CClinicalTrials.gg
CompletedNCT03900715Updated Oct 17, 2024Results posted

An Efficacy and Safety Study of Luspatercept (ACE-536) for the Treatment of Anemia Due to IPSS-R Very Low, Low or Intermediate Risk Myelodysplastic Syndromes (MDS) in Japanese Subjects Who Are Not Requiring Red Blood Cell Transfusion

A Phase 2 interventional study of Luspatercept in Myelodysplastic Syndromes, sponsored by Celgene. Completed at 19 sites in Japan. Open to participants aged 20 Years and older. Per ClinicalTrials.gov, last updated 2024-10-17.

Sponsored by Celgene · Phase 2, Interventional, and Treatment

Phase
Phase 2
Study type
Interventional
Enrollment
21
Allocation
Not applicable
Ages
20 Years and older
Sex
All
01

Study summary

The study will be conducted in compliance with the International Council for Harmonisation (ICH) of Technical Requirements for Registration of Pharmaceuticals for Human Use/Good Clinical Practice (GCP) and applicable regulatory requirements.

This is a Phase 2, multicenter, single-arm study to evaluate the efficacy, safety and Pharmacokinetics (PK) of luspatercept (ACE-536) for the treatment of anemia due to International prognostic scoring system-Revised (IPSS-R) very low, low or intermediate risk Myelodysplastic syndromes (MDS)in Japanese subjects who are not requiring Red blood cell (RBC) transfusion.

The study is divided into the Screening Period, a Treatment Period and a Post-Treatment Follow up Period.

Read the detailed description

Anemia is considered to be one of the most prevalent cytopenias in patients who have myelodysplastic syndromes, an umbrella term used to describe disorders relating to the ineffective production of red blood cells, white blood cells, and/or platelets. Ranging in severity from mild (asymptomatic) to severe, anemia can result in patients requiring regular red blood cell (RBC) transfusions, which can lead to further complications from iron overload. The goal of this study is to assess the efficacy, safety and PK of luspatercept in anemic patients who are categorized as International Prognostic Scoring System-Revised (IPSS-R) very low, low, or intermediate risk Myelodysplastic syndrome (MDS), and not requiring RBC transfusion. Subjects deemed eligible for the study will be enrolled and treated with luspatercept. Best supportive care (BSC) may be used in combination with study treatment when clinically indicated per investigator. Best supportive care includes, but is not limited to, treatment with transfusions, antibiotic, antiviral and/or antifungal therapy, and nutritional support as needed. Best supportive care for this study excludes the use of ESAs. Patients should receive treatment up to a minimum of 24 weeks after which an MDS Disease assessment visit is scheduled to assess the response to treatment. Patients who are determined to be experiencing clinical benefit may continue treatment. Continued clinical benefit will be re-assessed every 24 weeks. Once patients are discontinued from study treatment, they will enter a post treatment follow-up period.

02

Conditions studied

  • Myelodysplastic Syndromes

Keywords

  • Myelodysplastic Syndromes
  • MDS
  • ACE-536
  • Anemia
03

In context

Preleukemia

1,317 studies on the registry are indexed under Preleukemia; 57 are open to participants now.

This study's enrollment of 21 is below the median of 36 across 1,060 interventional studies indexed under Preleukemia.

Browse Preleukemia studies →

Lead sponsor

Celgene is the lead sponsor of 419 studies on the registry; 13 are open to participants now.

Of its 100 completed or terminated interventional studies of FDA-regulated products, 29 (29%) have results posted.

Counted across the registry records on this site, refreshed daily.

04

Who can participate

Ages eligible
20 Years and older
Sexes eligible
All
Accepts healthy volunteers
No

Inclusion criteria

Subjects must satisfy the following criteria to be enrolled in the study:

  1. Subject is ≥ 20 years of age the time of signing the informed consent form (ICF)
  2. Subject must understand and voluntarily sign an ICF prior to any study-related assessments/procedures being conducted.
  3. Subject is willing and able to adhere to the study visit schedule and other protocol requirements.
  4. Subject has a documented diagnosis of MDS according to WHO 2016 classification that meets IPSS-R classification of very low, low, or intermediate risk disease, and:

    • \< 5% blasts in bone marrow
  5. Subject has symptomatic anemia with mean Hgb concentration \< 10.0 g/dL from 2 measurements (one performed within 1 day prior to W1D1 and the other performed 7 to 35 days prior to W1D1) that does not require RBC transfusion. If more than one measurement exists in the period of 7 to 35 days prior to W1D1, the most recent value will be used.
  6. Subject must be TI, as documented by the following criteria:

