An interventional study of Modified CR and Traditional CR in Acute Myocardial Infarction and Heart Failure, sponsored by Jing Ma. Status unknown at 1 site in China. Open to participants aged 18 Years to 80 Years. Per ClinicalTrials.gov, last updated 2019-04-10.
Sponsored by Jing Ma · Not applicable, Interventional, and Treatment
The purposes of this study is to evaluate the improvement of a stress management involved cardiac rehabilitation program on the psychological states, quality of life and clinical outcomes of patients after acute myocardial infarction or heart failure.
The purposes of this study is to evaluate the improvement of a stress management involved cardiac rehabilitation program on the psychological states, quality of life and clinical outcomes of patients after acute myocardial infarction or heart failure. The investigators performed modified cardiac rehabilitation program involving stress management on the patients who suffered from acute myocardial infarction or severe heart failure who were admitted to the CCU. Then the psychological states, quality of life and clinical outcomes were followed up.
5,701 studies on the registry are indexed under Heart Failure; 1,220 are open to participants now.
This study's planned enrollment of 1,200 is above the median of 72 across 3,736 interventional studies indexed under Heart Failure.
Browse Heart Failure studies →Jing Ma is the lead sponsor of 3 studies on the registry; none are open to participants now.
Counted across the registry records on this site, refreshed daily.
Exclusion Criteria:
Group received education only
Behavioral: Education
Group received cardiac rehabilitation including education and exercise
Behavioral: Traditional CR
Group received cardiac rehabilitation including education, exercise and stress management
Behavioral: Modified CR
Stress management involved modified cardiac rehabilitation
Traditional cardiac rehabilitation
Education
The score of anxiety test questionnaire decreased
The score of anxiety test questionnaire(Generalized Anxiety Disorder,GAD-7, normal range 0-21, partially reflecting the severity of anxiety with the higher score) decreased
Time frame: 6 month
The score of Medical Outcomes Study Questionnaire Short Form 36 Health Survey (36-Item Short Form Survey) increased
The score of Medical Outcomes Study Questionnaire Short Form 36 Health Survey (abbreviation form is 36-Item Short Form Survey) increased. The SF-36 has eight scaled scores; the scores are weighted sums of the questions in each section. Scores range from 0 - 100 Lower scores = more disability, higher scores = less disability, The sections consists of Vitality, Physical functioning, Bodily pain, General health perceptions, Physical role functioning, Emotional role functioning, Social role functioning, and Mental health. The total score of SF 36 Health survey is higher, the quality of life is higher.
Time frame: 6 month
The score of patient health questionnaire decreased
The score of patient health questionnaire (PHQ9, normal range 0-27，indicating the profile of depression with the higher score) decreased
Time frame: 6 month
The score of Chinese perceived stress scale decreased.
The score of Chinese perceived stress scale (CPSS, 0-56, higher means more stress) decreased.
Time frame: 6 month
incidence of MACE in patients after acute myocardial infarction
any incidence of the following: death, cardiac death, AMI, revascularization, stroke
Time frame: 6 month
incidence of MACE in patients with heart failure
death, cardiac death, resynchronization
Time frame: 6 month
improvement of exercise capacity
6 minute walking distance
Time frame: 6 month
incidence of rehospitalization
incidence of rehospitalization
Time frame: 6 month
Plan to share: Yes — all IPD that underlie results in a publication
Supporting information: Study protocol, Sap, Icf, Csr
No publications or documents are linked to this record.
This study is status unknown, as verified in Apr 2019. You cannot join it, but the record below documents what was studied.
Get an email when the registry record changes — status, dates, results — or when someone posts here.
Sign in to followQuestions and observations about this study, from anyone following it. Not medical advice, and not a channel to the study team — their contact details are on the registry record.
Sign in to join the discussion. Reading takes no account; posting does. You choose a display name, and a pseudonym is the default.
Nothing here yet. If you are running this trial, taking part in it, or weighing whether to, this is the place to say so.