CClinicalTrials.gg
CompletedNCT03854344Updated Mar 31, 2026Results posted

Liposomal Bupivacaine Versus Lidocaine for Skin Graft Donor Site Pain

A Phase 4 interventional study of Lidocaine Hydrochloride and Liposomal bupivacaine in Pain, Postoperative and Burns, sponsored by University of Kansas Medical Center. Completed at 1 site in United States. Open to participants aged 18 Years and older. Per ClinicalTrials.gov, last updated 2026-03-31.

Sponsored by University of Kansas Medical Center · Phase 4, Interventional, and Treatment

Phase
Phase 4
Study type
Interventional
Enrollment
74
Allocation
Randomized
Ages
18 Years and older
Sex
All
01

Study summary

Donor site pain study comparing post-operative donor site pain and opioid consumption after use of Lidocaine, Liposomal Bupivicaine or regional nerve block for split thickness skin graft harvesting in patients with less than 20% TBSA burn wounds and less than %5 Deep partial or full thickness burn wounds.

Read the detailed description

The first phase of the study was a randomized controlled study. In the second phase, all subjects will receive fascia iliaca, lateral femoral cutaneous, or femoral nerve blocks based on the proposed donor site location and will be compared to historic controls from the first phase. In the first phase, the control group underwent split thickness autografting using the standard protocol, involving injection of lidocaine with epinephrine at the donor site. In the first phase, the experimental group underwent injection of liposomal bupivacaine (Exparel) at the time of harvest of the skin graft. In the second phase, patients will undergo preoperative regional anesthesia with a fascia iliaca, lateral femoral cutaneous, or femoral nerve block based on the proposed donor site location rather than the standard protocol of lidocaine with epinephrine at the donor site. Thus, in the second phase, group 3 (preoperative block group) will be compared to historic controls which received the standard of care in the first phase of this trial. Baseline pain levels will be obtained for all subjects using a validated pain assessment scale, the Visual Analog Pain Scale. Postoperatively, time to first opioid pain medication (excluding immediate postoperative recovery from anesthesia), total opioid consumption on a daily basis, and donor site interval pain scores using a validated pain assessment scale will be obtained. The experimental groups will then be individually compared to the control group to determine if there is a significant difference in pain levels, time to first opioid, and overall opioid consumption between the groups.

02

Conditions studied

  • Pain, Postoperative
  • Burns
03

In context

Pain, Postoperative

5,093 studies on the registry are indexed under Pain, Postoperative; 1,140 are open to participants now.

This study's enrollment of 74 is close to the median of 75 across 4,344 interventional studies indexed under Pain, Postoperative.

Browse Pain, Postoperative studies →

Lead sponsor

University of Kansas Medical Center is the lead sponsor of 483 studies on the registry; 113 are open to participants now.

Of its 38 completed or terminated interventional studies of FDA-regulated products, 24 (63%) have results posted.

Counted across the registry records on this site, refreshed daily.

04

Who can participate

Ages eligible
18 Years and older
Sexes eligible
All
Accepts healthy volunteers
No

Inclusion criteria

  • Spanish/English speaking
  • \<20%TBSA; \<5% TBSA deep partial or full thickness burns

Exclusion criteria

Exclusion Criteria:

  • chronic pain syndrome
  • > 20% TBSA burn injury; > 5% TBSA deep partial or full thickness burn
  • pregnant
  • allergy to lidocaine or other local anesthetics
  • burns to anterior thighs
05

Study design

Phase
Phase 4
Primary purpose
Treatment
Allocation
Randomized
Intervention model
Single group
Masking
Single (Participant)
Enrollment
74 participants (actual)

Study arms

  • Experimental
    Group 1

    Liposomal Bupivicaine (266mg/20ml) will be diluted into Lactated Ringer solution (280 ml) and injected once intra-operatively subcutaneously before donor site harvesting

    Drug: Liposomal bupivacaine

  • Active comparator
    Group 2

    Lidocaine (50 mg/50 ml) will be diluted into Lactated Ringer (1000ml) and injected once subcutaneously before donor site harvesting

