CClinicalTrials.gg
Status unknownNCT03921593Updated Sep 29, 2021

Quality of Life in Pancreas Transplantation

An observational study in Diabetes Mellitus and Quality of Life, sponsored by University of Oxford. Status unknown at 1 site in United Kingdom. Open to participants aged 18 Years and older. Per ClinicalTrials.gov, last updated 2021-09-29.

Sponsored by University of Oxford · Observational

The sponsor has not verified this record recently (last verified Jul 2021), so the status shown — last known as Recruiting — may be out of date.
Study type
Observational
Model
Cohort
Time perspective
Prospective
Enrollment
110
Ages
18 Years and older
Sex
All
01

Study summary

Quality of Life for individuals with Insulin Dependent Diabetes Mellitus (IDDM) can be severely impaired by acute and chronic complications of the disease.

Solid organ pancreatic transplantation restores endocrine pancreatic function. However, it is also burdened by high perioperative morbidity and mortality.

Clinical benefits and risks of this intervention have been extensively clarified, but our knowledge about quality of life gain, often mentioned among the assets of transplantation, is still limited.

This study aims to quantify the impact of all forms of Solid Organ Pancreas Transplantation on quality of life (QOL).

Read the detailed description

Rationale of the study:

There are 3.5 million people in the United Kingdom diagnosed with diabetes. Their life expectancy is significantly reduced when compared to non-diabetic population. The long standing poor metabolic control causes a cluster of complications such as metabolic instability, cardiovascular disease, nephropathy, retinopathy and neuropathy which have a major impact on the clinical and social wellbeing of these individuals.

Solid organ pancreatic transplantation restores endocrine pancreatic function, but it is still burdened by significant perioperative morbidity and mortality.

There are other less invasive transplant options we can offer to this cohort of patients. The most common are Kidney Transplant Alone (KTA) from deceased or living donor in the diabetic and uremic patients and Islets Transplant (IT) for those with hypoglycemia unawareness and preserved renal function.

Although current literature suggests that the less invasive approaches may be less effective in the long term, potentially they could resolve the most compelling clinical needs at a lower surgical risk.

There is now a general consensus that the surgical risks of pancreatic solid organ transplantation must be weighed against clinical outcomes as well as QOL gain

Aims of the study:

This study aims to quantify QOL trajectory pre- and post- pancreas transplantation and identify correlations between QOL and clinical outcomes. The data collected will be utilized to understand which forms of solid organ pancreas transplantation are associated with greater/ lesser QOL gain and to compute a cost effectiveness analysis of this intervention.

Methods:

The core of the study will be a prospective quasi-experimental design focusing on QOL outcomes for patients on the pancreas transplant waiting-list at Oxford University Transplant Centre.

Patients active on the Oxford Transplant Centre Pancreas Transplant Waiting list will be invited to take part to this study.

Participants will be requested to complete one set of validated generic and disease specific (diabetes and kidney failure where applicable) QOL questionnaires pre-transplantation and at three time points post-transplantation: 6 weeks, 6 months and 1 year. The research team will collect clinical and hospital usage data at the same time points.

At the end of data collection, statistical analysis will aim to discern overall QOL changes in terms of Quality Adjusted Life Years (QALY), but also whether different cohorts of pancreas transplant recipients (SPK, PAK, and PTA) have different QOL outcomes and in which domains of QOL they differ.

A cohort of patients who receive a PT will be matched to a cohort of patients who remain on the PT waiting-list. Matching estimators, including Propensity Score and Coarsened Exact Matching, will be used to achieve covariate balance between the synthetic treated and control groups in order to estimate the causal effect of QoL changes post-transplantation.

Cumulative hospital costs of care by treatment group will be analysed using appropriate regression methods for non-normal, continuous outcomes. Continuous QOL outcomes will be analysed using generalised linear models.

02

Conditions studied

  • Diabetes Mellitus
  • Quality of Life

Keywords

  • quality of life
  • pancreas transplant
03

In context

Lead sponsor

University of Oxford is the lead sponsor of 794 studies on the registry; 117 are open to participants now.

Counted across the registry records on this site, refreshed daily.

