A Phase 4 interventional study of Ezetimibe/Rosuvastatin and Candesartan cilexetil/Amlodipine besylate in Hypertension, Hyperlipidemia, sponsored by HK inno.N Corporation. Completed at 1 site in Korea, Republic of. Open to participants aged 19 Years to 74 Years. Per ClinicalTrials.gov, last updated 2022-05-10.
Sponsored by HK inno.N Corporation · Phase 4, Interventional, and Treatment
To evaluate the efficacy and the safety of concomitant use of Ezetimibe/Rosuvastatin combination tablets and Candesartan cilexetil/Amlodipine besylate combination tablets compared to each combination tablet alone in patients with essential hypertension (HTN) and hyperlipidemia.
To improve the ease of use of high blood pressure and hyperlipidemia to improve patient compliance and reduce the risk of cardiovascular disease.
And It is recommended to identify the need to develop a combination of Candesartan cilexetil/Amlodipine besylate combination tablets , and Ezetimibe/Rosuvastatin combination tablets.
821 studies on the registry are indexed under Hyperlipidemias; 105 are open to participants now.
This study's enrollment of 127 is above the median of 87 across 691 interventional studies indexed under Hyperlipidemias.
Browse Hyperlipidemias studies →HK inno.N Corporation is the lead sponsor of 99 studies on the registry; 15 are open to participants now.
Counted across the registry records on this site, refreshed daily.
[ Inclusion Criteria ]
[ Exclusion Criteria ]
* Criteria Related to HTN and Dyslipidemia
Patients with symptomatic orthostatic HTN (difference in BPs between the value measured in supine position and the value measured in standing position is ≥20 mmHg for siSBP or ≥10 mmHg for siDBP).
* Criteria Related to Medical History
Patients with shock.
* Criteria Related to Clinical Laboratory Tests
Laboratory abnormalities as follows:
Patients with conditions of body fluid depletion or laboratory findings indicating clinically significant electrolyte abnormality.
* Others
Ezetimibe/Rosuvastatin 10 mg/10 mg and Candesartan cilexetil/Amlodipine besylate 8 mg/5 mg, once a day for 6 weeks
Drug: Ezetimibe/Rosuvastatin
Candesartan cilexetil/Amlodipine besylate 8 mg/5 mg, once a day for 6 weeks
Drug: Candesartan cilexetil/Amlodipine besylate
Ezetimibe/Rosuvastatin 10 mg/10 mg + Candesartan cilexetil 8 mg, once a day for 6 weeks
Drug: Candesartan cilexetil
Ezetimibe/Rosuvastatin 10 mg/10 mg + Candesartan cilexetil/Amlodipine besylate 8 mg/5 mg + Candesartan cilexetil 8 mg placebo
Also known as: Ezetimibe/Rosuvastatin 10 mg/10 mg
Candesartan cilexetil/Amlodipine besylate 8 mg/5 mg + Ezetimibe/Rosuvastatin 10 mg/10 mg placebo + Candesartan cilexetil 8 mg placebo
Also known as: Candesartan cilexetil/Amlodipine besylate 8 mg/5 mg
Ezetimibe/Rosuvastatin 10 mg/10 mg + Candesartan cilexetil 8 mg + Candesartan cilexetil/Amlodipine besylate 8 mg/5 mg placebo
Also known as: Candesartan cilexetil 8 mg
Change in sitting Systolic Blood Pressure(siSBP) from baseline after 6 weeks of study treatment
EZE/ROS + CAN/AML arm vs. EZE/ROS + CAN arm Change in siSBP from baseline after 6 weeks of study treatment For the siSBP at baseline and after 6 weeks of study treatment, the mean, standard deviation, median, minimum, and maximum will be provided by treatment arm. The LS-mean change in baseline-adjusted siSBP from baseline after 6 weeks of study treatment and its standard error will be provided by treatment arm. Inter-arm comparison will be conducted using the analysis of covariance (ANCOVA) with change in siSBP as response variable and baseline siSBP and treatment arm as independent variables.
