An interventional study of Transcutaneous vagal nerve stimulation in Ulcerative Colitis, Vagal Nerve Stimulation and Transcutaneous Vagal Nerve Stimulation, sponsored by Queen Mary University of London. Terminated at 1 site in United Kingdom. Open to participants aged 18 Years to 76 Years. Per ClinicalTrials.gov, last updated 2022-03-22.
Sponsored by Queen Mary University of London · Not applicable, Interventional, and Other
There are approximately 2.5-3 million patients with inflammatory bowel disease (IBD) across Europe, with associated healthcare costs of €4.6-5.6 billion per annum (1). IBD is associated with a significant reduction in quality of life. Treatments directed towards modifying the inflammatory response, such as anti-tumour necrosis factor-alpha (TNF-α) agents, are expensive, can necessitate admission to hospital for their administration and can be associated with side effects (2 3). Thus, the development of a novel non-pharmacological anti-inflammatory intervention, such as electrical vagal nerve stimulation, is warranted.
This is a proof of concept study which aims to investigate whether transcutaneous vagal nerve stimulation is effective at reducing stress induced inflammatory cytokine levels in patients with quiescent ulcerative colitis.
1,073 studies on the registry are indexed under Colitis; 131 are open to participants now.
This study's enrollment of 12 is below the median of 60 across 771 interventional studies indexed under Colitis.
Browse Colitis studies →Queen Mary University of London is the lead sponsor of 250 studies on the registry; 59 are open to participants now.
Counted across the registry records on this site, refreshed daily.
Exclusion Criteria:
(Female patients of child-bearing potential must have a negative urine pregnancy test at Screening/pre-dose on Day 1 of the study, excluding female patients of non-child bearing potential who are surgically sterile or post-menopausal. [To be considered post-menopausal female patients must be without menses for 12 consecutive months before screening].)
The participant will be taught how to use the device and administer doses in our laboratory and independently at home over a period of 24 hours.
Device: Transcutaneous vagal nerve stimulation
The participant will be taught how to use the device and administer doses in our laboratory and independently at home over a period of 24 hours.
Device: Transcutaneous vagal nerve stimulation
The use of a transcutaneous vagal nerve stimulator by the participant
The effect of active transcutaneous vagal nerve stimulation on LPS stimulated TNF-α production in comparison to sham after the stress protocol
Whole blood taken from the participants is stimulated with LPS. The concentration of TNF-α will be measured using the ELISA technique. TNF-α level of intervention versus sham is the primary outcome measure.
Time frame: 1 year
The effect of active transcutaneous vagal nerve stimulation compared to sham on LPS stimulated TNF-α production without the stress protocol
Whole blood taken from the participants is stimulated with LPS. The concentration of TNF-α will be measured using the ELISA technique. TNF-α level of intervention versus sham without the stress protocol is a secondary measure.
Time frame: 1 year
Cardiac vagal tone at baseline visits 1 and 2 and post stress protocol
Cadriac vagal tone and autonomic nervous system monitoring is performed in our laboratory using a specialised device called 'powerlab'. It is able to convert ECG data into autonomic parameters, including vagal tone, which the investigators can then use as an outcome measure.
Time frame: 1 year
The effect of active transcutaneous vagal nerve stimulation compared to sham on LPS stimulated Il6 and Il10 production with and without the stress protocol
Whole blood taken from the participants is stimulated with LPS. The concentration of IL6 and IL10 will be measured using the ELISA technique. IL6 and IL10 level of intervention versus sham without the stress protocol is a secondary measure.
Time frame: 1 year
Plan to share: No
No publications or documents are linked to this record.
This study is terminated, as verified in Jan 2019. You cannot join it, but the record below documents what was studied.
Get an email when the registry record changes — status, dates, results — or when someone posts here.
Sign in to followQuestions and observations about this study, from anyone following it. Not medical advice, and not a channel to the study team — their contact details are on the registry record.
Sign in to join the discussion. Reading takes no account; posting does. You choose a display name, and a pseudonym is the default.
Nothing here yet. If you are running this trial, taking part in it, or weighing whether to, this is the place to say so.
Queen Mary University of London