CClinicalTrials.gg
TerminatedNCT03908073EVASION-UCUpdated Mar 22, 2022

Electrical Vagal Nerve Stimulation in Ulcerative Colitis

An interventional study of Transcutaneous vagal nerve stimulation in Ulcerative Colitis, Vagal Nerve Stimulation and Transcutaneous Vagal Nerve Stimulation, sponsored by Queen Mary University of London. Terminated at 1 site in United Kingdom. Open to participants aged 18 Years to 76 Years. Per ClinicalTrials.gov, last updated 2022-03-22.

Sponsored by Queen Mary University of London · Not applicable, Interventional, and Other

Why this study was terminated
COVID-19

From the registry’s dates

  • Primary completion was Mar 2021, 5 years 6 months ago, and no results have been posted to the registry.
  • Registered 3 months after the study started (first participant enrolled Oct 2018, registered Feb 2019).
Phase
Not applicable
Study type
Interventional
Enrollment
12
Allocation
Randomized
Ages
18 Years to 76 Years
Sex
All
01

Study summary

There are approximately 2.5-3 million patients with inflammatory bowel disease (IBD) across Europe, with associated healthcare costs of €4.6-5.6 billion per annum (1). IBD is associated with a significant reduction in quality of life. Treatments directed towards modifying the inflammatory response, such as anti-tumour necrosis factor-alpha (TNF-α) agents, are expensive, can necessitate admission to hospital for their administration and can be associated with side effects (2 3). Thus, the development of a novel non-pharmacological anti-inflammatory intervention, such as electrical vagal nerve stimulation, is warranted.

This is a proof of concept study which aims to investigate whether transcutaneous vagal nerve stimulation is effective at reducing stress induced inflammatory cytokine levels in patients with quiescent ulcerative colitis.

02

Conditions studied

  • Ulcerative Colitis
  • Vagal Nerve Stimulation
  • Transcutaneous Vagal Nerve Stimulation

Keywords

  • Ulcerative Colitis
  • Vagal Nerve Stimulation
  • Transcutaneous Vagal Nerve Stimulation
  • Cytokines
  • LPS stimulated cytokine production
03

In context

Colitis

1,073 studies on the registry are indexed under Colitis; 131 are open to participants now.

This study's enrollment of 12 is below the median of 60 across 771 interventional studies indexed under Colitis.

Browse Colitis studies →

Lead sponsor

Queen Mary University of London is the lead sponsor of 250 studies on the registry; 59 are open to participants now.

Counted across the registry records on this site, refreshed daily.

04

Who can participate

Ages eligible
18 Years to 76 Years
Sexes eligible
All
Accepts healthy volunteers
No

Inclusion criteria

  • Males or females between 18 and 76 years of age (inclusive).
  • Has a clinical diagnosis of UC at least 3 months before screening according to accepted international guidelines.
  • Quiescent disease. Disease activity will be assessed using the validated partial Mayo score and faecal calprotectin of \<4 and \<250 μg/g (18) respectively, scored within 3 months of entry into the study. Faecal calprotectin \<250 μg/g within 2 weeks before study entry to confirm that there has been no change in activity status.
  • Stable medications regimen for 3 months prior to entry into the study, defined as no additions to UC treatment or dosage escalations.
  • Patient is willing and able to participate in the study for the required duration, can understand and is willing to sign the ICF and agrees to undergo all protocol-related tests and procedures.
  • Patient has a BMI between 18 and 35 kg/m2 inclusive.

Exclusion criteria

Exclusion Criteria:

  • Has severe extensive colitis and is at imminent risk of colectomy.
  • Presence of a stoma or history of a fistula.
  • Currently taking any topical or oral corticosteroids.
  • Currently taking any anti-TNF therapy, azathioprine, 5-mercaptopurine or methotrexate.
  • Is pregnant, lactating or thinking of becoming pregnant during the study period, or of childbearing years and is unwilling to use and accepted form of birth control.

(Female patients of child-bearing potential must have a negative urine pregnancy test at Screening/pre-dose on Day 1 of the study, excluding female patients of non-child bearing potential who are surgically sterile or post-menopausal. [To be considered post-menopausal female patients must be without menses for 12 consecutive months before screening].)

