A Phase 4 interventional study of Poly-L-lactic acid (Sculptra® Aesthetic) in Buttock Contouring and Buttock Lifting, sponsored by Erevna Innovations Inc.. Completed at 1 site in Canada. Open to female participants aged 30 Years to 60 Years, including healthy volunteers. Per ClinicalTrials.gov, last updated 2020-04-10.
Sponsored by Erevna Innovations Inc. · Phase 4, Interventional, and Treatment
This is a phase IV prospective, multicentre, single cohort, open-label clinical trial evaluating the efficacy and safety of Poly-L-lactic acid (Sculptra® Aesthetic) for the treatment of contour deformities of the buttocks region
Erevna Innovations Inc. is the lead sponsor of 19 studies on the registry; 1 is open to participants now.
Counted across the registry records on this site, refreshed daily.
Exclusion Criteria:
Sculptra® Aesthetic is a commercially available product that is licensed for sale in Canada. It is an injectable implant that contains microparticles of poly-L-lactic acid (PLLA), a biocompatible, biodegradable, synthetic polymer from the alpha-hydroxy-acid family. Sculptra® Aesthetic is suitable for increasing the volume of depressed areas, particularly to correct skin depressions, such as in skin creases, wrinkles, folds, scars and for skin aging. Sculptra® Aesthetic is also suitable for large volume corrections of the signs of facial fat loss (lipoatrophy). The safety and efficacy of Sculptra® Aesthetic has been investigated in the literature and is generally considered safe and effective. PLLA has been used successfully to reverse HIV-associated lipoatrophy as well as to rejuvenate the face, neck, décolletage, hands, abdomen and gluteal regions.
Percentage of subjects to achieve a one-point increase or higher since Baseline, on the Global Aesthetic Improvement Scale (GAIS) at Visit 6
Time frame: Month 6
Assessment of adverse events (AEs) at all study visits (Visits 0-6). The incidence, seriousness, severity and relationship with the medical device of AEs reported will be evaluated.
Time frame: All visits, Baseline to Month 6
Skin hydration as measured by the corneometer
The Corneometer® CM 825 will be used to measure the skin's hydration, in the center of each four buttock quadrant, at all visits.
Time frame: All Visits; Baseline to month 6
Corporeal contour as measured by the VisioScan
Evaluation of corporeal contour will be performed at all visits using The Visioscan® VC 98 to identify select, major surface irregularities and/or textural depressions caused by skin sagging (often mistaken for "cellulite").
Time frame: All Visits; Baseline to month 6
Skin elasticity as measured by the cutometer
Evaluation of corporeal contour and skin parameters, using The Cutometer® Dual Multi-Probe Adapter (MPA) 580 to measure skin's elasticity, at all visits.
Time frame: All Visits; Baseline to month 6
cellulite severity as evaluated by the Nürnberger-Müller Scale for Cellulite
Evaluations of the blinded reviewer's Nürnberger-Müller Scale for Cellulite between Baseline (Visit 0/1) and Follow up visits (Visits 4 to 6). The Nurnberger-Muller Scale classifies cellulite into four categories: Stage Zero No dimpling is seen on the skin when you are standing naked in front of the mirror. When the skin is pinched no orange peel effect is seen. Stage One No dimpling is seen on the skin when you are standing, but when you pinch your skin you have bumps and lumps. Stage two You can see dimpling or the orange peel appearance when standing naked in front of the mirror, but not when lie down. Stage three You can see dimpling both when you are standing and lying down.
Time frame: Baseline and month 3; Baseline and month 6
Evaluations of patient satisfaction using the Patient Satisfaction Questionnaire at all visits
The Patient Satisfaction Questionnaire is a 5-point likert scale, including: Very dissatisfied; Dissatisfied; Slightly satisfied; Satisfied; Very satisfied.
Time frame: All Visits; Baseline to month 6
Evaluations of the investigator assessed GAIS scale at all visits (0-6).
The Global Aesthetic Improvement Scale (GAIS) is a 5-point scale rating global aesthetic improvement in appearance, compared to pretreatment, as judged by the investigator. The rating categories are "worse," "no change," "improved," "much improved," and "very much improved."
Time frame: Baseline to Month 6
Plan to share: No
No publications or documents are linked to this record.
This study is completed, as verified in Apr 2020. You cannot join it, but the record below documents what was studied.
Get an email when the registry record changes — status, dates, results — or when someone posts here.
Sign in to followQuestions and observations about this study, from anyone following it. Not medical advice, and not a channel to the study team — their contact details are on the registry record.
Sign in to join the discussion. Reading takes no account; posting does. You choose a display name, and a pseudonym is the default.
Nothing here yet. If you are running this trial, taking part in it, or weighing whether to, this is the place to say so.
Erevna Innovations Inc.