CClinicalTrials.gg
CompletedNCT03881371Updated Mar 20, 2024Results posted

A Study to Evaluate the Efficacy and Safety of Safinamide, as add-on Therapy, in Idiopathic Chinese Parkinson's Disease (PD) Patients With Motor Fluctuations Treated With Stable Doses of Levodopa

A Phase 3 interventional study of Safinamide and Placebo in Parkinson Disease, sponsored by Zambon SpA. Completed at 31 sites in China. Open to participants aged 18 Years and older. Per ClinicalTrials.gov, last updated 2024-03-20.

Sponsored by Zambon SpA · Phase 3, Interventional, and Treatment

Phase
Phase 3
Study type
Interventional
Enrollment
307
Allocation
Randomized
Ages
18 Years and older
Sex
All
01

Study summary

This is a Phase III, multicentre, randomised, double-blind, placebo-controlled study to evaluate the effects of 100 mg safinamide, administered orally once daily (OD), in Chinese Parkinson's disease (PD) patients, experiencing motor fluctuations while on stable doses of Levodopa (L-dopa) (alone or in combination with other anti-Parkinson drugs). Eligible patients are required to meet the United Kingdom PD Society Brain Bank Clinical Diagnostic Criteria. The study involves a placebo group. Placebo will be added to the standard stabilized treatment as a control of the safinamide group, hence patients on placebo will have benefit from other ongoing anti-PD medication. A total of 306 patients will be randomised into this study (153 in the safinamide and 153 in the placebo groups).

02

Conditions studied

  • Parkinson Disease

Browse trials for

03

In context

Parkinson Disease

4,487 studies on the registry are indexed under Parkinson Disease; 1,082 are open to participants now.

This study's enrollment of 307 is above the median of 40 across 3,294 interventional studies indexed under Parkinson Disease.

Browse Parkinson Disease studies →

Lead sponsor

Zambon SpA is the lead sponsor of 23 studies on the registry; none are open to participants now.

Of its 5 completed or terminated interventional studies of FDA-regulated products, 4 (80%) have results posted.

Counted across the registry records on this site, refreshed daily.

04

Who can participate

Ages eligible
18 Years and older
Sexes eligible
All
Accepts healthy volunteers
No

Inclusion criteria

  1. Male or female patients aged ≥18 years old.
  2. Chinese ethnicity.
  3. Able to understand and willing to provide written informed consent.
  4. Able to maintain an accurate and complete 24-hour diary with the help of a caregiver.
  5. Diagnosis of idiopathic Parkinson's Disease (IPD) using the United Kingdom Parkinson's Disease Society Brain Bank criteria of more than 3 years duration.
  6. Be levodopa responsive and receiving treatment with stable daily doses of oral L-dopa, with or without benserazide/carbidopa, with or without addition of a catechol-O-methyltransferase (COMT) inhibitor and may be receiving concomitant treatment with stable doses of dopamine agonists, anticholinergics and/or amantadine for at least 4 weeks prior to the screening visit.
  7. A Hoehn and Yahr stage between 1-4 inclusive during the "ON" phase.
  8. Experiencing motor fluctuations with a minimum of 1.5 hours/day of "OFF" time during the day (excluding morning akinesia), based on historical data.
  9. If female, be post-menopausal for at least one year or have undergone hysterectomy or, if of child-bearing potential, must have a negative pregnancy test, must not be breast-feeding nor become pregnant during the study and must use adequate contraception for 1 month prior to randomisation and for up to 1 month after the last dose of study drug. Adequate contraception is defined as:

    1. Hormonal oral, implantable, transdermal, or injectable contraceptives or a non-hormonal intrauterine device or female condom with spermicide or contraceptive sponge with spermicide or diaphragm with spermicide or cervical cap with spermicide for at least 2 months before the screening visit;
    2. a male sexual partner who agrees to use a male condom with spermicide or a sterile sexual partner . For all women of child-bearing potential, urine pregnancy test result at screening must be negative.

For all women of child-bearing potential, urine pregnancy test result at screening must be negative.

Exclusion criteria

Exclusion Criteria:

  1. Any form of Parkinsonism other than IPD.
  2. Diagnosis of chronic migraine (>15 days per month) or cancer pain.
  3. L-dopa infusion.
  4. Hoehn and Yahr stage 5 during the "ON" phase.
  5. If female, pregnancy or breast-feeding.
  6. Neurosurgical intervention of PD or stereotactic brain surgery.
  7. Severe peak dose or biphasic dyskinesia, unpredictable or widely swinging fluctuations.
  8. History of major depression or other clinically significant psychotic disorder which compromise the ability to provide the informed consent or to participate to the study.
  9. Drug and/or alcohol abuse within 12 months prior to the screening visit.
  10. History of dementia or severe cognitive dysfunction.
  11. Use of any investigational drug or device within 30 days prior to screening or 5 half-lives, whichever is the longest, or during the study.
  12. Allergy/sensitivity or contraindications to the investigational medicinal products (IMPs) or their excipients, to anticonvulsants or to anti-Parkinson drugs.
  13. Any clinically significant condition (including laboratory values) which, in the opinion of the Investigator, would not be compatible with study participation or represent a risk for patients while in the study.
  14. Moderate or severe liver failure using the Child-Pugh classification score, or human immunodeficiency virus (HIV) infection.
  15. Treatment with monoamine oxidase inhibitors (MAOIs), pethidine, opiates, opioids, fluoxetine, fluvoxamine in the 4 weeks prior to the screening visit. These drugs are not allowed throughout the study and up 2 weeks after the last dose of study drug.
  16. Ophthalmologic history including any of the following conditions: albinism, uveitis, retinitis pigmentosa, retinal degeneration, active retinopathy, severe progressive diabetic retinopathy, inherited retinopathy or family history of hereditary retinal disease.
05

Study design

Phase
Phase 3
Primary purpose
Treatment
Allocation
Randomized
Intervention model
Parallel assignment
Masking
Double (Participant, Investigator)
Enrollment
307 participants (actual)

Study arms

  • Experimental
    Safinamide

    Patient will receive film-coated Safinamide tablets orally at an initial dose of 50 mg once daily (OD) and then will be increased the day after the Visit 3/week 2 (ideally at day 15) to the final dose of 100 mg OD. Treatment will continue daily for a total of 16 weeks.

    Drug: Safinamide

  • Placebo comparator
    Placebo

    Patient will receive matching placebo orally at an initial dose of 50 mg once daily (OD) and then will be increased the day after the Visit 3/week 2 (ideally at day 15) to the final dose of 100 mg OD. Treatment will continue daily for a total of 16 weeks.

    Other: Placebo

Interventions

  • DrugSafinamide

    At baseline (Day 1), eligible patients will be randomised to receive safinamide (initial 50 mg titrated to 100 mg the day after the Visit 3/week 2, ideally at day 15). The investigational medicinal product (IMP) will be taken in the morning at breakfast time, in addition to the morning dose of L-dopa and other (if any) PD medications.

  • OtherPlacebo

    At baseline (Day 1), eligible patients will be randomised to receive matching placebo, orally OD. Placebo will be added to the standard stabilized treatment as a control of the safinamide group, hence patients on placebo will have benefit from other ongoing anti-PD medication

06

What researchers measure

Primary outcomes

  1. Change From Baseline to Week 16 in the Mean Total Daily "OFF" Time

    The mean total daily "OFF" time was assessed by 24-hour patient diary cards, of safinamide 100 mg/day compared to placebo, given as add-on therapy in PD patients with motor fluctuations on stable doses of L-dopa. Patients completed the daily diary by selecting one of the following five options for each 30-minute time period: * "OFF" (Stiffness, marked decrease in mobility, or immobility). * "ON" without dyskinesia (Good or practically normal mobility without dyskinesia). * "ON" with non-troublesome dyskinesia (With dyskinesia but it does not interfere with function/cause meaningful discomfort). * "ON" with troublesome dyskinesia (With dyskinesia which interferes with function/causes meaningful discomfort. Of note, these dyskinesia movements are different from the rhythmic "tremor" (a symptom of Parkinson's Disease itself). * Asleep (Time spent asleep).

    Time frame: At baseline and Week 16

Secondary outcomes

  1. Change From Baseline to Week 16 in Pain Severity, as Assessed by an 11 Point Numerical Rating Scale (NRS)

    The pain severity, was assessed by an 11-point Numerical Rating Scale (NRS). The NRS is a segmented numeric version of the visual analogue scale (VAS) in which a patient selects a whole number that best reflects the intensity of his/her pain, ranging from '0' ("no pain") to '10' ("worst possible pain").

    Time frame: At baseline and Week 16

  2. Change From Baseline to Week 16 in the Mean Total Daily "ON" Time

    The mean total daily "ON" time, as assessed by 24-hour patient diary cards. Patients completed the daily diary by selecting one of the following five options for each 30-minute time period: * "OFF" (Stiffness, marked decrease in mobility, or immobility). * "ON" without dyskinesia (Good or practically normal mobility without dyskinesia). * "ON" with non-troublesome dyskinesia (With dyskinesia but it does not interfere with function/cause meaningful discomfort). * "ON" with troublesome dyskinesia (With dyskinesia which interferes with function/causes meaningful discomfort. Of note, these dyskinesia movements are different from the rhythmic "tremor" (a symptom of Parkinson's Disease itself). * Asleep (Time spent asleep).

