An interventional study of r-TAPP and l-TAPP in Inguinal Hernia, sponsored by Algemeen Ziekenhuis Maria Middelares. Recruiting at 1 site in Belgium. Open to participants aged 18 Years and older. Per ClinicalTrials.gov, last updated 2026-08-06.
Sponsored by Algemeen Ziekenhuis Maria Middelares · Not applicable, Interventional, and Diagnostic
Evaluate the early postoperative course of patients undergoing laparoscopic inguinal hernia repair with either a conventional or a robot assisted approach and with or without the injection of the trocar wounds with a local anesthetic.
Introduction Inguinal hernia is a common disease with a high lifetime risk; 27 % for men and 3% for women. These hernias can be categorized as lateral, medial or femoral according to the classification of the European Hernia Society. The manifestations may vary from an asymptomatic swelling till an incarcerated or strangulated hernia requiring an urgent operation.
The introduction of mesh reinforcement for groin hernia repair has resulted in reducing the rate of recurrences and chronic pain. Moreover, laparoscopic repair techniques made it possible to place the mesh in de pre-peritoneal space by a transperitoneal (TAPP) or pre-peritoneal (TEP) approach. These minimally invasive techniques are not only associated with less chronic pain or numbness, but also with an earlier return to normal activities or work. A favor for one of the two techniques has not yet been proven.
At the Hernia Center Maria Middelares a laparoscopic transabdominal pre-peritoneal (l-TAPP) approach is favored in the majority of adult patients presenting with a groin hernia since more than 20 years. The investigators have adopted a technique using one large pre-peritoneal self-fixating mesh that covers both groins in bilateral laparoscopic repairs. In September 2016 the investigators started to use a robot assisted laparoscopic approach (r-TAPP) for groin hernia repair and built proficiency in this technique with 120 cases operated in the first year of adoption. Barriers to adopting robot assisted groin hernia repair are insufficient availability of the robot, perception of longer operative time, perceived lack of clinical benefit for the patient and increased cost for instrumentation.
In a learning curve study using the daVinci Xi robotic system the investigators have shown that after about 25 cases the skin to skin operating time for r-TAPP equals the skin to skin operating time for l-TAPP. Similarly the overall OR time (patient in and out of the OR) is not increased for r-TAPP compared to l-TAPP if the whole team including nurses and anesthetists have become proficient in robotic assisted surgery (Clinical Trials identifier: NCT0975401).
The investigators standard technique for repair of bilateral groin hernias is to use a self-fixating mesh placed in a pre-peritoneal position with a TAPP approach. The investigator prefers to use one large mesh covering the myopectineal orifice of both groins with a width of 28 cm and a length of 13 cm. The mesh used is a Progrip self-fixating mesh (Medtronic, US), which is a monofilament polyester mesh to which resorbable PLA grips have been added to fixate the mesh to the underlying tissue during the period of mesh ingrowth and incorporation. This technique has been studied in our department in a prospective study focusing on early and one year outcome and has shown favorable results (Clinical Trials identifier: NCT02525666 ).
This study aims to differentiate between the early postoperative recovery after laparoscopic repair of bilateral groin hernias treated either with r-TAPP or with l-TAPP.
A total of 200 male and female patients will be entered in the trial in Maria Middelares Ghent, for which an inclusion period of 24 months is anticipated. Patients will be screened and invited to participate at the outpatient clinic.
Study set-up:
543 studies on the registry are indexed under Hernia, Inguinal; 92 are open to participants now.
This study's planned enrollment of 200 is above the median of 90 across 395 interventional studies indexed under Hernia, Inguinal.
Browse Hernia, Inguinal studies →Algemeen Ziekenhuis Maria Middelares is the lead sponsor of 37 studies on the registry; 8 are open to participants now.
Counted across the registry records on this site, refreshed daily.
Go through the criteria one by one — yes, no or not sure — and take the list to your doctor or the study team. Kept in this browser only.
Exclusion Criteria:
Underlined terms in the criteria open these too. Explained by clinicaltrials.gg, not part of the registry record. The study team decides who can take part.
