ClinicalTrials.gg
Status unknownNCT03886675INTERCEPT:GPUpdated Oct 23, 2023

Intervention With Cerebral Embolic Protection in TEVAR: Gaseous Protection

An interventional study of CO2 flushing and Saline flushing in Stroke, Silent Cerebral Infarction and Neurocognitive Dysfunction, sponsored by Imperial College London. Status unknown at 1 site in United Kingdom. Open to participants aged 18 Years and older, including healthy volunteers. Per ClinicalTrials.gov, last updated 2023-10-23.

Sponsored by Imperial College London · Not applicable, Interventional, and Prevention

The sponsor has not verified this record recently (last verified Oct 2023), so the status shown — last known as Recruiting — may be out of date.
Phase
Not applicable
Study type
Interventional
Enrollment
120
Allocation
Randomized
Ages
18 Years and older
Sex
All
01

Study summary

Vascular brain infarction (VBI) occurs in 67% of patients undergoing TEVAR. Overt stroke occurs in 13% of these patients and 88% of patients suffer from neurocognitive impairment.

Cerebral air embolisation during the stent-graft deployment phase of TEVAR may be a cause of VBI. Standard treatment to de-air stent-grafts is through the use of a saline flush.

This study aims to investigate whether carbon-dioxide or saline is the better fluid to de-air TEVAR stent-grafts prior to insertion in to the patient and compare VBI rate in the carbon-dioxide group and saline group.

Read the detailed description

Thoracic endovascular aortic repair (TEVAR) is the re-lining of the thoracic aorta to prevent life threatening haemorrhage and death from rupture. This involves a small cut in the femoral artery in the groin and under imaging guidance, the insertion of wires and a stent into the thoracic aorta.

Prior to insertion into the patient, stents are flushed with saline to remove air and prevent air reaching the brain that can cause a form of brain injury known as vascular brain infarction (VBI). However, our preliminary clinical data suggests that saline flushing is not effective at de-airing stent-grafts used in TEVAR.

Carbon-dioxide has been used extensively in cardiac surgery to displace air from the chest cavity to prevent peri-procedural cerebral air embolisation. We hypothesise that flushing the stent-grafts with carbon-dioxide may be better at removing air from the stent-grafts than saline flush.

Patients undergoing TEVAR will be approached to participate in this study. After written consent is obtained, participants will be randomised to undergo (TEVAR) with carbon dioxide or saline flushing of stent-grafts. Pre-operatively, participants will undergo extensive neurocognitive testing, and a baseline blood test. Intra-operatively, participants will undergo continuous transcranial doppler monitoring (TCD) of the middle cerebral artery (MCA) to look for cerebral air embolisation at stent-graft deployment phase of TEVAR. Blood testing pre-op, immediately post op, and 24 hours post op will be taken to measure for biomarkers of brain injury. Post-operatively, participants will undergo another diffusion-weighted brain MRI within 72 hours post-procedure, stroke and delirium assessment at day 1, 3 and day 7 +/- day of discharge, and at 6-weeks and 6-month follow-up.

02

Conditions studied

  • Stroke
  • Silent Cerebral Infarction
  • Neurocognitive Dysfunction
  • Vascular Brain Injury

Keywords

  • Stroke
  • Silent cerebral infarction
  • Carbon dioxide
  • Thoracic endovascular aortic repair
  • TEVAR
  • DW-MRI
  • Vascular brain infarction
03

In context

Stroke

7,441 studies on the registry are indexed under Stroke; 2,012 are open to participants now.

This study's planned enrollment of 120 is above the median of 50 across 5,482 interventional studies indexed under Stroke.

Browse Stroke studies →

Lead sponsor

Imperial College London is the lead sponsor of 842 studies on the registry; 180 are open to participants now.

Of its 9 completed or terminated interventional studies of FDA-regulated products, 6 (67%) have results posted.

Counted across the registry records on this site, refreshed daily.

04

Who can participate

Ages eligible
18 Years and older
Sexes eligible
All
Accepts healthy volunteers
Yes

Go through the criteria one by one — yes, no or not sure — and take the list to your doctor or the study team. Kept in this browser only.

