥18 years
  • Attendance at study site
  • Willing and able to provide written informed consent

Study exclusion criteria prior to recruitment into study:

  • Confirmed HCV RNA positive result (chronic HCV infection) prior to study recruitment
  • Treatment experienced (either DAA or pegylated interferon)
  • Hepatitis B virus (HBV) infected
  • Human Immunodeficiency Virus (HIV) infected
  • estimated glomerular filtration rate (eGFR) \<30
  • Active tuberculosis (if known active tuberculosis or as per symptom screening assessment)
  • Pregnant women
  • Serious drug-drug interaction with sofosbuvir/daclatasvir of a drug that the patient is unwilling or unable to stop taking
02

Conditions studied

  • Hepatitis C

Browse trials for

Keywords

  • hepatitis C
  • Myanmar
  • primary care
  • direct acting antivirals
03

In context

Hepatitis C

1,743 studies on the registry are indexed under Hepatitis C; 97 are open to participants now.

This study's enrollment of 634 is above the median of 72 across 1,223 interventional studies indexed under Hepatitis C.

Browse Hepatitis C studies →

Lead sponsor

Macfarlane Burnet Institute for Medical Research and Public Health Ltd is the lead sponsor of 16 studies on the registry; 1 is open to participants now.

Counted across the registry records on this site, refreshed daily.

04

Who can participate

Ages eligible
18 Years and older
Sexes eligible
All
Accepts healthy volunteers
Yes

Go through the criteria one by one — yes, no or not sure — and take the list to your doctor or the study team. Kept in this browser only.

Inclusion criteria

  • Aged ≥18 years
  • Attendance at study site
  • Willing and able to provide written

Exclusion criteria

Exclusion Criteria:

  • Confirmed positive result (chronic HCV infection) prior to study recruitment
  • Treatment experienced (either DAA or pegylated interferon)
  • virus (HBV) infected
  • (HIV) infected
  • estimated (eGFR) \<30
  • Active tuberculosis (if known active tuberculosis or as per symptom screening assessment)
  • Pregnant women
  • Serious drug-drug interaction with sofosbuvir/daclatasvir of a drug that the patient is unwilling or unable to stop taking
Terms in these criteria, in plain language(5)

Underlined terms in the criteria open these too. Explained by clinicaltrials.gg, not part of the registry record. The study team decides who can take part.

Informed consent

Before you join, the study team explains what taking part involves — its purpose, what happens, the risks and possible benefits — and answers your questions, so you can decide freely. Consent is usually recorded on a form (the informed consent form, ICF) signed by you or, where the law allows, by someone legally authorised to decide for you.

You can keep asking questions during the study, you are told of new information that matters, and you can choose to leave at any time.

Hepatitis C tests

Hepatitis C is a virus that infects the liver. An HCV antibody test can stay positive after an infection has cleared (and is occasionally positive without one); an HCV RNA test shows whether the virus is there now.

After treatment, hepatitis C counts as cured when HCV RNA is still undetectable 12 weeks or more after the treatment ended. Studies often accept people cured this way.

Hepatitis B tests

Hepatitis B is a virus that infects the liver. These are separate tests: HBsAg positive usually means a current infection (a recent vaccination can briefly cause it too); total anti-HBc (HBcAb) positive means an infection now or in the past; HBV DNA measures how much virus is in the blood.

Some studies accept a past infection if HBV DNA is undetectable, sometimes with antiviral medicine during the study. Check what this study allows.

HIV

The human immunodeficiency virus, which weakens the immune system.

Many studies now accept people whose HIV is controlled on treatment, judged by the viral load and the CD4 count. Check the limits this study sets.

GFR and eGFR (kidney filtering)

GFR (glomerular filtration rate) is how much blood the kidneys filter each minute. It is usually estimated from a blood test — eGFR, by formulas such as CKD-EPI or MDRD — and some studies ask for it to be measured directly instead. Usually given in mL/min/1.73 m².

Check the method, the units and the minimum the study states. A value of 90 or above is in the normal-or-high range, but kidney damage can show in other tests too.

05

Study design

Phase
Not applicable
Primary purpose
Diagnostic
Allocation
Not applicable
Intervention model
Single group
Masking
None (open label)
Enrollment
634 participants (actual)

Study arms

  • Experimental
    Xpert HCV VL, sof/dac (local standard of care therapy)

    Use of Cepheid GeneXpert HCV VL device as diagnostic tool to test for HCV RNA for diagnosis of chronic hepatitis C infection, for assessment of sustained virological response at 12 weeks post treatment completion

    Diagnostic Test: Xpert HCV VL

Interventions

  • Diagnostic testXpert HCV VL

    Use of Cepheid GeneXpert HCV VL test as diagnostic tool to test for HCV RNA for diagnosis of hepatitis C infection, to test for sustained virological response at 12 weeks post treatment completion

    Also known as: Cepheid GeneXpert, Xpert HCV RNA

06

What researchers measure

Primary outcomes

  1. Proportion of Ab positive patients who receive GeneXpert HCV VL test

    Calculated by using Number of HCV Ab tests performed, Number of HCV RNA tests performed. Aggregate data is taken from patient-level case report forms recording results of tests performed (Clinical Case Report Form 1 \& 2).

