An interventional study of Fiber-reinforced framework and No framework in Completely Edentulous Patients, sponsored by Nermeen Ahmed Hassan. Status unknown. Open to participants aged 30 Years to 65 Years, including healthy volunteers. Per ClinicalTrials.gov, last updated 2019-01-23.
Sponsored by Nermeen Ahmed Hassan · Not applicable, Interventional, and Treatment
In immediate loading of implants of completely edentulous patients, the most common post-surgical complication following the surgery noted in the dental literature is fracture of the provisional restoration with rates ranging from 4.17% to 41%. Most of these fractures occur because polymethyl methacrylate (PMMA) materials are inadequate and have low rigidity to withstand extended periods of heavy occlusal use.
Fractures of full arch provisional restorations during healing are concerning, because they eliminate cross-arch stabilization and disrupt stress distribution patterns which might jeopardize implant osseointegration affecting the survival rates for implants. Therefore, it is important to look for another material that has higher rigidity than PMMA and can withstand masticatory forces for extended periods without fractures or load concentration on the implants during the osseointegration period.
244 studies on the registry are indexed under Mouth, Edentulous; 37 are open to participants now.
This study's planned enrollment of 114 is above the median of 30 across 187 interventional studies indexed under Mouth, Edentulous.
Browse Mouth, Edentulous studies →This is the only study on the registry with Nermeen Ahmed Hassan as lead sponsor.
Counted across the registry records on this site, refreshed daily.
Exclusion Criteria:
Procedure: No framework
Procedure: Fiber-reinforced framework
Glass fiber- reinforced framework is to be picked up over the implant abutments to strengthen the full arch acrylic restorations
Non-reinforced acrylic full arch prosthesis is to be picked up directly over the implant abutments.
Prosthesis survival
Clinical evaluation of any fracture in the prosthesis
Time frame: 4 months
Implant survival
Clinical evaluation of implant loss
Time frame: 4 months
Peri-implant crestal bone loss during healing
Crestal bone loss around implants is to be measured using periapical x ray with parallel technique in millemeters
Time frame: 4 months
No study locations are listed for this record.
This study is status unknown, as verified in Jan 2019. You cannot join it, but the record below documents what was studied.
Get an email when the registry record changes — status, dates, results — or when someone posts here.
Sign in to followQuestions and observations about this study, from anyone following it. Not medical advice, and not a channel to the study team — their contact details are on the registry record.
Sign in to join the discussion. Reading takes no account; posting does. You choose a display name, and a pseudonym is the default.
Nothing here yet. If you are running this trial, taking part in it, or weighing whether to, this is the place to say so.