Time frame: week 6
Percentage change in LDL-C levels from baseline after 6 weeks of study treatment
EZE/ROS + CAN/AML arm vs. CAN/AML arm Percentage change in LDL-C levels from baseline after 6 weeks of study treatment For the percentage change in LDL-C levels at baseline and after 6 weeks of study treatment, the mean, standard deviation, median, minimum, and maximum will be provided by treatment arm. The LS-mean percentage change in baseline-adjusted LDL-C levels from baseline after 6 weeks of study treatment and its standard error will be provided by treatment arm. Inter-arm comparison will be conducted using the ANCOVA with percentage change in LDL-C levels as response variable and baseline LDL-C level and treatment arm as independent variables.
Time frame: week 6
Change in siSBP from baseline after 3 weeks of study treatment
EZE/ROS + CAN/AML arm vs. EZE/ROS + CAN arm For the siSBP at baseline and after 3 weeks of study treatment, the mean, standard deviation, median, minimum, and maximum will be provided by treatment arm. The LS-mean change in baseline-adjusted siSBP from baseline after 3 weeks of study treatment and its standard error will be provided by treatment arm. Inter-arm comparison will be conducted using the ANCOVA with change in siSBP as response variable and baseline siSBP and treatment arm as independent variables.
Time frame: week 3
Percentage changes in LDL-C levels from baseline after 3 and 6 weeks of study treatment
EZE/ROS + CAN/AML arm vs. EZE/ROS + CAN arm For the LDL-C levels at baseline and after 3 and 6 weeks of study treatment, the mean, standard deviation, median, minimum, and maximum will be provided by treatment arm. The LS-mean percentage changes in baseline-adjusted LDL-C levels from baseline after 3 and 6 weeks of study treatment and their standard error will be provided by treatment arm. Inter-arm comparisons of the percentage changes in LDL-C levels at Week 3 and Week 6 will be conducted using the ANCOVA with percentage change in LDL-C levels as response variable and baseline LDL-C level and treatment arm as independent variables.
Time frame: week 3 and week 6
Percentage change in LDL-C levels from baseline after 3 weeks of study treatment
EZE/ROS + CAN/AML arm vs. CAN/AML arm For the percentage change in LDL-C levels at baseline and after 3 weeks of study treatment, the mean, standard deviation, median, minimum, and maximum will be provided by treatment arm. The LS-mean percentage change in baseline-adjusted LDL-C levels from baseline after 3 weeks of study treatment and its standard error will be provided by treatment arm. Inter-arm comparison will be conducted using the ANCOVA with percentage change in LDL-C levels as response variable and baseline LDL-C level and treatment arm as independent variables.
Time frame: week 3
Changes in siSBPs from baseline after 3 and 6 weeks of study treatment
EZE/ROS + CAN/AML arm vs. CAN/AML arm For the siSBP at baseline and after 3 and 6 weeks of study treatment, the mean, standard deviation, median, minimum, and maximum will be provided by treatment arm. The LS-mean change in baseline-adjusted siSBP from baseline after 3 and 6 weeks of study treatment and its standard error will be provided by treatment arm. Inter-arm comparison will be conducted using the ANCOVA with change in siSBP as response variable and baseline siSBP and treatment arm as independent variables.
Time frame: week 3 and week 6
Percentage changes in LDL-C/HDL-C and TC/HDL-C from baseline after 3 and 6 weeks of study treatment
EZE/ROS + CAN/AML arm vs. CAN/AML arm For the LDL-C/HDL-C and TC/HDL-C at baseline and for their percentage changes after 3 and 6 weeks of study treatment, the mean, standard deviation, median, minimum, and maximum were presented by treatment arm. The LS-mean percentage changes in baseline-adjusted LDL-C/HDL-C and TC/HDL-C levels from baseline after 3 and 6 weeks of study treatment and their standard errors will be provided by treatment arm. Inter-arm comparison will be conducted using the ANCOVA with percentage changes in LDL-C/HDL-C and TC/HDL-C levels as response variables and baseline LDL-C/HDL-C and TC/HDL-C levels and treatment arm as independent variables.