    Time frame: At baseline and Week 16

  3. Change From Baseline to Week 16 in the Mean Daily "ON" Time With no/Non Troublesome Dyskinesia

    The mean daily "ON" time with no/non troublesome dyskinesia, as assessed by 24-hour patient diary cards. Patients completed the daily diary by selecting one of the following five options for each 30-minute time period: * "OFF" (Stiffness, marked decrease in mobility, or immobility). * "ON" without dyskinesia (Good or practically normal mobility without dyskinesia). * "ON" with non-troublesome dyskinesia (With dyskinesia but it does not interfere with function/cause meaningful discomfort). * "ON" with troublesome dyskinesia (With dyskinesia which interferes with function/causes meaningful discomfort. Of note, these dyskinesia movements are different from the rhythmic "tremor" (a symptom of Parkinson's Disease itself). * Asleep (Time spent asleep).

    Time frame: At baseline and Week 16

  4. Change From Baseline to Week 16 in the Unified Parkinson's Disease Rating Scale (UPDRS) Total Score During the "ON" Phase

    The UPDRS comprises 3 parts that evaluates any complication of treatment: Part I: Evaluation of mentation or cognition, behavior and mood. Part II: Evaluation of the activities of daily life. Part III: Evaluation of motor function. Part IV: Evaluation of complications of therapy. The UPDRS performed by the Investigator with points assigned to each item in the scale based on the patient's response as well as observation and physical examination. Together Parts I-III contain 44 items, with each item scored on a 5-point scale. Part IV contains 11 questions with a scale ranging from 0 to 23. Thus, the final total score may range from 0 (no disability) to 199 (total disability). The UPDRS is the most commonly used scale in clinical studies to follow the longitudinal course of PD. Part I Evaluation of mentation or cognition, behavior and mood contains 4 items with each item scored on a 5 point scale, the scale ranging from 0 to 16.

    Time frame: At baseline and Week 16

  5. Change From Baseline to Week 16 in the UPDRS Part II Activities of Daily Living (ADL) Score During the "ON" Phase

    The UPDRS= Unified Parkinson's Disease Rating Scale; is the most commonly used scale in clinical studies to follow the longitudinal course of PD. It is divided in 4 sections, each of them with several items. The score of each item is 0-1 or 0-4 (the majority) where 0 is no symptom while the highest score means the most severe symptom. UPDRS part I: 4 items, score 0-16 (total); UPDRS part II: 13 items, score 0-52 (total); UPDRS part III: 14 items, score 0-108 (total) UPDRS part IV: it is dived in 3 sections. Section A=dyskinesias, 4 items, score 0-13 (total); section B=clinical fluctuations, 4 items, score 0-7 (total); section C=other complications, 3 items, score 0-3 (total). The total score of the UPDRS (meaning of all the 4 parts) is 0-199 where 0 means no symptoms, 199 the most severe symptoms.

    Time frame: At baseline and Week 16

  6. Change From Baseline to Week 16 in the UPDRS Part III (Motor Function) Score During the "ON" Phase

    The UPDRS= Unified Parkinson's Disease Rating Scale; is the most commonly used scale in clinical studies to follow the longitudinal course of PD. It is divided in 4 sections, each of them with several items. The score of each item is 0-1 or 0-4 (the majority) where 0 is no symptom while the highest score means the most severe symptom. UPDRS part I: 4 items, score 0-16 (total); UPDRS part II: 13 items, score 0-52 (total); UPDRS part III: 14 items, score 0-108 (total) UPDRS part IV: it is dived in 3 sections. Section A=dyskinesias, 4 items, score 0-13 (total); section B=clinical fluctuations, 4 items, score 0-7 (total); section C=other complications, 3 items, score 0-3 (total). The total score of the UPDRS (meaning of all the 4 parts) is 0-199 where 0 means no symptoms, 199 the most severe symptoms.

    Time frame: At baseline and Week 16

  7. Clinical Global Impression of Severity (CGI-S) Score Assessed at Week 16

    The CGI-S scale measures global severity of illness at a given point in time. It is rated on a 7-point Likert-type scale ranging from 1 (normal, not ill at all) to 7 (extremely severe). The CGI-S was assessed at all visits, starting at baseline.

    Time frame: At week 16

  8. Clinical Global Impression of Change (CGI-C) Assessed at Week 16

    The CGI-C scale measured the change in the patient's clinical status from baseline using a 7-point scale, ranging from 1 (very much improved) to 7 (very much worse), with a score of 4 indicating no change. The change from the patient's baseline condition is assessed by the Investigator at all post-baseline visits.

    Time frame: At baseline and Week 16

  9. Change From Baseline to Week 16 in the Parkinson's Disease Questionnaire-39 Items (PDQ-39) Score

    The PDQ-39 comprises 39 questions measuring eight dimensions of health: mobility, activities of daily living, emotional well-being, stigma, social support, cognition, communication and bodily pain. Dimension scores are coded on a scale of 0 (perfect health as assessed by the measure) to 100 (worst health as assessed by the measure).