    • No RBC transfusion administered within 16 weeks prior to W1D1 (except transfusions due to blood loss or infection that occurred between 16 and 8 weeks prior to W1D1)
  7. Subject has Eastern Cooperative Oncology Group (ECOG) score of 0, 1, or 2
  8. Females of childbearing potential (FCBP), defined as a sexually mature woman who:
  1. has achieved menarche at some point, 2) not undergone a hysterectomy or bilateral oophorectomy, or 3) has not been naturally postmenopausal (amenorrhea following cancer therapy or amenorrhea due to other medical reasons does not rule out childbearing potential) for at least 24 consecutive months (ie, has had menses at any time in the preceding 24 consecutive months), must:
  • Have two negative pregnancy tests as verified by the investigator prior to starting study therapy (unless the screening pregnancy test was done within 72 hours of W1D1). She must agree to ongoing pregnancy testing during the course of the study, and after end of study treatment. This applies even if the subject practices true abstinence1 from heterosexual contact.
  • Either commit to true abstinence from heterosexual contact (which must be reviewed on a monthly basis and source documented) or agree to use, and be able to comply with, highly effective contraception without interruption, 5 weeks prior to starting investigational product, during the study therapy (including dose interruptions), and for 12 weeks after discontinuation of study therapy.
  • If breastfeeding, agree to stop breastfeeding prior to the participation in the study and not to resume breastfeeding after treatment discontinuation.

    1. Male subjects must:
  • Practice true abstinence2 (which must be reviewed prior to each IP administration or on a monthly basis [eg, in the event of dose delays]) or agree to use a condom (latex or non-latex, but not made out of natural [animal] membrane) during sexual contact with a pregnant female or a female of childbearing potential while participating in the study, during dose interruptions and for at least 12 weeks following investigational product discontinuation, even if he has undergone a successful vasectomy.

Exclusion criteria

Exclusion Criteria:

The presence of any of the following will exclude a subject from enrollment:

  1. Subject with the any of the following prior treatments for underlying disease:

    • Disease modifying agents (eg, immune-modulatory drug [IMiDs such as lenalidomide])

      • Except if the subject received ≤ 1 week of treatment with a disease modifying agent ≥ 8 weeks from W1D1, at the investigator's discretion.
    • Hypomethylating agents

      • Subjects may be enrolled at the investigator's discretion contingent that the subject received no more than 2 injections of HMA. The last dose must be ≥ 8 weeks from the date of W1D1.
    • Luspatercept (ACE-536) or sotatercept (ACE-011)
    • Allogeneic and/or autologous hematopoietic cell transplant
  2. Subject with myelodysplastic syndromes/myeloproliferative neoplasms (MDS/MPN) according to WHO 2016 classification (ie, chronic myelomonocytic leukemia (CMML), atypical chronic myeloid leukemia (aCML), BCR-ABL12, juvenile myelomonocytic leukemia (JMML), MDS/MPN unclassifiable.
  3. Subject with secondary MDS, ie, MDS that is known to have arisen as the result of chemical injury or treatment with chemotherapy and/or radiation for other diseases.
  4. Subject with known clinically significant anemia due to iron, vitamin B12, or folate deficiencies, or autoimmune or hereditary hemolytic anemia, or hypothyroidism, or any type of known clinically significant bleeding or sequestration. Subject with drug induced anemia (eg, mycophenolate).

    • Iron deficiency to be determined by serum ferritin \< 100 μg/L and additional testing if clinically indicated (eg, calculated transferrin saturation [iron/total iron binding capacity ≤ 20%] or bone marrow aspirate stain for iron).
  5. Subject with known history of diagnosis of AML
  6. Subject receiving any of the following treatment within 8 weeks prior to W1D1:

    • Anticancer cytotoxic chemotherapeutic agent or treatment
    • ESAs
    • Granulocyte colony-stimulating factor (G-CSF), granulocyte-macrophage colonystimulating factor (GM-CSF), unless given for treatment of febrile neutropenia
    • Immunosuppressive therapy for MDS
    • Systemic corticosteroid, except for subjects on a stable or decreasing dose for ≥ 1 week prior to W1D1 for medical conditions other than MDS
    • Other RBC hematopoietic growth factors (eg, Interleukin-3)
    • Androgens, unless to treat hypogonadism
    • Hydroxyurea, anagrelide
    • Oral retinoids
    • Arsenic trioxide
    • Interferon and interleukins
    • Investigational drug or device, or approved therapy for investigational use (if 5 times the half-life of the previous investigational drug exceeds 8 weeks, then the time of exclusion should be extended up to 5 times the half-life of the investigational drug)
  7. Subject with uncontrolled hypertension, defined as repeated elevations of systolic blood pressure (SBP) of ≥ 150 mmHg and/or diastolic blood pressure (DBP) ≥ 100 mmHg despite adequate treatment, or with a history of hypertensive crisis or hypertensive encephalopathy.
  8. Subject with any of the following laboratory abnormalities:

