An interventional study of Gen 1B and Gen 1 in Breast Cancer, sponsored by Seno Medical Instruments Inc.. Suspended at 1 site in United States. Open to female participants aged 18 Years and older, including healthy volunteers. Per ClinicalTrials.gov, last updated 2020-04-06.
Sponsored by Seno Medical Instruments Inc. · Not applicable, Interventional, and Other
Comparative Evaluation of Gen1B (OA-16-1S) duplex OA/US probe versus Gen1 (OA-16-1) duplex OA/US probe in Healthy Subjects
This study performs the first clinical evaluation of the Gen1B (OA-16-1S) duplex OA/US probe. This probe includes design changes to improve reliability and performance compared to the Gen1 (OA-16-1) duplex OA/US probe. The performance of the Gen1 duplex probe is functionally equivalent to the PIONEER duplex probe (OA-15-3), which was used in previous clinical studies for suspicious breast masses.
Seno Medical Instruments Inc. is the lead sponsor of 9 studies on the registry; none are open to participants now.
Of its 5 completed or terminated interventional studies of FDA-regulated products, 4 (80%) have results posted.
Counted across the registry records on this site, refreshed daily.
Exclusion Criteria:
Gen 1B duplex probe ultrasound / optoacoustic imaging of the breast and axillary lymph node, with the IMAGIO System and the Gen1B duplex probe
Device: Gen 1B · Device: Gen 1
Gen 1 duplex probe ultrasound / optoacoustic imaging of the breast and axillary lymph node, with the IMAGIO System
Device: Gen 1B · Device: Gen 1
Diagnostic Ultrasound and Optoacoustic Imaging
Diagnostic Ultrasound and Optoacoustic Imaging
Number of Subjects with Treatment-related Events
Safety of the Gen 1B duplex Optoacoustic (OA)/ Ultrasound (US) probe in breast applications as compared to Gen 1 with respect to treatment-related events
Time frame: At end of study, average of six months
Diagnostic Image Quality of Gen 1B
Independent reader comparison using questionnaire and measurements on artifacts and features of Gen 1 Gen1B probe images for pair wise comparison
Time frame: At end of study, average of six months
Probe performance data comparison across skin types
The effect of skin pigmentation using the Fitzpatrick Scale (skin typing test), from Type I (always burns, never tans (palest; freckles) to Type VI never burns (deeply pigmented dark brown to darkest brown) will be used to determine similarities and differences between probes.
Time frame: At end of study, average of six months
Image Quality between probes at reduced laser level
OA images with reduced laser level energy will be collected to determine via a 7 point image quality scale, where 1 is poor and 7 is best, which probe produces better images by independent readers
Time frame: At end of study, average of six months
Plan to share: No
No publications or documents are linked to this record.
This study is suspended, as verified in Apr 2020. You cannot join it, but the record below documents what was studied.
Get an email when the registry record changes — status, dates, results — or when someone posts here.
Sign in to followQuestions and observations about this study, from anyone following it. Not medical advice, and not a channel to the study team — their contact details are on the registry record.
Sign in to join the discussion. Reading takes no account; posting does. You choose a display name, and a pseudonym is the default.
Nothing here yet. If you are running this trial, taking part in it, or weighing whether to, this is the place to say so.
Seno Medical Instruments Inc.