An interventional study of Meal Kit and Nutrition Education in Food Insecurity, Dietary Quality and Quality of Life, sponsored by University of Massachusetts, Lowell. Recruiting at 1 site in United States. Open to participants aged 40 Years and older. Per ClinicalTrials.gov, last updated 2026-05-05.
Sponsored by University of Massachusetts, Lowell · Not applicable, Interventional, and Prevention
The goal of this pilot study is to examine the feasibility of a novel meal kit and nutrition education intervention among adults aged 40 years and older, who are lower income, and to evaluate the preliminary impact of the meal kit and nutrition education intervention on food insecurity, dietary quality, mental health, quality of life and cardiovascular risk factors compared with general nutrition education materials in this population.
The main questions are:
What is the acceptability and satisfaction with the meal kits and nutrition education intervention?
What are the participation rates in the nutrition education program and the evaluation of the intervention?
What is the impact of the intervention on food insecurity, dietary quality and cooking and food preparation self-efficacy compared with general nutrition education materials?
What is the impact of the intervention of psychosocial health, quality of life and cardiometabolic outcomes compared with general nutrition education materials?
Food insecurity is a major risk factor for chronic health conditions through mechanisms such as poorer dietary quality and higher intake of processed foods due to high cost of healthier foods, poorer psychosocial health from increased stress and depression due to the worry of not having enough food, tradeoffs in spending and priorities to purchase food, and increased immune system activation and inflammation. Individuals who have lower income reported barriers to healthy eating beyond just access to healthy foods, including lack of time to prepare meals, insufficient nutrition knowledge, and limited cooking skills. Programs that reduce burden related to shopping, planning, and cooking time, and that do not solely provide food, may be more successful in reducing food insecurity and increasing dietary quality long term. Pre-made meals (ready to eat), tailored for specific diseases, have been shown to be beneficial for people living with health outcomes like diabetes. While pre-made meals designed for specific diseases can improve health outcomes,19-21 they do not address nutrition knowledge and cooking efficacy, which are important for developing long term behavior change. Meal kits are a growing area of food retail because they reduce challenges with meal planning and grocery shopping, but the majority of studies that have examined meal kits in relation to outcomes do not include nutrition education, particularly focused on cultural relevance.
The proposed pilot study is a randomized trial to evaluate the feasibility and whether a meal kit and nutrition education program leads to greater improvements in food insecurity, dietary quality, cooking and food preparation self-efficacy, psychosocial outcomes, quality of life, and cardiometabolic outcomes (glucose variability, blood pressure and anthropometric measures) compared with printed nutrition education materials and complementary recipes.
After successful screening and consent, 120 participants will be randomly assigned to either:
Group 1 (Intervention group, n=60): Receives the meal kit intervention and nutrition education weekly for 12 weeks. The meal kits, which include all ingredients needed to make a meal and step-by-step instructions for making the meal, will be delivered to participants homes. Participants will received meal kits to make 3 meals per week containing up to 4-5 servings for families.
Group 2 (Control group, n=60): Receives standard of care, which will include printed materials on eating a healthy diet and complementary recipes weekly.
Assessments will occur at baseline and 12-week follow up.
7,201 studies on the registry are indexed under Anxiety Disorders; 1,682 are open to participants now.
This study's planned enrollment of 120 is above the median of 80 across 6,057 interventional studies indexed under Anxiety Disorders.
Browse Anxiety Disorders studies →University of Massachusetts, Lowell is the lead sponsor of 12 studies on the registry; 2 are open to participants now.
Compared within Anxiety Disorders, the registry's first condition term, which may not be this study's main condition. Counted across the registry records on this site, refreshed daily. How we classify →
Go through the criteria one by one — yes, no or not sure — and take the list to your doctor or the study team. Kept in this browser only.
Exclusion Criteria:
Underlined terms in the criteria open these too. Explained by clinicaltrials.gg, not part of the registry record. The study team decides who can take part.
Before you join, the study team explains what taking part involves — its purpose, what happens, the risks and possible benefits — and answers your questions, so you can decide freely. Consent is usually recorded on a form (the informed consent form, ICF) signed by you or, where the law allows, by someone legally authorised to decide for you.
You can keep asking questions during the study, you are told of new information that matters, and you can choose to leave at any time.
Weight in kilograms divided by height in metres squared. Example: 70 kg and 1.75 m gives 70 ÷ (1.75 × 1.75) ≈ 22.9.
What counts as overweight or obesity differs between countries (some use lower cut-offs), so go by the range the study states.
Informed consent
Before you join, the study team explains what taking part involves — its purpose, what happens, the risks and possible benefits — and answers your questions, so you can decide freely. Consent is usually recorded on a form (the informed consent form, ICF) signed by you or, where the law allows, by someone legally authorised to decide for you.
