CClinicalTrials.gg
CompletedNCT03790917ANTEYUpdated Jul 16, 2020Results posted

Assessment of Adherence to New Oral anTicoagulants in Atrial Fibrillation patiEnts Within the Outpatient registrY

An observational study in Atrial Fibrillation, sponsored by National Research Center for Preventive Medicine. Completed at 1 site in Russian Federation. Open to participants aged 18 Years and older. Per ClinicalTrials.gov, last updated 2020-07-16.

Sponsored by National Research Center for Preventive Medicine · Observational

Study type
Observational
Model
Cohort
Time perspective
Prospective
Enrollment
201
Ages
18 Years and older
Sex
All
01

Study summary

A prospective non-interventional single-centre study aimed to evaluate actual adherence of AF patients using the validated adherence Scale.

Primary Study Objective(s) Primary study objective The aim of the present study is to assess adherence to therapy and factors associated with adherence in patients with CV disease complicated by non-valvular atrial fibrillation requiring OAC treatment within the outpatient registry PROFILE (prospective, observational study).

  1. Data collection in patients with non-valvular atrial fibrillation requiring OAC treatment included in the registry
  2. Evaluation of actual patient adherence to OACs

Secondary Study Objective(s)

  1. Evaluation of potential patient adherence to OACs
  2. Determination of the most significant factors associated with adherence to OACs in patients with non-valvular AF
  3. Validation of new original 5-item Questionnaire
  4. Evaluation of doctor's adherence to OAC prescription according to Guidelines (ESC). Management of atrial fibrillation,2016)
Read the detailed description

AF patients from ongoing PROFILE registry will be invited to visit the scientific center.

2 visits with a 6-month interval are expected for each patient as part of routine clinical practice and phone contact is scheduled for each patient 1 year from the first visit to the scientific center (follow-up period).

02

Conditions studied

  • Atrial Fibrillation

Browse trials for

Keywords

  • adherence
  • new oral anticoagulants (NOACs)
  • AF
03

In context

Atrial Fibrillation

3,870 studies on the registry are indexed under Atrial Fibrillation; 924 are open to participants now.

This study's enrollment of 201 is below the median of 300 across 1,363 observational studies indexed under Atrial Fibrillation.

Browse Atrial Fibrillation studies →

Lead sponsor

National Research Center for Preventive Medicine is the lead sponsor of 18 studies on the registry; none are open to participants now.

Counted across the registry records on this site, refreshed daily.

04

Who can participate

Ages eligible
18 Years and older
Sexes eligible
All
Accepts healthy volunteers
No
Sampling method
Non-probability sample

Study population

Primary patients with non-valvular atrial fibrillation included in the outpatient registry PROFILE during the period 01.01.2011-31.08.2015.

Inclusion criteria

  • Men and women above 18 years of age who were included in the PROFILE registry by the start of the observational study
  • Presence of written informed consent to participate in the study, fill in the study questionnaires and have personal data analyzed
  • Presence of any form of non-valvular atrial fibrillation with CHA2DS2-VASc score of ≥1 or patients with CHA2DS2-VASc score = 0, who are already taking OAK

Exclusion criteria

Exclusion Criteria:

  • Patients with high bleeding risk, including patients with:

    • Congenital or acquired bleeding disorders
    • Uncontrolled resistant hypertension
    • Exacerbation of gastric and duodenal ulcer
    • Vascular retinopathy
    • Recent history of intracranial or intracerebral hemorrhage
    • Pathology of the brain and spinal cord vessels
    • Recent history of brain, spinal cord or eye surgery
    • History of bronchiectasis or pulmonary hemorrhage
    • A CHA2DS2-VASc score of 0 (OACs are not indicated)
    • Pregnancy, lactation
    • Planned surgery
    • Known hypersensitivity to ingredients of medications used in the study
05

Study design

Observational model
Cohort
Time perspective
Prospective
Enrollment
201 participants (actual)
Patient registry
No
06

What researchers measure

Primary outcomes

  1. Proportions of Adherent, Partially Adherent, Partially Non-adherent and Completely Non-adherent Patients (NSEPh During V1)

    The study consisted of two visits half a year apart (V0, V1) and a phone contact (PC) one year after V0. During V0 all patients were recommended to start therapy with one of the NOACs. Adherence to therapy was assessed during V1 with the use of the original questionnaire - National society of evidence-based pharmacotherapy (NSEPh) adherence scale.

