CClinicalTrials.gg
CompletedNCT03823066Updated Jan 30, 2019

Experience With a Robot for Home Care and Its Acceptance by People With Dementia, Caregivers and Dementia Trainers

An interventional study of Coach Pepper in Dementia, sponsored by Medical University of Graz. Completed at 1 site in Austria. Per ClinicalTrials.gov, last updated 2019-01-30.

Sponsored by Medical University of Graz · Not applicable, Interventional, and Supportive care

From the registry’s dates

  • Registered 4 months after the study started (first participant enrolled Aug 2018, registered Jan 2019).
Phase
Not applicable
Study type
Interventional
Enrollment
12
Allocation
Not applicable
01

Study summary

Background:

Dementia rates are increasing worldwide and consequently burden global healthcare resources to a serious degree. However, there is a declining number of caregivers to provide care. It is for this reason that many new technologies, such as socially assistive robots, have been developed because of their potential to support caregivers in promoting the independence of people with dementia. Most of the (socially assistive) robots have so far been tested for people without dementia in mainly laboratory or institutional settings, like nursing homes. Consequently, there is a lack of knowledge about the possible uses of robots from the perspective of those affected by dementia in real-life/care situations (e.g. at home). Testing in a laboratory setting cannot capture the complexity and high variability of everyday situations occurring during the care of persons with dementia.

Methods

The design is a mixed method intervention study of a refined socially assistive humanoid robot. In total, three people with dementia, three relatives, three dementia trainers and three professional caregivers were included in the study. Quantitative data of technology acceptance were collected using the "Technology Usage Inventory". Qualitative data (main focus: experiences with the robot and handling the robot) were collected by means of observation and qualitative interviews. Movement data of people with dementia were collected by means of the eye camera of the robot.

This study helps to further refine and test a socially assistive robot for people with dementia living at home.

02

Conditions studied

  • Dementia

Browse trials for

Keywords

  • acceptance
  • usability
  • home care
  • socially assistive robot
  • humanoid robot
  • caregivers
  • dementia trainers
  • cognitive training
  • physical training
03

In context

Dementia

2,172 studies on the registry are indexed under Dementia; 540 are open to participants now.

This study's enrollment of 12 is below the median of 83 across 1,629 interventional studies indexed under Dementia.

Browse Dementia studies →

Lead sponsor

Medical University of Graz is the lead sponsor of 459 studies on the registry; 98 are open to participants now.

Counted across the registry records on this site, refreshed daily.

04

Who can participate

Ages eligible
Child (0–17), Adult (18–64), Older adult (65+)
Accepts healthy volunteers
No

Inclusion criteria

Persons with dementia:

  • adults
  • living at home
  • all types of dementia
  • light and moderate dementia (MMSE 10 and above)
  • light dementia: living alone or with a relative at home (if alone: the relative should live in the neighborhood and be in daily contact with the person with dementia.)
  • moderate dementia: living with a relative at home
  • receive professional and/or non professional care or no care
  • speak and understand German
  • have no physical, auditory or visual restrictions, as this would make the application of the interventions impossible
  • do not take any dementia-specific medication or have been taking dementia-specific medication for at least 3 months; condition stable and no change expected during the study period
  • do not take antipsychotic and antidepressant medication or have been taking them for at least 14 days before study start
  • children and pets in the household after previous individual discussion

Relatives:

  • relatives of the participating persons with dementia (adults)
  • relatives means family members, like spouse, daughter, aunt, ... or significant others like friends and neighbors
  • living or not living with the person with dementia in the same household (in the case of moderate dementia, relatives must live in the same household)
  • person with dementia receives or receives no professional care
  • the relative provides or does not provide care
  • If the person with dementia receives paid 24-hour care (regardless of whether they have mild or moderate dementia), a relative still has to be recruited as a participant (This relative must live in the same house or household and be in daily contact with the person with dementia).
  • speak and understand German

Professional caregivers

  • adults
  • nurses
  • speak and understand German

Dementia trainers

  • adults
  • trained as M.A.S. (Morbus Alzheimer Syndrome) trainer
  • train the participants with dementia at home
  • speak and understand German

Exclusion criteria

ExclusioncCriteria:

Persons with dementia:

  • known aggressive behavior
  • frontotemporal Dementia
05

Study design

Phase
Not applicable
Primary purpose
Supportive care
Allocation
Not applicable
Intervention model
Single group
Masking
None (open label)
Enrollment
12 participants (actual)

Study arms

  • Experimental
    Coach Pepper

    Pepper is a humanoid socially assistive robot

    Device: Coach Pepper

Interventions

  • DeviceCoach Pepper

    Robot Peppers's height is 1.20 meters and it weighs 28 kilograms. Pepper will be called Coach Pepper, because it is connected, via web interfaces, with a theratainment app including cognitive and physical training

06

What researchers measure

Primary outcomes

  1. Technology acceptance (all participants): "Technology Usage Inventory"

    The questionnaire "Technology Usage Inventory" measures technology acceptance. It captures technology-specific and psychological factors contributing to the use of a technological device. The questionnaire has 8 dimensions (curiosity:4 items, anxiety:4 items, interest:4 items, usability/user-friendliness: 3 items, immersion:4 items, utility:4 items, skepticism:4 items and accessibility:3 items) with 30 items (7-point Likert scale). For every dimension 1- 21 or 28 points can be obtained. For all dimensions, higher levels on the respective dimension indicate a higher level of expression in the respective construct.

