ClinicalTrials.gg
CompletedNCT03801291Updated Jan 11, 2019

Transvaginal Versus Transperineal Repair of Rectocele

An interventional study of Transvaginal repair and Transperineal repair in Rectocele, sponsored by Mansoura University. Completed at 1 site in Egypt. Open to female participants aged 18 Years to 70 Years. Per ClinicalTrials.gov, last updated 2019-01-11.

Sponsored by Mansoura University · Not applicable, Interventional, and Treatment

From the registry’s dates

  • Registered 2 years 9 months after the study started (first participant enrolled Apr 2016, registered Jan 2019).
Phase
Not applicable
Study type
Interventional
Enrollment
64
Allocation
Randomized
Ages
18 Years to 70 Years
Sex
Female
01

Study summary

Patients with anterior rectocele were randomized to undergo either transvaginal or transperineal repair. The primary outcome of the study was improvement in constipation at 6 and 12 months

02

Conditions studied

  • Rectocele

Browse trials for

03

In context

Rectocele

50 studies on the registry are indexed under Rectocele; 9 are open to participants now.

This study's enrollment of 64 is close to the median of 62 across 37 interventional studies indexed under Rectocele.

Browse Rectocele studies →

Lead sponsor

Mansoura University is the lead sponsor of 1,119 studies on the registry; 183 are open to participants now.

Of its 9 completed or terminated interventional studies of FDA-regulated products, 0 (0%) have results posted.

Counted across the registry records on this site, refreshed daily.

04

Who can participate

Ages eligible
18 Years to 70 Years
Sexes eligible
Female
Accepts healthy volunteers
No

Go through the criteria one by one — yes, no or not sure — and take the list to your doctor or the study team. Kept in this browser only.

Inclusion criteria

  • Adult female patients with anterior rectocele

Exclusion criteria

Exclusion Criteria:

  • Male patients.
  • Combined rectocele with internal rectal prolapse.
  • Anismus.
  • Associated anorectal condition such as hemorrhoids and anal fissure.
  • Pregnancy.
  • Unwilling to participate in the trial
05

Study design

Phase
Not applicable
Primary purpose
Treatment
Allocation
Randomized
Intervention model
Parallel assignment
Masking
Triple (Participant, Investigator, Outcomes assessor)
Enrollment
64 participants (actual)

Study arms

  • Active comparator
    Transvaginal repair

    Repair of anterior rectocele via the vagina

    Procedure: Transvaginal repair

  • Active comparator
    Transperineal repair

    Repair of anterior rectocele via the perineum

    Procedure: Transperineal repair

Interventions

  • ProcedureTransvaginal repair

    Vaginal incision through which plication of the rectovaginal septum is done

  • ProcedureTransperineal repair

    Perineal incision through which plication of the rectovaginal septum is done

06

What researchers measure

Primary outcomes

  1. Improvement in constipation

    decrease in Wexner constipation score by 25%

    Time frame: 6 and 12 months after surgery

07

Study locations

1 site
  • Mansoura university hospital
    Mansourah, Dakahlia, Egypt
08

References and documents

Publications

  • Balata M, Elgendy H, Emile SH, Youssef M, Omar W, Khafagy W. Functional Outcome and Sexual-Related Quality of Life After Transperineal Versus Transvaginal Repair of Anterior Rectocele: A Randomized Clinical Trial. Dis Colon Rectum. 2020 Apr;63(4):527-537. doi: 10.1097/DCR.0000000000001595. PubMed 31996580 ↗

Individual participant data

Plan to share: Undecided

09

Timeline

Tracking since Sep 25, 2026
ElapsedEstimatedEstimated, not yet reachedSimilar studies: half by the dot; the band is the middle halfHalf of similar studies reached it by the dot; the band is the middle half, from a quarter to three quarters

Ran from Apr 2016 to primary completion in Jul 2018, 27 months.

Of 16 interventional studies with no phase under Rectocele, half reached primary completion within 24 months of starting (the median), counting those still running; a quarter within 11 and three quarters within 38. This study's 27 months is above that.

How these figures are worked out, and which studies are left out of them.

Registered
Jan 9, 2019
First posted
Jan 11, 2019
StartActual
Apr 1, 2016
Primary completionActual
Jul 1, 2018
CompletionActual
Jan 7, 2019
Last update
Jan 11, 2019
What these dates mean
Start.
When the first participant enrolled; while estimated, when the study expects to open to recruitment.
Primary completion.
When the last participant was examined or treated to collect data for the study's main question, its primary outcome. A study that stopped early gives the date its data collection stopped.
Completion.
When the last participant's last visit took place, for every outcome, secondary ones and side effects included: the end of the study. Often later than primary completion, sometimes the same day.
Actual and Est.
Actual means the registry says the date has happened. Est. (estimated) is a date the sponsor plans or expects. It can still move, and the sponsor is expected to change it to actual once it has passed.
No changes since tracking began. The registry record was last updated on Jan 11, 2019, before this site started recording changes on Sep 25, 2026. Its history is on ClinicalTrials.gov ↗
10

Registry details

Key details

Study ID
NCT03801291
Responsible party
Sameh Emile (Lecturer of general surgery, Mansoura University) — Principal investigator
First posted
Jan 11, 2019
Start date
Apr 1, 2016
Primary completion
Jul 1, 2018
Completion
Jan 7, 2019
Last update
Jan 11, 2019

Study contacts

Sameh H Emile
principal investigator · Mansoura University

Oversight

Data monitoring committee
No
FDA-regulated drug
No
FDA-regulated device
No
View the source record on ClinicalTrials.gov ↗

Not currently enrolling

This study is completed, as verified in Jan 2019. You cannot join it, but the record below documents what was studied.

Follow this study

Get an email when the registry record changes — status, dates, results — or when someone posts here.

Sign in to follow

Discussion

Questions and observations about this study, from anyone following it. Not medical advice, and not a channel to the study team — their contact details are on the registry record.

Sign in to join the discussion. Reading takes no account; posting does. You choose a display name, and a pseudonym is the default.

Nothing here yet. If you are running this trial, taking part in it, or weighing whether to, this is the place to say so.

Start the discussion