    Drug: Lidocaine Hydrochloride

  • Experimental
    Group 3

    Subjects will receive regional anesthesia with a bupivacaine nerve block; either a fascia iliaca, lateral femoral cutaneous, or femoral nerve block based on the proposed donor site location

    Drug: Bupivacaine Hydrochloride

Interventions

  • DrugLidocaine Hydrochloride

    Injected subcutaneously for skin graft harvesting

  • DrugLiposomal bupivacaine

    Injected subcutaneously for skin graft harvesting

    Also known as: Exparel

  • DrugBupivacaine Hydrochloride

    Used for regional nerve block for skin graft harvesting

06

What researchers measure

Primary outcomes

  1. A Measurement of Post Operative Pain Involving Skin Graft Donor Site Using Visual Analog Scale (VAS) Ranging 0-10, at 8 Hours Post-operatively

    Pain score involving skin graft donor sites are measured using a Visual Analog Scale, which is a horizontal line numbered 0-10, with 10 being the worst pain imaginable and 0 indicating no pain and compare pain scores between donor sites treated with Exparel Vs Lidocaine

    Time frame: The subject completes a pain assessment at 8 hours post-operatively.

Secondary outcomes

  1. Opioid Pain Medication Consumption up to 72 Hours Post-operatively Will be Compared Between the Subjects Who Are Given Liposomal Bupivacaine (Exparel) and Lidocaine at the Donor Sites

    Opioid consumption will be measured by converting all opioids given to subjects to morphine equivalents

    Time frame: 72 hours (3 days) post operatively

  2. Pain Scores Over 72 Hours After Surgery

    Pain score involving skin graft donor sites are measured using a Visual Analog Scale, which is a horizontal line numbered 0-10, with 10 being the worst pain imaginable and 0 indicating no pain and compare pain scores between donor sites treated with Exparel Vs Lidocaine

    Time frame: Pain scores associated with skin graft donor site will be assessed using Visual Analog Scale (0-10) at 72 hours after surgery. They will be compared between the groups.

07

Results

Posted Mar 31, 2026

Participant flow

Participant flow — Overall Study
MilestoneGroup 1Group 2Group 3
Started252524
Completed252524
Not completed000

Outcome measures

PrimaryA Measurement of Post Operative Pain Involving Skin Graft Donor Site Using Visual Analog Scale (VAS) Ranging 0-10, at 8 Hours Post-operatively

Pain score involving skin graft donor sites are measured using a Visual Analog Scale, which is a horizontal line numbered 0-10, with 10 being the worst pain imaginable and 0 indicating no pain and compare pain scores between donor sites treated with Exparel Vs Lidocaine

Time frame:
The subject completes a pain assessment at 8 hours post-operatively.
Reported as:
Mean · score on a scale 0-10
A Measurement of Post Operative Pain Involving Skin Graft Donor Site Using Visual Analog Scale (VAS) Ranging 0-10, at 8 Hours Post-operatively
score on a scale 0-10Group 1Group 2Group 3
A Measurement of Post Operative Pain Involving Skin Graft Donor Site Using Visual Analog Scale (VAS) Ranging 0-10, at 8 Hours Post-operatively3.14 ± 2.783.68 ± 2.803.67 ± 3.32
SecondaryOpioid Pain Medication Consumption up to 72 Hours Post-operatively Will be Compared Between the Subjects Who Are Given Liposomal Bupivacaine (Exparel) and Lidocaine at the Donor Sites

Opioid consumption will be measured by converting all opioids given to subjects to morphine equivalents

Time frame:
72 hours (3 days) post operatively
Reported as:
Mean · MME
Opioid Pain Medication Consumption up to 72 Hours Post-operatively Will be Compared Between the Subjects Who Are Given Liposomal Bupivacaine (Exparel) and Lidocaine at the Donor Sites
MMEGroup 1Group 2Group 3
Opioid Pain Medication Consumption up to 72 Hours Post-operatively Will be Compared Between the Subjects Who Are Given Liposomal Bupivacaine (Exparel) and Lidocaine at the Donor Sites36.21 ± 30.6949.91 ± 42.0944.59 ± 31.71
SecondaryPain Scores Over 72 Hours After Surgery

