CClinicalTrials.gg
CompletedNCT03859349CLNSUpdated Jun 16, 2020

The Canada Lymph Node Score: A Feasibility Randomized Controlled Trial

An interventional study of Selective Targeted Sampling and Systematic Sampling in Non Small Cell Lung Cancer, sponsored by St. Joseph's Healthcare Hamilton. Completed at 1 site in Canada. Open to participants aged 18 Years and older. Per ClinicalTrials.gov, last updated 2020-06-16.

Sponsored by St. Joseph's Healthcare Hamilton · Not applicable, Interventional, and Diagnostic

Phase
Not applicable
Study type
Interventional
Enrollment
38
Allocation
Randomized
Ages
18 Years and older
Sex
All
01

Study summary

For patients diagnosed with early stage Non-Small Cell Lung Cancer (NSCLC) on preoperative computerized tomography (CT) and positron emission tomography (PET) scans, surgical resection is usually the preferred method of treatment. However, to be eligible for surgery, current guidelines require that the cancer has not spread to the lymph nodes in the chest cavity. To evaluate these lymph nodes, the standard of care is to undergo an endobronchial ultrasound (EBUS) procedure, where all the visible lymph nodes in the chest are biopsied (sampled) with a needle. Unfortunately, these biopsies are often inconclusive, especially in patients who have no evidence of mediastinal lymph node spread on pre-operative imaging. Currently, the standard of care mandates that inconclusive biopsies should be repeated, either through another EBUS, or through more invasive procedures. Repeat inconclusive biopsies are oftentimes inconclusive as well; leading to a vicious cycle of inconclusive results, a delay in treatment, morbidity for the patient, and increased costs to the healthcare system. To circumvent this issue, the investigators have developed, validated and published a 4-point score, the Canada Lymph Node Score (CLNS), which uses four features observed during EBUS to predict whether the cancer has spread to the lymph nodes or not. Research has demonstrated that lymph nodes which appear benign on both CT and PET scan that also have a CLNS of ≤1/4 are almost certainly benign. As such, it is believed that these "triple normal" lymph do not require biopsy (or repeat biopsy).

The investigators are challenging the current standard of care in lung cancer, which mandates that all the lymph nodes in the chest need to be biopsied (i.e. Systematic Sampling) before surgery, by proposing that triple normal lymph nodes can be omitted, and only those with cancer potential should be biopsied (i.e. Targeted Sampling).To prove this hypothesis, a randomized controlled trial comparing Systematic Sampling to Targeted Sampling is required. A feasibility trial is proposed to determine whether this large-scale randomized trial will be possible.

02

Conditions studied

  • Non Small Cell Lung Cancer

Browse trials for

Keywords

  • Endobronchial Ultrasound
  • Diagnostic Imaging
  • Feasibility
  • Randomized Controlled Trial
  • Clinical N0-N1 Disease
03

In context

Lung Neoplasms

7,243 studies on the registry are indexed under Lung Neoplasms; 1,557 are open to participants now.

This study's enrollment of 38 is below the median of 60 across 5,295 interventional studies indexed under Lung Neoplasms.

Browse Lung Neoplasms studies →

Lead sponsor

St. Joseph's Healthcare Hamilton is the lead sponsor of 137 studies on the registry; 31 are open to participants now.

Counted across the registry records on this site, refreshed daily.

04

Who can participate

Ages eligible
18 Years and older
Sexes eligible
All
Accepts healthy volunteers
No

Inclusion criteria

  • Referred to have EBUS for staging of confirmed or suspected NSCLC
  • Completed both a CT and PET scans
  • cN0-cN1 disease indicated on CT and PET scans

Exclusion criteria

Exclusion Criteria:

  • Patients with cN0 disease, peripheral tumours and tumours \< 2 cm in diameter (they do not require staging)
  • Evidence of cN2 disease or higher on CT and PET scan
05

Study design

Phase
Not applicable
Primary purpose
Diagnostic
Allocation
Randomized
Intervention model
Parallel assignment
Masking
Single (Participant)
Enrollment
38 participants (actual)

Study arms

  • Active comparator
    Systematic Sampling

    Patients will undergo systematic sampling of lymph node stations in the mediastinum with a minimum sampling of 3 stations: 4R, 4L and 7, as is the standard of care. Other stations may be included at the endoscopist's discretion. CLNS is not used for this arm.

    Diagnostic Test: Systematic Sampling

  • Experimental
    Selective Targeted Sampling

    Patients will first undergo endosonographic assessment of 3 mediastinal lymph node stations (i.e. 4R, 4L, and 7) using the four criteria of the CLNS. Lymph node stations that exhibit a CLNS \>1/4 will be biopsied as is standard of care. Lymph node stations with CLNS ≤ 1/4 will be marked as "not requiring biopsy" but will be biopsied nevertheless, so that there is no deviation from the standard of care. Other stations may be included at the endoscopist's discretion.