    Time frame: 6 months

  2. Proportions of Adherent, Partially Adherent, Partially Non-adherent and Completely Non-adherent Patients (NSEPh During Phone Contact)

    The study consisted of two visits half a year apart (V0, V1) and a phone contact (PC) one year after V0. During V0 all patients were recommended to start therapy with one of the NOACs. Adherence to therapy was assessed during phone contact with the use of the original questionnaire - National society of evidence-based pharmacotherapy (NSEPh) adherence scale. Out of 201 participants of the study 4 patients died and 197 patients completed the study.

    Time frame: 1 year

Secondary outcomes

  1. Proportion of Potentially Adherent Patients

    Specifically designed 5-item questionnaire was used for assessment of potential adherence to OACs. According to results patients were divided into groups: completely adherent, partially adherent, completely non-adherent to OACs.

    Time frame: Total - 1 year (two timepoints - 6 months (V1) and 1 year (PC)

  2. Proportion of OACs Prescribed by Doctors According to Guidelines

    Prescription of OACs according to guidelines was considered "positive" if it matched the key points of 2016 ESC Guidelines for the management of atrial fibrillation. 1. Oral anticoagulation therapy to prevent thromboembolism is recommended for all male AF patients with a CHA2DS2-VASc score of 2 or more. 2. Oral anticoagulation therapy to prevent thromboembolism is recommended in all female AF patients with a CHA2DS2-VASc score of 3 or more. 3. Antiplatelet monotherapy is not recommended for stroke prevention in AF patients, regardless of stroke risk. 4. NOACs (apixaban, dabigatran, edoxaban, and rivaroxaban) are not recommended in patients with mechanical heart valves (Level of evidence B) or moderate-to-severe mitral stenosis (Level of evidence C). 5. In male or female AF patients without additional stroke risk factors, anticoagulant or antiplatelet therapy is not recommended for stroke prevention.

    Time frame: Total - 1 year (two timepoints - 6 months (V1) and 1 year (PC)

  3. The Main Reasons for Refusing to Start NOAC Therapy

    The study consisted of two visits half a year apart (V0, V1) and a phone contact (PC) one year after V0. During V0 all patients were recommended to start therapy with one of the NOACs. Patients refusing to start NOAC treatmet were asked about the reasons to refuse NOAC treatment.

    Time frame: Total - 1 year (two timepoints - 6 months (V1) and 1 year (PC)

  4. Reasons for Stopping Oral Anticoagulants (Data From Visit 1)

    The study consisted of two visits half a year apart (V0, V1) and phone contact (PC) one year after V0. During V0 all patients were recommended to start therapy with one of the NOACs. Patients who stopped or didn't start NOAC treatment were asked about the reasons for non-adherence to anticoagulants use during visit 1 (6 months) and at PC (1 year).

    Time frame: Total - 1 year (two timepoints - 6 months (V1) and 1 year (PC))

  5. Reasons for Stopping Oral Anticoagulants (Data From the Phone Contact)

    The study consisted of two visits half a year apart (V0, V1) and a phone contact (PC) one year after V0. During V0 all patients were recommended to start therapy with one of the NOACs. Patients who stopped NOAC treatmet were asked about the reasons for stopping oral anticoagulants (NOAC and warfarin) use during the phone contact.

    Time frame: Total - 1 year (two timepoints - 6 months (V1) and 1 year (PC)

07

Results

Posted Jun 9, 2020

Participant flow

Participant flow — Overall Study
MilestoneANTEY
Started201
Completed200
Not completed1
Withdrew: Death1

Outcome measures

PrimaryProportions of Adherent, Partially Adherent, Partially Non-adherent and Completely Non-adherent Patients (NSEPh During V1)

The study consisted of two visits half a year apart (V0, V1) and a phone contact (PC) one year after V0. During V0 all patients were recommended to start therapy with one of the NOACs. Adherence to therapy was assessed during V1 with the use of the original questionnaire - National society of evidence-based pharmacotherapy (NSEPh) adherence scale.

