A Phase 2 interventional study of Luspatercept in Myelodysplastic Syndromes, sponsored by Celgene. Completed at 19 sites in Japan. Open to participants aged 20 Years and older. Per ClinicalTrials.gov, last updated 2024-10-17.
Sponsored by Celgene · Phase 2, Interventional, and Treatment
The study will be conducted in compliance with the International Council for Harmonisation (ICH) of Technical Requirements for Registration of Pharmaceuticals for Human Use/Good Clinical Practice (GCP) and applicable regulatory requirements.
This is a Phase 2, multicenter, single-arm study to evaluate the efficacy, safety and Pharmacokinetics (PK) of luspatercept (ACE-536) for the treatment of anemia due to International prognostic scoring system-Revised (IPSS-R) very low, low or intermediate risk Myelodysplastic syndromes (MDS)in Japanese subjects who are not requiring Red blood cell (RBC) transfusion.
The study is divided into the Screening Period, a Treatment Period and a Post-Treatment Follow up Period.
Anemia is considered to be one of the most prevalent cytopenias in patients who have myelodysplastic syndromes, an umbrella term used to describe disorders relating to the ineffective production of red blood cells, white blood cells, and/or platelets. Ranging in severity from mild (asymptomatic) to severe, anemia can result in patients requiring regular red blood cell (RBC) transfusions, which can lead to further complications from iron overload. The goal of this study is to assess the efficacy, safety and PK of luspatercept in anemic patients who are categorized as International Prognostic Scoring System-Revised (IPSS-R) very low, low, or intermediate risk Myelodysplastic syndrome (MDS), and not requiring RBC transfusion. Subjects deemed eligible for the study will be enrolled and treated with luspatercept. Best supportive care (BSC) may be used in combination with study treatment when clinically indicated per investigator. Best supportive care includes, but is not limited to, treatment with transfusions, antibiotic, antiviral and/or antifungal therapy, and nutritional support as needed. Best supportive care for this study excludes the use of ESAs. Patients should receive treatment up to a minimum of 24 weeks after which an MDS Disease assessment visit is scheduled to assess the response to treatment. Patients who are determined to be experiencing clinical benefit may continue treatment. Continued clinical benefit will be re-assessed every 24 weeks. Once patients are discontinued from study treatment, they will enter a post treatment follow-up period.
1,317 studies on the registry are indexed under Preleukemia; 57 are open to participants now.
This study's enrollment of 21 is below the median of 36 across 1,060 interventional studies indexed under Preleukemia.
Browse Preleukemia studies →Celgene is the lead sponsor of 419 studies on the registry; 13 are open to participants now.
Of its 100 completed or terminated interventional studies of FDA-regulated products, 29 (29%) have results posted.
Counted across the registry records on this site, refreshed daily.
Subjects must satisfy the following criteria to be enrolled in the study:
Subject has a documented diagnosis of MDS according to WHO 2016 classification that meets IPSS-R classification of very low, low, or intermediate risk disease, and:
Subject must be TI, as documented by the following criteria:
If breastfeeding, agree to stop breastfeeding prior to the participation in the study and not to resume breastfeeding after treatment discontinuation.
Exclusion Criteria:
The presence of any of the following will exclude a subject from enrollment:
Subject with the any of the following prior treatments for underlying disease:
Disease modifying agents (eg, immune-modulatory drug [IMiDs such as lenalidomide])
Hypomethylating agents
Subject with known clinically significant anemia due to iron, vitamin B12, or folate deficiencies, or autoimmune or hereditary hemolytic anemia, or hypothyroidism, or any type of known clinically significant bleeding or sequestration. Subject with drug induced anemia (eg, mycophenolate).