    Diagnostic Test: Selective Targeted Sampling

Interventions

  • Diagnostic testSelective Targeted Sampling

    After CLNS assessment, patients with proven malignant mediastinal lymph nodes will be referred for chemoradiation and patients with proven benign mediastinal lymph nodes will undergo surgical resection as per standard of care guidelines. Final pathology from the resected specimen will be considered the gold standard for analysis of sensitivity and specificity.

    Also known as: STS, CLNS

  • Diagnostic testSystematic Sampling

    Following routine biopsy of lymph nodes, patients with proven malignant mediastinal lymph nodes will be referred for chemoradiation and patients with proven benign mediastinal lymph nodes will undergo surgical resection as per standard of care guidelines. Final pathology from the resected specimen will be considered the gold standard for analysis of sensitivity and specificity.

    Also known as: Routine Mediastinal Staging, SS

06

What researchers measure

Primary outcomes

  1. Recruitment Rate

    Minimum acceptable recruitment rate is 70%

    Time frame: 1 Year

  2. Procedure Length

    Calculated in minutes. Recorded for both treatment arms.

    Time frame: 1 Day

  3. Diagnostic Accuracy

    The proportion of patients in whom the treatment (CLNS or biopsy) yielded the same diagnosis as the pathology report out of the total number of patients that have received the treatment. Recorded for both treatment arms.

    Time frame: 1 Year

Secondary outcomes

  1. Prevalence of Each Possible CLNS

    The CLNS has five possible scores: 0/4, 1/4, 2/4, 3/4 and 4/4. The number of lymph nodes with each score will be recorded for the Experimental Arm (Targeted Sampling).

    Time frame: 1 Year

  2. Frequency of Biopsies

    Number of times lymph nodes had to be sampled with a transbronchial needle per EBUS procedure. Recorded for both treatment arms.

    Time frame: 1 Year

  3. Percent of Inconclusive Biopsies

    Number of biopsies that provided an inconclusive diagnosis out of total number of biopsies obtained. Recorded for each treatment arm.

    Time frame: 1 Year

  4. Adverse Events

    Number of AEs has classified by the Ottawa TM\&M System

    Time frame: 1 Year

  5. Accrual Period

    Duration of time to reach sample size

    Time frame: 1 Year

07

Study locations

1 site
  • St. Joseph's Healthcare Hamilton
    Hamilton, Ontario L8N 4A6, Canada
08

References and documents

Publications

  • Sullivan KA, Farrokhyar F, Leontiadis GI, Patel YS, Churchill IF, Hylton DA, Xie F, Seely AJE, Spicer J, Kidane B, Turner SR, Yasufuku K, Hanna WC. Routine systematic sampling versus targeted sampling during endobronchial ultrasound: A randomized feasibility trial. J Thorac Cardiovasc Surg. 2022 Jul;164(1):254-261.e1. doi: 10.1016/j.jtcvs.2021.11.062. Epub 2021 Dec 4. PubMed 35031139 ↗
09

Updates

Tracking since Sep 25, 2026
No changes since tracking began. The registry record was last updated on Jun 16, 2020, before this site started recording changes on Sep 25, 2026. Its history is on ClinicalTrials.gov ↗
10

Registry details

Key details

Study ID
NCT03859349
Lead sponsor
St. Joseph's Healthcare Hamilton
Collaborators
McMaster University
Responsible party
Wael Hanna (Head of Endoscopy Services, Thoracic Surgeon, St. Joseph's Healthcare Hamilton) — Principal investigator
First posted
Mar 1, 2019
Start date
May 6, 2019
Primary completion
Mar 2, 2020
Completion
Jun 8, 2020
Last update
Jun 16, 2020

Study contacts

Waël C Hanna, MDCM, MBA, FRCSC
principal investigator · St. Joseph's Healthcare Hamilton / McMaster University

Oversight

Data monitoring committee
No
FDA-regulated drug
No
FDA-regulated device
No
View the source record on ClinicalTrials.gov ↗

Not currently enrolling

This study is completed, as verified in Jun 2020. You cannot join it, but the record below documents what was studied.

Follow this study

Get an email when the registry record changes — status, dates, results — or when someone posts here.

Sign in to follow

Discussion

Questions and observations about this study, from anyone following it. Not medical advice, and not a channel to the study team — their contact details are on the registry record.

Sign in to join the discussion. Reading takes no account; posting does. You choose a display name, and a pseudonym is the default.

Nothing here yet. If you are running this trial, taking part in it, or weighing whether to, this is the place to say so.

Start the discussion