    Time frame: At baseline and Week 16

Other outcomes

  1. Number of Patients With Treatment-emergent Adverse Events (TEAE) and Treatment-emergent Serious Adverse Event (TESAE)

    Evaluation of the safety and tolerability of safinamide compared with placebo in Chinese PD patients with motor fluctuations.

    Time frame: From baseline until follow-up visit (1 Week after the end of treatment [Up to 2 Years])

07

Results

Posted Mar 20, 2024

Participant flow

A total of 307 patients were randomized at approximately 31 study centres in China between 01-Aug-2019 to 20-Aug-2021.

Participant flow — Overall Study
MilestoneSafinamidePlacebo
Started153154
Number treated151154
Completed137130
Not completed1624
Withdrew: Adverse event89
Withdrew: Death10
Withdrew: Lost to follow-up10
Withdrew: Non-compliance with study drug02
Withdrew: Physician decision33
Withdrew: Withdrawal by subject210
Withdrew: Discontinuation from study10

Outcome measures

PrimaryChange From Baseline to Week 16 in the Mean Total Daily "OFF" Time

The mean total daily "OFF" time was assessed by 24-hour patient diary cards, of safinamide 100 mg/day compared to placebo, given as add-on therapy in PD patients with motor fluctuations on stable doses of L-dopa. Patients completed the daily diary by selecting one of the following five options for each 30-minute time period: * "OFF" (Stiffness, marked decrease in mobility, or immobility). * "ON" without dyskinesia (Good or practically normal mobility without dyskinesia). * "ON" with non-troublesome dyskinesia (With dyskinesia but it does not interfere with function/cause meaningful discomfort). * "ON" with troublesome dyskinesia (With dyskinesia which interferes with function/causes meaningful discomfort. Of note, these dyskinesia movements are different from the rhythmic "tremor" (a symptom of Parkinson's Disease itself). * Asleep (Time spent asleep).

Time frame:
At baseline and Week 16
Reported as:
Mean · Hours
Change From Baseline to Week 16 in the Mean Total Daily "OFF" Time
HoursSafinamidePlacebo
Change From Baseline to Week 16 in the Mean Total Daily "OFF" Time-1.93 ± 2.556-0.88 ± 2.543
Statistical analysis
  • Safinamide vs Placebo · ANCOVA · p = <.0001 (Analysis was based on a covariance model (ANCOVA) with treatment and centre as independent factors, baseline mean total daily "OFF" time measurement as covariate and change from baseline as dependent variable.) · Least-square mean: -1.10 · 95% CI -1.643 to -0.555
SecondaryChange From Baseline to Week 16 in Pain Severity, as Assessed by an 11 Point Numerical Rating Scale (NRS)

The pain severity, was assessed by an 11-point Numerical Rating Scale (NRS). The NRS is a segmented numeric version of the visual analogue scale (VAS) in which a patient selects a whole number that best reflects the intensity of his/her pain, ranging from '0' ("no pain") to '10' ("worst possible pain").

Time frame:
At baseline and Week 16
Reported as:
Mean · Score on a Scale
Change From Baseline to Week 16 in Pain Severity, as Assessed by an 11 Point Numerical Rating Scale (NRS)
Score on a ScaleSafinamidePlacebo
Change From Baseline to Week 16 in Pain Severity, as Assessed by an 11 Point Numerical Rating Scale (NRS)-0.0 ± 1.89-0.0 ± 2.14
Statistical analysis
  • Safinamide vs Placebo · ANCOVA · p = 0.8901 (ANCOVA with treatment and centre as independent factors, baseline NRS measurement as covariate and change from baseline as dependent variable.) · Least-square mean: -0.03 · 95% CI -0.440 to 0.382
SecondaryChange From Baseline to Week 16 in the Mean Total Daily "ON" Time

The mean total daily "ON" time, as assessed by 24-hour patient diary cards. Patients completed the daily diary by selecting one of the following five options for each 30-minute time period: * "OFF" (Stiffness, marked decrease in mobility, or immobility). * "ON" without dyskinesia (Good or practically normal mobility without dyskinesia). * "ON" with non-troublesome dyskinesia (With dyskinesia but it does not interfere with function/cause meaningful discomfort). * "ON" with troublesome dyskinesia (With dyskinesia which interferes with function/causes meaningful discomfort. Of note, these dyskinesia movements are different from the rhythmic "tremor" (a symptom of Parkinson's Disease itself). * Asleep (Time spent asleep).