Subject receiving any of the following treatment within 8 weeks prior to W1D1:
Subject with any of the following laboratory abnormalities:
Subject with prior history of malignancies, other than MDS, unless the subject has been free of the disease for ≥ 5 years. However, subjects with the following history/concurrent conditions are allowed if considered as curatively treated:
Subject with the following cardiac conditions within 6 months prior to W1D1:
myocardial infarction, uncontrolled angina, acute decompensated cardiac failure or New York Heart Association (NYHA) Class III-IV heart failure, or uncontrolled cardiac arrhythmia as determined by the investigator. Subjects with a known ejection fraction ˂35%, confirmed by a local echocardiogram (ECHO) or multi-gated acquisition (MUGA) scan performed within 6 months prior to W1D1.
Luspatercept will be administered as a subcutaneous injection every 3 week (21 days; Q3W), at an initial dose level of 1.0 mg/kg. Doses may be titrated up starting at dosing visit Week 7 Day 1 (W7D1)
Drug: Luspatercept
Luspatercept
Percentage of Participants Who Achieved Hematologic Improvement in Erythroid Response (HI-E) Per International Working Group (IWG) Through Week 24
Hematologic improvement is defined as the percent of participants meeting HI-E criteria of \>= 1.5 g/dL increase in hemoglobin (Hgb) sustained over any consecutive 56-day period in the absence of red blood cell (RBC) transfusions from Week 1 Day 1 through Week 24. Participants who discontinued from the Treatment Period without achieving HI-E are counted as non-responders.
Time frame: Week 1 Day 1 through Week 24
Percentage of Participants Who Achieved Modified Hematologic Improvement in Erythroid Response (mHI-E) Per International Working Group (IWG)
Modified hematologic improvement is defined as the percent of participants meeting mHI-E criteria of \>= 1.5 g/dL mean increase in hemoglobin (Hgb) compared to baseline sustained over any consecutive 56-day period in the absence of red blood cell (RBC) transfusions from Week 1 Day 1 through Week 24 and Week 48 of the Treatment Period. Participants who discontinued from the Treatment Period without achieving mHI-E are counted as non-responders. Baseline Hgb is defined as the mean of the two central laboratory values (one performed within 1 day prior to W1D1 and the other performed 7 to 35 days prior to W1D1).
Time frame: Week 1 Day 1 through Week 24 and Week 48
Percentage of Participants Who Achieved Hematologic Improvement in Erythroid Response (HI-E) Per International Working Group (IWG) Through Week 48
Hematologic improvement is defined as the percent of participants meeting HI-E criteria of \>= 1.5 g/dL increase in hemoglobin (Hgb) sustained over any consecutive 56-day period in the absence of red blood cell (RBC) transfusions from Week 1 Day 1 through Week 48 of the Treatment Period. Participants who discontinued from the Treatment Period without achieving HI-E are counted as non-responders.
Time frame: Week 1 Day 1 through Week 48
Time to Hematologic Improvement in Erythroid Response (HI-E)
Defined as time from Week 1 Day 1 to first onset of achieving ≥ 1.5 g/dL increase in hemoglobin (Hgb) over any consecutive 56-day period in the absence of red blood cell (RBC) transfusions.
Time frame: Week 1 Day 1 through Week 24 and Week 48
Time to Modified Hematologic Improvement in Erythroid Response (mHI-E)
Defined as the time from Week 1 Day 1 to first onset of achieving ≥ 1.5 g/dL mean increase in hemoglobin (Hgb) compared to baseline over any consecutive 56-day period in the absence of red blood cell (RBC) transfusions. Baseline Hgb is defined as the mean of the two central laboratory values (one performed within 1 day prior to W1D1 and the other performed 7 to 35 days prior to W1D1.
Time frame: Week 1 Day 1 through Week 24 and Week 48
Duration of Hematologic Improvement in Erythroid Response (HI-E)
Defined as the maximum duration of achieving ≥ 1.5 g/dL increase in hemoglobin (Hgb) for participants who achieve Hgb increase ≥ 56 days in the absence of red blood cell (RBC) transfusions. Participants who maintain HI-E through the end of the Treatment Period or time of analysis will be censored at the date of treatment discontinuation/time of analysis or death, whichever occurs first.