Inclusion criteria

  • All participants suitable for TEVAR with capacity to consent

Exclusion criteria

Exclusion Criteria:

  • Participants who lack capacity to consent
  • Contraindications to MRI such as pacemaker
  • Pregnant participants
  • Participants who do not wish to participate
  • Participants \<18yrs
05

Study design

Phase
Not applicable
Primary purpose
Prevention
Allocation
Randomized
Intervention model
Parallel assignment
Masking
Double (Participant, Outcomes assessor)
Enrollment
120 participants (estimated)

Study arms

  • Experimental
    carbon-dioxide

    Flushing of stent-grafts in TEVAR with carbon-dioxide

    Other: CO2 flushing

  • Active comparator
    Saline

    Flushing of stent-grafts with saline

    Other: Saline flushing

Interventions

  • OtherCO2 flushing

    As above

  • OtherSaline flushing

    As above

06

What researchers measure

Primary outcomes

  1. Recruitment

    The number of patients recruited into the trial will be collected

    Time frame: 36 months

  2. Retention

    The proportion of patients undergoing follow-up assessments will be collected

    Time frame: 36 months

  3. Study design for full randomised controlled trial

    The proportion of patients who are eligible for the trial will be collected

    Time frame: 36 months

Secondary outcomes

  1. Number, size and location of new ischaemic lesions on post-operative diffusion-weighted MRI scans

    Using DW-MRI at \<72 hours post operatively (day 1-7), and also 6 months post operatively, we will assess for new ischaemic lesions

    Time frame: 36 months

  2. Number of gaseous and solid intra-operative transcranial doppler microembolic signals by phase of TEVAR

    At all London units, transcranial doppler insonation of the middle cerebral artery will be carried out during the procedure, and analysed offline at a later date to evaluate gaseous or solid emboli during TEVAR

    Time frame: Duration of surgery, 36 months collection

  3. Number of participants with stroke or delirium as an inpatient

    Patients will undergo stroke and delirium assessment.

    Time frame: These will be carried out within 48 hours of patients' return to level 1 care. 36 months collection

  4. Serial biomarker blood tests

    Blood samples will be taken preoperatively, at the end of the procedure and 24 hours late. These will be analysed for a biomarker of neuroglial injury, S100B

    Time frame: 36 months

  5. Risk factor assessment

    Data such as stent type will be collected.

    Time frame: 36 months

  6. Neurological assessment, delirium assessment and quality of life testing

    Patients will undergo a baseline neurocognitive, delirium and quality of life testing. These will be repeated as an outpatient to measure change post operatively.

    Time frame: Pre-op, first outpatient assessment (approximately 6 weeks), 6 months. 36 months collection

