A Phase 2 interventional study of ctDNA analysis in Melanoma, sponsored by The Christie NHS Foundation Trust. Active, not recruiting at 1 site in United Kingdom. Open to participants aged 16 Years and older. Per ClinicalTrials.gov, last updated 2023-08-25.
Sponsored by The Christie NHS Foundation Trust · Phase 2, Interventional, and Treatment
The stay aims to determine whether switching from targeted therapy to immunotherapy based on a decrease in levels of circulating tumour DNA in the blood, will improve the outcome in melanoma patients.
The optimal scheduling of targeted and immune therapies in metastatic melanoma is unknown. At present, patients are treated with targeted therapy until acquired resistance develops, and then switched to immune therapy. Pre-clinical data has revealed that BRAF inhibition results in an environment that can enhance immune responses. Tumours responding to BRAF inhibitors but not resistant have been shown to have increased T cell infiltration, improved T cell recognition of melanoma associated antigens and reduced production of immunosuppressive cytokines. Furthermore, in response to targeted therapy LDH levels, which are associated with decreased response to immune therapy reduces, which may improve efficacy of immunotherapy.
A precise definition of response is required in order to decide upon a switch to immune therapy. A radiological definition of response is currently the standard assessment. However a scan at a fixed time point of 2 or 3 months does not reflect the wide range of response dynamics or allow decision making on an individual patient basis. The investigators have developed techniques using circulating tumour DNA (ctDNA) in the metastatic setting, which are able to accurately monitor tumour burden over time.
The aim of this pilot study is to provide a signal as to whether:
Data from this study will provide the basis for follow on studies with sufficient power to assess whether tumours responding to BRAF inhibition as defined by response in ctDNA can improve efficacy of immune therapy.
3,006 studies on the registry are indexed under Melanoma; 520 are open to participants now.
This study's enrollment of 21 is below the median of 38 across 2,351 interventional studies indexed under Melanoma.
Browse Melanoma studies →The Christie NHS Foundation Trust is the lead sponsor of 99 studies on the registry; 25 are open to participants now.
Counted across the registry records on this site, refreshed daily.
Exclusion Criteria:
Brain metastases and leptomeningeal metastases are excluded unless:
Dabrafenib + Trametinib Switch to N+I at first progression
Dabrafenib + Trametinib Switch to N+I when ctDNA levels in the blood have dropped by ≥80%.
Other: ctDNA analysis
Regular ctDNA analysis, which upon a decrease in mutant BRAF VAF (variant allele frequency) level of ≥80% the switch to N+I is triggered.
CtDNA result critical (red) blood samples returned within 7 working days of samples being received in the laboratory
Feasibility of returning samples to hospitals from the laboratory to inform clinical decisions
Time frame: 12 months from last patient starting trial treatment
Decrease in ctDNA level of mutant BRAF≥80%
To assess whether a decrease in ctDNA levels of mutant BRAF by ≥80% on targeted therapy is an appropriate cut off for switching to immune therapy
Time frame: Through study completion, an average of 1 year
Screen failure due to ctDNA levels of mutant BRAF VAF <1.5% Efficacy
To assess whether BRAF VAF (within the ctDNA) of ≥1.5% is an appropriate target for study inclusion (by assessing the number and proportion of screen failures
Time frame: Through study completion, an average of 1 year
First progression free survival (PFS) at 12 months
To explore whether PFS at 12 months would improve in patients switching from targeted to immune therapy on response to treatment as guided by ctDNA levels of mutant BRAF VAF
Time frame: Through study completion, an average of 1 year
First progression free survival
Time to first progression in both arms
Time frame: When all patients finished follow up, 4 years after last patient starting treatment
Second progression free survival
Time to second progression in both arms
Time frame: When all patients finished follow up, 4 years after last patient starting treatment
Overall survival
Explore whether survival outcomes would improve in patients switching from targeted to immune therapy on response to treatment as guided by ctDNA levels of mutant BRAF VAF
Time frame: When all patients finished follow up, 4 years after last patient starting treatment
Time to ctDNA first progression
Time to first progression measured by ctDNA
Time frame: Through study completion, an average of 1 year
Time to ctDNA second progression
Time to second progression measured by ctDNA
Time frame: Through study completion, an average of 1 year
Increase in ctDNA levels of BRAF VAF during washout period from targeted to immune therapy switch in arm B
Time frame: When all patients finished treatment, an average of 1 year after last patient starting treatment
Duration of mutant BRAF VAF (within ctDNA) response to targeted therapy
Time frame: When all patients finished treatment, an average of 1 year after last patient starting treatment
Duration of mutant BRAF VAF (within ctDNA) response to immune therapy
Time frame: When all patients finished treatment, an average of 1 year after last patient starting treatment
Time between observing rise in ctDNA levels of mutant BRAF VAF and progressive disease observed on scheduled scan
To explore the relationship between observing a rise in ctDNA level of mutant BRAF VAF and progressive disease observed from scheduled scan results
Time frame: When all patients finished treatment, an average of 1 year after last patient starting treatment
Time taken for mutant ctDNA level of mutant BRAF VAF to reach ≥80% decrease on targeted therapy
To compare duration in ctDNA level of mutant BRAF VAF response to targeted therapy between study arms
Time frame: When all patients finished treatment, an average of 1 year after last patient starting treatment
ctDNA level of mutant BRAF VAF (at each follow-up assessment timepoint)
To compare duration in ctDNA level of mutant BRAF VAF (within ctDNA) response to immune therapy between study arms
Time frame: When all patients finished treatment, an average of 1 year after last patient starting treatment
Best overall response rate to immune therapy
To explore whether switching from targeted to immune therapy on treatment response as guided by ctDNA levels of mutant BRAF VAF will increase response to therapy
Time frame: hen all patients finished treatment, an average of 1 year after last patient starting treatment
Duration of response to immune therapy
Time frame: When all patients finished treatment, an average of 1 year after last patient starting treatment
Progression free survival on immune therapy from date of commencement of immune therapy
Time to progression on immune therapy
Time frame: When all patients finished treatment, an average of 1 year after last patient starting treatment
Plan to share: No
No publications or documents are linked to this record.
This study is active, not recruiting, as verified in Aug 2023. You cannot join it, but the record below documents what was studied.
Get an email when the registry record changes — status, dates, results — or when someone posts here.
Sign in to followQuestions and observations about this study, from anyone following it. Not medical advice, and not a channel to the study team — their contact details are on the registry record.
Sign in to join the discussion. Reading takes no account; posting does. You choose a display name, and a pseudonym is the default.
Nothing here yet. If you are running this trial, taking part in it, or weighing whether to, this is the place to say so.
The Christie NHS Foundation Trust