ClinicalTrials.gg
CompletedNCT03811093Updated Sep 15, 2022Results posted

Comparing the Efficacy of a Dual-Frequency LLLT Device With a Sham Device as a Therapy for Adipose Tissue Loss

An interventional study of Care as Usual Group and Sham Group in Obesity, Body Weight and Fat Burn, sponsored by IR Technology, LLC. Completed at 1 site in United States. Open to participants aged 18 Years and older, including healthy volunteers. Per ClinicalTrials.gov, last updated 2022-09-15.

Sponsored by IR Technology, LLC · Not applicable, Interventional, and Treatment

Phase
Not applicable
Study type
Interventional
Enrollment
39
Allocation
Randomized
Ages
18 Years and older
Sex
All
01

Study summary

The trial was designed to provide empirical evidence with which to compare the efficacy and safety of the invisa-RED Technology Elite Low-level Laser Therapy (LLLT) device with a sham device as a placebo, when both are used in the treatment of individuals to reduce body fat and improve body aesthetics. At the conclusion of the trial; the change in body fat percentage, the change in total body fat in pounds, and total inches lost of the two groups were statistically analyzed to determine the efficacy of the invisa-RED Technology Elite when used for body fat (adipose tissue) loss and/or aesthetics therapy.

Read the detailed description

The trial was designed to prove the efficacy and safety of the invisa-RED Technology Elite Low-level Laser Therapy (LLLT) device. The trial compared results between two groups; the first group was treated using a fully functional invisa-RED Technology Elite device; this group was designated the Usual Care Group.

The second, a control group, was treated utilizing a nonfunctional invisa-RED Technology Elite device; this group is referred to as the Sham Group.The sham device consisted of an invisa-RED Technology Elite device that will appear to operate as the Usual Care Group device to the operator and participants, but the laser diodes will be disabled and will receive no power providing a placebo effect. If staff or a participant questions the efficacy of the sham device, an assertion may be made that only a near infrared, non-visible frequency of light, is being employed.

The trial was conducted employing a double blind study methodology; participants were randomly assigned to each group through a drawing, neither participants nor clinicians knew to which trial group they were assigned. To ensure the double blind; treatment for the two groups occurred separately using clinicians exclusive to each group.

A simplified weight loss protocol was employed based on the "Consultation Protocol" from the invisa-Red Training Manual. All study participants received nine (9) therapy sessions of 20 minutes each; power settings were based on the participants Fitzpatrick Scale skin type. For skin types i and ii a power setting of 7 was used, for skin types iii and iv a power setting of 6, for skin types v and vi a power setting of 4 was employed. At the conclusion of the nine (9) therapy sessions; the change in weight of body fat, body fat as a percentage of total body weight, and inches lost of the two groups were statistically analyzed to determine the efficacy of the invisa-RED Technology Elite as a therapy to reduce adipose tissue. The occurrence of any medical errors were documented and included in the statistical analysis.

02

Conditions studied

  • Obesity
  • Body Weight
  • Fat Burn
  • Cellulite
  • Abdominal Fat
  • Adipose Tissue Atrophy

Keywords

  • Adipose, Fat, Aesthetics, Skin, Weight Reduction,
03

In context

Obesity

11,522 studies on the registry are indexed under Obesity; 2,033 are open to participants now.

This study's enrollment of 39 is below the median of 67 across 9,006 interventional studies indexed under Obesity.

Browse Obesity studies →

Lead sponsor

IR Technology, LLC is the lead sponsor of 2 studies on the registry; none are open to participants now.

Counted across the registry records on this site, refreshed daily.

04

Who can participate

Ages eligible
18 Years and older
Sexes eligible
All
Accepts healthy volunteers
Yes

Go through the criteria one by one — yes, no or not sure — and take the list to your doctor or the study team. Kept in this browser only.

Inclusion criteria

Any healthy individual.