You can keep asking questions during the study, you are told of new information that matters, and you can choose to leave at any time.
Explained by clinicaltrials.gg, not part of the registry record. The study team decides who can take part.
BMI (body mass index)
Weight in kilograms divided by height in metres squared. Example: 70 kg and 1.75 m gives 70 ÷ (1.75 × 1.75) ≈ 22.9.
What counts as overweight or obesity differs between countries (some use lower cut-offs), so go by the range the study states.
Explained by clinicaltrials.gg, not part of the registry record. The study team decides who can take part.
Receives the meal kit intervention and nutrition education education materials.
Other: Meal Kit and Nutrition Education
Receives standard of care, which will include printed materials from the Dietary Guidelines for Americans on eating a healthy diet and complementary recipes.
Meal kits contain ingredients for 3 meals designed for 4 servings, along with nutrition education materials, recipes, and information on how to store and prepare the meals. Weekly educational content focused on healthy eating, food security, and meal planning will be provided, either via print materials or through an online platform (e.g., email or app-based resources).
Food insecurity
The U.S. Department of Agriculture (USDA) 10-item food security screener will be used. This tool asks participants about their food security within the last 12 months. Scores range from 0 to 10, which a score of 0 indicating high food security, 1-2 indicating marginal food security, 3-5 indicating low food security, and 6-10 indicating very low food security.
Time frame: At enrollment and at 12 weeks
Dietary Quality
Dietary data will be collected by three 24-hr dietary recalls, using multi-pass interview software. At each time point, one 24-hour recall will be conducted during the interview, and two by phone within the following week (including a weekend day). A trained interviewer will use the Nutrition Data System for Research software (NDSR version 2019; Nutrition Coordinating Center, University of Minnesota).
Time frame: At enrollment and at 12 weeks
Perceived Stress
Perceived Stress Scale: The 14- item Perceived Stress Scale (PSS) gauges the respondent's perception of stress over the last month. The PSS measures the extent to which respondents perceive their lives over the past month as unpredictable and uncontrollable. Total scores ranges from 0-56, with higher scores indicating greater perceived stress.
Time frame: At enrollment and at 12 weeks
Anxiety
The State Trait Anxiety Scale assesses anxiety in participants using a 10-item questionnaire. Total scores range from 10 to 40, with greater scores indicating greater anxiety symptoms.
Time frame: At enrollment and at 12 weeks
Depressive Symptomatology
The Center for Epidemiological Studies Depression Scale (CES-D) will be used to assess depressive symptomatology. The scale consists of 20 items which ask about mood during the past week. Total scores range from 0 to 60, with higher scores indicating more severe depressive symptomatology.
Time frame: At enrollment and at 12 weeks
Health-related Quality of Life
Health-related QOL will be assessed using the validated U.S. Centers for Disease Control and Prevention (CDC) Health-Related Quality of Life (HRQOL) scale. This instrument includes the standard 4-item set of Healthy Days core questions. Scores range from 0 to 30 days with higher scores indicating more frequent poor physical and mental health.
Time frame: At enrollment and at 12 weeks
Blood Pressure
Systolic and diastolic blood pressure will be measured using an electronic sphygmomanometer (DinamapTM Model 8260, Critikon, Tampa, FL), in duplicate, after a short rest period.
Time frame: At enrollment and at 12 weeks
Body Mass Index
Height and weight will be measured in duplicate following standard techniques and integrated into one reported measures of body mass index. Weight will be measured with a clinical scale (Toledo Weight Plate, Model I5S, Bay State and Systems Inc. Burlington, MA), and height with a portable stadiometer. Body mass index (BMI, kg/m2) will be calculated as weight in kilograms divided by height in meters squared.
Time frame: At enrollment and at 12 weeks
Glucose variability
Interstitial glucose will be measured every 15 minutes using Dexcom G6 PRO continuous glucose monitors. Monitors will be fitted by trained research study staff on the upper, non-dominant arm with adhesive tape during the baseline visit and work for 7 days. The monitor will be removed by trained staff.
Time frame: At enrollment and at 12 weeks
Waist circumference
Waist circumference will be measured in duplicate using a flexible tape measure following standard procedures. An average of the two values will be used.
Time frame: At enrollment and 12 weeks.
Plan to share: No
No publications or documents are linked to this record.
Eligibility is decided by the study team. Share this record with your doctor or contact the team directly.
Contact study teamGet an email when the registry record changes — status, dates, results — or when someone posts here.
Sign in to followQuestions and observations about this study, from anyone following it. Not medical advice, and not a channel to the study team — their contact details are on the registry record.
Sign in to join the discussion. Reading takes no account; posting does. You choose a display name, and a pseudonym is the default.
Nothing here yet. If you are running this trial, taking part in it, or weighing whether to, this is the place to say so.
University of Massachusetts, Lowell