CClinicalTrials.gg
CompletedNCT03891914MYELOCHOLUpdated May 12, 2026

Prospective Comparison of 18F-choline PET/CT and 18F-FDG PET/CT in the Initial Work-up of Multiple Myeloma

A Phase 3 interventional study of Positron Emission Tomography using 18F-FCH and Positron Emission Tomography using 18F-FDG in Myeloma Multiple, sponsored by University Hospital, Bordeaux. Completed at 1 site in France. Open to participants aged 18 Years and older. Per ClinicalTrials.gov, last updated 2026-05-12.

Sponsored by University Hospital, Bordeaux · Phase 3, Interventional, and Diagnostic

Phase
Phase 3
Study type
Interventional
Enrollment
20
Allocation
Not applicable
Ages
18 Years and older
Sex
All
01

Study summary

Multiple myeloma (MM) survival has been improved during the last decade owing to new treatments. Hence, it has become a matter of importance to precisely define the depth of MM response to therapy. 18F-FDG PET/CT (FDG-PET) has proved to be superior to X-rays for the initial staging of MM. It is now recommended by the International Myeloma Working Group (IMWG) during the initial work-up and for response evaluation, as it is superior to MRI in that setting. However, sensitivity of FDG-PET remains inferior to that of MRI for the initial staging of MM. Indeed, FDG-PET remains limited for the evaluation of skull lesions (due to brain physiological background) or spine infiltrative disease. Therefore, there is a need for a new diagnostic tool which could have equivalent sensitivity to that of MRI at diagnosis, and could bring better baseline information than FDG PET for therapy evaluation. Ultimately, this tool would be a one-stop-shop exam for diagnosis and patient follow-up during treatment. 18F-Choline, a tracer of phospholipids of cell membrane, has shown potential as compared to 18F-FDG in a recent retrospective study, with about 70% more lesions detected in MM patients with suspected relapsing disease. Following that perspective, our main objective is to compare prospectively, in a cohort of newly diagnosed MM, the detection rate of MM lesions by 18F-Choline PET/CT (FCH-PET) vs. FDG-PET. Our secondary objectives will be to compare the performance of both PET modalities as regard to MRI as well as the detection rate of extra-medullary lesions. Patients with MM will proceed to FCH-PET, FDG-PET and then Whole-Body MRI within 3 weeks.

02

Conditions studied

  • Myeloma Multiple

Browse trials for

Keywords

  • Multiple Myeloma
  • PET/CT
  • 18F-FDG
  • 18F-FCH
03

In context

Multiple Myeloma

3,632 studies on the registry are indexed under Multiple Myeloma; 745 are open to participants now.

This study's enrollment of 20 is below the median of 41 across 2,907 interventional studies indexed under Multiple Myeloma.

Browse Multiple Myeloma studies →

Lead sponsor

University Hospital, Bordeaux is the lead sponsor of 783 studies on the registry; 188 are open to participants now.

Counted across the registry records on this site, refreshed daily.

04

Who can participate

Ages eligible
18 Years and older
Sexes eligible
All
Accepts healthy volunteers
No

Inclusion criteria

  • Symptomatic Multiple Myeloma on first-line treatment as defined by 2014 International Myeloma Working Group criteria
  • Measurable disease either by serum or urinary monoclonal protein level or by serum free light chains assay
  • Age > 18 years old at time of signed consent
  • Beneficiary of social security insurance
  • Signed informed consent

Exclusion criteria

Exclusion Criteria:

  • Previous Multiple Myeloma treatment
  • Previous cancer with less than 5 year of complete remission (including plasmacytoma)
  • Chemotherapy in the 6 months preceding the inclusion
  • Uncontrolled diabetes mellitus
  • Medullary growth factor injection less than 48 hours before imaging procedures
  • Ongoing corticosteroid therapy, or given less than 72 hours before PET-CT imaging
  • Pregnant or nursing (lactating) women
  • Childbearing potential woman without adequate barrier contraception method (HAS criteria)
  • Freedom deprivated patient by judiciary or administrative decision
  • Patient under legal protection or unable to express its own consent
  • PET contraindication (known allergy to 18F-FCH or 18F-FDG or excipient)
  • MRI contraindication
05

Study design

Phase
Phase 3
Primary purpose
Diagnostic
Allocation
Not applicable
Intervention model
Single group
Masking
None (open label)
Enrollment
20 participants (actual)

Study arms

  • Experimental
    Symptomatic Multiple Myeloma on first-line treatment

    Drug: Positron Emission Tomography using 18F-FCH · Drug: Positron Emission Tomography using 18F-FDG

Interventions

  • DrugPositron Emission Tomography using 18F-FCH

    Positron Emission Tomography imaging coupled with scanner (PET-CT). with the injection of a radiopharmaceutical drug, the 18F-FCH(or fluorocholine) for the detection of bone lesions

  • DrugPositron Emission Tomography using 18F-FDG

    Positron Emission Tomography imaging coupled with scanner (PET-CT). with the injection of a radiopharmaceutical drug, the 18F-FDG (or fluorodeoxyglucose) for the detection of bone lesions

06

What researchers measure

Primary outcomes

  1. Number of whole-body bone lesions

    The numbers of bone lesions detected by 18F-FCH PET-CT and that are suspected to be related to multiple myeloma, will be counted. Every bone lesion will be validated by the reference test which is composed of MRI standard sequences plus whole-body diffusion MRI. A bone lesion that is not present on MRI but is present on any of the PET modalities must be validated by an expert multidisciplinary consensus.