Time frame: Week 1 Day 1 through end of treatment period (up to an average of 74 weeks and maximum of 178 weeks)
Duration of Modified Hematologic Improvement in Erythroid Response (mHI-E)
Defined as the maximum duration of achieving ≥ 1.5 g/dL increase in hemoglobin for participants who achieve mean hemoglobin (Hgb) increase compared to baseline ≥ 56 days in the absence of red blood cell (RBC) transfusions. Participants who maintain mHI-E through the end of the Treatment Period or time of analysis will be censored at the date of treatment discontinuation/time of analysis or death, whichever occurs first. Baseline Hgb is defined as the mean of the two central laboratory values (one performed within 1 day prior to W1D1 and the other performed 7 to 35 days prior to W1D1.
Time frame: Week 1 Day 1 through end of treatment period (up to an average of 74 weeks and maximum of 178 weeks)
Red Blood Cell Transfusion Independence (RBC-TI)
Defined as the percentage of participants not being given any red blood cell (RBC) transfusion during the treatment period.
Time frame: Week 1 Day 1 through Week 24, Week 48, and Week 72
Progression to Acute Myeloid Leukemia (AML)
Number of participants progressing to acute myeloid leukemia (AML). AML progression is defined per WHO classification of ≥ 20% blasts in peripheral blood or bone marrow. Subjects with diagnosis of AML will be considered to have had an event. Subjects who have not progressed to AML at the time of analysis will be censored at the last assessment date which does not indicate progression to AML.
Time frame: From Week 1 Day 1 up to approximately 44 months
Time to Acute Myeloid Leukemia (AML) Progression
Defined as the time between W1D1 and first diagnosis of AML as per WHO classification of ≥ 20% blasts in peripheral blood or bone marrow. Participants with diagnosis of AML will be considered to have had an event. Participants who have not progressed to AML at the time of analysis will be censored at the last assessment date which does not indicate progression to AML.
Time frame: Week 1 Day 1 to first diagnosis of AML (up to approximately 44 months)
Overall Survival
Overall Survival is defined as time from Week 1 Day 1 to a participants death date or last known alive date. Participants who die, regardless of the cause of death, will be considered to have had an event. Participants who are alive at the time of analysis will be censored at the last assessment date at which the participant was known to be alive. All participants who were lost to follow-up will also be censored at the time of last contact.
Time frame: Week 1 Day 1 to to a participants death date or last known alive date (up to approximately 44 months)
Number of Participants With Adverse Events (AEs)
Treatment-emergent adverse events include adverse events that started on or after the first dose until 42 days after the last dose, as well as those SAEs made known to the investigator at any time thereafter that are suspected of being related to study drug. An AE is any noxious, unintended, or untoward medical occurrence that may appear or worsen in a participant during the course of a study. Grade 3 = Severe Grade 4 = Life-threatening Grade 5 = Death
Time frame: From first dose to 42 days after last dose (up to approximately 42.5 months)
Maximum Plasma Concentration (Cmax)
Time frame: W1D1 (pre-dose), W1D3, W2D1, W2D3, W3D1, W4D1, W10D1, W13D1, W16D1, W17D1, W18D1, W19D1, W22D1, 24-Week MDS Disease Assessment, and every 12 weeks from the 24-Week MDS Disease Assessment Visit for up to 1 year from the first dose.
Time to Maximum Plasma Concentration (Tmax)
Time frame: W1D1 (pre-dose), W1D3, W2D1, W2D3, W3D1, W4D1, W10D1, W13D1, W16D1, W17D1, W18D1, W19D1, W22D1, 24-Week MDS Disease Assessment, and every 12 weeks from the 24-Week MDS Disease Assessment Visit for up to 1 year from the first dose.
Area Under the Concentration-Time Curve (AUC21d)
Time frame: W1D1 (pre-dose), W1D3, W2D1, W2D3 , W3D1, W4D1 (21 days after dose administration)
Number of Participants With a Positive Anti-Drug Antibody (ADA) Test
Number of participants under each ADA positive category. A participant is counted as 'Treatment-Emergent' if there is a positive post-baseline sample while the baseline sample is ADA negative, or there is a positive post-baseline sample with a titer \>= 4-fold of the baseline titer while the baseline sample is ADA positive. A participant is counted as 'Preexisting' if the baseline sample is ADA positive and the participant is not qualified for 'Treatment-Emergent'. Positive to preexisting ADA is considered baseline sample is positive and all post-baseline samples are negative, or both baseline and post-baseline samples are positive, but all positive post-baseline sample have a titer \< 4-fold of the baseline titer.
