ClinicalTrials.gg
CompletedNCT03847935Updated Feb 20, 2019

Trigger Finger Treatment

An observational study in Trigger Finger, Trigger Digit and Stenosing Tenosynovitis, sponsored by University of Massachusetts, Lowell. Completed. Open to participants aged 18 Years and older. Per ClinicalTrials.gov, last updated 2019-02-20.

Sponsored by University of Massachusetts, Lowell · Observational

Study type
Observational
Model
Cohort
Time perspective
Prospective
Enrollment
86
Ages
18 Years and older
Sex
All
01

Study summary

Trigger finger is a common disorder of the hand which causes pain at the A1 pulley, inflammation, stiffness and/or snapping during movement. This observational study compared all of the possible treatments and combinations of treatments for trigger finger at the A1 pulley, including surgery, cortisone injections and hand therapy.

Read the detailed description

Trigger finger is a common disorder of the hand which causes pain at the A1 pulley, inflammation, stiffness or snapping during movement. This can be very debilitating. Current treatment includes local steroid injection, oral NSAIDS, resting orthoses, physical or occupational therapy and surgical intervention. The aim of this prospective study with an observational design was to determine the outcome between surgical, hand therapy rehabilitation, and corticosteroid injection interventions for trigger finger. There were 6 treatment groups: surgery, corticosteroid injection, 1 visit of hand therapy for orthosis fabrication and therapeutic exercise, hand therapy in combination with cortisone injection, Modality hand therapy alone (ongoing visits) or with corticosteroid injections.

02

Conditions studied

  • Trigger Finger
  • Trigger Digit
  • Stenosing Tenosynovitis

Keywords

  • treatment outcome
  • hand therapy
  • physical therapy
  • occupational therapy
03

In context

Trigger Finger Disorder

93 studies on the registry are indexed under Trigger Finger Disorder; 22 are open to participants now.

This study's enrollment of 86 is above the median of 68 across 14 observational studies indexed under Trigger Finger Disorder.

Browse Trigger Finger Disorder studies →

Lead sponsor

University of Massachusetts, Lowell is the lead sponsor of 12 studies on the registry; 2 are open to participants now.

Counted across the registry records on this site, refreshed daily.

04

Who can participate

Ages eligible
18 Years and older
Sexes eligible
All
Accepts healthy volunteers
No
Sampling method
Non-probability sample

Study population

patients undergoing medical treatment or hand therapy for trigger finger in digits #2-5 at the hand clinic. Patients were dropped from the study if they had changed to a different treatment.

Go through the criteria one by one — yes, no or not sure — and take the list to your doctor or the study team. Kept in this browser only.

Inclusion criteria

  • trigger finger in digit 2-5

Exclusion criteria

Exclusion Criteria:

  • if prior treatment for trigger finger, or Trigger thumb
05

Study design

Observational model
Cohort
Time perspective
Prospective
Enrollment
86 participants (actual)
Patient registry
No

Groups and cohorts

  • Surgery

    Patients who underwent surgical release of A1 pulley

    Procedure: surgery

  • corticosteroid injections only

    Patients who underwent local corticosteroid injections only, and no other treatment

    Procedure: corticosteroid injections

  • hand therapy only occupational/physical

    1 visit: orthosis fabrication, range of motion, nodule and ice massage.

    Other: Hand Therapy

  • Injection and Hand therapy

    This group of participants received a combination of corticosteroid injection in the affected finger and one visit of hand therapy.

    Procedure: corticosteroid injections · Other: Hand Therapy

  • Modality Hand Therapy

    Ongoing hand therapy treatment, which included the above plus modalities such as ultrasound or iontophoresis.

    Other: Modality Hand Therapy

  • Injection and Modality Hand Therapy

    Ccombination of local cortiscosteroid injection to the affected digit and ongoing hand therapy with modalities.

    Procedure: corticosteroid injections · Other: Modality Hand Therapy

Interventions

  • Proceduresurgery

    A1 pulley release of finger

  • Procedurecorticosteroid injections

    corticosteroid injection to A1 pulley

  • OtherHand Therapy

    orthosis fabrication, therapeutic exercise for range of motion to digits, ice massage, nodule massage, patient education,

    Also known as: physical therapy, occupational therapy

  • OtherModality Hand Therapy

    orthosis fabrication, therapeutic exercise for range of motion to digits, ice massage, nodule massage, patient education, plus modalities such as ultrasound, iontophoresis

06

What researchers measure

Primary outcomes

  1. Change in Functional use using Quick DASH 6 weeks

    Change from baseline to 6 weeks Quick DASH

    Time frame: Day 1, 6 weeks

  2. Change in Functional use using Quick DASH 3 months

    Change from baseline to 3 months Quick DASH

    Time frame: Day 1, 3 months

  3. Change in Functional use using Quick DASH 6 months

    Change from baseline to 6 months Quick DASH

    Time frame: Day 1, 6 months

  4. Change in Edema 6 weeks

    Baseline to 6 weeks Circumferential measurement in centimeters of the proximal phalanx