Before you join, the study team explains what taking part involves — its purpose, what happens, the risks and possible benefits — and answers your questions, so you can decide freely. Consent is usually recorded on a form (the informed consent form, ICF) signed by you or, where the law allows, by someone legally authorised to decide for you.
You can keep asking questions during the study, you are told of new information that matters, and you can choose to leave at any time.
The anaesthetists’ scale of health before surgery: I is healthy, II has a mild illness that is under control, III a severe one, IV a severe illness that is a constant threat to life. V and VI are used for the critically ill and for organ donors.
Informed consent
Before you join, the study team explains what taking part involves — its purpose, what happens, the risks and possible benefits — and answers your questions, so you can decide freely. Consent is usually recorded on a form (the informed consent form, ICF) signed by you or, where the law allows, by someone legally authorised to decide for you.
You can keep asking questions during the study, you are told of new information that matters, and you can choose to leave at any time.
Explained by clinicaltrials.gg, not part of the registry record. The study team decides who can take part.
ASA physical status
The anaesthetists’ scale of health before surgery: I is healthy, II has a mild illness that is under control, III a severe one, IV a severe illness that is a constant threat to life. V and VI are used for the critically ill and for organ donors.
Explained by clinicaltrials.gg, not part of the registry record. The study team decides who can take part.
These patients will undergo a laparoscopic surgery without local anaesthetics.
Procedure: l-TAPP
These patients will undergo a laparoscopic surgery with local anaesthetics.
Procedure: l-TAPP · Procedure: local anesthetics
These patients will undergo a robot-assisted surgery without local anaesthetics.
Procedure: r-TAPP
These patients will undergo a robot-assisted surgery with local anaesthetics.
Procedure: r-TAPP · Procedure: local anesthetics
Robot-assisted repair
Laporoscopic repair
local anesthetics will be administred
change in PADSS score
Time postoperative for the patient to get fit for discharge as determined by a PADSS score (Post Anesthesia Discharge Scoring System) to reach ≥ 9 (10 is maximum). The score will be taken at 2 hourly intervals after surgery (0 hours,2 hours,4 hours,6 hours,8 hours,10 hours,12 hours,14 hours,16 hours,18 hours,20 hours,22 hours,24 hours) up to 24 hours or unitl score is ≥ 9.
Time frame: change of Baseline PADSS score up to 24h after surgery or unitl score is ≥ 9
Recurrence rate
Recurrence rate will be assessed at 12 months post-operatively
Time frame: at 12 month
Quality of Life assessment: EuraHS Quality of Life questionnaire
Quality of Life assessment using the EuraHS Quality of Life questionnaire. The questionnaire consists of 9 questions. Each question has a scale from 0-10, wherease 0 is considered the best outcome. Total score (max.90) is assessed by summerizing the scale of each question.
Time frame: 1 month and 12 months post-operatively
Plan to share: No
No publications or documents are linked to this record.
Started Sep 2019 (actual). Primary completion is estimated for Dec 2028, 111 months after the start.
Of 177 non-industry interventional studies with no phase under Hernia, Inguinal, half reached primary completion within 19 months of starting (the median), counting those still running; a quarter within 9 and three quarters within 35. This study's planned 111 months is above that.
Counting every sponsor, half of 186 studies reached it within 19 months; a quarter within 9 and three quarters within 36.
How these figures are worked out, and which studies are left out of them.
Eligibility is decided by the study team. Share this record with your doctor or contact the team directly.
Contact study teamGet an email when the registry record changes — status, dates, results — or when someone posts here.
Sign in to followQuestions and observations about this study, from anyone following it. Not medical advice, and not a channel to the study team — their contact details are on the registry record.
Sign in to join the discussion. Reading takes no account; posting does. You choose a display name, and a pseudonym is the default.
Nothing here yet. If you are running this trial, taking part in it, or weighing whether to, this is the place to say so.
Algemeen Ziekenhuis Maria Middelares