    • Absolute neutrophil count (ANC) \< 500/μL (0.5 x 10\^9/L)
    • Platelet count \< 30,000/μL (30 x 10\^9/L) (Exclude subjects that may be at risk of bleeding regardless of platelet counts. This includes [but is not limited to] subjects currently using aspirin or heparin, immediately after surgery, or easily causes bleeding such as nasal bleeding or subcutaneous bleeding or previous episode of major bleeding where the cause was not effectively treated.)
    • Estimated glomerular filtration rate (eGFR) \< 40 mL/min/1.73 m\^2 (via the 4-variable modification of diet in renal disease [MDRD] formula, Appendix G)
    • Serum aspartate aminotransferase/serum glutamic oxaloacetic transaminase (AST/SGOT) or alanine aminotransferase/serum glutamic pyruvic transaminase (ALT/SGPT) ≥ 3.0 x upper limit of normal (ULN)
    • Total bilirubin ≥ 2.0 x ULN. - Higher levels are acceptable if these can be attributed to active red blood cell precursor destruction within the bone marrow (ie, ineffective erythropoiesis) or in the presence of known history of Gilbert Syndrome.
  9. Subject with prior history of malignancies, other than MDS, unless the subject has been free of the disease for ≥ 5 years. However, subjects with the following history/concurrent conditions are allowed if considered as curatively treated:

    • Basal or squamous cell carcinoma of the skin
    • Carcinoma in situ of the cervix
    • Carcinoma in situ of the breast
    • Incidental histologic finding of prostate cancer (T1a or T1b using the tumor, nodes, metastasis [TNM] clinical staging system)
  10. Subject with major surgery within 8 weeks prior to W1D1. Subjects must have completely recovered from any previous surgery prior to W1D1
  11. Subject with history of cerebrovascular accident (including ischemic, embolic, and hemorrhagic cerebrovascular accident), transient ischemic attack, deep venous thrombosis (DVT; including proximal and distal), pulmonary or arterial embolism, arterial thrombosis or other venous thrombosis within 6 months prior to W1D1 Note: prior superficial thrombophlebitis is not an exclusion criterion.
  12. Subject with the following cardiac conditions within 6 months prior to W1D1:

    myocardial infarction, uncontrolled angina, acute decompensated cardiac failure or New York Heart Association (NYHA) Class III-IV heart failure, or uncontrolled cardiac arrhythmia as determined by the investigator. Subjects with a known ejection fraction ˂35%, confirmed by a local echocardiogram (ECHO) or multi-gated acquisition (MUGA) scan performed within 6 months prior to W1D1.

  13. Subject with uncontrolled systemic fungal, bacterial, or viral infection (defined as ongoing signs/symptoms related to the infection without improvement despite appropriate antibiotics, antiviral therapy, and/or other treatment).
  14. Subject with known human immunodeficiency virus (HIV), known evidence of active infectious hepatitis B, and/or known evidence of active Hepatitis C. Local laboratory testing confirming HIV, hepatitis B, and hepatitis C status should not have been performed beyond 4 weeks prior to the date of ICF signature.
  15. Subject with history of severe allergic or anaphylactic reactions or hypersensitivity to recombinant proteins or excipients in luspatercept (see current IB).
  16. Pregnant or breastfeeding females.
  17. Subject has any significant medical condition, laboratory abnormality, psychiatric illness, or is considered vulnerable by local regulations (eg, imprisoned or institutionalized) that would prevent the subject from participating in the study.
  18. Subject has any condition including the presence of laboratory abnormalities, which places the subject at unacceptable risk if he/she were to participate in the study.
  19. Subject has any condition or receives concomitant medication that confounds the ability to interpret data from the study.
  20. Subject has history of active SARS-CoV-2 infection within 4 weeks prior to screening, unless the subject has adequately recovered from COVID-19 symptoms and related complications as per investigator's discretion and following a discussion with the Medical Monitor. Use of a live COVID-19 vaccine is prohibited within 4 weeks prior to W1D1.
05

Study design

Phase
Phase 2
Primary purpose
Treatment
Allocation
Not applicable
Intervention model
Single group
Masking
None (open label)
Enrollment
21 participants (actual)

Study arms

  • Experimental
    Luspatercept Administration

    Luspatercept will be administered as a subcutaneous injection every 3 week (21 days; Q3W), at an initial dose level of 1.0 mg/kg. Doses may be titrated up starting at dosing visit Week 7 Day 1 (W7D1)

    Drug: Luspatercept

Interventions

  • DrugLuspatercept

    Luspatercept

06

What researchers measure

Primary outcomes

  1. Percentage of Participants Who Achieved Hematologic Improvement in Erythroid Response (HI-E) Per International Working Group (IWG) Through Week 24

    Hematologic improvement is defined as the percent of participants meeting HI-E criteria of \>= 1.5 g/dL increase in hemoglobin (Hgb) sustained over any consecutive 56-day period in the absence of red blood cell (RBC) transfusions from Week 1 Day 1 through Week 24. Participants who discontinued from the Treatment Period without achieving HI-E are counted as non-responders.

    Time frame: Week 1 Day 1 through Week 24

Secondary outcomes

  1. Percentage of Participants Who Achieved Modified Hematologic Improvement in Erythroid Response (mHI-E) Per International Working Group (IWG)

    Modified hematologic improvement is defined as the percent of participants meeting mHI-E criteria of \>= 1.5 g/dL mean increase in hemoglobin (Hgb) compared to baseline sustained over any consecutive 56-day period in the absence of red blood cell (RBC) transfusions from Week 1 Day 1 through Week 24 and Week 48 of the Treatment Period. Participants who discontinued from the Treatment Period without achieving mHI-E are counted as non-responders. Baseline Hgb is defined as the mean of the two central laboratory values (one performed within 1 day prior to W1D1 and the other performed 7 to 35 days prior to W1D1).

