CClinicalTrials.gg
Status unknownNCT03877432Updated Jan 20, 2021Results posted

Non-invasive Nerve Stimulation for Inhibition of Bladder Incontinence in Spinal Cord Injured Subjects.

An interventional study of Dermatome stimulation in Spinal Cord Injuries, sponsored by Taipei Medical University. Status unknown. Open to participants aged 18 Years and older. Per ClinicalTrials.gov, last updated 2021-01-20.

Sponsored by Taipei Medical University · Not applicable, Interventional, and Treatment

The sponsor has not verified this record recently (last verified Oct 2020), so the status shown — last known as Active, not recruiting — may be out of date.

From the registry’s dates

  • Registered 2 years 4 months after the study started (first participant enrolled Oct 2016, registered Mar 2019).
Phase
Not applicable
Study type
Interventional
Enrollment
10
Allocation
Not applicable
Ages
18 Years and older
Sex
All
01

Study summary

Investigators will test S2-S4 dermatome stimulation with spinal cord injury (SCI) individuals using intermittent catheterization to estimate the clinical impact on bladder capacity and continence. For individuals with SCI using intermittent catheterization, investigators hypothesize that dermatome stimulation will decrease bladder spasm frequency and intensity, and reduce bladder incontinence chronically. The goal of this study is to provide objective evidence for the assertion that dermatome stimulation chronically decreases bladder activity and therefore the unwanted side effects of neurogenic bladder. This project will improve the understanding of the neurophysiology of afferent-mediated neural pathways that affect bladder function, and translate recent advances discovered in animal and human studies into clinical research and treatment. The ability to void safely and effectively by electrical stimulation without cutting sacral nerves or the external urethral sphincter would be a major advance. A socially acceptable, predictable and reliable device for reducing incontinence would be widely used and improve quality of life.

Read the detailed description

Investigators will test S2-S4 dermatome stimulation with SCI individuals using intermittent catheterization to estimate the clinical impact on bladder capacity and continence.

For individuals with SCI using intermittent catheterization, investigators will verify that S2-S4 dermatome stimulation is acutely effective at reducing hyper-reflexive bladder activity during bladder filling. Investigators hypothesize that S2-S4 dermatome stimulation will reduce the number and severity of incontinent episodes, increase bladder capacity, and increase the volume catheterized. By comparing the extended outcomes to the acute laboratory outcomes obtained by ourselves and others, investigators can assess the feasibility of acute urodynamics to identify subjects for implanted devices or future studies.

For individuals with SCI using intermittent catheterization, investigators hypothesize that dermatome stimulation will decrease bladder spasm frequency and intensity, and reduce bladder incontinence chronically. The goal of this study is to provide objective evidence for the assertion that dermatome stimulation decreases bladder activity and therefore the unwanted side effects of neurogenic bladder. These experiments will demonstrate the neurophysiologic response of acute stimulation through urodynamic test, and will also provide increased evidence for future clinical trials through proof of lessened bladder pressures - an important cause of vesico-ureteral reflux and renal injury.

There is a potentially larger population of persons with incomplete SCI than complete SCI who retain sensation in the pelvis who could gain benefit from dermatome stimulation. To examine the outcomes following incomplete SCI (in persons who retain sensation in the pelvis), investigators will test dermatome stimulation to determine the tolerable and effective electrical stimulation parameters in persons that have some degree of preserved motor or sensory function through the lowest sacral spinal cord segments. Investigators will acutely measure the effects of dermatome stimulation on bladder pressure and hyper-reflexic bladder contractions during bladder filling. Investigators hypothesize that dermatome stimulation will increase bladder capacity at stimulus amplitudes that are acutely tolerable to subjects with incomplete SCI. It will determine the feasibility of a non-invasive screening procedure to identify potential candidates for future device implantation, thereby providing a pathway for translation of the technology to implantation.

This project will improve the understanding of the neurophysiology of afferent-mediated neural pathways that affect bladder function, and translate recent advances discovered in animal and human studies into clinical research and treatment. The ability to void safely and effectively by electrical stimulation without cutting sacral nerves or the external urethral sphincter would be a major advance. A socially acceptable, predictable and reliable device for reducing incontinence would be widely used and improve quality of life.

02

Conditions studied

03

In context

Spinal Cord Injuries

1,948 studies on the registry are indexed under Spinal Cord Injuries; 505 are open to participants now.

This study's enrollment of 10 is below the median of 24 across 1,566 interventional studies indexed under Spinal Cord Injuries.