04

Who can participate

Ages eligible
18 Years and older
Sexes eligible
All
Sampling method
Non-probability sample

Study population

Insulin Dependent diabetic adult patients with either renal failure or hypoglycemia unawareness or both, active on Oxford transplant centre pancreas transplant waiting list and fluent in English

Inclusion criteria

  • Willing and able to give informed consent for participation in the study
  • Insulin Dependent Diabetic Patients
  • Active on Pancreas Transplant Wait List

Exclusion criteria

Exclusion Criteria:

  • Not fluent in English
05

Study design

Observational model
Cohort
Time perspective
Prospective
Enrollment
110 participants (estimated)
Target follow-up
1 Year
Patient registry
Yes

Groups and cohorts

  • Simultaneous Pancreas Kidney Transplant Recipients

    Patient affected by Insulin Dependent Diabetes Mellitus and renal failure undergoing Simultaneous Pancreas Kidney Transplant (SPK)

    Procedure: Solid Organ Pancreas Transplantation with or without Kidney Transplantation

  • Pancreas after kidney Transplant Recipients

    Patient affected by Insulin Dependent Diabetes Mellitus and renal failure undergoing Pancreas after kidney Transplant (PAK)

    Procedure: Solid Organ Pancreas Transplantation with or without Kidney Transplantation

  • Pancreas Transplant Alone Recipients

    Patient affected by Insulin Dependent Diabetes Mellitus with hypoglycemia unawareness undergoing Pancreas Transplant Alone (PTA)

    Procedure: Solid Organ Pancreas Transplantation with or without Kidney Transplantation

Interventions

  • ProcedureSolid Organ Pancreas Transplantation with or without Kidney Transplantation

    Deceased donor pancreas transplantation

06

What researchers measure

Primary outcomes

  1. Quantification of Quality of Life

    Completion of EQ-5D-5L questionnaire. Scoring rules Each Dimension has 5 possible levels: 1 no problems, 2 slight problems, 3 moderate problems, 4 severe problems, 5 and extreme problems. Each level corresponds to a 1-digit code: 1-2-3-4-5. The final score is a 5-digit code describing the responder health state. These numbers have no arithmetic properties and should not be used as cardinal scores. Each 5-digit combination correspond to a possible health state. A total of 3125 possible health states is defined in this way. For example, state 11111 indicates no problems on any of the 5 dimensions, while state 12345 indicates no problems with mobility, slight problems with washing or dressing, moderate problems with doing usual activities, severe pain or discomfort and extreme anxiety or depression.

    Time frame: pre-transplantation, 6/52 post transplantation, 6/12 post transplantation, 1 year post transplantation

  2. Quantification of Quality of Life

    Completion of Diabetes Quality of Life questionnaire (DQOL) DQOL includes 46 core items forming four scales targeted at particular health-related concerns of individuals with Insulin Dependent Diabetes Mellitus, a generic health item that does not contribute to the scales Scoring rules Dimensions and DQoL total scores (average score across the 4 dimensions) are scored 0-100, where 0 is the lowest possible quality of life and 100 the highest.

    Time frame: pre-transplantation, 6/52 post transplantation, 6/12 post transplantation, 1 year post transplantation

  3. Quantification of Quality of Life

    Completion of Kidney Disease Quality of Life Short Form questionnaire (KDQOL-SF) KDQOL-SFTM includes multi-item scales targeted at particular health-related concerns of individuals with kidney disease and generic scales derived from the short form 36 (SF-36),Scoring Rules 1) Each possible response for each item corresponds to a pre-coded numeric value. 2) The raw pre-coded numeric values are transformed to a 0-100 range, with higher transformed scores reflecting better quality of life ( the lowest and highest possible scores are 0 and 100, respectively ). 3) Items on the same scale are averaged to ether to create the scale scores. Items that are left blank are not take into account: the final score for each scale represents the average for all the items in that scale that the respondent answered.

    Time frame: pre-transplantation, 6/52 post transplantation, 6/12 post transplantation, 1 year post transplantation

  4. Quantification of Quality of Life

    Completion of Short Form 12 v.2 questionnaire (SF-12 v.2®) includes 8 domains and 12 items that form two Components: Physical Health Component (PCS) and Mental Health Component (MCS) A computer-based scoring algorithm is used to calculate scores: Physical Component Summary (PCS) and Mental (MCS) Component Summary scales are generated using norm-based methods. Scores are transformed to have a mean value of 50, standard deviation (SD) 10, where scores above or below 50 are above or below average physical or mental well-being, respectively.

    Time frame: pre-transplantation, 6/52 post transplantation, 6/12 post transplantation, 1 year post transplantation

Secondary outcomes

  1. Correlation between clinical status and quality of life pre-transplantation

    Identification of which clinical phenotypes correspond to higher quality of life scores collection of clinical data at the same time points as quality of life questionnaires to establish correlation/causal effect between clinical and qol data

    Time frame: pre-transplantation, 6/52 post transplantation, 6/12 post transplantation, 1 year post transplantation

  2. Estimate cost-effectiveness of pancreas transplantation

    calculation of Quality Adjusted Life Years (QALYs) As per NICE recommendation, utility scores derived by EQ5D5L will be used to calculate Quality Adjusted Life Years before transplantation and at one year from transplant to calculate QALY gain after pancreas transplantation

