CClinicalTrials.gg
Not yet recruitingNCT03848039HOPE9Updated Nov 5, 2020

Impact on Disease Relapse of HPV Vaccination in Women Treated With LEEP for Cervical Intraepithelial Neoplasia. HOPE9

A Phase 3 interventional study of Gardasil-9 and Placebo in Cervical Intraepithelial Neoplasia, sponsored by Alessandro Ghelardi. Not yet recruiting. Open to female participants aged 18 Years and older. Per ClinicalTrials.gov, last updated 2020-11-05.

Sponsored by Alessandro Ghelardi · Phase 3, Interventional, and Prevention

From the registry’s dates

  • Primary completion was expected by Dec 2022, 3 years 10 months ago, but the record still lists the study as not yet recruiting.
Phase
Phase 3
Study type
Interventional
Enrollment
1,220
Allocation
Randomized
Ages
18 Years and older
Sex
Female
01

Study summary

This study evaluates the impact on disease relapse of presurgical 9-valent HPV vaccination versus placebo vaccination in women treated with LEEP (loop electrosurgical excision procedure) for CIN2+ (high grade cervical intraepithelial neoplasia) and initially invasive cervical cancer.

Read the detailed description

Rationale:

In 2006 HPV vaccination was licensed for primary prevention programs worldwide. Only a few years after, several studies have raised new scenarios about HPV related diseases with strong implications on clinical management in adult women. Some findings from retrospective data have shown a significant effect of HPV vaccine on women and men treated for HPV pathologies. Although vaccination is not effective in patients with prevalent HPV infection, some studies have suggested that HPV vaccine could influence the incidence of the disease relapse after a surgical treatment. Reduction in disease recurrence after surgical treatment in vaccinated patients comes from gastroenterological, gynecological and dermatological evidences concerning both benign lesions (warts) and precancerous lesions.

If vaccination reduces recurrence rates by 80%, according to our previous pilot study data, peri-surgical HPV vaccination will be a strong effective clinical intervention, very likely to be introduced into standard high grade cervical intraepithelial neoplasia management.

Objective:

The primary objective of the current study is to assess the efficacy of 9-valent HPV vaccination in preventing recurrence of CIN2+ in participants treated for high-grade CIN.

Study population: participants treated for CIN2+ with LEEP technique. Study design: A multicenter, randomised, double-blind clinical trial in 9 hospitals in Italy.

Intervention: Participants will be randomized in a 1:1 ratio to receive presurgical 9-valent HPV vaccination (Gardasil-9 ®) or placebo at months 0 (at pre-surgical enrollment time), at 2 months (the same day of surgical treatment) and 6 moths (during the first follow-up visit after surgery). The randomization list will be generated before the start of the study.

Main study parameters/endpoints:

Primary end point will be the cumulative recurrence of CIN2+ after conization, as assessed by biopsies taken of suspect lesions, histologically confirmed for high grade cervical intraepithelial neoplasia recurrence.

Secondary outcome measures are cumulative incidence/persistence of HPV infection after the surgical treatment, causative HPV type in recurrent CIN lesions, as assessed by HPV test and PCR (polymerase chain reaction).

The total sample size is estimated to be 1220 patients based on an expected recurrence rate of less than 6% within 5 years. Statistical analysis will be based on the intention-to-treat protocol. Both primary and secondary endpoints will be analyzed by descriptive statistics and the chi-square test with a 0,05 two-sided significance level.

Follow-up schedule (FUP) will be the same in both arms, with a FUP evaluation every 6 months in the first year followed by an annual evaluation for a total of 5 years. FUP visit will include HPV test, Pap-test and colposcopy. HPV test will be collected in order to evaluate the HPV infection clearance rate in both arms. HPV test will be part of all the follow-up visits allowing to study the natural history of HPV infection after the surgical treatment.

02

Conditions studied

  • Cervical Intraepithelial Neoplasia

Keywords

  • Cervical Cancer
  • cervical intraepithelial neoplasia
  • Papillomavirus Vaccines
03

In context

Neoplasms

9,365 studies on the registry are indexed under Neoplasms; 2,489 are open to participants now.

This study's planned enrollment of 1,220 is above the median of 50 across 7,253 interventional studies indexed under Neoplasms.

Browse Neoplasms studies →

Lead sponsor

This is the only study on the registry with Alessandro Ghelardi as lead sponsor.

Counted across the registry records on this site, refreshed daily.