Time frame: W1D1 (must be collected before the first dose), W4D1, W10D1, W16D1, W22D1, 24-Week MDS Disease Assessment Visit and every 12 weeks (± 14 days) from the 24-Week MDS Disease Assessment Visit for up to 1 year from the first dose..
| Milestone | Luspatercept |
|---|---|
| Started | 21 |
| Efficacy evaluable population | 19 |
| Completed | 0 |
| Not completed | 21 |
| Withdrew: Protocol deviation | 1 |
| Withdrew: Lack of efficacy | 1 |
| Withdrew: Progressive disease | 6 |
| Withdrew: Adverse event | 2 |
| Withdrew: Other reasons | 11 |
Hematologic improvement is defined as the percent of participants meeting HI-E criteria of \>= 1.5 g/dL increase in hemoglobin (Hgb) sustained over any consecutive 56-day period in the absence of red blood cell (RBC) transfusions from Week 1 Day 1 through Week 24. Participants who discontinued from the Treatment Period without achieving HI-E are counted as non-responders.
| Percentage of participants | Luspatercept |
|---|---|
| Percentage of Participants Who Achieved Hematologic Improvement in Erythroid Response (HI-E) Per International Working Group (IWG) Through Week 24 | 47.6 (25.7 to 70.2) |
Modified hematologic improvement is defined as the percent of participants meeting mHI-E criteria of \>= 1.5 g/dL mean increase in hemoglobin (Hgb) compared to baseline sustained over any consecutive 56-day period in the absence of red blood cell (RBC) transfusions from Week 1 Day 1 through Week 24 and Week 48 of the Treatment Period. Participants who discontinued from the Treatment Period without achieving mHI-E are counted as non-responders. Baseline Hgb is defined as the mean of the two central laboratory values (one performed within 1 day prior to W1D1 and the other performed 7 to 35 days prior to W1D1).
| Percentage of participants | Luspatercept |
|---|---|
| Week 1 Day 1 through Week 24 | 57.1 (34.0 to 78.2) |
| Week 1 Day 1 through Week 48 | 66.7 (43.0 to 85.4) |
Hematologic improvement is defined as the percent of participants meeting HI-E criteria of \>= 1.5 g/dL increase in hemoglobin (Hgb) sustained over any consecutive 56-day period in the absence of red blood cell (RBC) transfusions from Week 1 Day 1 through Week 48 of the Treatment Period. Participants who discontinued from the Treatment Period without achieving HI-E are counted as non-responders.
| Percentage of participants | Luspatercept |
|---|---|
| Percentage of Participants Who Achieved Hematologic Improvement in Erythroid Response (HI-E) Per International Working Group (IWG) Through Week 48 | 57.1 (34.0 to 78.2) |
Defined as time from Week 1 Day 1 to first onset of achieving ≥ 1.5 g/dL increase in hemoglobin (Hgb) over any consecutive 56-day period in the absence of red blood cell (RBC) transfusions.
| Days | Luspatercept |
|---|---|
| Week 1 Day 1 through Week 24 | 26.5 (14 to 87) |
| Week 1 Day 1 through Week 48 | 36.5 (14 to 275) |
Defined as the time from Week 1 Day 1 to first onset of achieving ≥ 1.5 g/dL mean increase in hemoglobin (Hgb) compared to baseline over any consecutive 56-day period in the absence of red blood cell (RBC) transfusions. Baseline Hgb is defined as the mean of the two central laboratory values (one performed within 1 day prior to W1D1 and the other performed 7 to 35 days prior to W1D1.