    Time frame: pre- transplant, 1 year

07

Study locations

1 of 1 sites recruiting
  • Oxford University Hospital NHS Foundation Trust
    Oxford, Oxfordshire OX3 7LE, United Kingdom
    Recruiting
08

References and documents

Publications

  • 1. Quality and Outcomes Framework (2014/15), Diabetes Prevalence Model 2016 (Public Health England) and 2012 APHO Diabetes Prevalence Model.
  • 2. Livingstone, S.J. et al (2015) Estimated Life Expectancy in a Scottish Cohort with Type 1 Diabetes, 2008-2010. JAMA 313(1) 37-44 78 Seshasai SR on behalf of the Emerging Risk Factors Collaboration (2011) Diabetes mellitus, fasting glucose, and risk of cause-specific death. N Engl J Med. 3;364(9):829-41
  • Diabetes mellitus: a major risk factor for cardiovascular disease. A joint editorial statement by the American Diabetes Association; The National Heart, Lung, and Blood Institute; The Juvenile Diabetes Foundation International; The National Institute of Diabetes and Digestive and Kidney Diseases; and The American Heart Association. Circulation. 1999 Sep 7;100(10):1132-3. doi: 10.1161/01.cir.100.10.1132. No abstract available. PubMed 10477541 ↗
  • Liew G, Michaelides M, Bunce C. A comparison of the causes of blindness certifications in England and Wales in working age adults (16-64 years), 1999-2000 with 2009-2010. BMJ Open. 2014 Feb 12;4(2):e004015. doi: 10.1136/bmjopen-2013-004015. PubMed 24525390 ↗
  • Dean PG, Kukla A, Stegall MD, Kudva YC. Pancreas transplantation. BMJ. 2017 Apr 3;357:j1321. doi: 10.1136/bmj.j1321. PubMed 28373161 ↗
  • Taber DJ, Meadows HB, Pilch NA, Chavin KD, Baliga PK, Egede LE. Pre-existing diabetes significantly increases the risk of graft failure and mortality following renal transplantation. Clin Transplant. 2013 Mar-Apr;27(2):274-82. doi: 10.1111/ctr.12080. Epub 2013 Feb 6. PubMed 23383719 ↗
  • Lablanche S, Borot S, Wojtusciszyn A, Bayle F, Tetaz R, Badet L, Thivolet C, Morelon E, Frimat L, Penfornis A, Kessler L, Brault C, Colin C, Tauveron I, Bosco D, Berney T, Benhamou PY; GRAGIL Network. Five-Year Metabolic, Functional, and Safety Results of Patients With Type 1 Diabetes Transplanted With Allogenic Islets Within the Swiss-French GRAGIL Network. Diabetes Care. 2015 Sep;38(9):1714-22. doi: 10.2337/dc15-0094. Epub 2015 Jun 11. PubMed 26068866 ↗
  • White SA, Shaw JA, Sutherland DE. Pancreas transplantation. Lancet. 2009 May 23;373(9677):1808-17. doi: 10.1016/S0140-6736(09)60609-7. PubMed 19465236 ↗

Individual participant data

Plan to share: Undecided

09

Updates

Tracking since Sep 25, 2026
No changes since tracking began. The registry record was last updated on Sep 29, 2021, before this site started recording changes on Sep 25, 2026. Its history is on ClinicalTrials.gov ↗
10

Registry details

Key details

Study ID
NCT03921593
Lead sponsor
University of Oxford
Responsible party
Sponsor
First posted
Apr 19, 2019
Start date
Nov 4, 2018
Primary completion
Dec 31, 2021 (estimated)
Completion
Mar 31, 2022 (estimated)
Last update
Sep 29, 2021

Study contacts

Irene Mosca, MD
Contact
irene.mosca@nds.ox.ac.uk
+44 01865 223-872
Aimee stewart
Contact
aimee.stewart@nds.ox.ac.uk
+44 01865 223-872
Peter J Friend, MA, MB, FRCS, MD
principal investigator · University of Oxford

Oversight

Data monitoring committee
No
FDA-regulated drug
No
FDA-regulated device
No
View the source record on ClinicalTrials.gov ↗

Not currently enrolling

This study is status unknown, as verified in Jul 2021. You cannot join it, but the record below documents what was studied.

Follow this study

Get an email when the registry record changes — status, dates, results — or when someone posts here.

Sign in to follow

Discussion

Questions and observations about this study, from anyone following it. Not medical advice, and not a channel to the study team — their contact details are on the registry record.

Sign in to join the discussion. Reading takes no account; posting does. You choose a display name, and a pseudonym is the default.

Nothing here yet. If you are running this trial, taking part in it, or weighing whether to, this is the place to say so.

Start the discussion