Time frame: week 3 and week 6
Changes in siDBPs from baseline after 3 and 6 weeks of study treatment
Co-Endpoints For the siDBP at baseline and after 3 and 6 weeks of study treatment, the mean, standard deviation, median, minimum, and maximum will be provided by treatment arm. The LS-mean change in baseline-adjusted siDBP from baseline after 3 and 6 weeks of study treatment and its standard error will be provided by treatment arm. Inter-arm comparison will be conducted using the ANCOVA with change in siDBP as response variable and baseline siDBP and treatment arm as independent variables.
Time frame: week 3 and week 6
Proportions of subjects who achieve the treatment goal based on JNC VIII Guideline from baseline after 3 and 6 weeks of study treatment
Co-Endpoints (HTN treatment goal: \<140/90 mmHg \[or \<150/90 mmHg for patients aged ≥60 years\]) The frequencies and proportions of subjects who achieve the treatment goal based on JNC VIII Guideline from baseline after 3 and 6 weeks of study treatment will be provided by treatment arm. The differences in the proportions of subjects who achieve the treatment goal after 3 and 6 weeks of study treatment between treatment arms will be analyzed using the Pearson's chi-square test or the Fisher's exact test.
Time frame: week 3 and week 6
Proportions of subjects who achieve the treatment goal based on NCEP ATP III Guideline from baseline after 3 and 6 weeks of study treatment
Co-Endpoints (LDL-C treatment goal - Group I: \<160 mg/dL; Group II: \<130 mg/dL; and Group III: \<100 mg/dL) The frequencies and proportions of subjects who achieve the treatment goal based on NCEP ATP III Guideline from baseline after 3 and 6 weeks of study treatment will be provided by treatment arm. The differences in the proportions of subjects who achieve the treatment goal after 3 and 6 weeks of study treatment between treatment arms will be analyzed using the Pearson's chi-square test or the Fisher's exact test.
Time frame: week 3 and week 6
Percentage changes in TC, TG, HDL-C, apolipoprotein B, and CRP levels from baseline after 3 and 6 weeks of study treatment
Co-Endpoints For the TC, TG, HDL-C, apolipoprotein B, and CRP levels at baseline and after 3 and 6 weeks of study treatment, the mean, standard deviation, median, minimum, and maximum will be provided by treatment arm. The LS-mean percentage changes in baseline-adjusted TC, TG, HDL-C, apolipoprotein B, and CRP levels from baseline after 3 and 6 weeks of study treatment and their standard error will be provided by treatment arm. Inter-arm comparisons of the percentage changes at Week 3 and Week 6 will be conducted using the ANCOVA with each percentage change in TC, TG, HDL-C, apolipoprotein B, and CRP levels as response variable and relevant baseline level and treatment arm as independent variables.
Time frame: week 3 and week 6
Adverse events
The safety will be evaluated for all subjects who receive at least on dose of investigational product. The number of subjects who report AEs, adverse drug reactions (ADRs), serious adverse events (SAEs), two-sided 95% CIs, incidence rate, and number of events will be provided by treatment arm. The difference between treatment arms will be analyzed using the χ2 test or Fisher's exact test. The incidences and percentages of events by severity, causality, actions taken, and outcome will be provided by treatment arm. All AEs will be coded per SOC and PT using the MedDRA; for each coded AE, the number of subjects, incidence rate, and number of events will be provided by treatment arm. In addition, for coded AEs, the number of subjects, incidence rate, and number of events by severity, causality, actions taken, and outcome will be provided by treatment arm
Time frame: Baseline, week 3 and week 6
Plan to share: No
No publications or documents are linked to this record.
This study is completed, as verified in May 2022. You cannot join it, but the record below documents what was studied.
Get an email when the registry record changes — status, dates, results — or when someone posts here.
Sign in to followQuestions and observations about this study, from anyone following it. Not medical advice, and not a channel to the study team — their contact details are on the registry record.
Sign in to join the discussion. Reading takes no account; posting does. You choose a display name, and a pseudonym is the default.
Nothing here yet. If you are running this trial, taking part in it, or weighing whether to, this is the place to say so.
HK inno.N Corporation