07

Study locations

1 of 1 sites recruiting
08

References and documents

Publications

  • Perera AH, Rudarakanchana N, Monzon L, Bicknell CD, Modarai B, Kirmi O, Athanasiou T, Hamady M, Gibbs RG. Cerebral embolization, silent cerebral infarction and neurocognitive decline after thoracic endovascular aortic repair. Br J Surg. 2018 Mar;105(4):366-378. doi: 10.1002/bjs.10718. Epub 2018 Feb 12. PubMed 29431856 ↗
  • Kahlert P, Eggebrecht H, Janosi RA, Hildebrandt HA, Plicht B, Tsagakis K, Moenninghoff C, Nensa F, Mummel P, Heusch G, Jakob HG, Forsting M, Erbel R, Schlamann M. Silent cerebral ischemia after thoracic endovascular aortic repair: a neuroimaging study. Ann Thorac Surg. 2014 Jul;98(1):53-8. doi: 10.1016/j.athoracsur.2014.03.037. Epub 2014 May 17. PubMed 24841546 ↗
  • Masada K, Kuratani T, Shimamura K, Kin K, Shijo T, Goto T, Sawa Y. Silent cerebral infarction after thoracic endovascular aortic repair: a magnetic resonance imaging study. Eur J Cardiothorac Surg. 2019 Jun 1;55(6):1071-1078. doi: 10.1093/ejcts/ezy449. PubMed 30629169 ↗
  • Inci K, Koutouzi G, Chernoray V, Jeppsson A, Nilsson H, Falkenberg M. Air bubbles are released by thoracic endograft deployment: An in vitro experimental study. SAGE Open Med. 2016 Dec 7;4:2050312116682130. doi: 10.1177/2050312116682130. eCollection 2016. PubMed 27994872 ↗
  • Rohlffs F, Tsilimparis N, Saleptsis V, Diener H, Debus ES, Kolbel T. Air Embolism During TEVAR: Carbon Dioxide Flushing Decreases the Amount of Gas Released from Thoracic Stent-Grafts During Deployment. J Endovasc Ther. 2017 Feb;24(1):84-88. doi: 10.1177/1526602816675621. Epub 2016 Oct 26. PubMed 27798380 ↗
  • Martens S, Neumann K, Sodemann C, Deschka H, Wimmer-Greinecker G, Moritz A. Carbon dioxide field flooding reduces neurologic impairment after open heart surgery. Ann Thorac Surg. 2008 Feb;85(2):543-7. doi: 10.1016/j.athoracsur.2007.08.047. PubMed 18222261 ↗
  • Ganguly G, Dixit V, Patrikar S, Venkatraman R, Gorthi SP, Tiwari N. Carbon dioxide insufflation and neurocognitive outcome of open heart surgery. Asian Cardiovasc Thorac Ann. 2015 Sep;23(7):774-80. doi: 10.1177/0218492315583562. Epub 2015 May 4. PubMed 25939908 ↗
  • Bismuth J, Garami Z, Anaya-Ayala JE, Naoum JJ, El Sayed HF, Peden EK, Lumsden AB, Davies MG. Transcranial Doppler findings during thoracic endovascular aortic repair. J Vasc Surg. 2011 Aug;54(2):364-9. doi: 10.1016/j.jvs.2010.12.063. Epub 2011 Mar 3. PubMed 21371850 ↗
  • Crockett S, Hanna L, Singh A, Gunning S, Nicholas R, Bicknell C, Hamady M, Gable D, Sallam M, Modarai B, Abisi S, Lyons O, Gibbs R. Carbon dioxide flushing versus saline flushing of thoracic aortic stents (INTERCEPTevar): protocol for a multicentre pilot randomised controlled trial. BMJ Open. 2023 Apr 27;13(4):e067605. doi: 10.1136/bmjopen-2022-067605. PubMed 37105705 ↗

Individual participant data

Plan to share: Yes — Data requests can be made to the corresponding author and make on a case by case basis

Supporting information: Study protocol, Informed consent form

Time frame: 10 years

Access criteria: These will be reviewed on a case by case basis

09

Updates

Tracking since Sep 25, 2026
No changes since tracking began. The registry record was last updated on Oct 23, 2023, before this site started recording changes on Sep 25, 2026. Its history is on ClinicalTrials.gov ↗
10

Registry details

Key details

Study ID
NCT03886675
Collaborators
Imperial College Healthcare NHS Trust, Guy's and St Thomas' NHS Foundation Trust, St George's University Hospitals NHS Foundation Trust, University Hospitals Coventry and Warwickshire NHS Trust, South Canterbury DHB, New Zealand, Baylor Scott and White Health, University Hospital Southampton NHS Foundation Trust, Health New Zealand
Responsible party
Sponsor
First posted
Mar 22, 2019
Start date
Nov 14, 2022
Primary completion
Jun 6, 2024 (estimated)
Completion
Oct 2024 (estimated)
Last update
Oct 23, 2023

Study contacts

Lydia Hanna
Contact
l.hanna@imperial.ac.uk
07747002704
Richard Gibbs
Contact
r.gibbs@nhs.net
Richard Gibbs
principal investigator · Imperial College London

Oversight

Data monitoring committee
No
FDA-regulated drug
No
FDA-regulated device
No
View the source record on ClinicalTrials.gov ↗

Not currently enrolling

This study is status unknown, as verified in Oct 2023. You cannot join it, but the record below documents what was studied.

Follow this study

Get an email when the registry record changes — status, dates, results — or when someone posts here.

Sign in to follow

Discussion

Questions and observations about this study, from anyone following it. Not medical advice, and not a channel to the study team — their contact details are on the registry record.

Sign in to join the discussion. Reading takes no account; posting does. You choose a display name, and a pseudonym is the default.

Nothing here yet. If you are running this trial, taking part in it, or weighing whether to, this is the place to say so.

Start the discussion