Time frame:
At baseline and Week 16
Reported as:
Mean · Hours
Change From Baseline to Week 16 in the Mean Total Daily "ON" Time
HoursSafinamidePlacebo
Change From Baseline to Week 16 in the Mean Total Daily "ON" Time1.30 ± 2.6930.51 ± 2.875
Statistical analysis
  • Safinamide vs Placebo · ANCOVA · p = 0.0049 (ANCOVA with treatment and centre as independent factors, baseline mean total daily "ON" time measurement as covariate and change from baseline as dependent variable.) · Least-square mean: 0.89 · 95% CI 0.274 to 1.515
SecondaryChange From Baseline to Week 16 in the Mean Daily "ON" Time With no/Non Troublesome Dyskinesia

The mean daily "ON" time with no/non troublesome dyskinesia, as assessed by 24-hour patient diary cards. Patients completed the daily diary by selecting one of the following five options for each 30-minute time period: * "OFF" (Stiffness, marked decrease in mobility, or immobility). * "ON" without dyskinesia (Good or practically normal mobility without dyskinesia). * "ON" with non-troublesome dyskinesia (With dyskinesia but it does not interfere with function/cause meaningful discomfort). * "ON" with troublesome dyskinesia (With dyskinesia which interferes with function/causes meaningful discomfort. Of note, these dyskinesia movements are different from the rhythmic "tremor" (a symptom of Parkinson's Disease itself). * Asleep (Time spent asleep).

Time frame:
At baseline and Week 16
Reported as:
Mean · Hours
Change From Baseline to Week 16 in the Mean Daily "ON" Time With no/Non Troublesome Dyskinesia
HoursSafinamidePlacebo
Change From Baseline to Week 16 in the Mean Daily "ON" Time With no/Non Troublesome Dyskinesia1.30 ± 2.9270.39 ± 3.212
Statistical analysis
  • Safinamide vs Placebo · ANCOVA · p = 0.0021 (ANCOVA with treatment and centre as independent factors, baseline mean total daily "ON" time with no/non-troublesome Dyskinesia measurement as covariate and change from baseline as dependent variable.) · Least-square mean: 1.07 · 95% CI 0.392 to 1.753
SecondaryChange From Baseline to Week 16 in the Unified Parkinson's Disease Rating Scale (UPDRS) Total Score During the "ON" Phase

The UPDRS comprises 3 parts that evaluates any complication of treatment: Part I: Evaluation of mentation or cognition, behavior and mood. Part II: Evaluation of the activities of daily life. Part III: Evaluation of motor function. Part IV: Evaluation of complications of therapy. The UPDRS performed by the Investigator with points assigned to each item in the scale based on the patient's response as well as observation and physical examination. Together Parts I-III contain 44 items, with each item scored on a 5-point scale. Part IV contains 11 questions with a scale ranging from 0 to 23. Thus, the final total score may range from 0 (no disability) to 199 (total disability). The UPDRS is the most commonly used scale in clinical studies to follow the longitudinal course of PD. Part I Evaluation of mentation or cognition, behavior and mood contains 4 items with each item scored on a 5 point scale, the scale ranging from 0 to 16.

Time frame:
At baseline and Week 16
Reported as:
Mean · Change in score
Change From Baseline to Week 16 in the Unified Parkinson's Disease Rating Scale (UPDRS) Total Score During the "ON" Phase
Change in scoreSafinamidePlacebo
Change From Baseline to Week 16 in the Unified Parkinson's Disease Rating Scale (UPDRS) Total Score During the "ON" Phase-12.3 ± 13.59-5.8 ± 12.30
Statistical analysis
  • Safinamide vs Placebo · ANCOVA · p = <.0001 (ANCOVA with treatment and centre as independent factors, baseline UPDRS score as covariate and change from baseline as dependent variable.) · Least-square mean: -5.99 · 95% CI -8.842 to -3.141
SecondaryChange From Baseline to Week 16 in the UPDRS Part II Activities of Daily Living (ADL) Score During the "ON" Phase

The UPDRS= Unified Parkinson's Disease Rating Scale; is the most commonly used scale in clinical studies to follow the longitudinal course of PD. It is divided in 4 sections, each of them with several items. The score of each item is 0-1 or 0-4 (the majority) where 0 is no symptom while the highest score means the most severe symptom. UPDRS part I: 4 items, score 0-16 (total); UPDRS part II: 13 items, score 0-52 (total); UPDRS part III: 14 items, score 0-108 (total) UPDRS part IV: it is dived in 3 sections. Section A=dyskinesias, 4 items, score 0-13 (total); section B=clinical fluctuations, 4 items, score 0-7 (total); section C=other complications, 3 items, score 0-3 (total). The total score of the UPDRS (meaning of all the 4 parts) is 0-199 where 0 means no symptoms, 199 the most severe symptoms.