    Time frame: 6-9 months of recruitment

  2. Proportion of RNA positive patients who receive direct-acting antiviral therapy for chronic hepatitis C infection

    Calculated by using Number of HCV RNA positive patients, Number of patients started on DAAs. Aggregate data is taken from patient-level case report forms recording results of tests performed and treatment plan (Clinical Case Report Form 1, 2 \& 3).

    Time frame: 9-12 months of recruitment & treatment

  3. Proportion of patients who complete direct-acting antiviral therapy for chronic hepatitis C infection

    Calculated by using Number of patients started on DAAs, Number of patients who completed treatment. Aggregate data is taken from patient-level case report forms recording results of tests performed and treatment plan (Clinical Case Report Form 1, 2, 3, 4 \& 5).

    Time frame: 9-18 months

  4. Proportion of patients who achieve SVR12 who started on direct-acting antiviral therapy for chronic hepatitis C infection

    Calculated by using Number of patients started on DAAs, Number of patients who completed treatment, Number of patients who achieve SVR12 as measured by GeneXpert HCV VL not detected 12 weeks post completion of treatment. Aggregate data is taken from patient-level case report forms recording results of tests performed and treatment plan (Clinical Case Report Form 1, 2, 3, 4 \& 5).

    Time frame: 9-18 months

Secondary outcomes

  1. Satisfaction of testing and treatment pathway among patients

    Measured using a patient completed survey covering domains of satisfaction with care received, any barriers to accessing care and preferences for testing and treatment as per standard of care (hospital - prior experience) vs intervention (community based - trial experience).

    Time frame: 6-18 months

  2. Costing of testing and treatment pathway at community site

    Measured using clinical workflow observations and costing tool; collecting data on staff time spent with patient on each phase of pathway, staff costs and consumables.

    Time frame: 6-18 months

07

Study locations

2 sites
  • Myanmar Liver Foundation Than Sitt Charity Clinic
    Yangon, Myanmar
  • Thingangyun Clinic
    Yangon, Myanmar
08

References and documents

Publications

  • Draper BL, Yee WL, Shilton S, Bowring A, Htay H, Nwe N, Markby J, Kyi KP, Easterbrook P, Naing W, Win TM, Aung KS, Howell J, Pedrana A, Hellard M. Feasibility of decentralised, task-shifted hepatitis C testing and treatment services in urban Myanmar: implications for scale-up. BMJ Open. 2022 May 3;12(5):e059639. doi: 10.1136/bmjopen-2021-059639. PubMed 35504640 ↗

Individual participant data

Plan to share: No

09

Timeline

Tracking since Sep 25, 2026
ElapsedEstimatedEstimated, not yet reachedSimilar studies: half by the dot; the band is the middle halfHalf of similar studies reached it by the dot; the band is the middle half, from a quarter to three quarters

Ran from Jan 2019 to primary completion in Aug 2020, 19 months.

Of 150 non-industry interventional studies with no phase under Hepatitis C, half reached primary completion within 26 months of starting (the median), counting those still running; a quarter within 15 and three quarters within 42. This study's 19 months is below that.

Counting every sponsor, half of 153 studies reached it within 25 months; a quarter within 14 and three quarters within 42.

How these figures are worked out, and which studies are left out of them.

Registered
Apr 17, 2019
First posted
May 6, 2019
StartActual
Jan 30, 2019
Primary completionActual
Aug 31, 2020
CompletionActual
Dec 20, 2020
Last update
Feb 2, 2021
What these dates mean
Start.
When the first participant enrolled; while estimated, when the study expects to open to recruitment.
Primary completion.
When the last participant was examined or treated to collect data for the study's main question, its primary outcome. A study that stopped early gives the date its data collection stopped.
Completion.
When the last participant's last visit took place, for every outcome, secondary ones and side effects included: the end of the study. Often later than primary completion, sometimes the same day.
Actual and Est.
Actual means the registry says the date has happened. Est. (estimated) is a date the sponsor plans or expects. It can still move, and the sponsor is expected to change it to actual once it has passed.
No changes since tracking began. The registry record was last updated on Feb 2, 2021, before this site started recording changes on Sep 25, 2026. Its history is on ClinicalTrials.gov ↗
10

Registry details

Key details

Study ID
NCT03939013
Lead sponsor
Macfarlane Burnet Institute for Medical Research and Public Health Ltd
Collaborators
Myanmar Liver Foundation, Foundation for Innovative New Diagnostics, Switzerland, UNITAID
Responsible party
Sponsor
First posted
May 6, 2019
Start date
Jan 30, 2019
Primary completion
Aug 31, 2020
Completion
Dec 20, 2020
Last update
Feb 2, 2021

Study contacts

Margaret Hellard
principal investigator · Burnet Institute
Hla Htay
principal investigator · Burnet Institute

Oversight

Data monitoring committee
No
FDA-regulated drug
No
FDA-regulated device
No
View the source record on ClinicalTrials.gov ↗

Not currently enrolling

This study is completed, as verified in Jan 2021. You cannot join it, but the record below documents what was studied.

Follow this study

Get an email when the registry record changes — status, dates, results — or when someone posts here.

Sign in to follow

Discussion

Questions and observations about this study, from anyone following it. Not medical advice, and not a channel to the study team — their contact details are on the registry record.

Sign in to join the discussion. Reading takes no account; posting does. You choose a display name, and a pseudonym is the default.

Nothing here yet. If you are running this trial, taking part in it, or weighing whether to, this is the place to say so.

Start the discussion