Exclusion criteria

Exclusion Criteria:

  • If you are pregnant, trying to get pregnant or nursing laser light therapy should be received only after the end of these conditions. There is no evidence of harm to a an unborn baby however there have been no safety tests either, so for medical legal reasons we recommend never treating areas directly over a developing child.
  • Individuals with hypertension, light sensitive epilepsy, cancer, heart disease, infectious skin disease, and severe varicose veins should not use this device.
  • People suffering from infectious and acute disease such as a fever should not use this device.
  • People who have hemorrhagic disease, vascular ruptures, skin inflammation, or any disease of the skin should not use this device.
  • People who have immune system dysfunction such as Leukemia, Hemophilia, etc., and light sensitive persons should not use this device.
  • Individuals with a history of melanoma, raised moles, suspicious lesions, keloid scar formation, or healing problems should not undergo laser light therapy.
  • Individuals with active infections, open lesions, hives, herpetic lesions, cold sores, or tattoos and permanent make-up in the area of treatment should not undergo laser light therapy.
  • People who have used isotretinoin (commonly known as Accutane), tetracycline, St. John's Wort, or any photo sensitizing drugs in the last year should not undergo laser light therapy.
  • Individuals with diseases such as Lupus, Scleroderma, or Vitiligo should not undergo laser light therapy.
  • Individuals who have pacemakers or other electro-stimulation devices surgically implanted should not undergo laser light therapy.
  • Any insulin dependent individual should consult their physician before undergoing laser light therapy.
  • All individuals considered "vulnerable" such as children, pregnant women, nursing home residents or other institutionalized persons, students, employees, fetuses, prisoners, and persons with decisional incapacity.
Terms in these criteria, in plain language(1)

Underlined terms in the criteria open these too. Explained by clinicaltrials.gg, not part of the registry record. The study team decides who can take part.

Autoimmune disease

A condition in which the immune system attacks the body’s own tissues, such as rheumatoid arthritis, lupus, psoriasis, type 1 diabetes or inflammatory bowel disease.

Immunotherapy studies often leave out active autoimmune disease, and some name exceptions, such as thyroid disease on replacement hormone. Check the exceptions this study lists.

05

Study design

Phase
Not applicable
Primary purpose
Treatment
Allocation
Randomized
Intervention model
Parallel assignment
Masking
Double (Participant, Care provider)
Enrollment
39 participants (actual)

Study arms

  • Experimental
    Care as Usual Group

    A randomly selected group of 20 participants who received treatment per the prescribed trial protocol using a fully functional invisa-RED Technology Elite device. Treatment protocol was as follows: Participants will undergo nine (9) therapy sessions of 20 minutes each over a three week period; using a singular LLLT protocol setting for pulse (3.5s) and delay (0.2s), however power settings will be based on the participants Fitzpatrick Scale skin type. For skin types i and ii a power setting of 7 will be used, for skin types iii and iv a power setting of 6, for skin types v and vi a power setting of 4 will be employed.

    Device: Care as Usual Group

  • Placebo comparator
    Sham Group

    A randomly selected group of 20 participants who will receive treatment per the prescribed trial protocol using a non functional invisa-RED Technology Elite device. (The sham device will be disabled and will deliver no low laser light energy during therapy.) Treatment protocol is as follows: Participants will undergo nine (9) therapy sessions of 20 minutes each over a three week period; using a singular protocol setting for pulse (3.5s) and delay (0.2s), however power settings will be based on the participants Fitzpatrick Scale skin type. For skin types i and ii a power setting of 7 will be used, for skin types iii and iv a power setting of 6, for skin types v and vi a power setting of 4 will be employed.

    Device: Sham Group

Interventions

  • DeviceCare as Usual Group

    Each participant randomly assigned to the "Care As Usual Group" will undergo nine therapy sessions over three weeks using a fully functioning invisa-RED Technology Elite device.

  • DeviceSham Group

    Each participant randomly assigned to the "Sham Group" will undergo nine therapy sessions over three weeks using a non functioning invisa-RED Technology Elite device.