Time frame:
At baseline and Week 16
Reported as:
Mean · Change in score
Change From Baseline to Week 16 in the UPDRS Part II Activities of Daily Living (ADL) Score During the "ON" Phase
Change in scoreSafinamidePlacebo
Change From Baseline to Week 16 in the UPDRS Part II Activities of Daily Living (ADL) Score During the "ON" Phase-2.7 ± 4.45-1.2 ± 4.32
Statistical analysis
  • Safinamide vs Placebo · ANCOVA · p = 0.0033 (ANCOVA with treatment and centre as independent factors, baseline UPDRS part II (ADL) score as covariate and change from baseline as dependent variable.) · Least-square mean: -1.52 · 95% CI -2.521 to -0.511
SecondaryChange From Baseline to Week 16 in the UPDRS Part III (Motor Function) Score During the "ON" Phase

The UPDRS= Unified Parkinson's Disease Rating Scale; is the most commonly used scale in clinical studies to follow the longitudinal course of PD. It is divided in 4 sections, each of them with several items. The score of each item is 0-1 or 0-4 (the majority) where 0 is no symptom while the highest score means the most severe symptom. UPDRS part I: 4 items, score 0-16 (total); UPDRS part II: 13 items, score 0-52 (total); UPDRS part III: 14 items, score 0-108 (total) UPDRS part IV: it is dived in 3 sections. Section A=dyskinesias, 4 items, score 0-13 (total); section B=clinical fluctuations, 4 items, score 0-7 (total); section C=other complications, 3 items, score 0-3 (total). The total score of the UPDRS (meaning of all the 4 parts) is 0-199 where 0 means no symptoms, 199 the most severe symptoms.

Time frame:
At baseline and Week 16
Reported as:
Mean · Change in score
Change From Baseline to Week 16 in the UPDRS Part III (Motor Function) Score During the "ON" Phase
Change in scoreSafinamidePlacebo
Change From Baseline to Week 16 in the UPDRS Part III (Motor Function) Score During the "ON" Phase-8.2 ± 9.64-3.7 ± 8.71
Statistical analysis
  • Safinamide vs Placebo · ANCOVA · p = 0.0002 (ANCOVA with treatment and centre as independent factors, baseline UPDRS part III (motor function) score as covariate and change from baseline as dependent variable.) · Least-square mean: -3.80 · 95% CI -5.749 to -1.856
SecondaryClinical Global Impression of Severity (CGI-S) Score Assessed at Week 16

The CGI-S scale measures global severity of illness at a given point in time. It is rated on a 7-point Likert-type scale ranging from 1 (normal, not ill at all) to 7 (extremely severe). The CGI-S was assessed at all visits, starting at baseline.

Time frame:
At week 16
Reported as:
Mean · Point on scale
Clinical Global Impression of Severity (CGI-S) Score Assessed at Week 16
Point on scaleSafinamidePlacebo
Clinical Global Impression of Severity (CGI-S) Score Assessed at Week 163.6 ± 0.803.8 ± 0.95
Statistical analysis
  • Safinamide vs Placebo · Wilcoxon (Mann-Whitney) · p = 0.0150 (Analysis was based on the Wilcoxon-Mann-Whitney test stratified by centre.) · Median: 0.0 · 95% CI 0.000 to 0.000Non-parametric 95% confidence interval was presented for the treatment difference in CGI-S at each post-baseline visit as reported by the Hodges-Lehmann estimator.
SecondaryClinical Global Impression of Change (CGI-C) Assessed at Week 16

The CGI-C scale measured the change in the patient's clinical status from baseline using a 7-point scale, ranging from 1 (very much improved) to 7 (very much worse), with a score of 4 indicating no change. The change from the patient's baseline condition is assessed by the Investigator at all post-baseline visits.

Time frame:
At baseline and Week 16
Reported as:
Mean · Point on scale
Clinical Global Impression of Change (CGI-C) Assessed at Week 16
Point on scaleSafinamidePlacebo
Clinical Global Impression of Change (CGI-C) Assessed at Week 163.0 ± 1.123.4 ± 1.03
Statistical analysis
  • Safinamide vs Placebo · Wilcoxon (Mann-Whitney) · p = 0.0007 (Analysis was based on the Wilcoxon-Mann-Whitney test stratified by centre.) · Median: 0.5 · 95% CI 0.000 to 1.000Non-parametric 95% confidence interval was presented for the treatment difference in CGI-C score at each post-baseline visit as reported by the Hodges-Lehmann estimator.
SecondaryChange From Baseline to Week 16 in the Parkinson's Disease Questionnaire-39 Items (PDQ-39) Score

The PDQ-39 comprises 39 questions measuring eight dimensions of health: mobility, activities of daily living, emotional well-being, stigma, social support, cognition, communication and bodily pain. Dimension scores are coded on a scale of 0 (perfect health as assessed by the measure) to 100 (worst health as assessed by the measure).

Time frame:
At baseline and Week 16
Reported as:
Mean · Change in score
Change From Baseline to Week 16 in the Parkinson's Disease Questionnaire-39 Items (PDQ-39) Score
Change in scoreSafinamidePlacebo
Change From Baseline to Week 16 in the Parkinson's Disease Questionnaire-39 Items (PDQ-39) Score-6.42 ± 10.223-2.67 ± 10.901
Statistical analysis
  • Safinamide vs Placebo · ANCOVA · p = 0.0033 (ANCOVA with treatment and centre as independent factor, baseline Summary Index score as covariate and change from baseline as dependent variable.) · Least-square mean: -3.36 · 95% CI -5.589 to -1.128
Other pre-specifiedNumber of Patients With Treatment-emergent Adverse Events (TEAE) and Treatment-emergent Serious Adverse Event (TESAE)

Evaluation of the safety and tolerability of safinamide compared with placebo in Chinese PD patients with motor fluctuations.