    Time frame: Week 1 Day 1 through Week 24 and Week 48

  2. Percentage of Participants Who Achieved Hematologic Improvement in Erythroid Response (HI-E) Per International Working Group (IWG) Through Week 48

    Hematologic improvement is defined as the percent of participants meeting HI-E criteria of \>= 1.5 g/dL increase in hemoglobin (Hgb) sustained over any consecutive 56-day period in the absence of red blood cell (RBC) transfusions from Week 1 Day 1 through Week 48 of the Treatment Period. Participants who discontinued from the Treatment Period without achieving HI-E are counted as non-responders.

    Time frame: Week 1 Day 1 through Week 48

  3. Time to Hematologic Improvement in Erythroid Response (HI-E)

    Defined as time from Week 1 Day 1 to first onset of achieving ≥ 1.5 g/dL increase in hemoglobin (Hgb) over any consecutive 56-day period in the absence of red blood cell (RBC) transfusions.

    Time frame: Week 1 Day 1 through Week 24 and Week 48

  4. Time to Modified Hematologic Improvement in Erythroid Response (mHI-E)

    Defined as the time from Week 1 Day 1 to first onset of achieving ≥ 1.5 g/dL mean increase in hemoglobin (Hgb) compared to baseline over any consecutive 56-day period in the absence of red blood cell (RBC) transfusions. Baseline Hgb is defined as the mean of the two central laboratory values (one performed within 1 day prior to W1D1 and the other performed 7 to 35 days prior to W1D1.

    Time frame: Week 1 Day 1 through Week 24 and Week 48

  5. Duration of Hematologic Improvement in Erythroid Response (HI-E)

    Defined as the maximum duration of achieving ≥ 1.5 g/dL increase in hemoglobin (Hgb) for participants who achieve Hgb increase ≥ 56 days in the absence of red blood cell (RBC) transfusions. Participants who maintain HI-E through the end of the Treatment Period or time of analysis will be censored at the date of treatment discontinuation/time of analysis or death, whichever occurs first.

    Time frame: Week 1 Day 1 through end of treatment period (up to an average of 74 weeks and maximum of 178 weeks)

  6. Duration of Modified Hematologic Improvement in Erythroid Response (mHI-E)

    Defined as the maximum duration of achieving ≥ 1.5 g/dL increase in hemoglobin for participants who achieve mean hemoglobin (Hgb) increase compared to baseline ≥ 56 days in the absence of red blood cell (RBC) transfusions. Participants who maintain mHI-E through the end of the Treatment Period or time of analysis will be censored at the date of treatment discontinuation/time of analysis or death, whichever occurs first. Baseline Hgb is defined as the mean of the two central laboratory values (one performed within 1 day prior to W1D1 and the other performed 7 to 35 days prior to W1D1.

    Time frame: Week 1 Day 1 through end of treatment period (up to an average of 74 weeks and maximum of 178 weeks)

  7. Red Blood Cell Transfusion Independence (RBC-TI)

    Defined as the percentage of participants not being given any red blood cell (RBC) transfusion during the treatment period.

    Time frame: Week 1 Day 1 through Week 24, Week 48, and Week 72

  8. Progression to Acute Myeloid Leukemia (AML)

    Number of participants progressing to acute myeloid leukemia (AML). AML progression is defined per WHO classification of ≥ 20% blasts in peripheral blood or bone marrow. Subjects with diagnosis of AML will be considered to have had an event. Subjects who have not progressed to AML at the time of analysis will be censored at the last assessment date which does not indicate progression to AML.

    Time frame: From Week 1 Day 1 up to approximately 44 months

  9. Time to Acute Myeloid Leukemia (AML) Progression

    Defined as the time between W1D1 and first diagnosis of AML as per WHO classification of ≥ 20% blasts in peripheral blood or bone marrow. Participants with diagnosis of AML will be considered to have had an event. Participants who have not progressed to AML at the time of analysis will be censored at the last assessment date which does not indicate progression to AML.

    Time frame: Week 1 Day 1 to first diagnosis of AML (up to approximately 44 months)

  10. Overall Survival

    Overall Survival is defined as time from Week 1 Day 1 to a participants death date or last known alive date. Participants who die, regardless of the cause of death, will be considered to have had an event. Participants who are alive at the time of analysis will be censored at the last assessment date at which the participant was known to be alive. All participants who were lost to follow-up will also be censored at the time of last contact.

