CClinicalTrials.gg
Active, not recruitingNCT03808441CAcTUSUpdated Aug 25, 2023

CAcTUS - Circulating Tumour DNA Guided Switch

A Phase 2 interventional study of ctDNA analysis in Melanoma, sponsored by The Christie NHS Foundation Trust. Active, not recruiting at 1 site in United Kingdom. Open to participants aged 16 Years and older. Per ClinicalTrials.gov, last updated 2023-08-25.

Sponsored by The Christie NHS Foundation Trust · Phase 2, Interventional, and Treatment

Phase
Phase 2
Study type
Interventional
Enrollment
21
Allocation
Randomized
Ages
16 Years and older
Sex
All
01

Study summary

The stay aims to determine whether switching from targeted therapy to immunotherapy based on a decrease in levels of circulating tumour DNA in the blood, will improve the outcome in melanoma patients.

Read the detailed description

The optimal scheduling of targeted and immune therapies in metastatic melanoma is unknown. At present, patients are treated with targeted therapy until acquired resistance develops, and then switched to immune therapy. Pre-clinical data has revealed that BRAF inhibition results in an environment that can enhance immune responses. Tumours responding to BRAF inhibitors but not resistant have been shown to have increased T cell infiltration, improved T cell recognition of melanoma associated antigens and reduced production of immunosuppressive cytokines. Furthermore, in response to targeted therapy LDH levels, which are associated with decreased response to immune therapy reduces, which may improve efficacy of immunotherapy.

A precise definition of response is required in order to decide upon a switch to immune therapy. A radiological definition of response is currently the standard assessment. However a scan at a fixed time point of 2 or 3 months does not reflect the wide range of response dynamics or allow decision making on an individual patient basis. The investigators have developed techniques using circulating tumour DNA (ctDNA) in the metastatic setting, which are able to accurately monitor tumour burden over time.

The aim of this pilot study is to provide a signal as to whether:

  1. In BRAF mutant melanoma the efficacy of immune therapy is enhanced by response to pre-treatment with MAPK pathway inhibition with dabrafenib + trametinib.
  2. Changes in ctDNA levels can be used to accurately inform when to switch from targeted to immune therapy.

Data from this study will provide the basis for follow on studies with sufficient power to assess whether tumours responding to BRAF inhibition as defined by response in ctDNA can improve efficacy of immune therapy.

02

Conditions studied

  • Melanoma

Browse trials for

Keywords

  • Circulating tumour DNA
  • targeted therapy
  • immune therapy
  • dabrafenib
  • trametinib
  • ipilimumab
  • nivolumab
03

In context

Melanoma

3,006 studies on the registry are indexed under Melanoma; 520 are open to participants now.

This study's enrollment of 21 is below the median of 38 across 2,351 interventional studies indexed under Melanoma.

Browse Melanoma studies →

Lead sponsor

The Christie NHS Foundation Trust is the lead sponsor of 99 studies on the registry; 25 are open to participants now.

Counted across the registry records on this site, refreshed daily.

04

Who can participate

Ages eligible
16 Years and older
Sexes eligible
All
Accepts healthy volunteers
No

Inclusion criteria

  1. Patient capable of giving written informed consent
  2. Patients must be willing and able to comply with scheduled visits, treatment schedule, laboratory tests and other requirements of the study.
  3. Histological confirmation of cutaneous melanoma
  4. ≥ 16 years
  5. Stage III un-resectable/ IV disease
  6. BRAF p.V600E/K/R mutation confirmed (exact point mutation must be provided to the investigators)
  7. At least one target lesion measurable by CT or MRI as per RECIST 1.1
  8. Baseline ctDNA (as defined by the mutant BRAF VAF in plasma) ≥1.5%
  9. Adequate organ function
  10. ECOG performance status 0/1
  11. Prior radiotherapy or radiosurgery must have been completed at least 2 weeks prior to the first dose of study drug
  12. Women of childbearing potential (WOCBP) must have a negative serum or urine pregnancy test (minimum sensitivity 25 IU/L or equivalent units of HCG) within 24 hours prior to the start of study drug.
  13. WOCBP must agree to follow instructions for method(s) of contraception for the duration of treatment with study drugs plus 5 half-lives of the drugs they are taking at treatment completion (5 times the half-life = 125 days [nivolumab]; 5 times the half-life = 90 days [ipilimumab]; 5 times the half life = 40 hours [dabrafenib]; 5 times the half life = 50 days [trametinib]) plus 30 days (duration of ovulatory cycle).
  14. Males who are sexually active with WOCBP must agree to follow instructions for method(s) of contraception for the duration of treatment plus 5 half-lives of the study drug as above plus 90 days (duration of sperm turnover).
  15. Azoospermic males and WOCBP who are continuously not heterosexually active are exempt from contraceptive requirements

Exclusion criteria

Exclusion Criteria:

  1. Prior systemic anti-cancer treatment (immune therapy, targeted therapy, vaccine therapy, or investigational treatment) for unresectable Stage III or Stage IV melanoma.
  2. Prior adjuvant therapy with BRAF +/- MEK inhibitor or adjuvant therapy with combination PD-1 inhibitor plus CTLA-4 inhibitor. Prior adjuvant therapy with PD-1 inhibitor is allowed so long as relapse occurred > 6 months from discontinuation of treatment and treatment not stopped due to grade 3 or 4 toxicity.
  3. Current use of a prohibited medication
  4. History of another malignancy. Exception: patients who have been disease-free for 3 years, (i.e. patients with second malignancies that are indolent or definitively treated at least 3 years ago) or patients with a history of completely resected non-melanoma skin cancer. No additional therapy should be required whilst the patient is on study.
  5. Any serious or unstable pre-existing medical conditions (aside from malignancy exceptions specified above), psychiatric disorders, or other conditions that could interfere with the patients safety, obtaining informed consent, or compliance with study procedures.
  6. Known Human Immunodeficiency Virus (HIV), Hepatitis B Virus (HBV), or Hepatitis C Virus (HCV) infection (patients with laboratory evidence of cleared or chronic (not active) HBV and HCV infection will be permitted).
  7. A history of glucose-6-phosphate dehydrogenase (G6PD) deficiency.
  8. Patients with active, known or suspected autoimmune disease. Patients with type 1 diabetes mellitus, hypothyroidism only requiring hormone replacement, skin disorders (such as vitiligo, psoriasis or alopecia) not requiring systemic treatment, or conditions not expected to recur in the absence of an external trigger will be permitted to enrol.
  9. Patients with a condition requiring systemic treatment with either corticosteroids (>10 mg daily prednisone equivalent) or other immunosuppressive medications within 14 days of study drug administration. Inhaled or topical steroids and adrenal replacement steroid doses > 10 mg daily prednisone equivalent are permitted in the absence of active autoimmune disease.
  10. Patients with interstitial lung disease that is symptomatic or may interfere with the detection or management of suspected drug-related pulmonary toxicity.
  11. Brain metastases and leptomeningeal metastases are excluded unless:

    • Asymptomatic and untreated at presentation, OR
    • Symptomatic lesions have been definitively treated with surgery or stereotactic surgery (whole-brain radiation may be given as adjuvant treatment), and do not require steroids for control of symptoms
    • Symptomatic metastases, treated or untreated, or metastases requiring steroids to control symptoms, are excluded
  12. No enzyme inducing anticonvulsants for ≥ 4 weeks prior to randomisation
  13. Coronary syndromes (including myocardial infarction within 6 months or unstable angina)
  14. A history or evidence of current ≥ Class II congestive heart failure as defined by the New York Heart Association (NYHA) guidelines with an ejection fraction of \<50%
  15. Treatment refractory hypertension defined as a blood pressure of systolic> 150 mmHg and/or diastolic > 95 mm Hg on >3 occasions which cannot be controlled by anti-hypertensive therapy;
  16. Known cardiac metastases;
  17. Uncorrectable electrolyte abnormalities (e.g. hypokalaemia, hypomagnesaemia, hypocalcaemia), long QT syndrome or taking medicinal products known to prolong the QT interval.
  18. A history or current evidence/risk of retinal vein occlusion (RVO) or central serous retinopathy (CSR) including presence of predisposing factors to RVO or CSR (e.g., uncontrolled glaucoma or ocular hypertension, uncontrolled hypertension, uncontrolled diabetes mellitus, or a history of hyperviscosity or hypercoagulability syndromes)
  19. Known immediate or delayed hypersensitivity reaction or idiosyncrasy to drugs chemically related to the study treatments including monoclonal antibodies, their excipients, and/or dimethyl sulfoxide (DMSO) and/or Polysorbate-80-containing infusions.
  20. Females who are breast-feeding.
  21. Prisoners or patients who are involuntarily incarcerated.
  22. Patients who are compulsorily detained for treatment of either a psychiatric or physical (e.g., infectious disease) illness.
05

Study design

Phase
Phase 2
Primary purpose
Treatment
Allocation
Randomized
Intervention model
Parallel assignment
Masking
None (open label)
Enrollment
21 participants (actual)

Study arms

  • No intervention
    Standard Arm

    Dabrafenib + Trametinib Switch to N+I at first progression

  • Active comparator
    ctDNA Guided Switch

    Dabrafenib + Trametinib Switch to N+I when ctDNA levels in the blood have dropped by ≥80%.

    Other: ctDNA analysis

Interventions

  • OtherctDNA analysis

    Regular ctDNA analysis, which upon a decrease in mutant BRAF VAF (variant allele frequency) level of ≥80% the switch to N+I is triggered.