Time frame:
From baseline until follow-up visit (1 Week after the end of treatment [Up to 2 Years])
Reported as:
Count of participants · Participants
Number of Patients With Treatment-emergent Adverse Events (TEAE) and Treatment-emergent Serious Adverse Event (TESAE)
ParticipantsSafinamidePlacebo
Any TEAE10588
Any TEAE Related to study drug5440
Any Severe TEAE44
Any Severe TEAE, Related to study drug31
Any TEAE with Outcome of Death10
Any TEAE with Outcome of Death to study drug10
Any TESAE85
Any TESAE, Related to Study Drug43
Any TEAE Leading to Study Withdrawal89
Any TEAE Leading to Discontinuation of Study Drug810
Any TESAE Leading to Study Withdrawal31
Any TESAE Leading to Discontinuation of Study Drug31
Any TEAE Leading to Discontinuation of Study Drug710
Any TEAE Leading to Dose Reduction of Study Drug72

Adverse events

Collected over From baseline until follow-up visit (1 Week after the end of treatment [Up to 2 Years]). Non-serious events are listed at a 5% frequency threshold.

Adverse event summary by group
GroupDeathsSeriousOther
Safinamide1/151 (0.7%)8/151 (5.3%)42/151 (27.8%)
Placebo0/154 (0%)5/154 (3.2%)35/154 (22.7%)
Most frequent serious events
Showing 10 of 12
Most frequent serious events
EventSafinamidePlacebo
DizzinessNervous system disorders1/1510/154
Vascular headacheNervous system disorders1/1510/154
Ventricular extrasystolesCardiac disorders1/1511/154
HaemorrhoidsGastrointestinal disorders1/1510/154
Chest discomfortGeneral disorders1/1510/154
Completed suicidePsychiatric disorders1/1510/154
PneumothoraxRespiratory, thoracic and mediastinal disorders1/1510/154
HypertensionVascular disorders1/1510/154
Parkinson's diseaseNervous system disorders0/1511/154
Angina unstableCardiac disorders0/1511/154
Most frequent other events
Most frequent other events
EventSafinamidePlacebo
DyskinesiaNervous system disorders18/1516/154
Parkinson's diseaseNervous system disorders7/15114/154
DizzinessNervous system disorders9/15110/154
Back painMusculoskeletal and connective tissue disorders9/1516/154
ConstipationGastrointestinal disorders6/1518/154

Baseline characteristics

Safety population were included all patients who provided informed consent and received at least 1 dose or partial dose of study drug.

Age, Continuous
Age, Continuous(Years)SafinamidePlaceboTotal
Mean61.4 ± 9.2961.8 ± 9.2861.6 ± 9.27
Sex: Female, Male
Sex: Female, Male(Participants)SafinamidePlaceboTotal
Female5969128
Male9285177
Race/Ethnicity, Customized
Race/Ethnicity, Customized(Participants)SafinamidePlaceboTotal
Chinese151154305
08