Browse Spinal Cord Injuries studies →

Lead sponsor

Taipei Medical University is the lead sponsor of 245 studies on the registry; 56 are open to participants now.

Counted across the registry records on this site, refreshed daily.

04

Who can participate

Ages eligible
18 Years and older
Sexes eligible
All
Accepts healthy volunteers
No

Inclusion criteria

  • Suprasacral SCI
  • Neurologically stable
  • Skeletally mature, over 18 years of age.
  • At least six (6) months post SCI
  • Able to understand and comply with study requirements
  • Able to understand and give informed consent.

Exclusion criteria

Exclusion Criteria:

  • Active sepsis
  • Open wound or pressure sores on cutaneous area
  • Significant trauma, erosion or stricture of the urethra
  • Pregnancy
  • Individuals who can not speak.
05

Study design

Phase
Not applicable
Primary purpose
Treatment
Allocation
Not applicable
Intervention model
Single group
Masking
None (open label)
Enrollment
10 participants (actual)

Study arms

  • Experimental
    Dermatome stimulation

    Check the effect of improving the function of bladder storage and bladder capacity before and after dermatome stimulation.

    Device: Dermatome stimulation

Interventions

  • DeviceDermatome stimulation

    Dermatome (S2-S4) stimulation is aimed at improving the function of bladder storage and bladder capacity. A total of 8 serial cystometrograms will be performed: 2 control fills, followed by 4 fills with stimulation, followed by 2 control fills. The minimum (or threshold) stimulation amplitude (T) necessary to elicit the genito-anal reflex was first determined for each subject. Subsequently, each subject received a randomized sequence of cystometric fill trials with and without continuous dermatome stimulation. The dermatome stimulation was randomly stimulated at stimulation amplitudes of 1, 2, 3, and 4 T.

06

What researchers measure

Primary outcomes

  1. The Changes of Bladder Capacity (mL) by Using Urodynamic Measurement

    Investigator will verify that S2-S4 dermatome nerve stimulation is acutely effective at reducing hyper-reflexic bladder activity during bladder filling in urodynamic measurement. All experimental trials will be completed in one day for each subject. Serial cystometrograms will be conducted by filling the bladder with saline and recording the volume in the bladder with or without concomitant nerve stimulation. A total of 8 serial cystometrograms will be performed: 2 control fills, followed by 4 fills with stimulation, followed by 2 control fills. Stimulation threshold will be randomly given (1-4 folds of stimulation threshold). Data from each of 4 stimulation fills per threshold or a total of 4 control fills were averaged. The averaged values are presented per Arm/Group below. The interval between every fill is 20-40 min. Investigator will compare the difference of bladder capacity (mL) between giving-control fill and fill with stimulation through statistical analysis.

    Time frame: The outcome measure will be assessed in day 1.

Secondary outcomes

  1. The Changes of Bladder Pressure (cmH2O) During Urodynamic Measurement

    Investigator will verify that S2-S4 dermatome nerve stimulation is acutely effective at reducing hyper-reflexic bladder activity during bladder filling in urodynamic measurement. All experimental trials will be completed in one day for each subject. Serial cystometrograms will be conducted by filling the bladder with saline and recording the pressure in the bladder with or without concomitant nerve stimulation. A total of 8 serial cystometrograms will be performed: 2 control fills, followed by 4 fills with stimulation, followed by 2 control fills. Stimulation threshold will be randomly given (1-4 folds of stimulation threshold). The interval between every fill is 20-40 min. Investigator will compare the difference of bladder capacity (mL) between giving-control fill and fill with stimulation through statistical analysis.

    Time frame: The outcome measure will be assessed in day 1.

07

Results

Posted Jan 20, 2021

Participant flow

Participant flow — Overall Study
MilestoneDermatome Stimulation
Started10
Completed10
Not completed0

Outcome measures

PrimaryThe Changes of Bladder Capacity (mL) by Using Urodynamic Measurement

Investigator will verify that S2-S4 dermatome nerve stimulation is acutely effective at reducing hyper-reflexic bladder activity during bladder filling in urodynamic measurement. All experimental trials will be completed in one day for each subject. Serial cystometrograms will be conducted by filling the bladder with saline and recording the volume in the bladder with or without concomitant nerve stimulation. A total of 8 serial cystometrograms will be performed: 2 control fills, followed by 4 fills with stimulation, followed by 2 control fills. Stimulation threshold will be randomly given (1-4 folds of stimulation threshold). Data from each of 4 stimulation fills per threshold or a total of 4 control fills were averaged. The averaged values are presented per Arm/Group below. The interval between every fill is 20-40 min. Investigator will compare the difference of bladder capacity (mL) between giving-control fill and fill with stimulation through statistical analysis.