Time frame:
6 months
Reported as:
Count of participants · Participants
Proportions of Adherent, Partially Adherent, Partially Non-adherent and Completely Non-adherent Patients (NSEPh During V1)
ParticipantsANTEY
completely adherent155
partially adherent5
partially non-adherent7
completely non-adherent33
PrimaryProportions of Adherent, Partially Adherent, Partially Non-adherent and Completely Non-adherent Patients (NSEPh During Phone Contact)

The study consisted of two visits half a year apart (V0, V1) and a phone contact (PC) one year after V0. During V0 all patients were recommended to start therapy with one of the NOACs. Adherence to therapy was assessed during phone contact with the use of the original questionnaire - National society of evidence-based pharmacotherapy (NSEPh) adherence scale. Out of 201 participants of the study 4 patients died and 197 patients completed the study.

Time frame:
1 year
Reported as:
Count of participants · Participants
Proportions of Adherent, Partially Adherent, Partially Non-adherent and Completely Non-adherent Patients (NSEPh During Phone Contact)
ParticipantsANTEY
completely adherent158
partially adherent6
partially non-adherent18
completely non-adherent15
SecondaryProportion of Potentially Adherent Patients

Specifically designed 5-item questionnaire was used for assessment of potential adherence to OACs. According to results patients were divided into groups: completely adherent, partially adherent, completely non-adherent to OACs.

Time frame:
Total - 1 year (two timepoints - 6 months (V1) and 1 year (PC)
Reported as:
Count of participants · Participants
Proportion of Potentially Adherent Patients
ParticipantsANTEY
completely adherent161
partially adherent28
completely non-adherent12
SecondaryProportion of OACs Prescribed by Doctors According to Guidelines

Prescription of OACs according to guidelines was considered "positive" if it matched the key points of 2016 ESC Guidelines for the management of atrial fibrillation. 1. Oral anticoagulation therapy to prevent thromboembolism is recommended for all male AF patients with a CHA2DS2-VASc score of 2 or more. 2. Oral anticoagulation therapy to prevent thromboembolism is recommended in all female AF patients with a CHA2DS2-VASc score of 3 or more. 3. Antiplatelet monotherapy is not recommended for stroke prevention in AF patients, regardless of stroke risk. 4. NOACs (apixaban, dabigatran, edoxaban, and rivaroxaban) are not recommended in patients with mechanical heart valves (Level of evidence B) or moderate-to-severe mitral stenosis (Level of evidence C). 5. In male or female AF patients without additional stroke risk factors, anticoagulant or antiplatelet therapy is not recommended for stroke prevention.

Time frame:
Total - 1 year (two timepoints - 6 months (V1) and 1 year (PC)
Reported as:
Count of participants · Participants
Proportion of OACs Prescribed by Doctors According to Guidelines
ParticipantsANTEY
OACs were recommended by doctors171
OACs were not recommended by doctors30
SecondaryThe Main Reasons for Refusing to Start NOAC Therapy

The study consisted of two visits half a year apart (V0, V1) and a phone contact (PC) one year after V0. During V0 all patients were recommended to start therapy with one of the NOACs. Patients refusing to start NOAC treatmet were asked about the reasons to refuse NOAC treatment.

Time frame:
Total - 1 year (two timepoints - 6 months (V1) and 1 year (PC)
Reported as:
Count of participants · Participants
The Main Reasons for Refusing to Start NOAC Therapy
ParticipantsANTEY
high price of NOAC14
fear of adverse events6
doubts about the correctness of prescribtion5
adherence to Warfarin2
adherence to another NOAC2
difficult regimen for all drugs2
lack of NOAC in the preferential drug list2
SecondaryReasons for Stopping Oral Anticoagulants (Data From Visit 1)

The study consisted of two visits half a year apart (V0, V1) and phone contact (PC) one year after V0. During V0 all patients were recommended to start therapy with one of the NOACs. Patients who stopped or didn't start NOAC treatment were asked about the reasons for non-adherence to anticoagulants use during visit 1 (6 months) and at PC (1 year).