    Time frame: Week 1 Day 1 to to a participants death date or last known alive date (up to approximately 44 months)

  11. Number of Participants With Adverse Events (AEs)

    Treatment-emergent adverse events include adverse events that started on or after the first dose until 42 days after the last dose, as well as those SAEs made known to the investigator at any time thereafter that are suspected of being related to study drug. An AE is any noxious, unintended, or untoward medical occurrence that may appear or worsen in a participant during the course of a study. Grade 3 = Severe Grade 4 = Life-threatening Grade 5 = Death

    Time frame: From first dose to 42 days after last dose (up to approximately 42.5 months)

  12. Maximum Plasma Concentration (Cmax)

    Time frame: W1D1 (pre-dose), W1D3, W2D1, W2D3, W3D1, W4D1, W10D1, W13D1, W16D1, W17D1, W18D1, W19D1, W22D1, 24-Week MDS Disease Assessment, and every 12 weeks from the 24-Week MDS Disease Assessment Visit for up to 1 year from the first dose.

  13. Time to Maximum Plasma Concentration (Tmax)

    Time frame: W1D1 (pre-dose), W1D3, W2D1, W2D3, W3D1, W4D1, W10D1, W13D1, W16D1, W17D1, W18D1, W19D1, W22D1, 24-Week MDS Disease Assessment, and every 12 weeks from the 24-Week MDS Disease Assessment Visit for up to 1 year from the first dose.

  14. Area Under the Concentration-Time Curve (AUC21d)

    Time frame: W1D1 (pre-dose), W1D3, W2D1, W2D3 , W3D1, W4D1 (21 days after dose administration)

  15. Number of Participants With a Positive Anti-Drug Antibody (ADA) Test

    Number of participants under each ADA positive category. A participant is counted as 'Treatment-Emergent' if there is a positive post-baseline sample while the baseline sample is ADA negative, or there is a positive post-baseline sample with a titer \>= 4-fold of the baseline titer while the baseline sample is ADA positive. A participant is counted as 'Preexisting' if the baseline sample is ADA positive and the participant is not qualified for 'Treatment-Emergent'. Positive to preexisting ADA is considered baseline sample is positive and all post-baseline samples are negative, or both baseline and post-baseline samples are positive, but all positive post-baseline sample have a titer \< 4-fold of the baseline titer.

    Time frame: W1D1 (must be collected before the first dose), W4D1, W10D1, W16D1, W22D1, 24-Week MDS Disease Assessment Visit and every 12 weeks (± 14 days) from the 24-Week MDS Disease Assessment Visit for up to 1 year from the first dose..

07

Results

Posted Oct 17, 2024

Participant flow

Participant flow — Overall Study
MilestoneLuspatercept
Started21
Efficacy evaluable population19
Completed0
Not completed21
Withdrew: Protocol deviation1
Withdrew: Lack of efficacy1
Withdrew: Progressive disease6
Withdrew: Adverse event2
Withdrew: Other reasons11

Outcome measures

PrimaryPercentage of Participants Who Achieved Hematologic Improvement in Erythroid Response (HI-E) Per International Working Group (IWG) Through Week 24

Hematologic improvement is defined as the percent of participants meeting HI-E criteria of \>= 1.5 g/dL increase in hemoglobin (Hgb) sustained over any consecutive 56-day period in the absence of red blood cell (RBC) transfusions from Week 1 Day 1 through Week 24. Participants who discontinued from the Treatment Period without achieving HI-E are counted as non-responders.

Time frame:
Week 1 Day 1 through Week 24
Reported as:
Number · Percentage of participants
Percentage of Participants Who Achieved Hematologic Improvement in Erythroid Response (HI-E) Per International Working Group (IWG) Through Week 24
Percentage of participantsLuspatercept
Percentage of Participants Who Achieved Hematologic Improvement in Erythroid Response (HI-E) Per International Working Group (IWG) Through Week 2447.6 (25.7 to 70.2)
SecondaryPercentage of Participants Who Achieved Modified Hematologic Improvement in Erythroid Response (mHI-E) Per International Working Group (IWG)

Modified hematologic improvement is defined as the percent of participants meeting mHI-E criteria of \>= 1.5 g/dL mean increase in hemoglobin (Hgb) compared to baseline sustained over any consecutive 56-day period in the absence of red blood cell (RBC) transfusions from Week 1 Day 1 through Week 24 and Week 48 of the Treatment Period. Participants who discontinued from the Treatment Period without achieving mHI-E are counted as non-responders. Baseline Hgb is defined as the mean of the two central laboratory values (one performed within 1 day prior to W1D1 and the other performed 7 to 35 days prior to W1D1).

Time frame:
Week 1 Day 1 through Week 24 and Week 48
Reported as:
Number · Percentage of participants
Percentage of Participants Who Achieved Modified Hematologic Improvement in Erythroid Response (mHI-E) Per International Working Group (IWG)
Percentage of participantsLuspatercept
Week 1 Day 1 through Week 2457.1 (34.0 to 78.2)
Week 1 Day 1 through Week 4866.7 (43.0 to 85.4)
SecondaryPercentage of Participants Who Achieved Hematologic Improvement in Erythroid Response (HI-E) Per International Working Group (IWG) Through Week 48

Hematologic improvement is defined as the percent of participants meeting HI-E criteria of \>= 1.5 g/dL increase in hemoglobin (Hgb) sustained over any consecutive 56-day period in the absence of red blood cell (RBC) transfusions from Week 1 Day 1 through Week 48 of the Treatment Period. Participants who discontinued from the Treatment Period without achieving HI-E are counted as non-responders.