| Days | Luspatercept |
|---|---|
| Week 1 Day 1 through Week 24 | 0.0 (0 to 8) |
| Week 1 Day 1 through Week 48 | 0.0 (0 to 210) |
Defined as the maximum duration of achieving ≥ 1.5 g/dL increase in hemoglobin (Hgb) for participants who achieve Hgb increase ≥ 56 days in the absence of red blood cell (RBC) transfusions. Participants who maintain HI-E through the end of the Treatment Period or time of analysis will be censored at the date of treatment discontinuation/time of analysis or death, whichever occurs first.
| Weeks | Luspatercept |
|---|---|
| Duration of Hematologic Improvement in Erythroid Response (HI-E) | 40.0 (30.1 to 57.9) |
Defined as the maximum duration of achieving ≥ 1.5 g/dL increase in hemoglobin for participants who achieve mean hemoglobin (Hgb) increase compared to baseline ≥ 56 days in the absence of red blood cell (RBC) transfusions. Participants who maintain mHI-E through the end of the Treatment Period or time of analysis will be censored at the date of treatment discontinuation/time of analysis or death, whichever occurs first. Baseline Hgb is defined as the mean of the two central laboratory values (one performed within 1 day prior to W1D1 and the other performed 7 to 35 days prior to W1D1.
| Weeks | Luspatercept |
|---|---|
| Duration of Modified Hematologic Improvement in Erythroid Response (mHI-E) | 92.1 (46.1 to 157.4) |
Defined as the percentage of participants not being given any red blood cell (RBC) transfusion during the treatment period.
| Percentage of participants | Luspatercept |
|---|---|
| Week 1 Day 1 through Week 24 | 81.0 (58.1 to 94.6) |
| Week 1 Day 1 through Week 48 | 81.0 (58.1 to 94.6) |
| Week 1 Day 1 through Week 72 | 81.0 (58.1 to 94.6) |
Number of participants progressing to acute myeloid leukemia (AML). AML progression is defined per WHO classification of ≥ 20% blasts in peripheral blood or bone marrow. Subjects with diagnosis of AML will be considered to have had an event. Subjects who have not progressed to AML at the time of analysis will be censored at the last assessment date which does not indicate progression to AML.
| Participants | Luspatercept |
|---|---|
| Progression to Acute Myeloid Leukemia (AML) | 0 |
Defined as the time between W1D1 and first diagnosis of AML as per WHO classification of ≥ 20% blasts in peripheral blood or bone marrow. Participants with diagnosis of AML will be considered to have had an event. Participants who have not progressed to AML at the time of analysis will be censored at the last assessment date which does not indicate progression to AML.
No measurements were reported for this outcome.
Overall Survival is defined as time from Week 1 Day 1 to a participants death date or last known alive date. Participants who die, regardless of the cause of death, will be considered to have had an event. Participants who are alive at the time of analysis will be censored at the last assessment date at which the participant was known to be alive. All participants who were lost to follow-up will also be censored at the time of last contact.
| Months | Luspatercept |
|---|---|
| Overall Survival | NA (NA to NA) |
Treatment-emergent adverse events include adverse events that started on or after the first dose until 42 days after the last dose, as well as those SAEs made known to the investigator at any time thereafter that are suspected of being related to study drug. An AE is any noxious, unintended, or untoward medical occurrence that may appear or worsen in a participant during the course of a study. Grade 3 = Severe Grade 4 = Life-threatening Grade 5 = Death
| Participants | Luspatercept |
|---|---|
| Treatment-Emergent Adverse Events (TEAEs) | 20 |
| Suspected Drug Related TEAE | 8 |
| Serious TEAE | 6 |
| Suspected Drug Related Serious TEAE | 1 |
| Grade 3 or 4 TEAE | 8 |
| Suspected Drug Related Grade 3 or 4 TEAE | 4 |
| Grade 5 TEAE | 0 |
| Suspected Drug Related Grade 5 TEAE | 0 |
| TEAE Leading to Dose Interruption | 5 |
| TEAE Leading to Dose Reduction | 2 |
| TEAE Leading to Dose Withdrawn | 6 |
| ug/mL | Luspatercept |
|---|---|
| Maximum Plasma Concentration (Cmax) | 5.713 ± 29.27 |
| Day | Luspatercept |
|---|---|
| Time to Maximum Plasma Concentration (Tmax) | 7.921 (2.884 to 13.75) |
| Day*ug/mL | Luspatercept |
|---|---|
| Area Under the Concentration-Time Curve (AUC21d) | 94.28 ± 29.31 |
Number of participants under each ADA positive category. A participant is counted as 'Treatment-Emergent' if there is a positive post-baseline sample while the baseline sample is ADA negative, or there is a positive post-baseline sample with a titer \>= 4-fold of the baseline titer while the baseline sample is ADA positive. A participant is counted as 'Preexisting' if the baseline sample is ADA positive and the participant is not qualified for 'Treatment-Emergent'. Positive to preexisting ADA is considered baseline sample is positive and all post-baseline samples are negative, or both baseline and post-baseline samples are positive, but all positive post-baseline sample have a titer \< 4-fold of the baseline titer.