Time frame:
Total - 1 year (two timepoints - 6 months (V1) and 1 year (PC))
Reported as:
Count of participants · Participants
Reasons for Stopping Oral Anticoagulants (Data From Visit 1)
ParticipantsANTEY
bleeding5
cancellation by another doctor1
high cost1
SecondaryReasons for Stopping Oral Anticoagulants (Data From the Phone Contact)

The study consisted of two visits half a year apart (V0, V1) and a phone contact (PC) one year after V0. During V0 all patients were recommended to start therapy with one of the NOACs. Patients who stopped NOAC treatmet were asked about the reasons for stopping oral anticoagulants (NOAC and warfarin) use during the phone contact.

Time frame:
Total - 1 year (two timepoints - 6 months (V1) and 1 year (PC)
Reported as:
Count of participants · Participants
Reasons for Stopping Oral Anticoagulants (Data From the Phone Contact)
ParticipantsANTEY
bleeding7
cancellation by another doctor6
high cost2
others3

Adverse events

Collected over 1 year. Non-serious events are listed at a 0% frequency threshold.

Adverse event summary by group
GroupDeathsSeriousOther
ANTEY4/201 (2%)21/201 (10.4%)30/201 (14.9%)
Most frequent serious events
Most frequent serious events
EventANTEY
Unstable angina pectorisCardiac disorders5/201
CHF decompensationCardiac disorders5/201
Paroxysm of atrial fibrillationCardiac disorders5/201
StrokeNervous system disorders2/201
Acute myiocardial infarctionCardiac disorders1/201
SarcomaNeoplasms benign, malignant and unspecified (incl cysts and polyps)1/201
Bleeding in the retinaEye disorders1/201
Iron deficiency anaemiaBlood and lymphatic system disorders1/201
Most frequent other events
Most frequent other events
EventANTEY
BleedingGeneral disorders18/201
NauseaGastrointestinal disorders4/201
UrticariaImmune system disorders2/201
ObstipationGastrointestinal disorders2/201
HypothyroidismEndocrine disorders1/201
CoughRespiratory, thoracic and mediastinal disorders1/201
GynecomastiaReproductive system and breast disorders1/201
Arterial hypotensionCardiac disorders1/201

Baseline characteristics

Age, Continuous
Age, Continuous(years)ANTEY
Mean71.1 ± 8.7
Sex: Female, Male
Sex: Female, Male(Participants)ANTEY
Female83
Male118
Race (NIH/OMB)
Race (NIH/OMB)(Participants)ANTEY
American Indian or Alaska Native0
Asian0
Native Hawaiian or Other Pacific Islander0
Black or African American0
White201
More than one race0
Unknown or Not Reported0
Region of Enrollment
Region of Enrollment(Participants)ANTEY
Russia201
NOAC recommended to patients by doctors during V0
NOAC recommended to patients by doctors during V0(Participants)ANTEY
rivaroxaban111
dabigatran47
apixaban43
08

Study locations

1 site
  • National Research Center for Preventive Medicine
    Moscow, 101990, Russian Federation
09

References and documents

Study documents

  • Protocol and statistical analysis plan · Dec 12, 2016

Documents are hosted by the registry — open the source record to download them.

10

Updates

Tracking since Sep 25, 2026
No changes since tracking began. The registry record was last updated on Jul 16, 2020, before this site started recording changes on Sep 25, 2026. Its history is on ClinicalTrials.gov ↗
11

Registry details

Key details

Study ID
NCT03790917
Lead sponsor
National Research Center for Preventive Medicine
Responsible party
Sponsor
First posted
Jan 2, 2019
Start date
Sep 5, 2017
Primary completion
Dec 28, 2018
Completion
Dec 28, 2018
Results posted
Jun 9, 2020
Last update
Jul 16, 2020

Study contacts

Sergey Martsevich, MD,PhD
principal investigator · National Research Center of Preventive Medicine

Oversight

Data monitoring committee
No
FDA-regulated drug
No
FDA-regulated device
No
View the source record on ClinicalTrials.gov ↗

Not currently enrolling

This study is completed, as verified in May 2020. You cannot join it, but the record below documents what was studied.

Follow this study

Get an email when the registry record changes — status, dates, results — or when someone posts here.

Sign in to follow

Discussion

Questions and observations about this study, from anyone following it. Not medical advice, and not a channel to the study team — their contact details are on the registry record.

Sign in to join the discussion. Reading takes no account; posting does. You choose a display name, and a pseudonym is the default.

Nothing here yet. If you are running this trial, taking part in it, or weighing whether to, this is the place to say so.

Start the discussion