Time frame:
Week 1 Day 1 through Week 48
Reported as:
Number · Percentage of participants
Percentage of Participants Who Achieved Hematologic Improvement in Erythroid Response (HI-E) Per International Working Group (IWG) Through Week 48
Percentage of participantsLuspatercept
Percentage of Participants Who Achieved Hematologic Improvement in Erythroid Response (HI-E) Per International Working Group (IWG) Through Week 4857.1 (34.0 to 78.2)
SecondaryTime to Hematologic Improvement in Erythroid Response (HI-E)

Defined as time from Week 1 Day 1 to first onset of achieving ≥ 1.5 g/dL increase in hemoglobin (Hgb) over any consecutive 56-day period in the absence of red blood cell (RBC) transfusions.

Time frame:
Week 1 Day 1 through Week 24 and Week 48
Reported as:
Median · Days
Time to Hematologic Improvement in Erythroid Response (HI-E)
DaysLuspatercept
Week 1 Day 1 through Week 2426.5 (14 to 87)
Week 1 Day 1 through Week 4836.5 (14 to 275)
SecondaryTime to Modified Hematologic Improvement in Erythroid Response (mHI-E)

Defined as the time from Week 1 Day 1 to first onset of achieving ≥ 1.5 g/dL mean increase in hemoglobin (Hgb) compared to baseline over any consecutive 56-day period in the absence of red blood cell (RBC) transfusions. Baseline Hgb is defined as the mean of the two central laboratory values (one performed within 1 day prior to W1D1 and the other performed 7 to 35 days prior to W1D1.

Time frame:
Week 1 Day 1 through Week 24 and Week 48
Reported as:
Median · Days
Time to Modified Hematologic Improvement in Erythroid Response (mHI-E)
DaysLuspatercept
Week 1 Day 1 through Week 240.0 (0 to 8)
Week 1 Day 1 through Week 480.0 (0 to 210)
SecondaryDuration of Hematologic Improvement in Erythroid Response (HI-E)

Defined as the maximum duration of achieving ≥ 1.5 g/dL increase in hemoglobin (Hgb) for participants who achieve Hgb increase ≥ 56 days in the absence of red blood cell (RBC) transfusions. Participants who maintain HI-E through the end of the Treatment Period or time of analysis will be censored at the date of treatment discontinuation/time of analysis or death, whichever occurs first.

Time frame:
Week 1 Day 1 through end of treatment period (up to an average of 74 weeks and maximum of 178 weeks)
Reported as:
Median · Weeks
Duration of Hematologic Improvement in Erythroid Response (HI-E)
WeeksLuspatercept
Duration of Hematologic Improvement in Erythroid Response (HI-E)40.0 (30.1 to 57.9)
SecondaryDuration of Modified Hematologic Improvement in Erythroid Response (mHI-E)

Defined as the maximum duration of achieving ≥ 1.5 g/dL increase in hemoglobin for participants who achieve mean hemoglobin (Hgb) increase compared to baseline ≥ 56 days in the absence of red blood cell (RBC) transfusions. Participants who maintain mHI-E through the end of the Treatment Period or time of analysis will be censored at the date of treatment discontinuation/time of analysis or death, whichever occurs first. Baseline Hgb is defined as the mean of the two central laboratory values (one performed within 1 day prior to W1D1 and the other performed 7 to 35 days prior to W1D1.

Time frame:
Week 1 Day 1 through end of treatment period (up to an average of 74 weeks and maximum of 178 weeks)
Reported as:
Median · Weeks
Duration of Modified Hematologic Improvement in Erythroid Response (mHI-E)
WeeksLuspatercept
Duration of Modified Hematologic Improvement in Erythroid Response (mHI-E)92.1 (46.1 to 157.4)
SecondaryRed Blood Cell Transfusion Independence (RBC-TI)

Defined as the percentage of participants not being given any red blood cell (RBC) transfusion during the treatment period.

Time frame:
Week 1 Day 1 through Week 24, Week 48, and Week 72
Reported as:
Number · Percentage of participants
Red Blood Cell Transfusion Independence (RBC-TI)
Percentage of participantsLuspatercept
Week 1 Day 1 through Week 2481.0 (58.1 to 94.6)
Week 1 Day 1 through Week 4881.0 (58.1 to 94.6)
Week 1 Day 1 through Week 7281.0 (58.1 to 94.6)
SecondaryProgression to Acute Myeloid Leukemia (AML)

Number of participants progressing to acute myeloid leukemia (AML). AML progression is defined per WHO classification of ≥ 20% blasts in peripheral blood or bone marrow. Subjects with diagnosis of AML will be considered to have had an event. Subjects who have not progressed to AML at the time of analysis will be censored at the last assessment date which does not indicate progression to AML.