Pain score involving skin graft donor sites are measured using a Visual Analog Scale, which is a horizontal line numbered 0-10, with 10 being the worst pain imaginable and 0 indicating no pain and compare pain scores between donor sites treated with Exparel Vs Lidocaine

Time frame:
Pain scores associated with skin graft donor site will be assessed using Visual Analog Scale (0-10) at 72 hours after surgery. They will be compared between the groups.
Reported as:
Mean · Pain score 1-10
Pain Scores Over 72 Hours After Surgery
Pain score 1-10Group 1Group 2Group 3
Pain Scores Over 72 Hours After Surgery4.88 ± 2.143.64 ± 2.593 ± 2.17

Adverse events

Collected over 72 hours. Non-serious events are listed at a 0% frequency threshold.

Adverse event summary by group
GroupDeathsSeriousOther
Group 10/25 (0%)0/25 (0%)0/25 (0%)
Group 20/25 (0%)0/25 (0%)0/25 (0%)
Group 30/24 (0%)0/24 (0%)0/25 (0%)

Baseline characteristics

All patients underwent skin grating surgery for full thickness burn injury.

Age, Categorical
Age, Categorical(Participants)Group 1Group 2Group 3Total
<=18 years0000
Between 18 and 65 years25252474
>=65 years0000
Age, Continuous
Age, Continuous(years)Group 1Group 2Group 3Total
Mean49.16 ± 15.8947 ± 17.4547.46 ± 19.1747.88 ± 17.31
Sex: Female, Male
Sex: Female, Male(Participants)Group 1Group 2Group 3Total
Female55818
Male20201656
Race and Ethnicity Not Collected
Race and Ethnicity Not Collected(Participants)Group 1Group 2Group 3Total
Count of participants———0
Region of Enrollment
Region of Enrollment(participants)Group 1Group 2Group 3Total
United States25252474
08

Study locations

1 site
  • The University of Kansas Health System
    Kansas City, Kansas 66160, United States
09

References and documents

Publications

  • Egan KG, Guest R, Sinik LM, Nazir N, De Ruyter M, Ponnuru S, Bhavsar D. Evaluation of Liposomal Bupivacaine at Split-Thickness Skin Graft Donor Sites Through a Randomized, Controlled Trial. J Burn Care Res. 2021 Nov 24;42(6):1280-1285. doi: 10.1093/jbcr/irab129. PubMed 34216466 ↗

Study documents

  • Protocol and statistical analysis plan · Nov 13, 2018

Documents are hosted by the registry — open the source record to download them.

Individual participant data

Plan to share: No

10

Updates

Tracking since Sep 25, 2026
No changes since tracking began. The registry record was last updated on Mar 31, 2026, before this site started recording changes on Sep 25, 2026. Its history is on ClinicalTrials.gov ↗
11

Registry details

Key details

Study ID
NCT03854344
Lead sponsor
University of Kansas Medical Center
Responsible party
Dhaval Bhavsar (Medical Director Burnett Burn Center, Department of Plastic Surgery Associate Professor, University of Kansas Medical Center) — Principal investigator
First posted
Feb 26, 2019
Start date
Mar 18, 2019
Primary completion
Aug 6, 2025
Completion
Oct 27, 2025
Results posted
Mar 31, 2026
Last update
Mar 31, 2026

Oversight

Data monitoring committee
No
FDA-regulated drug
Yes
FDA-regulated device
No
View the source record on ClinicalTrials.gov ↗

Not currently enrolling

This study is completed, as verified in Mar 2026. You cannot join it, but the record below documents what was studied.

Follow this study

Get an email when the registry record changes — status, dates, results — or when someone posts here.

Sign in to follow

Discussion

Questions and observations about this study, from anyone following it. Not medical advice, and not a channel to the study team — their contact details are on the registry record.

Sign in to join the discussion. Reading takes no account; posting does. You choose a display name, and a pseudonym is the default.

Nothing here yet. If you are running this trial, taking part in it, or weighing whether to, this is the place to say so.

Start the discussion