06

What researchers measure

Primary outcomes

  1. Change in Body Fat Percentage

    Measured change in body fat as a percentage of total weight.

    Time frame: In order to determine change over time, body fat as a percentage of body weight will be measured before any treatment at first therapy session and measured again for comparison at the end of three weeks therapy.

  2. Change in Body Circumference Measurements

    The prescribed body circumference measurements of the chest, right arm, upper-waist, mid-waist, hips, and right thigh are summed for each participant and recorded.

    Time frame: In order to determine change over time, the prescribed body measurements will be summed for each participant and recorded before any treatment at first therapy session and recorded again for comparison at the end of three weeks therapy.

  3. Change in Weight of Body Fat

    The percentage of body fat for each participant was measured using Bioelectrical Impedance Analysis (BIA). That percentage is then multiplied by the total body weight of the participant in order to calculate the weight in pounds of the participants body fat.

    Time frame: In order to determine change over time, each participants body fat weight will be calculated before any treatment at the first therapy session and calculated again to determine if there exists any change at the end of three weeks therapy.

07

Results

Posted Jun 4, 2019

Participant flow

The Trial recruitment period had a start date of January 14th and ended on January 19th 2019. (A total of 6 days) All participant recruitment and interviews were conducted at the Cross Chiropractic Center in Hixson, TN.

Participant flow — Overall Study
MilestoneCare as Usual GroupSham Group
Started2019
Completed1815
Not completed24
Withdrew: Lack of efficacy, withdrawal by subject04
Withdrew: Unable to measure body fat percentage20

Outcome measures

PrimaryChange in Body Fat Percentage

Measured change in body fat as a percentage of total weight.

Time frame:
In order to determine change over time, body fat as a percentage of body weight will be measured before any treatment at first therapy session and measured again for comparison at the end of three weeks therapy.
Reported as:
Mean · Percentage of Body Fat
Change in Body Fat Percentage
Percentage of Body FatCare as Usual GroupSham Group
Change in Body Fat Percentage-1.7556 (-2.4273 to -1.0838)0.280 (-.1194 to 0.6794)
Statistical analysis
  • Care as Usual Group vs Sham Group · t-test, 2 sided · p = <0.01 (p-value is calculated using SPSS.) · Mean difference (net): 2.036 · 95% CI 1.243 to 2.828
  • Care as Usual Group vs Sham Group · Kolmogorov-Smirnov Test · p = 0.20 (The significance value has been Lilliefors corrected and represents the lower bound of the true significance.)
  • Care as Usual Group vs Sham Group · Levene's Test for Equality of Variance · p = 0.075
PrimaryChange in Body Circumference Measurements

The prescribed body circumference measurements of the chest, right arm, upper-waist, mid-waist, hips, and right thigh are summed for each participant and recorded.

Time frame:
In order to determine change over time, the prescribed body measurements will be summed for each participant and recorded before any treatment at first therapy session and recorded again for comparison at the end of three weeks therapy.
Reported as:
Mean · Inches
Change in Body Circumference Measurements
InchesCare as Usual GroupSham Group
Change in Body Circumference Measurements-10.162500 (-12.1930 to -8.1319)-3.100000 (-5.8958 to -.304128)
Statistical analysis
  • Care as Usual Group vs Sham Group · t-test, 2 sided · p = <0.01 (p-value is calculated using SPSS.) · Mean difference (net): 7.063 · 95% CI 3.829 to 10.296
  • Care as Usual Group vs Sham Group · Kolmogorov-Smirnov Test · p = 0.20 (The significance value has been Lilliefors corrected and represents the lower bound of the true significance.)
  • Care as Usual Group vs Sham Group · Levene's Test for Equality of Variance · p = 0.44
PrimaryChange in Weight of Body Fat

The percentage of body fat for each participant was measured using Bioelectrical Impedance Analysis (BIA). That percentage is then multiplied by the total body weight of the participant in order to calculate the weight in pounds of the participants body fat.

