ClinicalTrials.gg
CompletedNCT03832205Updated Dec 12, 2019

Validation of Respiratory Rate and Heart Rate Measurements by Capaciflectors Placed in Four Locations on the Chest

An observational study in Exercise, Respiratory Rate and Heart Rate, sponsored by University Hospital Southampton NHS Foundation Trust. Completed at 1 site in United Kingdom. Open to participants aged 18 Years to 100 Years, including healthy volunteers. Per ClinicalTrials.gov, last updated 2019-12-12.

Sponsored by University Hospital Southampton NHS Foundation Trust · Observational

Study type
Observational
Model
Cohort
Time perspective
Prospective
Enrollment
50
Ages
18 Years to 100 Years
Sex
All
01

Study summary

In a collaborative project between University Hospital Southampton NHS Trust and the University of Southampton, the investigators have developed a wearable, mobile, non invasive, low-cost, continuous respiratory rate monitor device called a capaciflector.

This study will be the first ever study undertaken to attempt to measure the respiratory rate and heart rate on patients using a capaciflector. Investigators will evaluate whether the correlation between the capaciflector's measurements of respiratory rate and heart rate when compared with the gold standard pneumotachometer and electrocardiogram respectively is high enough to promote its potential future use within a device for clinical practice.

Read the detailed description

RESEARCH QUESTION/AIM(S)

Will a capaciflector measure the respiratory rate as accurately as a pneumotachometer and the heart rate as accurately as an electrocardiogram?

Objectives:

  1. To test the reliability and accuracy of our capaciflector in measuring respiratory rate and heart rate by comparing it with gold standard readings.
  2. To assess whether different capaciflector locations around the body are all as accurate as each other.

STUDY DESIGN and METHODS of DATA COLLECTION AND DATA ANALYSIS

Unblinded observational study - for each subject demographic data will be collected: age, gender, height, weight, body mass index.

As well as the routine monitoring devices worn while undergoing a CPET test, the patients will have 4 capaciflectors placed on them as well. These will be placed using hypoallergenic medical grade tape.

  • Over the left precordium
  • Over the right precordium
  • Under the left axilla
  • Under the right axilla

Each practical component of the study setup will be delivered consistently by CI Dr Nick Hayward, Student Doctor Alan Doughty, or cardiopulmonary exercise testing (CPET) technicians once the study becomes established. The patient will then undergo a routine CPET and our monitors will not affect what a patient is asked to do as part of the current CPET protocol. If a patient is unable to finish the CPET then their data will still be included.

Raw CPET data will be exported via a feed from the CPET machine and also from the capaciflectors. A laptop computer provided by the University will receive both data feeds. Simultaneous recordings will be taken from each of the capaciflectors at time zero and then at one minute intervals. These anonymous datasets will be stored on the laptop computer. Once the CPET test is completed, the participant's involvement in the study will have ended.

Anonymised raw data analysis comparisons will be made by the Department of Engineering, University of Southampton, in collaboration with the other investigators of this study. There will be no patient identifiable information in any dataset, yet demographic data and raw CPET acquired data will be held securely on the laptop in line with clinical governance requirements of University Hospital Southampton. Statistical support by Dr Helen Moyses of the Clinical Informatics Research Unit, Southampton, will be provided for data analysis at the final stage.

STUDY SETTING

The study will be a single centre study at University Hospital Southampton. Participants will have been recruited from the patients booked for a CPET test prior to them having major surgery. The study will be conducted in the CPET department in the Day Surgery Unit. This is where the CPET for patients routinely takes place.

02

Conditions studied

  • Exercise
  • Respiratory Rate
  • Heart Rate

Browse trials for

03

In context

Motor Activity

2,646 studies on the registry are indexed under Motor Activity; 1,205 are open to participants now.

This study's enrollment of 50 is below the median of 100 across 318 observational studies indexed under Motor Activity.

Browse Motor Activity studies →

Lead sponsor

University Hospital Southampton NHS Foundation Trust is the lead sponsor of 150 studies on the registry; 35 are open to participants now.

Counted across the registry records on this site, refreshed daily.

04

Who can participate

Ages eligible
18 Years to 100 Years
Sexes eligible
All
Accepts healthy volunteers
Yes
Sampling method
Non-probability sample

Study population

Adults undergoing routine clinical cardiopulmonary exercise testing (CPET).

Go through the criteria one by one — yes, no or not sure — and take the list to your doctor or the study team. Kept in this browser only.