| Participants | Luspatercept |
|---|---|
| Preexisting | 0 |
| Treatment-Emergent | 0 |
Collected over Participants were assessed for all-cause mortality from their first dose until their study completion (up to approximately 44 months). SAEs and other AEs were assessed from first dose to 42 days after last dose (up to approximately 42.5 months).. Non-serious events are listed at a 5% frequency threshold.
| Group | Deaths | Serious | Other |
|---|---|---|---|
| Luspatercept | 0/21 (0%) | 6/21 (28.6%) | 14/21 (66.7%) |
| Event | Luspatercept |
|---|---|
| Myelodysplastic syndromeNeoplasms benign, malignant and unspecified (incl cysts and polyps) | 4/21 |
| BronchitisInfections and infestations | 1/21 |
| Alcohol poisoningInjury, poisoning and procedural complications | 1/21 |
| Lumbar vertebral fractureInjury, poisoning and procedural complications | 1/21 |
| Interstitial lung diseaseRespiratory, thoracic and mediastinal disorders | 1/21 |
| Event | Luspatercept |
|---|---|
| ConstipationGastrointestinal disorders | 4/21 |
| ContusionInjury, poisoning and procedural complications | 4/21 |
| Oedema peripheralGeneral disorders | 3/21 |
| FallInjury, poisoning and procedural complications | 3/21 |
| ArthralgiaMusculoskeletal and connective tissue disorders | 3/21 |
| Back painMusculoskeletal and connective tissue disorders | 3/21 |
| StomatitisGastrointestinal disorders | 2/21 |
| VomitingGastrointestinal disorders | 2/21 |
| Injection site pruritusGeneral disorders | 2/21 |
| PyrexiaGeneral disorders | 2/21 |
| Age, Continuous(Years) | Luspatercept |
|---|---|
| Mean | 74.5 ± 8.47 |
| Sex: Female, Male(Participants) | Luspatercept |
|---|---|
| Female | 8 |
| Male | 13 |
| Race/Ethnicity, Customized(Participants) | Luspatercept |
|---|---|
| Asian (Japanese) | 21 |
| Race/Ethnicity, Customized(Participants) | Luspatercept |
|---|---|
| Not Hispanic or Latino | 21 |
Documents are hosted by the registry — open the source record to download them.
Plan to share: Yes — Information relating to our policy on data sharing and the process for requesting data can be found at the following link: https://www.celgene.com/research-development/clinical-trials/clinical-trials-data-sharing/
Supporting information: Study protocol, Sap, Icf, Csr, Analytic code
This study is completed, as verified in Oct 2024. You cannot join it, but the record below documents what was studied.
Get an email when the registry record changes — status, dates, results — or when someone posts here.
Sign in to followQuestions and observations about this study, from anyone following it. Not medical advice, and not a channel to the study team — their contact details are on the registry record.
Sign in to join the discussion. Reading takes no account; posting does. You choose a display name, and a pseudonym is the default.
Nothing here yet. If you are running this trial, taking part in it, or weighing whether to, this is the place to say so.
Celgene