Time frame:
The outcome measure will be assessed in day 1.
Reported as:
Mean · ml
The Changes of Bladder Capacity (mL) by Using Urodynamic Measurement
mlControl1T (Threshold)2T (Threshold)3T (Threshold)4T (Threshold)
The Changes of Bladder Capacity (mL) by Using Urodynamic Measurement253 ± 112346 ± 116332 ± 137390 ± 157401 ± 134
Statistical analysis
  • Control vs 1T (Threshold) · ANOVA · p = 0.012
  • Control vs 2T (Threshold) · ANOVA · p = 0.017
  • Control vs 3T (Threshold) · ANOVA · p = 0.003
  • Control vs 4T (Threshold) · ANOVA · p = 0.004
SecondaryThe Changes of Bladder Pressure (cmH2O) During Urodynamic Measurement

Investigator will verify that S2-S4 dermatome nerve stimulation is acutely effective at reducing hyper-reflexic bladder activity during bladder filling in urodynamic measurement. All experimental trials will be completed in one day for each subject. Serial cystometrograms will be conducted by filling the bladder with saline and recording the pressure in the bladder with or without concomitant nerve stimulation. A total of 8 serial cystometrograms will be performed: 2 control fills, followed by 4 fills with stimulation, followed by 2 control fills. Stimulation threshold will be randomly given (1-4 folds of stimulation threshold). The interval between every fill is 20-40 min. Investigator will compare the difference of bladder capacity (mL) between giving-control fill and fill with stimulation through statistical analysis.

Time frame:
The outcome measure will be assessed in day 1.

Results for this outcome have not been posted.

Adverse events

Collected over 3 months. Non-serious events are listed at a 0% frequency threshold.

Adverse event summary by group
GroupDeathsSeriousOther
Dermatome Stimulation0/10 (0%)0/10 (0%)0/10 (0%)

Baseline characteristics

Age, Categorical
Age, Categorical(Participants)Dermatome Stimulation
<=18 years0
Between 18 and 65 years10
>=65 years0
Sex: Female, Male
Sex: Female, Male(Participants)Dermatome Stimulation
Female0
Male10
Race (NIH/OMB)
Race (NIH/OMB)(Participants)Dermatome Stimulation
American Indian or Alaska Native0
Asian10
Native Hawaiian or Other Pacific Islander0
Black or African American0
White0
More than one race0
Unknown or Not Reported0
Region of Enrollment
Region of Enrollment(participants)Dermatome Stimulation
Taiwan10
08

Study locations

No study locations are listed for this record.

09

References and documents

Study documents

  • Protocol and statistical analysis plan · Oct 29, 2020

Documents are hosted by the registry — open the source record to download them.

Individual participant data

Plan to share: No

10

Updates

Tracking since Sep 25, 2026
No changes since tracking began. The registry record was last updated on Jan 20, 2021, before this site started recording changes on Sep 25, 2026. Its history is on ClinicalTrials.gov ↗
11

Registry details

Key details

Study ID
NCT03877432
Lead sponsor
Taipei Medical University
Responsible party
Sponsor
First posted
Mar 15, 2019
Start date
Oct 21, 2016
Primary completion
Dec 2, 2016
Completion
Aug 1, 2021 (estimated)
Results posted
Jan 20, 2021
Last update
Jan 20, 2021

Study contacts

Chih-Wei Peng, Ph.D.
principal investigator · Professor, School of Biomedical Engineering, Taipei Medical University

Oversight

FDA-regulated drug
No
FDA-regulated device
No
View the source record on ClinicalTrials.gov ↗

Not currently enrolling

This study is status unknown, as verified in Oct 2020. You cannot join it, but the record below documents what was studied.

Follow this study

Get an email when the registry record changes — status, dates, results — or when someone posts here.

Sign in to follow

Discussion

Questions and observations about this study, from anyone following it. Not medical advice, and not a channel to the study team — their contact details are on the registry record.

Sign in to join the discussion. Reading takes no account; posting does. You choose a display name, and a pseudonym is the default.

Nothing here yet. If you are running this trial, taking part in it, or weighing whether to, this is the place to say so.

Start the discussion