Inclusion criteria

  • Aged 18 and over
  • Able to give informed consent in English
  • Able to at least start a CPET test

Exclusion criteria

Exclusion Criteria:

  • Absolute contraindications to taking part in CPET:
  • Recent (within 5 days) Acute Myocardial Infarction
  • Unstable angina
  • Uncontrolled arrhythmia causing symptoms or haemodynamic compromise
  • Syncope
  • Active endocarditis, acute myocarditis or pericarditis
  • Symptomatic severe aortic stenosis
  • Uncontrolled heart failure
  • Suspected dissecting or leaking aortic aneurysm
  • Uncontrolled asthma
  • Arterial desaturation at rest on room air \< 85%
  • Known allergy to medical grade tape
05

Study design

Observational model
Cohort
Time perspective
Prospective
Enrollment
50 participants (actual)
Patient registry
No

Groups and cohorts

  • Capaciflector monitoring group

    Patients undergoing their pre-planned, routine cardiopulmonary exercise test (CPET). Additional, non-invasive capaciflector monitoring only - no therapeutic intervention.

    Device: Capaciflector monitoring

Interventions

  • DeviceCapaciflector monitoring

    Non-invasive capaciflector monitoring of respiratory rate and heart rate.

06

What researchers measure

Primary outcomes

  1. Respiratory rate comparison

    Statistical comparisons between the two methods of measuring respiratory rate

    Time frame: Through study completion, an average of one year

  2. Heart rate comparison

    Statistical comparisons between the two methods of measuring heart rate

    Time frame: Through study completion, an average of one year

  3. Capaciflector location comparison

    Statistical comparisons between the four anatomical chest locations of our capaciflectors

    Time frame: Through study completion, an average of one year

07

Study locations

1 site
  • University Hospital Southampton NHS Foundation Trust
    Southampton, SO50 9BB, United Kingdom
08

References and documents

Publications

  • White N. et al. (2017) A Planar Respiration Sensor Based on a Capaciflector Structure. IEEE Sensors Letters vol. 1 no. 4 pp. 1-4 Art no. 6000604. doi: 10.1109/LSENS.2017.2722481. http://ieeexplore.ieee.org/stamp/stamp.jsp?tp=&arnumber=7967772&isnumber=7949374
  • Naranjo-Hernandez D, Talaminos-Barroso A, Reina-Tosina J, Roa LM, Barbarov-Rostan G, Cejudo-Ramos P, Marquez-Martin E, Ortega-Ruiz F. Smart Vest for Respiratory Rate Monitoring of COPD Patients Based on Non-Contact Capacitive Sensing. Sensors (Basel). 2018 Jul 3;18(7):2144. doi: 10.3390/s18072144. PubMed 29970861 ↗
  • Gerry S, Birks J, Bonnici T, Watkinson PJ, Kirtley S, Collins GS. Early warning scores for detecting deterioration in adult hospital patients: a systematic review protocol. BMJ Open. 2017 Dec 3;7(12):e019268. doi: 10.1136/bmjopen-2017-019268. PubMed 29203508 ↗
  • Effects of current on human beings and livestock - Part 1: General Aspects, section 4.5.4 (1993) Bureau of Indian Standards, New Delhi. http://questin.org/sites/default/files/standards/is.8437.1.1992_0.pdf
  • Hayward N, Shaban M, Badger J, Jones I, Wei Y, Spencer D, Isichei S, Knight M, Otto J, Rayat G, Levett D, Grocott M, Akerman H, White N. A capaciflector provides continuous and accurate respiratory rate monitoring for patients at rest and during exercise. J Clin Monit Comput. 2022 Oct;36(5):1535-1546. doi: 10.1007/s10877-021-00798-7. Epub 2022 Jan 18. PubMed 35040037 ↗

Individual participant data

Plan to share: Undecided — No personal identifiable data will be shared. Physiological data may be shared with statisticians within the University or University Hospital. Data analysis may be partly conducted by Dr Peter Charlton, Kings College London, UK

09

Updates

Tracking since Sep 25, 2026
No changes since tracking began. The registry record was last updated on Dec 12, 2019, before this site started recording changes on Sep 25, 2026. Its history is on ClinicalTrials.gov ↗
10

Registry details

Key details

Study ID
NCT03832205
Responsible party
Sponsor
First posted
Feb 6, 2019
Start date
Sep 30, 2019
Primary completion
Oct 28, 2019
Completion
Oct 28, 2019
Last update
Dec 12, 2019

Study contacts

Neil White, PhD
study director · University of Southampton

Oversight

Data monitoring committee
No
FDA-regulated drug
No
FDA-regulated device
No
View the source record on ClinicalTrials.gov ↗

Not currently enrolling

This study is completed, as verified in Dec 2019. You cannot join it, but the record below documents what was studied.

Follow this study

Get an email when the registry record changes — status, dates, results — or when someone posts here.

Sign in to follow

Discussion

Questions and observations about this study, from anyone following it. Not medical advice, and not a channel to the study team — their contact details are on the registry record.

Sign in to join the discussion. Reading takes no account; posting does. You choose a display name, and a pseudonym is the default.

Nothing here yet. If you are running this trial, taking part in it, or weighing whether to, this is the place to say so.

Start the discussion