Time frame:
In order to determine change over time, each participants body fat weight will be calculated before any treatment at the first therapy session and calculated again to determine if there exists any change at the end of three weeks therapy.
Reported as:
Mean · Pounds
Change in Weight of Body Fat
PoundsCare as Usual GroupSham Group
Change in Weight of Body Fat-4.5183 ± 3.42558-.0480 ± 2.35970
Statistical analysis
  • Care as Usual Group vs Sham Group · t-test, 2 sided · p = <0.01 (p-value is computed using SPSS.) · Mean difference (net): 4.4703 · 95% CI 2.3372 to 6.6034
  • Care as Usual Group vs Sham Group · Kolmogorov-Smirnov Test · p = .200 (The significance value has been Lilliefors corrected and represents the lower bound of the true significance.)
  • Care as Usual Group vs Sham Group · Levene's Test for Equality of Variance · p = .438

Adverse events

Collected over Three weeks concurrent with clinical trial.. Non-serious events are listed at a 0% frequency threshold.

Adverse event summary by group
GroupDeathsSeriousOther
Care as Usual Group0/20 (0%)0/20 (0%)0/20 (0%)
Sham Group0/15 (0%)0/15 (0%)0/15 (0%)

Baseline characteristics

Age, Continuous
Age, Continuous(years)Care as Usual GroupSham GroupTotal
Mean48.6 ± 9.2250.6 ± 13.3049.46 ± 11.01
Sex: Female, Male
Sex: Female, Male(Participants)Care as Usual GroupSham GroupTotal
Female191635
Male134
Race and Ethnicity Not Collected
Race and Ethnicity Not Collected(Participants)Care as Usual GroupSham GroupTotal
Count of participants——0
Region of Enrollment
Region of Enrollment(participants)Care as Usual GroupSham GroupTotal
United States201939
Percentage Body Fat
Percentage Body Fat(Percent Body Fat)Care as Usual GroupSham GroupTotal
Mean40.38 ± 6.2539.63 ± 6.9040.04 ± 6.46
Body Circumference Measurements
Body Circumference Measurements(Inches)Care as Usual GroupSham GroupTotal
Mean225.19 ± 30.64222.58 ± 24.83224.07 ± 27.93
Weight of Body Fat
Weight of Body Fat(Pounds)Care as Usual GroupSham GroupTotal
Mean82.80 ± 28.1285.81 ± 26.0684.17 ± 26.83
08

Study locations

1 site
  • Cross Chiropractic Center
    Hixson, Tennessee 37343, United States
09

References and documents

Study documents

PDFs hosted by the registry, ClinicalTrials.gov.

Individual participant data

Plan to share: No

10

Updates

Tracking since Sep 25, 2026
No changes since tracking began. The registry record was last updated on Sep 15, 2022, before this site started recording changes on Sep 25, 2026. Its history is on ClinicalTrials.gov ↗
11

Registry details

Key details

Study ID
NCT03811093
Lead sponsor
IR Technology, LLC
Responsible party
Sponsor
First posted
Jan 22, 2019
Start date
Jan 21, 2019
Primary completion
Feb 9, 2019
Completion
Feb 9, 2019
Results posted
Jun 4, 2019
Last update
Sep 15, 2022

Study contacts

Thomas A Namynanik, BS
study director

Oversight

Data monitoring committee
No
FDA-regulated drug
No
FDA-regulated device
Yes
View the source record on ClinicalTrials.gov ↗

Not currently enrolling

This study is completed, as verified in Aug 2022. You cannot join it, but the record below documents what was studied.

Follow this study

Get an email when the registry record changes — status, dates, results — or when someone posts here.

Sign in to follow

Discussion

Questions and observations about this study, from anyone following it. Not medical advice, and not a channel to the study team — their contact details are on the registry record.

Sign in to join the discussion. Reading takes no account; posting does. You choose a display name, and a pseudonym is the default.

Nothing here yet. If you are running this trial, taking part in it, or weighing whether to, this is the place to say so.

Start the discussion