An interventional study of Revanesse Sculpt+ in Aesthetic, sponsored by Erevna Innovations Inc.. Completed at 1 site in Canada. Open to participants aged 18 Years and older, including healthy volunteers. Per ClinicalTrials.gov, last updated 2026-08-05.
Sponsored by Erevna Innovations Inc. · Not applicable, Interventional, and Treatment
The use of hyaluronic acid (HA) fillers for soft tissue augmentation offers a valuable treatment modality for the correction of chin retrusion (i.e., when the chin appears to be set back or further back than normal in relation to the rest of the face). Their use is well-tolerated and provides satisfactory aesthetic results by improving facial balance and projection. Although the efficacy of hyaluronic acid HA fillers for chin augmentation has been established, the specific anatomy of the region may lead to adverse events. More specifically, certain fillers with strong integration characteristics may lead to product migration, while others with poor integration characteristics may lead to palpable deformities and distortion of the surrounding injection tissues.
Using a filler that has a high concentration of hyaluronic acid, a medium level of firmness and low water absorption may offer an effective option for treating this indication while minimizing certain adverse events. In addition, using consistent, standardized injection techniques can help achieve an ideal result.
We believe that the use of a novel HA gel (Revanesse Sculp+) for the chin, with a high concentration of HA, a moderate firmness and low water absorption, will perform better than historical controls with firmer properties in the management of chin retrusion.
Erevna Innovations Inc. is the lead sponsor of 19 studies on the registry; 1 is open to participants now.
Counted across the registry records on this site, refreshed daily.
Exclusion Criteria:
History of clinically significant medical conditions or any other reason that the investigator determines would interfere with the participants participation in this study or would make the participant an unsuitable candidate to receive study medical device;
Twenty-one (n = 21) male and female participants aged 18 years or older, including seven (n = 7) participants within each of the Allergan Chin Retrusion Scale(ACRS) categories corresponding to mild, moderate, and severe, based on the assessment of the Treating Investigator, will receive Revanesse Sculpt+ for the treatment of mild to severe chin retrusion at the Baseline visit (Visit 2) and will be eligible for retreatment 2 weeks later if a touch up is deemed necessary by the Treating Investigator. Volumes used for each participant will be determined by the aesthetic judgement of the Treating Investigator.
Device: Revanesse Sculpt+
Revanesse Sculpt+ is approved and commercially available for use in Canada and is manufactured by Prollenium Technologies Inc. All study participants will receive Revanesse Sculpt+ for the treatment of mild to severe chin retrusion.
Frequency of participants graded as at least 'improved' on the Global Aesthetic Improvement Scale (GAIS) by a blinded evaluator at baseline to Month 12
Frequency of participants having at least "improved" (e.g., "improved", "much improved" or "very much improved") on the Global Aesthetics Improvement Scale (GAIS), as graded by a blinded evaluator. The Global Aesthetics Improvement Scale (GAIS) is a five-point Likert scale, categorized as "worse", "no change", "improved", "much improved" and "very much improved".
Time frame: Baseline to Month 12
Proportion of participants with ≥1 grade-point improvement from baseline in chin retrusion, as assessed by a blinded evaluator using the CCPS and/or ACRS
The Croma Chin Projection Assessment Scale (CCPS) is a a validated 5-point assessment tool for the projection of the chin using a vertical line from pogonium through the lower vermilion boarder in front of the labiomental crease. It grades chin retrusion from 0 (ideal chin projection) to 4 (very severe retrusion). The Allergan Chin Retrusion Scale (ACRS) is a validated 5-point assessment tool for chin retrusion using the midpoint of the chin and the lower vermillion boarder. It grades chin retrusion from 0 (no retrusion) to 4 (extreme chin retrusion).
Time frame: Baseline to Month 12
Frequency of post-injection reactions including pain and discomfort during treatment, immediately after treatment, and at 14 days post-treatment
Frequency of post injection reactions including pain and discomfort (generalized, during chewing, talking, and/or kissing as applicable) during treatment, immediately after treatment and 14 days following treatment.
Time frame: Baseline to Month 12
Frequency of physician-reported and participant-reported adverse events (AEs) at any visit post-injection
Frequency of post injections reactions including physician-reported and participant-reported adverse events (AEs) at any visit.
Time frame: Baseline to Month 12
Change perimental tissue depth assessed by CT imaging at Months 6 and 12 compared to baseline
The degree of changes in peri-injection tissue will be observed through computed tomography (CT) scans at Months 6 and 12, compared to Baseline, and will be evaluated by a blinded radiologist using a depth quantification (mm) assessment.
Time frame: Baseline, Month 6, Month 12
Correlation between hyaluronic acid (HA) volume injected and the incidence and/or severity of HA-related tissue changes in the chin at Months 6 and 12
The correlation between HA volumes used and the incidence and/or severity of HA-related tissue changes in the chin area observed through computed tomography (CT) scans at Months 6 and 12, compared to Baseline, will be analyzed.
Time frame: Baseline, Month 6, Month 12
Correlation between aesthetic improvement and degree of tissue changes in the chin area from Baseline to Month 12
Correlation between depth of chin tissue changes (mm), and change in aesthetic outcomes, as measured by at least 1 grade point decrease in the Global Aesthetic Improvement Scale (GAIS) at any visit, will be analyzed.
Time frame: Baseline to Month 12
Proportion of Participants Reporting being at least satisfied with treatment after Treatment using a 7-point Likert Scale from Week 2 to Month 12
Change in participant satisfaction with treatment will be evaluated using a 7-point Likert scale (extremely satisfied, very much satisfied, satisfied, neutral, dissatisfied, very much dissatisfied, extremely dissatisfied) at study visits Week 2 to Month 12.
Time frame: Week 2 to Month 12
Change in participant satisfaction of their chin using the FACE-Q questionnaire as assessed from baseline to Month 12
The FACE-Q Satisfaction with Chin questionnaire will be used to evaluate participant satisfaction with their chin at all visits from Baseline to Month 12.
Time frame: Baseline to Month 12
Change in participant satisfaction with facial balance (facial thirds) as assessed using a 5-point Likert scale form from Baseline to Month 12
The participant satisfaction with facial balance and changes to the facial thirds (upper, middle, lower face) will be evaluated at all visits using a five-point Likert scale (very much satisfied, satisfied, neutral, unsatisfied, very much unsatisfied).
Time frame: Baseline to Month 12
Plan to share: No
No publications or documents are linked to this record.
This study is completed, as verified in Aug 2026. You cannot join it, but the record below documents what was studied.
Get an email when the registry record changes — status, dates, results — or when someone posts here.
Sign in to followQuestions and observations about this study, from anyone following it. Not medical advice, and not a channel to the study team — their contact details are on the registry record.
Sign in to join the discussion. Reading takes no account; posting does. You choose a display name, and a pseudonym is the default.
Nothing here yet. If you are running this trial, taking part in it, or weighing whether to, this is the place to say so.
Erevna Innovations Inc.