Time frame:
From Week 1 Day 1 up to approximately 44 months
Reported as:
Count of participants · Participants
Progression to Acute Myeloid Leukemia (AML)
ParticipantsLuspatercept
Progression to Acute Myeloid Leukemia (AML)0
SecondaryTime to Acute Myeloid Leukemia (AML) Progression

Defined as the time between W1D1 and first diagnosis of AML as per WHO classification of ≥ 20% blasts in peripheral blood or bone marrow. Participants with diagnosis of AML will be considered to have had an event. Participants who have not progressed to AML at the time of analysis will be censored at the last assessment date which does not indicate progression to AML.

Time frame:
Week 1 Day 1 to first diagnosis of AML (up to approximately 44 months)

No measurements were reported for this outcome.

SecondaryOverall Survival

Overall Survival is defined as time from Week 1 Day 1 to a participants death date or last known alive date. Participants who die, regardless of the cause of death, will be considered to have had an event. Participants who are alive at the time of analysis will be censored at the last assessment date at which the participant was known to be alive. All participants who were lost to follow-up will also be censored at the time of last contact.

Time frame:
Week 1 Day 1 to to a participants death date or last known alive date (up to approximately 44 months)
Reported as:
Median · Months
Overall Survival
MonthsLuspatercept
Overall SurvivalNA (NA to NA)
SecondaryNumber of Participants With Adverse Events (AEs)

Treatment-emergent adverse events include adverse events that started on or after the first dose until 42 days after the last dose, as well as those SAEs made known to the investigator at any time thereafter that are suspected of being related to study drug. An AE is any noxious, unintended, or untoward medical occurrence that may appear or worsen in a participant during the course of a study. Grade 3 = Severe Grade 4 = Life-threatening Grade 5 = Death

Time frame:
From first dose to 42 days after last dose (up to approximately 42.5 months)
Reported as:
Count of participants · Participants
Number of Participants With Adverse Events (AEs)
ParticipantsLuspatercept
Treatment-Emergent Adverse Events (TEAEs)20
Suspected Drug Related TEAE8
Serious TEAE6
Suspected Drug Related Serious TEAE1
Grade 3 or 4 TEAE8
Suspected Drug Related Grade 3 or 4 TEAE4
Grade 5 TEAE0
Suspected Drug Related Grade 5 TEAE0
TEAE Leading to Dose Interruption5
TEAE Leading to Dose Reduction2
TEAE Leading to Dose Withdrawn6
SecondaryMaximum Plasma Concentration (Cmax)
Time frame:
W1D1 (pre-dose), W1D3, W2D1, W2D3, W3D1, W4D1, W10D1, W13D1, W16D1, W17D1, W18D1, W19D1, W22D1, 24-Week MDS Disease Assessment, and every 12 weeks from the 24-Week MDS Disease Assessment Visit for up to 1 year from the first dose.
Reported as:
Geometric mean · ug/mL
Maximum Plasma Concentration (Cmax)
ug/mLLuspatercept
Maximum Plasma Concentration (Cmax)5.713 ± 29.27
SecondaryTime to Maximum Plasma Concentration (Tmax)
Time frame:
W1D1 (pre-dose), W1D3, W2D1, W2D3, W3D1, W4D1, W10D1, W13D1, W16D1, W17D1, W18D1, W19D1, W22D1, 24-Week MDS Disease Assessment, and every 12 weeks from the 24-Week MDS Disease Assessment Visit for up to 1 year from the first dose.
Reported as:
Median · Day
Time to Maximum Plasma Concentration (Tmax)
DayLuspatercept
Time to Maximum Plasma Concentration (Tmax)7.921 (2.884 to 13.75)
SecondaryArea Under the Concentration-Time Curve (AUC21d)
Time frame:
W1D1 (pre-dose), W1D3, W2D1, W2D3 , W3D1, W4D1 (21 days after dose administration)
Reported as:
Geometric mean · Day*ug/mL
Area Under the Concentration-Time Curve (AUC21d)
Day*ug/mLLuspatercept
Area Under the Concentration-Time Curve (AUC21d)94.28 ± 29.31
SecondaryNumber of Participants With a Positive Anti-Drug Antibody (ADA) Test

Number of participants under each ADA positive category. A participant is counted as 'Treatment-Emergent' if there is a positive post-baseline sample while the baseline sample is ADA negative, or there is a positive post-baseline sample with a titer \>= 4-fold of the baseline titer while the baseline sample is ADA positive. A participant is counted as 'Preexisting' if the baseline sample is ADA positive and the participant is not qualified for 'Treatment-Emergent'. Positive to preexisting ADA is considered baseline sample is positive and all post-baseline samples are negative, or both baseline and post-baseline samples are positive, but all positive post-baseline sample have a titer \< 4-fold of the baseline titer.

Time frame:
W1D1 (must be collected before the first dose), W4D1, W10D1, W16D1, W22D1, 24-Week MDS Disease Assessment Visit and every 12 weeks (± 14 days) from the 24-Week MDS Disease Assessment Visit for up to 1 year from the first dose..
Reported as:
Count of participants · Participants
Number of Participants With a Positive Anti-Drug Antibody (ADA) Test
ParticipantsLuspatercept
Preexisting0
Treatment-Emergent0

Adverse events

Collected over Participants were assessed for all-cause mortality from their first dose until their study completion (up to approximately 44 months). SAEs and other AEs were assessed from first dose to 42 days after last dose (up to approximately 42.5 months).. Non-serious events are listed at a 5% frequency threshold.

