CClinicalTrials.gg
CompletedNCT03825185Updated Jan 31, 2019

Transsternal Versus Transcervical Thymectomy

An interventional study of Transcervical Thymectomy and Transsternal Thymectomy in Myasthenia Gravis, Thymectomy, sponsored by Instituto Nacional de Ciencias Medicas y Nutricion Salvador Zubiran. Completed. Open to participants aged 18 Years to 60 Years. Per ClinicalTrials.gov, last updated 2019-01-31.

Sponsored by Instituto Nacional de Ciencias Medicas y Nutricion Salvador Zubiran · Not applicable, Interventional, and Treatment

From the registry’s dates

  • Registered 26 years after the study started (first participant enrolled Jan 1993, registered Jan 2019).
Phase
Not applicable
Study type
Interventional
Enrollment
100
Allocation
Randomized
Ages
18 Years to 60 Years
Sex
All
01

Study summary

Objective: To comparatively analyze long-term results and complications of transcervical (TCT) and transsternal thymectomy (TST) in a randomized controlled trial with a mean follow-up of ten years.

Results: Outcomes 10 years after surgery by MGFA post-intervention status showed that complete stable remission was achieved in 8 (21.6%) patients of the TCT group, and in 20 patients (55.5%) of the TST group.

Conclusions: Transcervical and transsternal thymectomy are safe and result in significant improvement of patients with Myasthenia Gravis. TST has superior results in terms of complete stable remission at 10 years.

Read the detailed description

Background: Thymectomy is an effective treatment for Myasthenia Gravis in the adult population. Surgical removal of the thymus can be performed through several approaches. Comparison of the most commonly used surgical techniques through randomized control trials with long-term follow-up is scarce.

Objective: To comparatively analyze long-term results and complications of transcervical (TCT) and transsternal thymectomy (TST) in a randomized controlled trial with a mean follow-up of ten years.

Results: A total of 100 patients were randomized to transsternal thymectomy (50), and transcervical procedure (50). There were not significant differences in the demographic characteristics, MGFA clinical classification, and MGFA therapy status between groups before surgery. Twenty patients were lost of follow up during the first year and were excluded. Our final group included 40 patients in each group. Three patients in TCT group (7.5%) and 6 patients in the TST group (15%) developed surgical complications. At 1 year of follow-up, 7 patients (17.5%) of the TCT group were asymptomatic in comparison with 15 patients (37.5%) of group TST, after 10 years of follow-up, 26 cases (72.9%) in group TCT were asymptomatic in comparison with 29 cases (80.5%) of group TST. Outcomes 10 years after surgery by MGFA post-intervention status showed that complete stable remission was achieved in 8 (21.6%) patients of the TCT group, and in 20 patients (55.5%) of the TST group.

Conclusions: Transcervical and transsternal thymectomy are safe and result in significant improvement of patients with Myasthenia Gravis. TST has superior results in terms of complete stable remission at 10 years.

02

Conditions studied

  • Myasthenia Gravis, Thymectomy

Browse trials for

03

In context

Myasthenia Gravis

324 studies on the registry are indexed under Myasthenia Gravis; 146 are open to participants now.

This study's planned enrollment of 100 is above the median of 44 across 212 interventional studies indexed under Myasthenia Gravis.

Browse Myasthenia Gravis studies →

Lead sponsor

Instituto Nacional de Ciencias Medicas y Nutricion Salvador Zubiran is the lead sponsor of 141 studies on the registry; 17 are open to participants now.

Counted across the registry records on this site, refreshed daily.

04

Who can participate

Ages eligible
18 Years to 60 Years
Sexes eligible
All
Accepts healthy volunteers
No

Inclusion criteria

Inclusion criteria were a clinical diagnosis of MG confirmed by biochemical or physiologic studies and a CT excluding thymoma. -

Exclusion criteria

Exclusion Criteria:

Exclusion criteria were contraindications for major surgery.

05

Study design

Phase
Not applicable
Primary purpose
Treatment
Allocation
Randomized
Intervention model
Parallel assignment
Masking
None (open label)
Enrollment
100 participants (estimated)

Study arms

  • Experimental
    Transcervical Thymectomy

    50 patients were randomized to transcervical thymectomy for treatment of myasthenia gravis.

    Procedure: Transcervical Thymectomy

  • Experimental
    TranssternalThymectomy

    50 patients were randomized to transternal thymectomy for treatment of myasthenia gravis.

    Procedure: Transsternal Thymectomy

Interventions

  • ProcedureTranscervical Thymectomy

    Transcervical Thymectomy. All transcervical thymectomies were performed with an 8 cm transversal cervicotomy was performed approximately 2 cm above the sternal notch. Musculocutaneous flaps were developed up to the thyroid cartilage and the suprasternal notch. Strap muscles were split in the middle and retracted laterally. The upper horns of the thymus were exposed and were freed up to the level of the innominate vein. All tributary veins were suture ligated. A sternal retractor was then placed to retract the sternum upward until the patient was nearly lifted off the table. The rest of the Thymus was dissected, from the pericardium and the pleura. Care was specially taken to remove as much fatty tissue adjacent to the thymus as possible preserving the phrenic nerves.

  • ProcedureTranssternal Thymectomy

    Transsternal Thymectomy. A standard formal median sternotomy was carried out. The sternum was retracted laterally using an automatic retractor. All thymic tissue with the adjacent adipose tissue was removed starting with the inferior horns of the thymus. Thymic vessels were ligated and dissection was continued until the upper horns could be separated from the thyroid. A mediastinal tube was placed before closing the sternum and was kept in close suction for 2 to 3 days.

06

What researchers measure

Primary outcomes

  1. Pharmacological remission of MG.

    Remission of MG classified according to MGFA Post intervention status for postoperative remission of Myasthenia Gravis

    Time frame: 10 years

  2. Clinical remission of MG.

    Remission of MG classified according to MGFA Post intervention status for postoperative remission of Myasthenia Gravis

    Time frame: 10 years

  3. Pharmacological and clinical remission of MG.

    Remission of MG classified according to MGFA Post intervention status for postoperative remission of Myasthenia Gravis

    Time frame: 10 years

07

Study locations

No study locations are listed for this record.

08

References and documents

Individual participant data

Plan to share: No

No publications or documents are linked to this record.

09

Updates

Tracking since Sep 25, 2026
No changes since tracking began. The registry record was last updated on Jan 31, 2019, before this site started recording changes on Sep 25, 2026. Its history is on ClinicalTrials.gov ↗
10

Registry details

Key details

Study ID
NCT03825185
Lead sponsor
Instituto Nacional de Ciencias Medicas y Nutricion Salvador Zubiran
Responsible party
Sponsor
First posted
Jan 31, 2019
Start date
Jan 1, 1993
Primary completion
Dec 1, 2004
Completion
Dec 1, 2018
Last update
Jan 31, 2019

Oversight

Data monitoring committee
Yes
FDA-regulated drug
No
FDA-regulated device
No
View the source record on ClinicalTrials.gov ↗

Not currently enrolling

This study is completed, as verified in Jan 2019. You cannot join it, but the record below documents what was studied.

Follow this study

Get an email when the registry record changes — status, dates, results — or when someone posts here.

Sign in to follow

Discussion

Questions and observations about this study, from anyone following it. Not medical advice, and not a channel to the study team — their contact details are on the registry record.

Sign in to join the discussion. Reading takes no account; posting does. You choose a display name, and a pseudonym is the default.

Nothing here yet. If you are running this trial, taking part in it, or weighing whether to, this is the place to say so.

Start the discussion