    Time frame: day 1, 6 weeks

  5. Change in Edema 3 months

    Baseline to 3 months weeks Circumferential measurement in centimeters of the proximal phalanx

    Time frame: day 1, 3 months

  6. Change in Edema 6 months

    Baseline to 6 months weeks Circumferential measurement in centimeters of the proximal phalanx

    Time frame: day 1, 6 months

  7. Change in Pain on a likert scale 6 weeks

    Baseline to 6 weeks pain on a 0-10 scale

    Time frame: 1 day, 6 weeks

  8. Change in Pain on a likert scale 3 months

    Baseline to 3 months pain on a 0-10 scale

    Time frame: 1 day, 3 months

  9. Change in Pain on a likert scale 6 months

    Baseline to 6 months pain on a 0-10 scale

    Time frame: 1 day, 6 months

  10. Change in Range of motion 6 weeks

    Baseline to 6 weeks flexion and extension range of motion at metacarpophalangeal (MCP), proximal interphalangeal (PIP) and distal interphalangeal (DIP) using a finger goniometer.

    Time frame: 1 day, 6 weeks

  11. Change in Range of motion 3 months

    Baseline to 3 months flexion and extension range of motion at metacarpophalangeal (MCP), proximal interphalangeal (PIP) and distal interphalangeal (DIP) using a finger goniometer.

    Time frame: 1 day, 3 months

  12. Change in Range of motion 6 months

    Baseline to 6 months flexion and extension range of motion at metacarpophalangeal (MCP), proximal interphalangeal (PIP) and distal interphalangeal (DIP) using a finger goniometer.

    Time frame: 1 day, 6 months

  13. Change in Severity or Grade of triggering 6 weeks

    Baseline to 6 weeks Using the scale by Patel and Bassini to measure the amount of triggering 1=normal joint, 6=locked in flexion

    Time frame: 1 day, 6 weeks

  14. Change in Severity or Grade of triggering 3 months

    Baseline to 3 months Using the scale by Patel and Bassini to measure the amount of triggering 1=normal joint, 6=locked in flexion

    Time frame: 1 day, 3 months

  15. Change in Severity or Grade of triggering 6 months

    Baseline to 6 months Using the scale by Patel and Bassini to measure the amount of triggering 1=normal joint, 6=locked in flexion

    Time frame: 1 day, 6 months

07

Study locations

No study locations are listed for this record.

08

References and documents

Publications

  • Lewis E, Fors L, Tharion WJ. Interrater and intrarater reliability of finger goniometric measurements. Am J Occup Ther. 2010 Jul-Aug;64(4):555-61. doi: 10.5014/ajot.2010.09028. PubMed 20825126 ↗

Individual participant data

Plan to share: No — There are no plans for sharing the IPD

09

Timeline

Tracking since Sep 25, 2026
ElapsedEstimatedEstimated, not yet reached

Ran from Dec 2007 to primary completion in Dec 2012, 59 months.

How these figures are worked out, and which studies are left out of them.

Registered
Feb 8, 2019
First posted
Feb 20, 2019
StartActual
Dec 10, 2007
Primary completionActual
Dec 8, 2012
CompletionActual
Dec 8, 2012
Last update
Feb 20, 2019
What these dates mean
Start.
When the first participant enrolled; while estimated, when the study expects to open to recruitment.
Primary completion.
When the last participant was examined or treated to collect data for the study's main question, its primary outcome. A study that stopped early gives the date its data collection stopped.
Completion.
When the last participant's last visit took place, for every outcome, secondary ones and side effects included: the end of the study. Often later than primary completion, sometimes the same day.
Actual and Est.
Actual means the registry says the date has happened. Est. (estimated) is a date the sponsor plans or expects. It can still move, and the sponsor is expected to change it to actual once it has passed.
No changes since tracking began. The registry record was last updated on Feb 20, 2019, before this site started recording changes on Sep 25, 2026. Its history is on ClinicalTrials.gov ↗
10

Registry details

Key details

Study ID
NCT03847935
Lead sponsor
University of Massachusetts, Lowell
Responsible party
ELewis (Associate Professor, University of Massachusetts, Lowell) — Principal investigator
First posted
Feb 20, 2019
Start date
Dec 10, 2007
Primary completion
Dec 8, 2012
Completion
Dec 8, 2012
Last update
Feb 20, 2019

Study contacts

Erika S. Lewis, Ed.D
principal investigator · Associate Professor, University of Massachusetts Lowell

Oversight

Data monitoring committee
No
FDA-regulated drug
No
FDA-regulated device
No
View the source record on ClinicalTrials.gov ↗

Not currently enrolling

This study is completed, as verified in Feb 2019. You cannot join it, but the record below documents what was studied.

Follow this study

Get an email when the registry record changes — status, dates, results — or when someone posts here.

Sign in to follow

Discussion

Questions and observations about this study, from anyone following it. Not medical advice, and not a channel to the study team — their contact details are on the registry record.

Sign in to join the discussion. Reading takes no account; posting does. You choose a display name, and a pseudonym is the default.

Nothing here yet. If you are running this trial, taking part in it, or weighing whether to, this is the place to say so.

Start the discussion