04

Who can participate

Ages eligible
18 Years and older
Sexes eligible
Female
Accepts healthy volunteers
No

Inclusion criteria

  1. Patients aged ≥ 18 and ecog performance status ≤ 1
  2. Patients with a diagnosis of high-grade cervical intraepithelial neoplasia or initially invasive cervical cancer (histological results ≥ CIN2 + and ≤ Ia1 according to the FIGO staging of cervical cancer)
  3. No fever at the time of vaccination
  4. No previous HPV vaccination
  5. Ability to understand and write Italian
  6. Signed informed and privacy consent

Exclusion criteria

Exclusion Criteria:

  1. Patients enrolled in other clinical studies
  2. History of allergic reaction or serious adverse events to previous vaccinations
  3. Positive pregnancy test at the time of vaccination
  4. Patient in treatment with immunosuppressive therapy
  5. Subjects who received immunoglobulins or blood products in 3 months prior to vaccination.
  6. Thrombocytopenia or any other clotting disorder that may lead to bleeding as a result of intramuscular administration
  7. Clinical criteria contraindicating the surgical act of conization
  8. ECOG performance status ≥2
05

Study design

Phase
Phase 3
Primary purpose
Prevention
Allocation
Randomized
Intervention model
Parallel assignment
Masking
Double (Participant, Investigator)
Enrollment
1,220 participants (estimated)

Study arms

  • Experimental
    Gardasil-9

    Intramuscular Gardasil-9 vaccination at 0, 2 and 6 months.

    Biological: Gardasil-9

  • Placebo comparator
    Placebo

    Placebo injection at 0, 2 and 6 months

    Drug: Placebo

Interventions

  • BiologicalGardasil-9

    administration by intramuscular injection of the 9-valent HPV vaccine according to a 3-dose vaccination schedule (0, 2, 6 months).

    Also known as: 9-valent HPV vaccine, Vaccine against HPV-6, 11, 16, 18, 31, 33, 45, 52, 58

  • DrugPlacebo

    administration by intramuscular injection of the placebo according to vaccination schedule of the 9-valent HPV vaccine (0, 2, 6 months)

    Also known as: Sterile Water for Injection Ph. Eur.

06

What researchers measure

Primary outcomes

  1. evaluation of disease recurrence reduction (cervical intraepithelial neoplasia up to microinvasive cancer of the cervix)

    evaluation of disease recurrence reduction (cervical intraepithelial neoplasia up to microinvasive cancer of the cervix) by comparing the number of recurrences in the two arms of the study

    Time frame: 5 years after surgical treatment

Secondary outcomes

  1. impact of the vaccine on prevalent post-surgery infections

    Analysis of the impact of the vaccine on prevalent post-surgery infections by comparing the prevalence of persistent HPV infections (duration greater than 12 months after surgery) in the two arms.

    Time frame: 5 years after surgical treatment

  2. impact of the vaccine in the post-surgical surveillance times, comparison of viral wash-out times (negativity of the HPV test), times of negativization of the pap test and of the colposcopic picture in the post-operative period

    Analysis of the impact of the vaccine in the post-surgical surveillance times, comparison of the viral wash-out times (negativity of the HPV test), times of negativization of the pap test and of the colposcopic picture in the post-operative period: comparison of the times of negativization overexposed in the two arms.

    Time frame: 5 years after surgical treatment

07

Study locations

No study locations are listed for this record.

08

References and documents

Individual participant data

Plan to share: No

No publications or documents are linked to this record.

09

Updates

Tracking since Sep 25, 2026
No changes since tracking began. The registry record was last updated on Nov 5, 2020, before this site started recording changes on Sep 25, 2026. Its history is on ClinicalTrials.gov ↗
10

Registry details

Key details

Study ID
NCT03848039
Lead sponsor
Alessandro Ghelardi
Responsible party
Alessandro Ghelardi (Principal Investigator, Department of Obstetrics and Gynaecology Azienda USL Toscana Nord Ovest, Presidio Ospedaliero delle Apuane (MS)- Italy, Azienda USL Toscana Nord Ovest) — Sponsor-investigator
First posted
Feb 20, 2019
Start date
Dec 2020 (estimated)
Primary completion
Dec 2022 (estimated)
Completion
May 2028 (estimated)
Last update
Nov 5, 2020

Study contacts

Alessandro Ghelardi, MD
Contact
alessandro.ghelardi@uslnordovest.toscana.it
+39 0585 6571
Paola Bay, MD
Contact
paola.bay@uslnordovest.toscana.it
+39 0585 6571
Alessandro Ghelardi, MD
principal investigator · Az. USL Toscana Nord Ovest

Oversight

Data monitoring committee
Yes
FDA-regulated drug
No
FDA-regulated device
No
View the source record on ClinicalTrials.gov ↗

Not currently enrolling

This study is not yet recruiting, as verified in Nov 2020. You cannot join it, but the record below documents what was studied.

Follow this study

Get an email when the registry record changes — status, dates, results — or when someone posts here.

Sign in to follow

Discussion

Questions and observations about this study, from anyone following it. Not medical advice, and not a channel to the study team — their contact details are on the registry record.

Sign in to join the discussion. Reading takes no account; posting does. You choose a display name, and a pseudonym is the default.

Nothing here yet. If you are running this trial, taking part in it, or weighing whether to, this is the place to say so.

Start the discussion