    Time frame: Day 0

  2. Number of whole-body bone lesions

    The numbers of bone lesions detected by 18F-FDG PET-CT, and that are suspected to be related to multiple myeloma, will be counted. Every bone lesion will be validated by the reference test which is composed of MRI standard sequences plus whole-body diffusion MRI. A bone lesion that is not present on MRI but is present on any of the PET modalities must be validated by an expert multidisciplinary consensus.

    Time frame: Day 7

  3. Number of bone lesions within defined skeletal areas

    Six skeletal areas are defined : skull - spine - pelvis - sternum and ribs - superior limbs - inferior limbs. The number of bone lesions that are suspected to be related to myeloma in each of these skeletal area is assessed on 18F-FCH PET-CT Every bone lesion will be validated by the reference test which is composed of MRI standard sequences plus whole-body diffusion MRI. A bone lesion that is not present on MRI but is present on any of the PET modalities must be validated by an expert multidisciplinary consensus

    Time frame: Day 0

  4. Number of bone lesions within defined skeletal areas

    Six skeletal areas are defined : skull - spine - pelvis - sternum and ribs - superior limbs - inferior limbs. The number of bone lesions that are suspected to be related to myeloma in each of these skeletal area is assessed on 18F-FDG PET-CT. Every bone lesion will be validated by the reference test which is composed of MRI standard sequences plus whole-body diffusion MRI. A bone lesion that is not present on MRI but is present on any of the PET modalities must be validated by an expert multidisciplinary consensus

    Time frame: Day 7

Secondary outcomes

  1. Diagnostic performance for the detection of focal bone lesions

    Sensitivity, specificity, positive predictive value, negative predictive value and accuracy of 18F-FCH PET-CT will be calculated based on two different reference test. First reference test will be standard MRI sequences (T1SE, T2-STIR). Second reference test will be composed of standard MRI sequences plus whole-body diffusion MRI acquisitions.

    Time frame: Day 0

  2. Diagnostic performance for the detection of focal bone lesions

    Sensitivity, specificity, positive predictive value, negative predictive value and accuracy of 18F-FDG PET-CT will be calculated based on two different reference test. First reference test will be standard MRI sequences (T1SE, T2-STIR). Second reference test will be composed of standard MRI sequences plus whole-body diffusion MRI acquisitions.

    Time frame: Day 7

  3. Diagnostic performances for the detection of diffuse infiltrative disease of the spine

    Sensitivity, specificity, positive predictive value, negative predictive value and accuracy of 18F-FDG PET-CT will be calculated based on standard MRI sagittal acquisitions of the spine.

    Time frame: Day 7

  4. Diagnostic performances for the detection of diffuse infiltrative disease of the spine

    Sensitivity, specificity, positive predictive value, negative predictive value and accuracy of 18F-FCH PET-CT will be calculated based on standard MRI sagittal acquisitions of the spine.

    Time frame: Day 0

  5. Number of extra-medullary lesions

    Each extra-medullary lesion detected on 18F-FDG PET-CT will be validated by an expert multidisciplinary consensus

    Time frame: Day 7

  6. Number of extra-medullary lesions

    Each extra-medullary lesion detected on 18F-FCH PET-CT will be validated by an expert multidisciplinary consensus

    Time frame: Day 0

07

Study locations

1 site
  • Bordeaux University Hospital - Haut-Lévêque
    Pessac, 33604, France
08

References and documents

Publications

  • Mesguich C, Hulin C, Latrabe V, Asselineau J, Bordenave L, Perez P, Hindie E, Marit G. Prospective Comparison of 18F-Choline Positron Emission Tomography/Computed Tomography (PET/CT) and 18F-Fluorodeoxyglucose (FDG) PET/CT in the Initial Workup of Multiple Myeloma: Study Protocol of a Prospective Imaging Trial. JMIR Res Protoc. 2020 Sep 10;9(9):e17850. doi: 10.2196/17850. PubMed 32909953 ↗
09

Updates

Tracking since Sep 25, 2026
No changes since tracking began. The registry record was last updated on May 12, 2026, before this site started recording changes on Sep 25, 2026. Its history is on ClinicalTrials.gov ↗
10

Registry details

Key details

Study ID
NCT03891914
Lead sponsor
University Hospital, Bordeaux
Responsible party
Sponsor
First posted
Mar 27, 2019
Start date
Nov 12, 2019
Primary completion
Jan 27, 2023
Completion
Jan 31, 2023
Last update
May 12, 2026

Oversight

Data monitoring committee
No
FDA-regulated drug
No
FDA-regulated device
No
View the source record on ClinicalTrials.gov ↗

Not currently enrolling

This study is completed, as verified in Jul 2025. You cannot join it, but the record below documents what was studied.

Follow this study

Get an email when the registry record changes — status, dates, results — or when someone posts here.

Sign in to follow

Discussion

Questions and observations about this study, from anyone following it. Not medical advice, and not a channel to the study team — their contact details are on the registry record.

Sign in to join the discussion. Reading takes no account; posting does. You choose a display name, and a pseudonym is the default.

Nothing here yet. If you are running this trial, taking part in it, or weighing whether to, this is the place to say so.

Start the discussion