    Time frame: 1 week

  2. Experience with the robot (all participants)

    Qualitative interviews with people with dementia. 1 qualitative focus group interview for all other participants.

    Time frame: 1 week

Secondary outcomes

  1. Handling the robot (people with dementia)

    Open, 1-hour semi-structured participant observation of people with dementia using the robot at home conducted by nurses.

    Time frame: After 3 days of intervention

  2. Change of mobility (people with dementia)

    Movement data collected by the eye camera of the robot.

    Time frame: 1 week

07

Study locations

1 site
  • Medical University of Graz, Institute of Nursing Science
    Graz, 8010, Austria
08

References and documents

Publications

  • ADI. Journey of caring: an analysis of long-term care for dementia. ADI, London, 2013
  • Bioethikkommission (Bioethics Commission). Roboter in der Betreuung alter Menschen - Stellungnahme der Bioethikkommission (Robots in the care of older people - statement of the Bioethics Commission). Geschäftsstelle der Bioethikkommission, Vienna, 2018
  • Boman IL, Lundberg S, Starkhammar S, Nygard L. Exploring the usability of a videophone mock-up for persons with dementia and their significant others. BMC Geriatr. 2014 Apr 16;14:49. doi: 10.1186/1471-2318-14-49. PubMed 24739662 ↗
  • Lauriks S, Reinersmann A, Van der Roest HG, Meiland FJ, Davies RJ, Moelaert F, Mulvenna MD, Nugent CD, Droes RM. Review of ICT-based services for identified unmet needs in people with dementia. Ageing Res Rev. 2007 Oct;6(3):223-46. doi: 10.1016/j.arr.2007.07.002. Epub 2007 Aug 2. PubMed 17869590 ↗
  • Mao HF, Chang LH, Yao G, Chen WY, Huang WN. Indicators of perceived useful dementia care assistive technology: Caregivers' perspectives. Geriatr Gerontol Int. 2015 Aug;15(8):1049-57. doi: 10.1111/ggi.12398. Epub 2014 Nov 19. PubMed 25407039 ↗
  • NHI, WHO. Global Health and Aging http://www.who.int/ageing/publications/ global_health.pdf. Accessed 18. Dezember 2017, 2011.
  • OECD. Adressing Dementia - the OECD response. OECD publishing, Paris, 2015.
  • Pino M, Boulay M, Jouen F, Rigaud AS. "Are we ready for robots that care for us?" Attitudes and opinions of older adults toward socially assistive robots. Front Aging Neurosci. 2015 Jul 23;7:141. doi: 10.3389/fnagi.2015.00141. eCollection 2015. PubMed 26257646 ↗
  • Prince et al. World Alzheimer Report 2016 - Improving healthcare for people living with dementia. ADI, UK, 2016
  • Robert Koch Institut. Gesundheit in Deutschland. Gesundheitsberichterstattung des Bundes (Health in Germany. Health report of the federal government). Gemeinsam getragen von RKI und Destatis. RKI, Berlin, 2015

Individual participant data

Plan to share: Undecided

09

Updates

Tracking since Sep 25, 2026
No changes since tracking began. The registry record was last updated on Jan 30, 2019, before this site started recording changes on Sep 25, 2026. Its history is on ClinicalTrials.gov ↗
10

Registry details

Key details

Study ID
NCT03823066
Lead sponsor
Medical University of Graz
Collaborators
Joanneum Research Forschungsgesellschaft mbH, Sozialverein Deutschlandsberg, Humanizing Technologies GmbH
Responsible party
Sandra Schüssler (Deputy Head of the Institute of Nursing Science, Medical University of Graz) — Principal investigator
First posted
Jan 30, 2019
Start date
Aug 22, 2018
Primary completion
Sep 18, 2018
Completion
Sep 18, 2018
Last update
Jan 30, 2019

Oversight

Data monitoring committee
No
FDA-regulated drug
No
FDA-regulated device
No
View the source record on ClinicalTrials.gov ↗

Not currently enrolling

This study is completed, as verified in Jan 2019. You cannot join it, but the record below documents what was studied.

Follow this study

Get an email when the registry record changes — status, dates, results — or when someone posts here.

Sign in to follow

Discussion

Questions and observations about this study, from anyone following it. Not medical advice, and not a channel to the study team — their contact details are on the registry record.

Sign in to join the discussion. Reading takes no account; posting does. You choose a display name, and a pseudonym is the default.

Nothing here yet. If you are running this trial, taking part in it, or weighing whether to, this is the place to say so.

Start the discussion