06

What researchers measure

Primary outcomes

  1. CtDNA result critical (red) blood samples returned within 7 working days of samples being received in the laboratory

    Feasibility of returning samples to hospitals from the laboratory to inform clinical decisions

    Time frame: 12 months from last patient starting trial treatment

  2. Decrease in ctDNA level of mutant BRAF≥80%

    To assess whether a decrease in ctDNA levels of mutant BRAF by ≥80% on targeted therapy is an appropriate cut off for switching to immune therapy

    Time frame: Through study completion, an average of 1 year

Secondary outcomes

  1. Screen failure due to ctDNA levels of mutant BRAF VAF <1.5% Efficacy

    To assess whether BRAF VAF (within the ctDNA) of ≥1.5% is an appropriate target for study inclusion (by assessing the number and proportion of screen failures

    Time frame: Through study completion, an average of 1 year

  2. First progression free survival (PFS) at 12 months

    To explore whether PFS at 12 months would improve in patients switching from targeted to immune therapy on response to treatment as guided by ctDNA levels of mutant BRAF VAF

    Time frame: Through study completion, an average of 1 year

  3. First progression free survival

    Time to first progression in both arms

    Time frame: When all patients finished follow up, 4 years after last patient starting treatment

  4. Second progression free survival

    Time to second progression in both arms

    Time frame: When all patients finished follow up, 4 years after last patient starting treatment

  5. Overall survival

    Explore whether survival outcomes would improve in patients switching from targeted to immune therapy on response to treatment as guided by ctDNA levels of mutant BRAF VAF

    Time frame: When all patients finished follow up, 4 years after last patient starting treatment

Other outcomes

  1. Time to ctDNA first progression

    Time to first progression measured by ctDNA

    Time frame: Through study completion, an average of 1 year

  2. Time to ctDNA second progression

    Time to second progression measured by ctDNA

    Time frame: Through study completion, an average of 1 year

  3. Increase in ctDNA levels of BRAF VAF during washout period from targeted to immune therapy switch in arm B

    Time frame: When all patients finished treatment, an average of 1 year after last patient starting treatment

  4. Duration of mutant BRAF VAF (within ctDNA) response to targeted therapy

    Time frame: When all patients finished treatment, an average of 1 year after last patient starting treatment

  5. Duration of mutant BRAF VAF (within ctDNA) response to immune therapy

    Time frame: When all patients finished treatment, an average of 1 year after last patient starting treatment

  6. Time between observing rise in ctDNA levels of mutant BRAF VAF and progressive disease observed on scheduled scan

    To explore the relationship between observing a rise in ctDNA level of mutant BRAF VAF and progressive disease observed from scheduled scan results

    Time frame: When all patients finished treatment, an average of 1 year after last patient starting treatment

  7. Time taken for mutant ctDNA level of mutant BRAF VAF to reach ≥80% decrease on targeted therapy

    To compare duration in ctDNA level of mutant BRAF VAF response to targeted therapy between study arms

    Time frame: When all patients finished treatment, an average of 1 year after last patient starting treatment

  8. ctDNA level of mutant BRAF VAF (at each follow-up assessment timepoint)

    To compare duration in ctDNA level of mutant BRAF VAF (within ctDNA) response to immune therapy between study arms

    Time frame: When all patients finished treatment, an average of 1 year after last patient starting treatment

  9. Best overall response rate to immune therapy

    To explore whether switching from targeted to immune therapy on treatment response as guided by ctDNA levels of mutant BRAF VAF will increase response to therapy

    Time frame: hen all patients finished treatment, an average of 1 year after last patient starting treatment

  10. Duration of response to immune therapy

    Time frame: When all patients finished treatment, an average of 1 year after last patient starting treatment

  11. Progression free survival on immune therapy from date of commencement of immune therapy

    Time to progression on immune therapy

    Time frame: When all patients finished treatment, an average of 1 year after last patient starting treatment

07

Study locations

1 site
  • The Christie NHS Foundation Trust
    Manchester, M20 4BX, United Kingdom
08

References and documents

Individual participant data

Plan to share: No

No publications or documents are linked to this record.

09

Updates

Tracking since Sep 25, 2026
No changes since tracking began. The registry record was last updated on Aug 25, 2023, before this site started recording changes on Sep 25, 2026. Its history is on ClinicalTrials.gov ↗
10

Registry details

Key details

Study ID
NCT03808441
Lead sponsor
The Christie NHS Foundation Trust
Collaborators
Bristol-Myers Squibb, University of Manchester, Manchester Academic Health Science Centre
Responsible party
Sponsor
First posted
Jan 17, 2019
Start date
May 2, 2019
Primary completion
Apr 26, 2023
Completion
May 2, 2024 (estimated)
Last update
Aug 25, 2023

Study contacts

Paul Lorigan
principal investigator · The Christie National Health Service (NHS) Foundation Trust

Oversight

Data monitoring committee
No
FDA-regulated drug
No
FDA-regulated device
No
View the source record on ClinicalTrials.gov ↗

Not currently enrolling

This study is active, not recruiting, as verified in Aug 2023. You cannot join it, but the record below documents what was studied.

Follow this study

Get an email when the registry record changes — status, dates, results — or when someone posts here.

Sign in to follow

Discussion

Questions and observations about this study, from anyone following it. Not medical advice, and not a channel to the study team — their contact details are on the registry record.

Sign in to join the discussion. Reading takes no account; posting does. You choose a display name, and a pseudonym is the default.

Nothing here yet. If you are running this trial, taking part in it, or weighing whether to, this is the place to say so.

Start the discussion