Adverse event summary by group
GroupDeathsSeriousOther
Luspatercept0/21 (0%)6/21 (28.6%)14/21 (66.7%)
Most frequent serious events
Most frequent serious events
EventLuspatercept
Myelodysplastic syndromeNeoplasms benign, malignant and unspecified (incl cysts and polyps)4/21
BronchitisInfections and infestations1/21
Alcohol poisoningInjury, poisoning and procedural complications1/21
Lumbar vertebral fractureInjury, poisoning and procedural complications1/21
Interstitial lung diseaseRespiratory, thoracic and mediastinal disorders1/21
Most frequent other events
Showing 10 of 13
Most frequent other events
EventLuspatercept
ConstipationGastrointestinal disorders4/21
ContusionInjury, poisoning and procedural complications4/21
Oedema peripheralGeneral disorders3/21
FallInjury, poisoning and procedural complications3/21
ArthralgiaMusculoskeletal and connective tissue disorders3/21
Back painMusculoskeletal and connective tissue disorders3/21
StomatitisGastrointestinal disorders2/21
VomitingGastrointestinal disorders2/21
Injection site pruritusGeneral disorders2/21
PyrexiaGeneral disorders2/21

Baseline characteristics

Age, Continuous
Age, Continuous(Years)Luspatercept
Mean74.5 ± 8.47
Sex: Female, Male
Sex: Female, Male(Participants)Luspatercept
Female8
Male13
Race/Ethnicity, Customized
Race/Ethnicity, Customized(Participants)Luspatercept
Asian (Japanese)21
Race/Ethnicity, Customized
Race/Ethnicity, Customized(Participants)Luspatercept
Not Hispanic or Latino21
08

Study locations

19 sites
  • Local Institution - 338
    Matsuyama, Ehime 790-8524, Japan
  • Local Institution - 344
    Nagasaki-shi, Nagasaki 852-8511, Japan
  • Local Institution - 336
    Osakasayama, Osaka 5898511, Japan
  • Local Institution - 345
    Chiba, 260-0852, Japan
  • Local Institution - 334
    Fukuoka, 810-8563, Japan
  • Local Institution - 347
    Himeji, 670-8540, Japan
  • Local Institution - 337
    Hitachi, Ibaraki, 317-0077, Japan
  • Local Institution - 346
    Kamakura, 247-8533, Japan
  • Local Institution - 331
    Kamogawa, 296-8602, Japan
  • Local Institution - 348
    Kitakyushu, 806-8501, Japan
  • Local Institution - 349
    Kofu, 400-0027, Japan
  • Local Institution - 343
    Nagoya-shi, 460-0001, Japan
  • Local Institution - 341
    Ogaki, 503-8502, Japan
  • Local Institution - 335
    Okayama, 700-8557, Japan
  • Local Institution - 342
    Osaka, 545-8586, Japan
  • Local Institution - 333
    Sagamihara, 252-0375, Japan
  • Local Institution - 339
    Sendai, 980-8574, Japan
  • Local Institution - 332
    Shibuya-ku, 150-8935, Japan
  • Local Institution - 330
    Shinagawa-ku, Tokyo, 141-8625, Japan
09

References and documents

Study documents

  • Protocol and statistical analysis plan · Nov 22, 2021

Documents are hosted by the registry — open the source record to download them.

Individual participant data

Plan to share: Yes — Information relating to our policy on data sharing and the process for requesting data can be found at the following link: https://www.celgene.com/research-development/clinical-trials/clinical-trials-data-sharing/

Supporting information: Study protocol, Sap, Icf, Csr, Analytic code

10

Updates

Tracking since Sep 25, 2026
No changes since tracking began. The registry record was last updated on Oct 17, 2024, before this site started recording changes on Sep 25, 2026. Its history is on ClinicalTrials.gov ↗
11

Registry details

Key details

Study ID
NCT03900715
Lead sponsor
Celgene
Responsible party
Sponsor
First posted
Apr 3, 2019
Start date
May 20, 2019
Primary completion
Jul 1, 2022
Completion
Mar 1, 2023
Results posted
Oct 17, 2024
Last update
Oct 17, 2024

Study contacts

Bristol-Myers Squibb
study director · Bristol-Myers Squibb

Oversight

Data monitoring committee
No
FDA-regulated drug
No
FDA-regulated device
No
View the source record on ClinicalTrials.gov ↗

Not currently enrolling

This study is completed, as verified in Oct 2024. You cannot join it, but the record below documents what was studied.

Follow this study

Get an email when the registry record changes — status, dates, results — or when someone posts here.

Sign in to follow

Discussion

Questions and observations about this study, from anyone following it. Not medical advice, and not a channel to the study team — their contact details are on the registry record.

Sign in to join the discussion. Reading takes no account; posting does. You choose a display name, and a pseudonym is the default.

Nothing here yet. If you are running this trial, taking part in it, or weighing whether to, this is the place to say so.

Start the discussion