  • Patient has unstable acute illness or exacerbation or an unstable chronic illness or chronic disease (other than UC) that may affect assessments for this study as determined by previous physical examination, medical history, vital signs, ECG, and laboratory (serum biochemistry, haematology, urinalysis) assessments. (Note: Non-fasting elevations of cholesterol and triglycerides are not considered clinically significant.)
  • Patient with medical history of hepatitis B, hepatitis C or human immunodeficiency virus (HIV) infection
  • Has known or suspected severe cardiac disease (e.g., symptomatic coronary artery disease, prior myocardial infarction, congestive heart failure (CHF);
  • Has known or suspected cerebrovascular disease (e.g. prior stroke or transient ischemic attack, symptomatic carotid artery disease, prior carotid endarterectomy or other vascular neck surgery);
  • Has a clinically significant abnormal screening Electrocardiogram (ECG) e.g. second and third degree heart block, prolonged QT interval, atrial fibrillation, atrial flutter, history of ventricular tachycardia or ventricular fibrillation, or clinically significant premature ventricular contraction);
  • Has had a cervical vagotomy;
  • Has uncontrolled high blood pressure (systolic >160, diastolic >100 after 3 repeated measurements within 24 hours);
  • Is currently implanted with an electrical and/or neurostimulator device (e.g.. cardiac pacemaker or defibrillator, vagal neurostimulator, deep brain stimulator, spinal stimulator, bone growth stimulator, cochlear implant, sphenopalatine ganglion stimulator or occipital nerve stimulator);
  • Has been implanted with metal cervical spine hardware or has a metallic implant near the gammaCore® stimulation site;
  • Has a history of syncope (within last two years);
  • Has a history of seizures (within last five years);
  • Has a known history or suspected history of substance abuse or addiction (within last five years);
  • Has previously used the gammaCore® device.
05

Study design

Phase
Not applicable
Primary purpose
Other
Allocation
Randomized
Intervention model
Crossover assignment
Masking
Quadruple (Participant, Care provider, Investigator, Outcomes assessor)
Enrollment
12 participants (actual)

Study arms

  • Active comparator
    Active transcutaneous vagal nerve stimulation

    The participant will be taught how to use the device and administer doses in our laboratory and independently at home over a period of 24 hours.

    Device: Transcutaneous vagal nerve stimulation

  • Placebo comparator
    Sham transcutaneous vagal nerve stimulation

    The participant will be taught how to use the device and administer doses in our laboratory and independently at home over a period of 24 hours.

    Device: Transcutaneous vagal nerve stimulation

Interventions

  • DeviceTranscutaneous vagal nerve stimulation

    The use of a transcutaneous vagal nerve stimulator by the participant

06

What researchers measure

Primary outcomes

  1. The effect of active transcutaneous vagal nerve stimulation on LPS stimulated TNF-α production in comparison to sham after the stress protocol

    Whole blood taken from the participants is stimulated with LPS. The concentration of TNF-α will be measured using the ELISA technique. TNF-α level of intervention versus sham is the primary outcome measure.

    Time frame: 1 year

Secondary outcomes

  1. The effect of active transcutaneous vagal nerve stimulation compared to sham on LPS stimulated TNF-α production without the stress protocol

    Whole blood taken from the participants is stimulated with LPS. The concentration of TNF-α will be measured using the ELISA technique. TNF-α level of intervention versus sham without the stress protocol is a secondary measure.

    Time frame: 1 year

  2. Cardiac vagal tone at baseline visits 1 and 2 and post stress protocol

    Cadriac vagal tone and autonomic nervous system monitoring is performed in our laboratory using a specialised device called 'powerlab'. It is able to convert ECG data into autonomic parameters, including vagal tone, which the investigators can then use as an outcome measure.

    Time frame: 1 year

  3. The effect of active transcutaneous vagal nerve stimulation compared to sham on LPS stimulated Il6 and Il10 production with and without the stress protocol

    Whole blood taken from the participants is stimulated with LPS. The concentration of IL6 and IL10 will be measured using the ELISA technique. IL6 and IL10 level of intervention versus sham without the stress protocol is a secondary measure.

    Time frame: 1 year

07

Study locations

1 site
  • Tamara Mogilevski
    London, Select One E1 2AJ, United Kingdom
08

References and documents

Individual participant data

Plan to share: No

No publications or documents are linked to this record.

09

Updates

Tracking since Sep 25, 2026
No changes since tracking began. The registry record was last updated on Mar 22, 2022, before this site started recording changes on Sep 25, 2026. Its history is on ClinicalTrials.gov ↗
10

Registry details

Key details

Study ID
NCT03908073
Lead sponsor
Queen Mary University of London
Responsible party
Sponsor
First posted
Apr 9, 2019
Start date
Oct 30, 2018
Primary completion
Mar 15, 2021
Completion
Mar 15, 2021
Last update
Mar 22, 2022

Oversight

Data monitoring committee
Yes
FDA-regulated drug
No
FDA-regulated device
Yes
View the source record on ClinicalTrials.gov ↗

Not currently enrolling

This study is terminated, as verified in Jan 2019. You cannot join it, but the record below documents what was studied.

Follow this study

Get an email when the registry record changes — status, dates, results — or when someone posts here.

Sign in to follow

Discussion

Questions and observations about this study, from anyone following it. Not medical advice, and not a channel to the study team — their contact details are on the registry record.

Sign in to join the discussion. Reading takes no account; posting does. You choose a display name, and a pseudonym is the default.

Nothing here yet. If you are running this trial, taking part in it, or weighing whether to, this is the place to say so.

Start the discussion