An interventional study of automatic quality-control system in Esophagogastroduodenoscopy, sponsored by Yanqing Li. Completed at 1 site in China. Open to participants aged 40 Years to 80 Years. Per ClinicalTrials.gov, last updated 2020-01-30.
Sponsored by Yanqing Li · Not applicable, Interventional, and Other
The aim of our study was to develop an automatic quality-control system and assess the performance of this system in quality control of esophagogastroduodenoscopy.
In this study, the researchers firstly developed an automatic quality-control system, name as EAS. Next, the researchers applied the system in a endoscopic center and designed a prospective randomised controlled trial to investigate the performance of the system in quality control of esophagogastroduodenoscopy.
Exclusion Criteria:
esophagogastroduodenoscopy examination with the assistance of automatic quality-control system
Other: automatic quality-control system
conventional standard esophagogastroduodenoscopy examination without the assistance of automatic quality-control system
Automatic quality-control system could real-time measuring endoscopic inspection completeness, detecting gastric neoplasms and evaluating gastric mucosal visibility.
detection rate of gastric neoplasms
detection rate of gastric neoplasms in different groups
Time frame: 8 months
mean number of gastric neoplasms detected
mean number of gastric neoplasms detected per procedure in different groups
Time frame: 8 months
mean inspection completeness
inspection completeness per procedure in different groups
Time frame: 8 months
mean inspection time
inspection time per procedure in different groups
Time frame: 8 months
errors of EAS
errors of EAS in EAS-aided group
Time frame: 8 months
This study is completed, as verified in Jan 2020. You cannot join it, but the record below documents what was studied.
Get an email when the registry record changes — status, dates, results — or when someone posts here.
Sign in to followQuestions and observations about this study, from anyone following it. Not medical advice, and not a channel to the study team — their contact details are on the registry record.
Sign in to join the discussion. Reading takes no account; posting does. You choose a display name, and a pseudonym is the default.
Nothing here yet. If you are running this trial, taking part in it, or weighing whether to, this is the place to say so.
Yanqing Li