Study locations

31 sites
  • Sir Run Run Shaw Hospital, Zhejiang University 浙江大学医学院附属邵逸夫医院
    Hangzhou, No 3, Qing Chun East Road, China
  • Shanghai Ninth People's Hospital 上海交通大学医学院附属第九人民医院
    Shanghai, No 639, Zhizaoju Road, China
  • Tianjin Union Medicine Center 天津市人民医院
    Tianjin, No. 130, Jie Yuan Rd., Hong Qiao District, China
  • The Third Xiangya Hospital of Central South University 中南大学湘雅三医院
    Changsha, No. 138, Tong Zi Po Road, He XI Yue Lu District, China
  • Renmin Hospital of Wuhan University 武汉大学人民医院
    Wuhan, No. 238, Jie Fang Road, China
  • Sichuan Provincial People's Hospital 四川省医学科学院·四川省人民医院
    Chengdu, No. 32 XI Er Duan, First Ring Road, Qing Yang District, China
  • West China Hospital, Sichuan University 四川大学华西医院
    Chengdu, No. 37, Guoxue Alley, China
  • Beijing Friendship Hospital 首都医科大学附属北京友谊医院
    Beijing, No. 6, Tiantan XI Li, Chongwen District, China
  • Beijing Tiantan Hospital Affiliated to Capital Medical University 首都医科大学附属北京天坛医院
    Beijing, No. 6, Tiantan XI Li, Chongwen District, China
  • The First Bethune Hospital of Jilin University
    Changchun, No. 71, Xin Min Street, China
  • The First Hospital of Shanxi Medical University 山西医科大学第一医院
    Taiyuan, No. 85, Jie Fang South Road, China
  • The Second Affiliated Hospital of Zhejiang University 浙江大学医学院附属第二医院
    Hangzhou, No. 88, Jie Fang Rd., China
  • The Second Affiliated Hospital of Nanchang University 南昌大学第二附属医院
    Nanchang, No.1 Minde Road Of Nanchang, China
  • Guangzhou First People's Hospital 广州市第一人民医院
    Guangzhou, No.1 Panfu Rd., China
  • Shanghai General Hospital 上海市第一人民医院
    Shanghai, No.100 Haining Road, China
  • Sun Yat-sen Memorial Hospital 中山大学孙逸仙纪念医院
    Guangzhou, No.107, Yanjiang West Road, China
  • Tongji Hospital of Tongji University 同济大学附属同济医院
    Wuhan, No.1095 Jiefang Avenue, China
  • The Third Hospital of Hebei Medical University 河北医科大学第三医院
    Shijiazhuang, No.139.Zi Qiang Rd, China
  • Chongqing Three Gorges Central Hospital 重庆三峡中心医院
    Chongqing, No.165 Xincheng Rd, Wanzhou District, China
  • Shanghai Ruijin Hospital 上海交通大学医学院附属瑞金医院
    Shanghai, No.197 Ruijin Er Road, China
  • The First Affiliated Hospital of Baotou Medical University 内蒙古科技大学包头医学院第一附属医院
    Baotou, No.41 Linyin Road, China
  • Baotou City Central Hospital 包头市中心医院
    Baotou, No.61, Huancheng Road, Donghe District, China
  • The Affiliated Hospital of Xuzhou Medical University 徐州医科大学附属医院
    Xuzhou, No.99, Huaihai West Road, Xuzhou, Jiangsu, China
  • The Affiliated Hospital Of Guiyang Medical College 贵州医科大学附属医院
    Guiyang, No28. Guiyi Street, China
  • The First Affiliated Hospital of Guangzhou Medical University 广州医科大学附属第一医院
    Guangzhou, Number 151, Yanjiang Road, China
  • Wenzhou Medical College-The First Affiliated Hospital 温州医科大学附属第一医院
    Wenzhou, Shangcai Burg, Ouhai District, China
  • Daqing Oilfield General Hospital 大庆油田总医院
    Daqing, China
  • Fujian Medical University Union Hospital 福建医科大学附属协和医院
    Fuzhou, China
  • Qilu Hospital of Shandong University 山东大学齐鲁医院
    Jinan, China
  • Nanjing Drum Tower Hospital 南京鼓楼医院
    Nanjing, China
  • The second affiliated hospital of Soochow University 苏州大学附属第二医院
    Suzhou, China
09

References and documents

Publications

  • Wei Q, Tan Y, Xu P, Tao E, Lu Z, Pan X, Wang B, Liu C, Dong X, Tian Y, Sun X, Cattaneo C, Chen S, Shang H; XINDI Study Investigators Group. The XINDI Study: A Randomized Phase III Clinical Trial Evaluating the Efficacy and Safety of Safinamide as Add-On Therapy to Levodopa in Chinese Patients with Parkinson's Disease with Motor Fluctuations. CNS Drugs. 2022 Nov;36(11):1217-1227. doi: 10.1007/s40263-022-00958-6. Epub 2022 Nov 8. PubMed 36346534 ↗

Study documents

  • Study protocol · Oct 8, 2019
  • Statistical analysis plan · Nov 8, 2021

Documents are hosted by the registry — open the source record to download them.

10

Updates

Tracking since Sep 25, 2026
No changes since tracking began. The registry record was last updated on Mar 20, 2024, before this site started recording changes on Sep 25, 2026. Its history is on ClinicalTrials.gov ↗
11

Registry details

Key details

Study ID
NCT03881371
Lead sponsor
Zambon SpA
Responsible party
Sponsor
First posted
Mar 19, 2019
Start date
Aug 1, 2019
Primary completion
Aug 20, 2021
Completion
Aug 20, 2021
Results posted
Mar 20, 2024
Last update
Mar 20, 2024

Oversight

Data monitoring committee
No
FDA-regulated drug
No
FDA-regulated device
No
View the source record on ClinicalTrials.gov ↗

Not currently enrolling

This study is completed, as verified in Mar 2024. You cannot join it, but the record below documents what was studied.

Follow this study

Get an email when the registry record changes — status, dates, results — or when someone posts here.

Sign in to follow

Discussion

Questions and observations about this study, from anyone following it. Not medical advice, and not a channel to the study team — their contact details are on the registry record.

Sign in to join the discussion. Reading takes no account; posting does. You choose a display name, and a pseudonym is the default.

Nothing here yet. If you are running this trial, taking part in it, or weighing whether to, this is the place to say so.

Start the discussion